Manipulating gene expression in the different cell types of the Drosophila melanogaster testis stem cell niche is critical to understanding its biology. Here, we tested the specificity of commonly used somatic cyst stem cell (CySC) lineage GAL4 drivers by assessing their abilities to promote loss of hub cell quiescence. We found that reduction of the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma (Rbf) using c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, or zfh1-GAL4 is sufficient to drive quiescent hub cells into mitosis. Concomitant inhibition of GAL4 expression in hub cells via GAL80 eliminates hub cell proliferation, supporting that hub cells autonomously require Rbf to maintain quiescence. Thus, the activity of GAL4 drivers commonly used to manipulate the CySC lineage also functionally affect hub cells.
","acknowledgements":"We thank E. Bach, S. DiNardo, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; and M. de Cuevas and J. Grey for comments. Illustration created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","visualization"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"},{"awardId":"HD052937","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/fec39da5c040e4f64ada2ec758ed5272.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) Illustration of testis apex containing niche (hub) cells (green) which are surrounded by and maintain Germline Stem Cells (GSCs, purple) and Cyst Stem Cells (CySCs, blue). As stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSCs give rise to gonialblasts (GBs) that divide to produce spermatogonia (SG) which undergo three additional rounds of transit amplification and ultimately produce sperm. CySCs divide and produce daughter cyst cells (CCs) that differentiate as they support adjacent germ cells. (B – G) Representative single confocal sections through testis apices from flies carrying the cyst cell driver, c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS, controlling expression of (B) UAS-GFