Japanese hops are a closely related annual relative of the perennial crop species common hops, as such they are a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development. Ploidy manipulation is an important tool in common hop breeding. In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels. Guard cell length in Japanese hop exhibited intraindividual variability but appeared less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and successfully distinguished the triploid cultivar from most other groups.
","acknowledgements":"Tested common hops were provided through a research agreement with The Norcross Wildlife Foundation, and the contributions of private landowners and businesses including James and Laura Remington, Four Star Farms, Indian Ladder Farms and Milagro Coffee Bar.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"aseigneur@umass.edu","firstName":"Adriana","lastName":" Seigneur ","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-5898-3268"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"pujapradhan@umass.edu","firstName":"Puja","lastName":"Pradhan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-1335-8764"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","methodology","project","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"noawilliams@umass.edu","firstName":"Noah","lastName":"Williams","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9610-524X"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","project","supervision"],"email":"gjung@umass.edu","firstName":"Geunhwa","lastName":"Jung","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6504-3883"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding came from the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture & the University of Massachusetts Amherst Natural History Collections Graduate Student Grant
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/e2fc37eacd0279f4038a225fd3f099ef.png"},"imageCaption":"Number of plastids per guard cell pair (a), guard cell width (b), and guard cell length (c) in Japanese hops by sex and growing environment. Number of plastids per guard cell pair (d), guard cell width (e), and guard cell length (f) in hops from cultivated, feral and wild backgrounds. Letters indicate groups that are significantly different (α < 0.05) based on Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction.
","imageTitle":"Guard cell metrics of common and Japanese hops from wild, feral and cultivated backgrounds.
","methods":"Site and Growing Conditions
A population of Japanese hops was identified in Amherst, Massachusetts, consisting of approximately 20 individuals growing on a 60-degree slope. Field samples were collected between August and October 2025, with sampling completed prior to the first frost to avoid frost-induced physiological changes.
Vegetative-stage plants collected from Swansea, Concord, and Wilmington, Massachusetts, were transferred to the CNS Research Greenhouse at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Plants were grown in 1- or 2.5-gallon containers filled with Pro-Mix BX growing medium and fertigated with a nutrient solution supplying 200 ppm nitrogen. Greenhouse environmental conditions were maintained at 70°F during the day and 65°F at night, with supplemental lighting provided to maintain a consistent 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod.
Sex Determination of Japanese Hop Plants
Sex of Japanese hop plants was determined based on distinct reproductive morphological traits, using the same criteria for both field and greenhouse populations. Japanese hop is a dioecious species, with male and female flowers borne on separate individuals. Male plants produce branched panicles, whereas female plants develop cup-shaped perianths that form cone-like structures (Shepard et al., 2000, Ehara, 1956).
Epidermal Peels
Epidermal peels were obtained from one or two fully expanded mature leaves per sampled individual. For each sample, a total of 10 measurements were collected per response variable. Peel and staining procedures were adapted from Ordoñez et al. (2017). The abaxial (underside) epidermis was carefully removed and mounted on a microscope slide containing two drops of Gram’s iodine solution. An additional two drops were applied to fully submerge the tissue, and a coverslip was placed over the sample, gently pressed to ensure even contact and remove air bubbles. Slides were stained for 10-30 minutes to achieve optimal contrast. Excess stain was removed by blotting the slide with a Kimwipe at the end of the staining period.
Imaging
Samples were imaged using brightfield microscopy with an Axio Imager A2 at 40x magnification for stomatal measurements and 100x magnification when higher resolution was required to distinguish plastids. Images were captured using an Axiocam 503 Mono digital camera and analyzed with ZEN 2 (Blue Edition) software. Guard cell length and width were measured to the nearest 0.01 um, and plastid number was quantified per pair of guard cells following the approach described by Williams et al. (2024).
Source | Reagent | Identifier |
Hardy Diagnostics | Non-Stabilized Gram's Iodine | I008N |
Common hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and Japanese hop (Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.; syn. Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc.) belong to the genus Humulus within the Cannabaceae family. Common hop is a dioecious, herbaceous perennial bine cultivated for its female inflorescences, which are economically important to the brewing and pharmaceutical industries (Paguet et al., 2023). Five botanical varieties of H. lupulus have been described: one native to Asia, one to Europe, and three to North America (Small, 1978). In the northeastern United States, native populations of H. l. var. lupuloides have interacted with feral hop plants that have persisted from abandoned farms since their introduction in the 1600s (McWilliams, 1998; Rumney, 1997, 1998; Somalraju et al., 2024). Many modern American cultivars contain genetic contributions from H. l. lupuloides and, more recently, H. l. neomexicanus (Small, 1978; Comi, 2024).
Japanese hop is an annual species native to East Asia and invasive in North America (Ehara, 1955; Small, 1978; Huang & Matthews, 2024). Unlike common hop, which produces economically important phytochemicals in lupulin glands, Japanese hop lacks lupulin glands and is grown primarily as an ornamental (Ehara, 1955, 1956; Paguet et al., 2023). As a closely related annual relative of a perennial crop species, Japanese hop represents a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development.
Ploidy manipulation has been widely used in crop improvement to enhance agronomic traits via polyploidization and to develop inbred lines through haploid induction in several crop systems, including potato, where these approaches involve multiple stages of ploidy screening (Hougas & Peloquin, 1957; Graebner, 2019; Williams et al., 2024). Common hop occurs primarily in the wild as a diploid (2n=20) with an XX/XY sex chromosome system. In contrast, Japanese hop exhibits 2n=16 in females and 2n=17 in males, with an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Zhang et al., 2023; Carey et al., 2024). Natural ploidy variation is present within the Cannabaceae family, including triploid species (Hayes et al., 2022). In common hop, aneuploids, triploids (3n), and tetraploids (4n) have arisen both spontaneously and through chemically induced polyploidization (Koutoulis et al., 2005). Triploids are particularly desirable due to their improved yield and production of nearly seedless cones, which are preferred by processors and brewers (Trojak-Goluch & Skomra, 2018, 2020).
Current hop breeding pipelines rely primarily on flow cytometry for ploidy determination, with leaf or root chromosome squashes used for cytological confirmation. Roy et al. (2001) reported average guard cell length and width for a limited sample of diploid and tetraploid common hops; however, comparative measurements for Japanese hops are not available (Šesek et al., 2000; Beatson et al., 2003; Trojak-Goluch & Skoma, 2020). In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels (Frandsen, 1968). Guard cell size has also been correlated with DNA content and ploidy level in angiosperms fossil records, suggesting that size-based metrics may be broadly applicable across taxa, including Humulus (Masterson, 1994). The present study provides the first publicly available guard cell metrics for Japanese hops, H. l. neomexicanus, and feral hop populations from the northern United States. It also represents the first comparison of guard cell traits between greenhouse-grown and wild Japanese hop populations.
To assess intraindividual consistency of guard cell metrics, three independent sets of ten measurements were collected from a single greenhouse-grown Japanese hop (Swansea, MA). Differences among measurement sets for guard cell length, guard cell width, and plastid number per guard cell pair were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Guard cell length differed significantly among measurement sets (P =0.014), whereas guard cell width (P=0.177) and plastid number (P=0.730) did not, indicating greater within-plant variability for length relative to the other traits. Plastid measurements were taken from greenhouse-grown Japanese hop plants and from a wild population, with each population further subdivided by sex. The greenhouse-grown group consisted of ten plants (five female, five male) collected from Middlesex, Concord, and Swansea, MA, while the wild group included ten plants (seven female, three male) identified on a slope in Amherst, MA and sampled in situ. Differences among the four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences were detected for plastid count (P<0.001) and guard cell width (P<0.001), whereas guard cell length did not differ significantly among groups (P=0.118). Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction (α<0.05). Plastid count in greenhouse-grown females was significantly lower than in wild plants of either sex. Greenhouse-grown males differed significantly from wild males but not from wild females (Fig.1a). Guard cell width varied by growing environment but not by sex (Fig.1b). Guard cell length showed no significant differences or consistent sub-significant trends among groups (Fig.1c).
Comparison analyses were conducted between greenhouse-grown Japanese hop and multiple common hop groups. The diploid cultivar group included ‘UK Serebrianka’, ‘Tettnanger’, and ‘Petoskey’. The feral group comprised one individual collected from each of the following locations: Albany, NY; Troy, NY; Wales, MA; Sudbury, MA; Bedford, MA; Skowhegan, ME; and Southwest Harbor, ME. The Japanese hop group included the ten previously described plants as well as one unsexed plant grown from commercially available seed (Dee's Seeds, Port Saint Lucie, Florida). Data for H. l. neomexicanus were obtained from a single accession (PI 6355445). The seed-grown common hop group consisted of six individuals: four derived from PI 689630 and two from commercially available seed (MySeedsCo, Oakland Gardens, NY). The triploid cultivar evaluated was ‘Triple Pearle’ (Somalraju et al., 2024). Kruskal Wallis tests detected significant differences among groups for plastid count (P=0.009), guard cell width (P<0.001), and guard cell length (P<0.001). Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction as described above. For plastid count, most groups overlapped, except for the feral and seed-grown groups, which differed significantly from one another (Fig.1d). Guard cell width clearly separated Japanese hop from common hop groups, and the seed-grown group differed significantly from both diploid and triploid cultivars (Fig.1e). Guard cell length distinguished the triploid cultivar from the other groups; notably, only H. l. neomexicanus overlapped with the Japanese hop group for this trait (Fig.1f).
All guard cell metrics exhibited limitations when applied to the available germplasm. Epidermal peels are not typically effective for detecting single chromosome aneuploidy, and triploids can be difficult to distinguish from diploids using stomatal traits alone (Frandsen, 1968; Graebner, 2019). In the present study, genetic differences between the two Japanese hop populations represent a potential confounding factor, as the genetic diversity and introduction history of Japanese hop populations in Massachusetts remain unknown. When using leaf peels for ploidy screening based on plastid measurements, environmental variation must also be considered. Environmental effects on stomatal traits have been documented in other crop systems and can be minimized by evaluating plants grown under uniform conditions (Frandsen, 1968). Consistent with this, plastid width in Japanese hop showed sensitivity to growing environment and provided limited resolution for distinguishing triploids or species-level differences. Although guard cell length exhibited intraindividual variability, it appeared less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and successfully distinguished the triploid cultivar from most other groups. Overall, this study establishes baseline guard cell measurements for Japanese hop and related Humulus germplasm, providing foundational data to support future ploidy manipulation and screening efforts.
","references":[{"reference":"Beatson RA, Ferguson AR, Weir IE, Graham LT, Ansell KA, Ding H. 2003. Flow cytometric identification of sexually derived polyploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and their use in hop breeding. Euphytica. 134: 189.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1023/B:EUPH.0000003882.23615.c5"},{"reference":"Carey SB, Bentz PC, Lovell JT, Akozbek LM, Myers Z, Korani W, et al., Harkess A. 2024. An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.09.627636"},{"reference":"Comi M. 2024. Making Citra: Branding, Breeding, and the Co-production of New Aroma Hops in the Yakima Valley. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 49: 1103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1177/01622439241238026"},{"reference":"Ehara K. 1955. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅰ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. 10: 209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.5109/22655"},{"reference":"Ehara, K. 1956. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅱ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 10(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.5109/22660
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Frandsen NO. 1968. Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 38: 153.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/BF00933811"},{"reference":"Graebner RC, Chen H, Contreras RN, Haynes KG, Sathuvalli V. 2019. Identification of the High Frequency of Triploid Potato Resulting from Tetraploid × Diploid Crosses. HortScience. 54: 1159.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.21273/HORTSCI13797-18"},{"reference":"Hayes A, Wang S, Whittemore AT, Smith TW. 2022. The Genetic Diversity of Triploid Celtis pumila and its Diploid Relatives C. occidentalis and C. laevigata (Cannabaceae). Systematic Botany. 47: 441.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1600/036364422X16512564801713"},{"reference":"Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ. 1957. A Haploid Plant of the Potato Variety Katahdin. Nature. 180: 1209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/1801209a0"},{"reference":"Huang AH, Matthews JW. 2024. The invasion of Japanese hop ( Humulus japonicus ) in a restored floodplain forest. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 17: 258.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/inp.2024.25"},{"reference":"Koutoulis A, Roy AT, Price A, Sherriff L, Leggett G. 2005. DNA ploidy level of colchicine-treated hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 105: 263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.010"},{"reference":"Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms. Science. 264: 421.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.264.5157.421"},{"reference":"Mc Williams JE. 1998. Brewing Beer in Massachusetts Bay, 1640-1690. The New England Quarterly. 71: 543.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/366602"},{"reference":"Ordoñez, B., Orrillo, M., and Bonierbale, M. 2017. Manual on potato reproductive and cytological biology. Lima (Peru). International Potato Center (CIP). ISBN 978-92-9060-480-8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Paguet AS, Siah A, Lefevre G, Vandenberghe M, Lutun D, Degardin N, et al., Riviere C. 2024. Phytochemical characterisation and aromatic potential for brewing of wild hops (Humulus lupulus L.) from Northern France: Towards a lead for local hop varieties. Food Chemistry. 433: 137302.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137302"},{"reference":"Roy A, Leggett G, Koutoulis A. 2001. In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Cell Reports. 20: 489.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s002990100364"},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1997. Hops cultivation in Wisconsin: A nineteenth century inter lude. The Wisconsin Geographer. 13: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1998. A search for economic alternatives: Hops in Franklin County, New York during the nineteenth century. Middle States Geographer. 31: 23.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sesek P, Sustar Vozlic J, Bohanec B. 2000. Determination of aneuploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) using flow cytometry. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 439: r016.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s004240000074"},{"reference":"Shepherd, H.L., Parker, J.S., Darby, P. and Ainsworth, C.C. 2000. Sexual development and sex chromosomes in hop. New Phytologist, 148: 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00771.x
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Small E. 1978. A Numerical and Nomenclatural Analysis of Morpho-Geographic Taxa of Humulus. Systematic Botany. 3: 37.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/2418532"},{"reference":"Somalraju A, Soto Cerda B, Ghose K, Mc Callum J, Knox R, Fofana B. 2024. Structure and genetic diversity of Canadian Maritimes wild hops. Genome. 67: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1139/gen-2023-0045"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2018. Breeding of triploid common hop cultivars (Humulus lupulus L.).","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.26114/PJA.IUNG.357.2018.34.01"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2020. Ploidy variation and agronomic performance of F1 hybrids of tetraploid and diploid forms of Humulus lupulus L.. Breeding Science. 70: 176.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1270/jsbbs.19102"},{"reference":"Williams N, Kornelis G, Tan EH, Collins P. 2024. Report of a Spontaneous Potato Monoploid Resulting from a Biparental Diploid Potato Cross. American Journal of Potato Research. 101: 443.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s12230-024-09971-5"},{"reference":"Zhang GJ, Jia KL, Wang J, Gao WJ, Li SF. 2023. Genome-wide analysis of transposable elements and satellite DNA in Humulus scandens, a dioecious plant with XX/XY1Y2 chromosomes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1230250.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2023.1230250"}],"title":"Guard Cell Metrics in Common and Japanese Hops from Wild, Feral, and Cultivated Backgrounds
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"9d196595-9f20-4b85-8b51-11600af126f7","decision":"revise","abstract":"Japanese hops are a closely related annual relative of the perennial crop species common hops, as such they are a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development. Ploidy manipulation is an important tool in common hop breeding. In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels. Guard cell length in Japanese hop exhibited intraindividual variability but appeared less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and successfully distinguished the triploid cultivar from most other groups.
","acknowledgements":"Tested common hops were provided through a research agreement with The Norcross Wildlife Foundation, and the contributions of private landowners and businesses including James and Laura Remington, Four Star Farms, Indian Ladder Farms and Milagro Coffee Bar.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"aseigneur@umass.edu","firstName":"Adriana","lastName":" Seigneur ","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-5898-3268"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"pujapradhan@umass.edu","firstName":"Puja","lastName":"Pradhan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-1335-8764"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","methodology","project","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"noawilliams@umass.edu","firstName":"Noah","lastName":"Williams","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9610-524X"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","project","supervision"],"email":"gjung@umass.edu","firstName":"Geunhwa","lastName":"Jung","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6504-3883"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding came from the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture & the University of Massachusetts Amherst Natural History Collections Graduate Student Grant
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/e2fc37eacd0279f4038a225fd3f099ef.png"},"imageCaption":"Number of plastids per guard cell pair (a), guard cell width (b), and guard cell length (c) in Japanese hops by sex and growing environment. Number of plastids per guard cell pair (d), guard cell width (e), and guard cell length (f) in hops from cultivated, feral and wild backgrounds. Letters indicate groups that are significantly different (α < 0.05) based on Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction.
","imageTitle":"Guard cell metrics of common and Japanese hops from wild, feral and cultivated backgrounds.
","methods":"Site and Growing Conditions
A population of Japanese hops was identified in Amherst, Massachusetts, consisting of approximately 20 individuals growing on a 60-degree slope. Field samples were collected between August and October 2025, with sampling completed prior to the first frost to avoid frost-induced physiological changes.
Vegetative-stage plants collected from Swansea, Concord, and Wilmington, Massachusetts, were transferred to the CNS Research Greenhouse at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Plants were grown in 1- or 2.5-gallon containers filled with Pro-Mix BX growing medium and fertigated with a nutrient solution supplying 200 ppm nitrogen. Greenhouse environmental conditions were maintained at 70°F during the day and 65°F at night, with supplemental lighting provided to maintain a consistent 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod.
Sex Determination of Japanese Hop Plants
Sex of Japanese hop plants was determined based on distinct reproductive morphological traits, using the same criteria for both field and greenhouse populations. Japanese hop is a dioecious species, with male and female flowers borne on separate individuals. Male plants produce branched panicles, whereas female plants develop cup-shaped perianths that form cone-like structures (Shepard et al., 2000, Ehara, 1956).
Epidermal Peels
Epidermal peels were obtained from one or two fully expanded mature leaves per sampled individual. For each sample, a total of 10 measurements were collected per response variable. Peel and staining procedures were adapted from Ordoñez et al. (2017). The abaxial (underside) epidermis was carefully removed and mounted on a microscope slide containing two drops of Gram’s iodine solution. An additional two drops were applied to fully submerge the tissue, and a coverslip was placed over the sample, gently pressed to ensure even contact and remove air bubbles. Slides were stained for 10-30 minutes to achieve optimal contrast. Excess stain was removed by blotting the slide with a Kimwipe at the end of the staining period.
Imaging
Samples were imaged using brightfield microscopy with an Axio Imager A2 at 40x magnification for stomatal measurements and 100x magnification when higher resolution was required to distinguish plastids. Images were captured using an Axiocam 503 Mono digital camera and analyzed with ZEN 2 (Blue Edition) software. Guard cell length and width were measured to the nearest 0.01 um, and plastid number was quantified per pair of guard cells following the approach described by Williams et al. (2024).
Statistical Analysis
Three sets of ten measurements from an arbitrarily selected Swansea Japanese hop plant were taken for each response variable to assess intraindividual variation. Because the assumption of independence was violated, the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for each metric to determine whether the measurement sets differed significantly. For comparisons of Japanese hop guard cell metrics across four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) and across hop categories (diploid cultivar, feral common hops, Japanese hops, Humulus lupulus var. neomexicanus, seed-grown, triploid cultivar), unequal group sizes increased heteroscedasticity. The Kruskal–Wallis test was therefore used for each response variable because it is relatively robust to heteroscedasticity, followed by Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction to control Type I error within each test.
","reagents":"Source | Reagent | Identifier |
Hardy Diagnostics | Non-Stabilized Gram's Iodine | I008N |
Common hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and Japanese hop (Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.; syn. Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc.) belong to the genus Humulus within the Cannabaceae family. Common hop is a dioecious, herbaceous perennial bine cultivated for its female inflorescences, which are economically important to the brewing and pharmaceutical industries (Paguet et al., 2023). Five botanical varieties of H. lupulus have been described: one native to Asia, one to Europe, and three to North America (Small, 1978). In the northeastern United States, native populations of H. l. var. lupuloides have interacted with feral hop plants that have persisted from abandoned farms since their introduction in the 1600s (McWilliams, 1998; Rumney, 1997, 1998; Somalraju et al., 2024). Many modern American cultivars contain genetic contributions from H. l. lupuloides and, more recently, H. l. neomexicanus (Small, 1978; Comi, 2024).
Japanese hop is an annual species native to East Asia and invasive in North America (Ehara, 1955; Small, 1978; Huang & Matthews, 2024). Unlike common hop, which produces economically important phytochemicals in lupulin glands, Japanese hop lacks lupulin glands and is grown primarily as an ornamental (Ehara, 1955, 1956; Paguet et al., 2023). As a closely related annual relative of a perennial crop species, Japanese hop represents a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development.
Ploidy manipulation has been widely used in crop improvement to enhance agronomic traits via polyploidization and to develop inbred lines through haploid induction in several crop systems, including potato, where these approaches involve multiple stages of ploidy screening (Hougas & Peloquin, 1957; Graebner, 2019; Williams et al., 2024). Common hop occurs primarily in the wild as a diploid (2n=20) with an XX/XY sex chromosome system. In contrast, Japanese hop exhibits 2n=16 in females and 2n=17 in males, with an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Zhang et al., 2023; Carey et al., 2024). Natural ploidy variation is present within the Cannabaceae family, including triploid species (Hayes et al., 2022). In common hop, aneuploids, triploids (3n), and tetraploids (4n) have arisen both spontaneously and through chemically induced polyploidization (Koutoulis et al., 2005). Triploids are particularly desirable due to their improved yield and production of nearly seedless cones, which are preferred by processors and brewers (Trojak-Goluch & Skomra, 2018, 2020).
Current hop breeding pipelines rely primarily on flow cytometry for ploidy determination, with leaf or root chromosome squashes used for cytological confirmation. Roy et al. (2001) reported average guard cell length and width for a limited sample of diploid and tetraploid common hops; however, comparative measurements for Japanese hops are not available (Šesek et al., 2000; Beatson et al., 2003; Trojak-Goluch & Skoma, 2020). In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels (Frandsen, 1968). Guard cell size has also been correlated with DNA content and ploidy level in angiosperms fossil records, suggesting that size-based metrics may be broadly applicable across taxa, including Humulus (Masterson, 1994). The present study provides the first publicly available guard cell metrics for Japanese hops, H. l. neomexicanus, and feral hop populations from the northern United States. It also represents the first comparison of guard cell traits between greenhouse-grown and wild Japanese hop populations.
To assess intraindividual consistency of guard cell metrics, three sets of measurements with ten replicates were collected from a single greenhouse-grown Japanese hop (Swansea, MA). Differences among measurement sets for guard cell length, guard cell width, and plastid number per guard cell pair were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Guard cell length differed significantly among measurement sets (χ2=8.596, df=2, P =0.014), whereas guard cell width (χ2=3.469, df=2, P=0.177) and plastid number (χ2=0.628, df=2, P=0.730) did not, indicating greater within-plant variability for length relative to the other traits. Plastid measurements were taken from greenhouse-grown Japanese hop plants and from a wild population, with each population further subdivided by sex. The greenhouse-grown group consisted of ten plants (five female, five male) collected from Middlesex, Concord, and Swansea, MA, while the wild group included ten plants (seven female, three male) identified on a slope in Amherst, MA and sampled in situ. Differences among the four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences were detected for plastid count (χ2=53.011, df=3, P<0.001) and guard cell width (χ2=51.2, df=3, P<0.001), whereas guard cell length did not differ significantly among groups (χ2=5.871, df=3, P=0.118). Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction to control for Type I error within each test (α<0.05). Plastid count in greenhouse-grown females was significantly lower than in wild plants of either sex. Greenhouse-grown males differed significantly from wild males but not from wild females (Fig.1a). Guard cell width varied by growing environment but not by sex (Fig.1b). Guard cell length showed no significant differences or consistent sub-significant trends among groups (Fig.1c).
Comparison analyses were conducted between greenhouse-grown Japanese hop and multiple common hop groups. The diploid cultivar group included ‘UK Serebrianka’, ‘Tettnanger’, and ‘Petoskey’. The feral group comprised one individual collected from each of the following locations: Albany, NY; Troy, NY; Wales, MA; Sudbury, MA; Bedford, MA; Skowhegan, ME; and Southwest Harbor, ME. The Japanese hop group included the ten previously described plants as well as one unsexed plant grown from commercially available seed (Dee's Seeds, Port Saint Lucie, Florida). Data for H. l. neomexicanus were obtained from a single accession (PI 6355445). The seed-grown common hop group consisted of six individuals: four derived from PI 689630 and two from commercially available seed (MySeedsCo, Oakland Gardens, NY). The triploid cultivar evaluated was ‘Triple Pearle’ (Somalraju et al., 2024). Kruskal Wallis tests detected significant differences among groups for plastid count (χ2=15.393, df=5, P=0.009), guard cell width (χ2=70.214, df=5, P<0.001), and guard cell length (χ2=47.236, df=5, P<0.001). Post-hoc comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s test with a Bonferroni correction as described above. For plastid count, most groups overlapped, except for the feral and seed-grown groups, which differed significantly from one another (Fig.1d). Guard cell width clearly separated Japanese hop from common hop groups, and the seed-grown group differed significantly from both diploid and triploid cultivars (Fig.1e). Guard cell length distinguished the triploid cultivar from the other groups; notably, only H. l. neomexicanus overlapped with the Japanese hop group for this trait (Fig.1f).
All guard cell metrics exhibited limitations when applied to the available germplasm. Epidermal peels are not typically effective for detecting single chromosome aneuploidy, and triploids can be difficult to distinguish from diploids using stomatal traits alone (Frandsen, 1968; Graebner, 2019). In the present study, genetic differences between the two Japanese hop populations represent a potential confounding factor, as the genetic diversity and introduction history of Japanese hop populations in Massachusetts remain unknown. When using leaf peels for ploidy screening based on plastid measurements, environmental variation must also be considered. Environmental effects on stomatal traits have been documented in other crop systems and can be minimized by evaluating plants grown under uniform conditions (Frandsen, 1968). Consistent with this, plastid width in Japanese hop showed sensitivity to growing environment and provided limited resolution for distinguishing triploids or species-level differences. Although guard cell length exhibited intraindividual variability, it appeared less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and successfully distinguished the triploid cultivar from most other groups. Overall, this study establishes baseline guard cell measurements for Japanese hop and related Humulus germplasm, providing foundational data to support future ploidy manipulation and screening efforts.
","references":[{"reference":"Beatson RA, Ferguson AR, Weir IE, Graham LT, Ansell KA, Ding H. 2003. Flow cytometric identification of sexually derived polyploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and their use in hop breeding. Euphytica. 134: 189.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1023/B:EUPH.0000003882.23615.c5"},{"reference":"Carey SB, Bentz PC, Lovell JT, Akozbek LM, Myers Z, Korani W, et al., Harkess A. 2024. An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.09.627636"},{"reference":"Comi M. 2024. Making Citra: Branding, Breeding, and the Co-production of New Aroma Hops in the Yakima Valley. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 49: 1103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1177/01622439241238026"},{"reference":"Ehara K. 1955. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅰ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. 10: 209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.5109/22655"},{"reference":"Ehara, K. 1956. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅱ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 10(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.5109/22660
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Frandsen NO. 1968. Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 38: 153.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/BF00933811"},{"reference":"Graebner RC, Chen H, Contreras RN, Haynes KG, Sathuvalli V. 2019. Identification of the High Frequency of Triploid Potato Resulting from Tetraploid × Diploid Crosses. HortScience. 54: 1159.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.21273/HORTSCI13797-18"},{"reference":"Hayes A, Wang S, Whittemore AT, Smith TW. 2022. The Genetic Diversity of Triploid Celtis pumila and its Diploid Relatives C. occidentalis and C. laevigata (Cannabaceae). Systematic Botany. 47: 441.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1600/036364422X16512564801713"},{"reference":"Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ. 1957. A Haploid Plant of the Potato Variety Katahdin. Nature. 180: 1209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/1801209a0"},{"reference":"Huang AH, Matthews JW. 2024. The invasion of Japanese hop ( Humulus japonicus ) in a restored floodplain forest. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 17: 258.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/inp.2024.25"},{"reference":"Koutoulis A, Roy AT, Price A, Sherriff L, Leggett G. 2005. DNA ploidy level of colchicine-treated hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 105: 263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.010"},{"reference":"Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms. Science. 264: 421.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.264.5157.421"},{"reference":"Mc Williams JE. 1998. Brewing Beer in Massachusetts Bay, 1640-1690. The New England Quarterly. 71: 543.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/366602"},{"reference":"Ordoñez, B., Orrillo, M., and Bonierbale, M. 2017. Manual on potato reproductive and cytological biology. Lima (Peru). International Potato Center (CIP). ISBN 978-92-9060-480-8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Paguet AS, Siah A, Lefevre G, Vandenberghe M, Lutun D, Degardin N, et al., Riviere C. 2024. Phytochemical characterisation and aromatic potential for brewing of wild hops (Humulus lupulus L.) from Northern France: Towards a lead for local hop varieties. Food Chemistry. 433: 137302.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137302"},{"reference":"Roy A, Leggett G, Koutoulis A. 2001. In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Cell Reports. 20: 489.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s002990100364"},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1997. Hops cultivation in Wisconsin: A nineteenth century inter lude. The Wisconsin Geographer. 13: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1998. A search for economic alternatives: Hops in Franklin County, New York during the nineteenth century. Middle States Geographer. 31: 23.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sesek P, Sustar Vozlic J, Bohanec B. 2000. Determination of aneuploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) using flow cytometry. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 439: r016.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s004240000074"},{"reference":"Shepherd, H.L., Parker, J.S., Darby, P. and Ainsworth, C.C. 2000. Sexual development and sex chromosomes in hop. New Phytologist, 148: 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00771.x
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Small E. 1978. A Numerical and Nomenclatural Analysis of Morpho-Geographic Taxa of Humulus. Systematic Botany. 3: 37.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/2418532"},{"reference":"Somalraju A, Soto Cerda B, Ghose K, Mc Callum J, Knox R, Fofana B. 2024. Structure and genetic diversity of Canadian Maritimes wild hops. Genome. 67: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1139/gen-2023-0045"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2018. Breeding of triploid common hop cultivars (Humulus lupulus L.).","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.26114/PJA.IUNG.357.2018.34.01"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2020. Ploidy variation and agronomic performance of F1 hybrids of tetraploid and diploid forms of Humulus lupulus L.. Breeding Science. 70: 176.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1270/jsbbs.19102"},{"reference":"Williams N, Kornelis G, Tan EH, Collins P. 2024. Report of a Spontaneous Potato Monoploid Resulting from a Biparental Diploid Potato Cross. American Journal of Potato Research. 101: 443.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s12230-024-09971-5"},{"reference":"Zhang GJ, Jia KL, Wang J, Gao WJ, Li SF. 2023. Genome-wide analysis of transposable elements and satellite DNA in Humulus scandens, a dioecious plant with XX/XY1Y2 chromosomes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1230250.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2023.1230250"}],"title":"Guard Cell Metrics in Common and Japanese Hops from Wild, Feral, and Cultivated Backgrounds
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Michaela Liegertová"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"0864dee1-3a0f-4154-b3cb-8c9dd98b2e0f","decision":"accept","abstract":"Japanese hops are a closely related annual relative of the perennial crop species common hops, as such they are a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development. Ploidy manipulation is an important tool in common hop breeding. In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels. Guard cell length in Japanese hop exhibited intraindividual variability but appeared potentially less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and trended higher in the tested triploid cultivar.
","acknowledgements":"Tested common hops were provided through a research agreement with The Norcross Wildlife Foundation, and the contributions of private landowners and businesses including James and Laura Remington, Four Star Farms, Indian Ladder Farms and Milagro Coffee Bar.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"aseigneur@umass.edu","firstName":"Adriana","lastName":" Seigneur ","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-5898-3268"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"pujapradhan@umass.edu","firstName":"Puja","lastName":"Pradhan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-1335-8764"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","methodology","project","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"noawilliams@umass.edu","firstName":"Noah","lastName":"Williams","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9610-524X"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["",""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","project","supervision"],"email":"gjung@umass.edu","firstName":"Geunhwa","lastName":"Jung","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6504-3883"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"Raw data of guard cell measurements.
","doi":"10.22002/f2y39-6sp91","resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Supplemental Table 1.xlsx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/46d0b4c9880adfc1742cb583207bfc57.xlsx"}],"funding":"Funding came from the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture & the University of Massachusetts Amherst Natural History Collections Graduate Student Grant
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/13620690dd0fa8efc66294673a52f0ce.png"},"imageCaption":"Number of plastids per guard cell pair (a), guard cell width (b), and guard cell length (c) in Japanese hop by sex and growing environment. The greenhouse female and greenhouse male groups each comprised five plants; the wild female group comprised seven plants and the wild male group three plants. Number of plastids per guard cell pair (d), guard cell width (e), and guard cell length (f) across hop groups of cultivated, feral, and wild origin. The diploid cultivar group comprised three plants, the feral group seven, and the Japanese hop group eleven. The seed-grown group comprised six plants; the H. l. neomexicanus and triploid cultivar groups were each represented by a single individual. Each data point represents the per plant mean of ten guard cell measurements.
","imageTitle":"Guard cell metrics of common and Japanese hops from wild, feral and cultivated backgrounds.
","methods":"Site and Growing Conditions
A population of Japanese hops was identified in Amherst, Massachusetts, consisting of approximately 20 individuals growing on a 60-degree slope. Field samples were collected between August and October 2025, with sampling completed prior to the first frost to avoid frost-induced physiological changes.
Vegetative-stage plants collected from Swansea, Concord, and Wilmington, Massachusetts, were transferred to the CNS Research Greenhouse at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Plants were grown in 1- or 2.5-gallon containers filled with Pro-Mix BX growing medium and fertigated with a nutrient solution supplying 200 ppm nitrogen. Greenhouse environmental conditions were maintained at 70°F during the day and 65°F at night, with supplemental lighting provided to maintain a consistent 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod.
Sex Determination of Japanese Hop Plants
Sex of Japanese hop plants was determined based on distinct reproductive morphological traits, using the same criteria for both field and greenhouse populations. Japanese hop is a dioecious species, with male and female flowers borne on separate individuals. Male plants produce branched panicles, whereas female plants develop cup-shaped perianths that form cone-like structures (Shepard et al., 2000, Ehara, 1956).
Epidermal Peels
Epidermal peels were obtained from one or two fully expanded mature leaves per sampled individual. Ten guard cell or guard cell pairs were measured, selection was arbitrary and performed by the worker who made the peel. If ten clear measurements could not be obtained from two or fewer leaves, the measurements were discarded and new peels were made. Peel and staining procedures were adapted from Ordoñez et al. (2017). The abaxial (underside) epidermis was carefully removed and mounted on a microscope slide containing two drops of Gram’s iodine solution. An additional two drops were applied to fully submerge the tissue, and a coverslip was placed over the sample, gently pressed to ensure even contact and remove air bubbles. Slides were stained for 10-30 minutes to achieve optimal contrast. Excess stain was removed by blotting the slide with a Kimwipe at the end of the staining period.
Imaging
Samples were imaged using brightfield microscopy with an Axio Imager A2 at 40x magnification for stomatal measurements and 100x magnification when higher resolution was required to distinguish plastids. Images were captured using an Axiocam 503 Mono digital camera and analyzed with ZEN 2 (Blue Edition) software. Individual guard cell length and width were measured to the nearest 0.01 um, and plastid number was quantified per pair of guard cells following the approach described by Williams et al. (2024).
Statistical Analysis
Three sets of measurements of ten guard cells for length and width, and ten guard cell pairs for plastid count, from an arbitrarily selected Swansea Japanese hop plant were taken for each response variable to assess intraindividual variation. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for each metric to determine whether the measurement sets differed significantly. For comparisons of Japanese hop guard cell metrics across four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) and across hop categories (diploid cultivar, feral common hops, Japanese hops, Humulus lupulus var. neomexicanus, seed-grown, triploid cultivar), the mean of the ten measurements taken per individual was used as the value for each response variable; unequal group sizes increased heteroscedasticity. The Kruskal–Wallis test was therefore used for each response variable because it is relatively robust to heteroscedasticity. Where the Kruskal–Wallis test found significant differences, the post-hoc Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction was employed.
","reagents":"Source | Reagent | Identifier |
Hardy Diagnostics | Non-Stabilized Gram's Iodine | I008N |
Common hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and Japanese hop (Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.; syn. Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc.) belong to the genus Humulus within the Cannabaceae family. Common hop is a dioecious, herbaceous perennial bine cultivated for its female inflorescences, which are economically important to the brewing and pharmaceutical industries (Paguet et al., 2023). Five botanical varieties of H. lupulus have been described: one native to Asia, one to Europe, and three to North America (Small, 1978). In the northeastern United States, native populations of H. l. var. lupuloides have interacted with feral hop plants that have persisted from abandoned farms since their introduction in the 1600s (McWilliams, 1998; Rumney, 1997, 1998; Somalraju et al., 2024). Many modern American cultivars contain genetic contributions from H. l. lupuloides and, more recently, H. l. neomexicanus (Small, 1978; Comi, 2024).
Japanese hop is an annual species native to East Asia and invasive in North America (Ehara, 1955; Small, 1978; Huang & Matthews, 2024). Unlike common hop, which produces economically important phytochemicals in lupulin glands, Japanese hop lacks lupulin glands and is grown primarily as an ornamental (Ehara, 1955, 1956; Paguet et al., 2023). As a closely related annual relative of a perennial crop species, Japanese hop represents a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development.
Ploidy manipulation has been widely used in crop improvement to enhance agronomic traits via polyploidization and to develop inbred lines through haploid induction in several crop systems, including potato, where these approaches involve multiple stages of ploidy screening (Hougas & Peloquin, 1957; Graebner, 2019; Williams et al., 2024). Common hop occurs primarily in the wild as a diploid (2n=20) with an XX/XY sex chromosome system. In contrast, Japanese hop exhibits 2n=16 in females and 2n=17 in males, with an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Zhang et al., 2023; Carey et al., 2024). Natural ploidy variation is present within the Cannabaceae family, including triploid species (Hayes et al., 2022). In common hop, aneuploids, triploids (3n), and tetraploids (4n) have arisen both spontaneously and through chemically induced polyploidization (Koutoulis et al., 2005). Triploids are particularly desirable due to their improved yield and production of nearly seedless cones, which are preferred by processors and brewers (Trojak-Goluch & Skomra, 2018, 2020).
Current hop breeding pipelines rely primarily on flow cytometry for ploidy determination, with leaf or root chromosome squashes used for cytological confirmation. Roy et al. (2001) reported average guard cell length and width for a limited sample of diploid and tetraploid common hops; however, comparative measurements for Japanese hops are not available (Šesek et al., 2000; Beatson et al., 2003; Trojak-Goluch & Skoma, 2020). In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels (Frandsen, 1968). Guard cell size has also been correlated with DNA content and ploidy level in angiosperms fossil records, suggesting that size-based metrics may be broadly applicable across taxa, including Humulus (Masterson, 1994). The present study provides the first publicly available guard cell metrics for Japanese hops, H. l. neomexicanus, and feral hop populations from the northern United States. It also represents the first comparison of guard cell traits between greenhouse-grown and wild Japanese hop populations.
To assess intraindividual consistency of guard cell metrics, three sets of measurements from ten guard cells (length and width) or guard cell pairs (plastid count) were collected from a single greenhouse-grown Japanese hop (Swansea, MA). Guard cell length differed significantly among measurement sets (χ2=8.596, df=2, P=0.0136), whereas guard cell width (χ2=3.4692, df=2, P=0.1765) and plastid number (χ2=0.6286, df=2, P=0.7303) did not, indicating greater within-plant variability for length relative to the other traits. Plastid measurements were taken from greenhouse-grown Japanese hop plants and from a wild population, with each population further subdivided by sex. The greenhouse-grown group consisted of ten plants (five female, five male) collected from Middlesex, Concord, and Swansea, MA, while the wild group included ten plants (seven female, three male) identified on a slope in Amherst, MA and sampled in situ. For each individual, the mean of ten measurements was used as the value for each response variable (length, width, plastid count). Differences among the four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) were evaluated using a Kruskal–Wallis test. Neither plastid count (χ²=6.537, df=3, P=0.0882), guard cell width (χ²=7.425, df=3, P=0.0595) or guard cell length (χ²=0.4939, df=3, P=0.9202) differed significantly among groups. Descriptive trends suggested lower plastid counts in greenhouse-grown females relative to wild plants and greater guard cell width in wild plants relative to greenhouse-grown plants, but these patterns were not statistically supported (Fig. 1a–c).
Comparative analyses were conducted between greenhouse-grown Japanese hop and multiple common hop groups. The diploid cultivar group included cultivars 'UK Serebrianka', 'Tettnanger', and 'Petoskey'. The feral group was comprised of one individual collected from each of the following locations: Albany, NY; Troy, NY; Wales, MA; Sudbury, MA; Bedford, MA; Skowhegan, ME; and Southwest Harbor, ME. The Japanese hop group included the ten previously described plants as well as one unsexed plant grown from commercially available seed (Dee's Seeds, Port Saint Lucie, Florida). Data for H. l. neomexicanus were obtained from a single accession (PI 635445). The seed-grown common hop group consisted of six individuals: four derived from PI 689630 and two from commercially available seed (MySeedsCo, Oakland Gardens, NY). The triploid cultivar evaluated was 'Triple Pearle' (Somalraju et al., 2024). For each individual, the mean of ten measurements was used as the value for each response variable. Kruskal–Wallis tests detected a significant difference among groups for guard cell width (χ²=11.376, df=5, P=0.044), whereas plastid count (χ²=3.1895, df=5, P=0.6708) and guard cell length (χ²=5.953, df=5, P=0.3108) did not differ significantly among groups. A post-hoc Dunn's test with the Bonferroni correction revealed no significant pairwise difference among categories guard cell widths. Descriptive trends suggested that guard cell width tended to be greater in common hop than in Japanese hop groups, and that the triploid cultivar had longer guard cells than most other groups, but none of these patterns were statistically supported (Fig. 1d–f).
All guard cell metrics exhibited limitations when applied to the available germplasm. Epidermal peels are not typically effective for detecting single chromosome aneuploidy, and triploids can be difficult to distinguish from diploids using stomatal traits alone (Frandsen, 1968; Graebner, 2019). In the present study, genetic differences between the two Japanese hop populations are a confounding factor, as the genetic diversity and introduction history of Japanese hop populations in Massachusetts remain unknown. When using leaf peels for ploidy screening based on plastid measurements, environmental variation must also be considered. Environmental effects on stomatal traits have been documented in other crop systems and can be minimized by evaluating plants grown under uniform conditions (Frandsen, 1968). Consistent with this, guard cell width in Japanese hop showed a non-significant trend toward sensitivity to growing environment, though no pairwise differences were statistically supported after correction for multiple comparisons. Although guard cell length exhibited intraindividual variability, it appeared less environmentally sensitive than guard cell width in Japanese hop and showed a non-significant trend toward distinguishing the triploid cultivar from most other groups. Overall, this study establishes baseline guard cell measurements for Japanese hop and related Humulus germplasm, providing foundational data to support future ploidy manipulation and screening efforts.
","references":[{"reference":"Beatson RA, Ferguson AR, Weir IE, Graham LT, Ansell KA, Ding H. 2003. Flow cytometric identification of sexually derived polyploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and their use in hop breeding. Euphytica. 134: 189.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1023/B:EUPH.0000003882.23615.c5"},{"reference":"Carey SB, Bentz PC, Lovell JT, Akozbek LM, Myers Z, Korani W, et al., Harkess A. 2024. An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.09.627636"},{"reference":"Comi M. 2024. Making Citra: Branding, Breeding, and the Co-production of New Aroma Hops in the Yakima Valley. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 49: 1103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1177/01622439241238026"},{"reference":"Ehara K. 1955. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅰ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. 10: 209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.5109/22655"},{"reference":"Ehara, K. 1956. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅱ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 10(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.5109/22660
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Frandsen NO. 1968. Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 38: 153.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/BF00933811"},{"reference":"Graebner RC, Chen H, Contreras RN, Haynes KG, Sathuvalli V. 2019. Identification of the High Frequency of Triploid Potato Resulting from Tetraploid × Diploid Crosses. HortScience. 54: 1159.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.21273/HORTSCI13797-18"},{"reference":"Hayes A, Wang S, Whittemore AT, Smith TW. 2022. The Genetic Diversity of Triploid Celtis pumila and its Diploid Relatives C. occidentalis and C. laevigata (Cannabaceae). Systematic Botany. 47: 441.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1600/036364422X16512564801713"},{"reference":"Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ. 1957. A Haploid Plant of the Potato Variety Katahdin. Nature. 180: 1209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/1801209a0"},{"reference":"Huang AH, Matthews JW. 2024. The invasion of Japanese hop ( Humulus japonicus ) in a restored floodplain forest. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 17: 258.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/inp.2024.25"},{"reference":"Koutoulis A, Roy AT, Price A, Sherriff L, Leggett G. 2005. DNA ploidy level of colchicine-treated hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 105: 263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.010"},{"reference":"Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms. Science. 264: 421.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.264.5157.421"},{"reference":"Mc Williams JE. 1998. Brewing Beer in Massachusetts Bay, 1640-1690. The New England Quarterly. 71: 543.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/366602"},{"reference":"Ordoñez, B., Orrillo, M., and Bonierbale, M. 2017. Manual on potato reproductive and cytological biology. Lima (Peru). International Potato Center (CIP). ISBN 978-92-9060-480-8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Paguet AS, Siah A, Lefevre G, Vandenberghe M, Lutun D, Degardin N, et al., Riviere C. 2024. Phytochemical characterisation and aromatic potential for brewing of wild hops (Humulus lupulus L.) from Northern France: Towards a lead for local hop varieties. Food Chemistry. 433: 137302.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137302"},{"reference":"Roy A, Leggett G, Koutoulis A. 2001. In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Cell Reports. 20: 489.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s002990100364"},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1997. Hops cultivation in Wisconsin: A nineteenth century inter lude. The Wisconsin Geographer. 13: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1998. A search for economic alternatives: Hops in Franklin County, New York during the nineteenth century. Middle States Geographer. 31: 23.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sesek P, Sustar Vozlic J, Bohanec B. 2000. Determination of aneuploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) using flow cytometry. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 439: r016.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s004240000074"},{"reference":"Shepherd, H.L., Parker, J.S., Darby, P. and Ainsworth, C.C. 2000. Sexual development and sex chromosomes in hop. New Phytologist, 148: 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00771.x
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Small E. 1978. A Numerical and Nomenclatural Analysis of Morpho-Geographic Taxa of Humulus. Systematic Botany. 3: 37.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/2418532"},{"reference":"Somalraju A, Soto Cerda B, Ghose K, Mc Callum J, Knox R, Fofana B. 2024. Structure and genetic diversity of Canadian Maritimes wild hops. Genome. 67: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1139/gen-2023-0045"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2018. Breeding of triploid common hop cultivars (Humulus lupulus L.).","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.26114/PJA.IUNG.357.2018.34.01"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2020. Ploidy variation and agronomic performance of F1 hybrids of tetraploid and diploid forms of Humulus lupulus L.. Breeding Science. 70: 176.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1270/jsbbs.19102"},{"reference":"Williams N, Kornelis G, Tan EH, Collins P. 2024. Report of a Spontaneous Potato Monoploid Resulting from a Biparental Diploid Potato Cross. American Journal of Potato Research. 101: 443.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s12230-024-09971-5"},{"reference":"Zhang GJ, Jia KL, Wang J, Gao WJ, Li SF. 2023. Genome-wide analysis of transposable elements and satellite DNA in Humulus scandens, a dioecious plant with XX/XY1Y2 chromosomes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1230250.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2023.1230250"}],"title":"Guard Cell Metrics in Common and Japanese Hops from Wild, Feral, and Cultivated Backgrounds
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Michaela Liegertová"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"7103048e-278b-4ae7-bd18-1977d6f08f67","decision":"publish","abstract":"Japanese hops are a closely related annual relative of the perennial crop species common hops, as such they are a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development. Ploidy manipulation is an important tool in common hop breeding. In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels. Guard cell length in Japanese hop exhibited intraindividual variability but appeared potentially less environmentally sensitive than plastid-based metrics in Japanese hop and trended higher in the tested triploid cultivar.
","acknowledgements":"Tested common hops were provided through a research agreement with The Norcross Wildlife Foundation, and the contributions of private landowners and businesses including James and Laura Remington, Four Star Farms, Indian Ladder Farms and Milagro Coffee Bar.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["Stockbridge School of Agriculture",""],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"aseigneur@umass.edu","firstName":"Adriana","lastName":" Seigneur ","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-5898-3268"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["Stockbridge School of Agriculture"],"credit":["investigation","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"pujapradhan@umass.edu","firstName":"Puja","lastName":"Pradhan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-1335-8764"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["Stockbridge School of Agriculture"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","methodology","project","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"noawilliams@umass.edu","firstName":"Noah","lastName":"Williams","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9610-524X"},{"affiliations":["UMass Amherst, Amherst Center, MA, US"],"departments":["Stockbridge School of Agriculture",""],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","project","supervision"],"email":"gjung@umass.edu","firstName":"Geunhwa","lastName":"Jung","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-6504-3883"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"Raw data of guard cell measurements.
","doi":"10.22002/qks9z-3p465","resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Supplemental Table 1.xlsx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/46d0b4c9880adfc1742cb583207bfc57.xlsx"}],"funding":"Funding came from the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture & the University of Massachusetts Amherst Natural History Collections Graduate Student Grant
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/13620690dd0fa8efc66294673a52f0ce.png"},"imageCaption":"Number of plastids per guard cell pair (a), guard cell width (b), and guard cell length (c) in Japanese hop by sex and growing environment. The greenhouse female and greenhouse male groups each comprised five plants; the wild female group comprised seven plants and the wild male group three plants. Number of plastids per guard cell pair (d), guard cell width (e), and guard cell length (f) across hop groups of cultivated, feral, and wild origin. The diploid cultivar group comprised three plants, the feral group seven, and the Japanese hop group eleven. The seed-grown group comprised six plants; the H. l. neomexicanus and triploid cultivar groups were each represented by a single individual. Each data point represents the per plant mean of ten guard cell measurements.
","imageTitle":"Guard cell metrics of common and Japanese hops from wild, feral and cultivated backgrounds.
","methods":"Site and Growing Conditions
A population of Japanese hops was identified in Amherst, Massachusetts, consisting of approximately 20 individuals growing on a 60-degree slope. Field samples were collected between August and October 2025, with sampling completed prior to the first frost to avoid frost-induced physiological changes.
Vegetative-stage plants collected from Swansea, Concord, and Wilmington, Massachusetts, were transferred to the CNS Research Greenhouse at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. Plants were grown in 1- or 2.5-gallon containers filled with Pro-Mix BX growing medium and fertigated with a nutrient solution supplying 200 ppm nitrogen. Greenhouse environmental conditions were maintained at 70°F during the day and 65°F at night, with supplemental lighting provided to maintain a consistent 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod.
Sex Determination of Japanese Hop Plants
Sex of Japanese hop plants was determined based on distinct reproductive morphological traits, using the same criteria for both field and greenhouse populations. Japanese hop is a dioecious species, with male and female flowers borne on separate individuals. Male plants produce branched panicles, whereas female plants develop cup-shaped perianths that form cone-like structures (Shepard et al., 2000, Ehara, 1956).
Epidermal Peels
Epidermal peels were obtained from one or two fully expanded mature leaves per sampled individual. Ten guard cell or guard cell pairs were measured, selection was arbitrary and performed by the worker who made the peel. If ten clear measurements could not be obtained from two or fewer leaves, the measurements were discarded and new peels were made. Peel and staining procedures were adapted from Ordoñez et al. (2017). The abaxial (underside) epidermis was carefully removed and mounted on a microscope slide containing two drops of Gram’s iodine solution. An additional two drops were applied to fully submerge the tissue, and a coverslip was placed over the sample, gently pressed to ensure even contact and remove air bubbles. Slides were stained for 10-30 minutes to achieve optimal contrast. Excess stain was removed by blotting the slide with a Kimwipe at the end of the staining period.
Imaging
Samples were imaged using brightfield microscopy with an Axio Imager A2 at 40x magnification for stomatal measurements and 100x magnification when higher resolution was required to distinguish plastids. Images were captured using an Axiocam 503 Mono digital camera and analyzed with ZEN 2 (Blue Edition) software. Individual guard cell length and width were measured to the nearest 0.01 um, and plastid number was quantified per pair of guard cells following the approach described by Williams et al. (2024).
Statistical Analysis
Three sets of measurements of ten guard cells for length and width, and ten guard cell pairs for plastid count, from an arbitrarily selected Swansea Japanese hop plant were taken for each response variable to assess intraindividual variation. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for each metric to determine whether the measurement sets differed significantly. For comparisons of Japanese hop guard cell metrics across four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) and across hop categories (diploid cultivar, feral common hops, Japanese hops, Humulus lupulus var. neomexicanus, seed-grown, triploid cultivar), the mean of the ten measurements taken per individual was used as the value for each response variable; unequal group sizes increased heteroscedasticity. The Kruskal–Wallis test was therefore used for each response variable because it is relatively robust to heteroscedasticity. Where the Kruskal–Wallis test found significant differences, the post-hoc Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction was employed.
","reagents":"Source | Reagent | Identifier |
Hardy Diagnostics | Non-Stabilized Gram's Iodine | I008N |
Common hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and Japanese hop (Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.; syn. Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc.) belong to the genus Humulus within the Cannabaceae family. Common hop is a dioecious, herbaceous perennial bine cultivated for its female inflorescences, which are economically important to the brewing and pharmaceutical industries (Paguet et al., 2023). Five botanical varieties of H. lupulus have been described: one native to Asia, one to Europe, and three to North America (Small, 1978). In the northeastern United States, native populations of H. l. var. lupuloides have interacted with feral hop plants that have persisted from abandoned farms since their introduction in the 1600s (McWilliams, 1998; Rumney, 1997, 1998; Somalraju et al., 2024). Many modern American cultivars contain genetic contributions from H. l. lupuloides and, more recently, H. l. neomexicanus (Small, 1978; Comi, 2024).
Japanese hop is an annual species native to East Asia and invasive in North America (Ehara, 1955; Small, 1978; Huang & Matthews, 2024). Unlike common hop, which produces economically important phytochemicals in lupulin glands, Japanese hop lacks lupulin glands and is grown primarily as an ornamental (Ehara, 1955, 1956; Paguet et al., 2023). As a closely related annual relative of a perennial crop species, Japanese hop represents a potential genetic resource for accelerating hop breeding and cultivar development.
Ploidy manipulation has been widely used in crop improvement to enhance agronomic traits via polyploidization and to develop inbred lines through haploid induction in several crop systems, including potato, where these approaches involve multiple stages of ploidy screening (Hougas & Peloquin, 1957; Graebner, 2019; Williams et al., 2024). Common hop occurs primarily in the wild as a diploid (2n=20) with an XX/XY sex chromosome system. In contrast, Japanese hop exhibits 2n=16 in females and 2n=17 in males, with an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Zhang et al., 2023; Carey et al., 2024). Natural ploidy variation is present within the Cannabaceae family, including triploid species (Hayes et al., 2022). In common hop, aneuploids, triploids (3n), and tetraploids (4n) have arisen both spontaneously and through chemically induced polyploidization (Koutoulis et al., 2005). Triploids are particularly desirable due to their improved yield and production of nearly seedless cones, which are preferred by processors and brewers (Trojak-Goluch & Skomra, 2018, 2020).
Current hop breeding pipelines rely primarily on flow cytometry for ploidy determination, with leaf or root chromosome squashes used for cytological confirmation. Roy et al. (2001) reported average guard cell length and width for a limited sample of diploid and tetraploid common hops; however, comparative measurements for Japanese hops are not available (Šesek et al., 2000; Beatson et al., 2003; Trojak-Goluch & Skoma, 2020). In other crop systems, epidermal peels measuring guard cell traits-length, width, and plastid number-provide a rapid and low-cost method for screening ploidy levels (Frandsen, 1968). Guard cell size has also been correlated with DNA content and ploidy level in angiosperms fossil records, suggesting that size-based metrics may be broadly applicable across taxa, including Humulus (Masterson, 1994). The present study provides the first publicly available guard cell metrics for Japanese hops, H. l. neomexicanus, and feral hop populations from the northern United States. It also represents the first comparison of guard cell traits between greenhouse-grown and wild Japanese hop populations.
To assess intraindividual consistency of guard cell metrics, three sets of measurements from ten guard cells (length and width) or guard cell pairs (plastid count) were collected from a single greenhouse-grown Japanese hop (Swansea, MA). Guard cell length differed significantly among measurement sets (χ2=8.596, df=2, P=0.0136), whereas guard cell width (χ2=3.4692, df=2, P=0.1765) and plastid number (χ2=0.6286, df=2, P=0.7303) did not, indicating greater within-plant variability for length relative to the other traits. Plastid measurements were taken from greenhouse-grown Japanese hop plants and from a wild population, with each population further subdivided by sex. The greenhouse-grown group consisted of ten plants (five female, five male) collected from Wilmington, Concord, and Swansea, MA, while the wild group included ten plants (seven female, three male) identified on a slope in Amherst, MA and sampled in situ. For each individual, the mean of ten measurements was used as the value for each response variable (length, width, plastid count). Differences among the four groups (greenhouse female, greenhouse male, wild female, wild male) were evaluated using a Kruskal–Wallis test. Neither plastid count (χ²=6.537, df=3, P=0.0882), guard cell width (χ²=7.425, df=3, P=0.0595) or guard cell length (χ²=0.4939, df=3, P=0.9202) differed significantly among groups. Descriptive trends suggested lower plastid counts in greenhouse-grown females relative to wild plants and greater guard cell width in wild plants relative to greenhouse-grown plants, but these patterns were not statistically supported (Fig. 1a–c).
Comparative analyses were conducted between greenhouse-grown Japanese hop and multiple common hop groups. The diploid cultivar group included cultivars 'UK Serebrianka', 'Tettnanger', and 'Petoskey'. The feral group was comprised of one individual collected from each of the following locations: Albany, NY; Troy, NY; Wales, MA; Sudbury, MA; Bedford, MA; Skowhegan, ME; and Southwest Harbor, ME. The Japanese hop group included the ten previously described plants as well as one unsexed plant grown from commercially available seed (Dee's Seeds, Port Saint Lucie, Florida). Data for H. l. neomexicanus were obtained from a single accession (PI 635445). The seed-grown common hop group consisted of six individuals: four derived from PI 689630 and two from commercially available seed (MySeedsCo, Oakland Gardens, NY). The triploid cultivar evaluated was 'Triple Pearle' (Somalraju et al., 2024). For each individual, the mean of ten measurements was used as the value for each response variable. Kruskal–Wallis tests detected a significant difference among groups for guard cell width (χ²=11.376, df=5, P=0.044), whereas plastid count (χ²=3.1895, df=5, P=0.6708) and guard cell length (χ²=5.953, df=5, P=0.3108) did not differ significantly among groups. A post-hoc Dunn's test with the Bonferroni correction revealed no significant pairwise difference among categories guard cell widths. Descriptive trends suggested that guard cell width tended to be greater in common hop than in Japanese hop groups, and that the triploid cultivar had longer guard cells than most other groups, but none of these patterns were statistically supported (Fig. 1d–f).
All guard cell metrics exhibited limitations when applied to the available germplasm. Epidermal peels are not typically effective for detecting single chromosome aneuploidy, and triploids can be difficult to distinguish from diploids using stomatal traits alone (Frandsen, 1968; Graebner, 2019). In the present study, genetic differences between the two Japanese hop populations are a confounding factor, as the genetic diversity and introduction history of Japanese hop populations in Massachusetts remain unknown. When using leaf peels for ploidy screening based on plastid measurements, environmental variation must also be considered. Environmental effects on stomatal traits have been documented in other crop systems and can be minimized by evaluating plants grown under uniform conditions (Frandsen, 1968). Consistent with this, guard cell width in Japanese hop showed a non-significant trend toward sensitivity to growing environment, though no pairwise differences were statistically supported after correction for multiple comparisons. Although guard cell length exhibited intraindividual variability, it appeared less environmentally sensitive than guard cell width in Japanese hop and showed a non-significant trend toward distinguishing the triploid cultivar from most other groups. Overall, this study establishes baseline guard cell measurements for Japanese hop and related Humulus germplasm, providing foundational data to support future ploidy manipulation and screening efforts.
","references":[{"reference":"Beatson RA, Ferguson AR, Weir IE, Graham LT, Ansell KA, Ding H. 2003. Flow cytometric identification of sexually derived polyploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) and their use in hop breeding. Euphytica. 134: 189.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1023/B:EUPH.0000003882.23615.c5"},{"reference":"Carey SB, Bentz PC, Lovell JT, Akozbek LM, Myers Z, Korani W, et al., Harkess A. 2024. An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.09.627636"},{"reference":"Comi M. 2024. Making Citra: Branding, Breeding, and the Co-production of New Aroma Hops in the Yakima Valley. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 49: 1103.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1177/01622439241238026"},{"reference":"Ehara K. 1955. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅰ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University. 10: 209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.5109/22655"},{"reference":"Ehara, K. 1956. Comparative Morphological Studies On The Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.) And The Japanese Hop (H. Japonicus Sieb. ET ZUCC.). Ⅱ. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 10(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.5109/22660
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Frandsen NO. 1968. Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 38: 153.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/BF00933811"},{"reference":"Graebner RC, Chen H, Contreras RN, Haynes KG, Sathuvalli V. 2019. Identification of the High Frequency of Triploid Potato Resulting from Tetraploid × Diploid Crosses. HortScience. 54: 1159.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.21273/HORTSCI13797-18"},{"reference":"Hayes A, Wang S, Whittemore AT, Smith TW. 2022. The Genetic Diversity of Triploid Celtis pumila and its Diploid Relatives C. occidentalis and C. laevigata (Cannabaceae). Systematic Botany. 47: 441.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1600/036364422X16512564801713"},{"reference":"Hougas RW, Peloquin SJ. 1957. A Haploid Plant of the Potato Variety Katahdin. Nature. 180: 1209.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/1801209a0"},{"reference":"Huang AH, Matthews JW. 2024. The invasion of Japanese hop ( Humulus japonicus ) in a restored floodplain forest. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 17: 258.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/inp.2024.25"},{"reference":"Koutoulis A, Roy AT, Price A, Sherriff L, Leggett G. 2005. DNA ploidy level of colchicine-treated hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Scientia Horticulturae. 105: 263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.010"},{"reference":"Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms. Science. 264: 421.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.264.5157.421"},{"reference":"Mc Williams JE. 1998. Brewing Beer in Massachusetts Bay, 1640-1690. The New England Quarterly. 71: 543.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/366602"},{"reference":"Ordoñez, B., Orrillo, M., and Bonierbale, M. 2017. Manual on potato reproductive and cytological biology. Lima (Peru). International Potato Center (CIP). ISBN 978-92-9060-480-8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Paguet AS, Siah A, Lefevre G, Vandenberghe M, Lutun D, Degardin N, et al., Riviere C. 2024. Phytochemical characterisation and aromatic potential for brewing of wild hops (Humulus lupulus L.) from Northern France: Towards a lead for local hop varieties. Food Chemistry. 433: 137302.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137302"},{"reference":"Roy A, Leggett G, Koutoulis A. 2001. In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Cell Reports. 20: 489.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s002990100364"},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1997. Hops cultivation in Wisconsin: A nineteenth century inter lude. The Wisconsin Geographer. 13: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rumney T. 1998. A search for economic alternatives: Hops in Franklin County, New York during the nineteenth century. Middle States Geographer. 31: 23.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Sesek P, Sustar Vozlic J, Bohanec B. 2000. Determination of aneuploids in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) using flow cytometry. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 439: r016.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s004240000074"},{"reference":"Shepherd, H.L., Parker, J.S., Darby, P. and Ainsworth, C.C. 2000. Sexual development and sex chromosomes in hop. New Phytologist, 148: 397-411. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00771.x
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Small E. 1978. A Numerical and Nomenclatural Analysis of Morpho-Geographic Taxa of Humulus. Systematic Botany. 3: 37.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.2307/2418532"},{"reference":"Somalraju A, Soto Cerda B, Ghose K, Mc Callum J, Knox R, Fofana B. 2024. Structure and genetic diversity of Canadian Maritimes wild hops. Genome. 67: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1139/gen-2023-0045"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2018. Breeding of triploid common hop cultivars (Humulus lupulus L.).","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.26114/PJA.IUNG.357.2018.34.01"},{"reference":"Trojak Goluch A, Skomra U. 2020. Ploidy variation and agronomic performance of F1 hybrids of tetraploid and diploid forms of Humulus lupulus L.. Breeding Science. 70: 176.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1270/jsbbs.19102"},{"reference":"Williams N, Kornelis G, Tan EH, Collins P. 2024. Report of a Spontaneous Potato Monoploid Resulting from a Biparental Diploid Potato Cross. American Journal of Potato Research. 101: 443.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s12230-024-09971-5"},{"reference":"Zhang GJ, Jia KL, Wang J, Gao WJ, Li SF. 2023. Genome-wide analysis of transposable elements and satellite DNA in Humulus scandens, a dioecious plant with XX/XY1Y2 chromosomes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1230250.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2023.1230250"}],"title":"Guard Cell Metrics in Common and Japanese Hops from Wild, Feral, and Cultivated Backgrounds
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"5767ad8e-b681-4f28-b742-77dd6d8d7125","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}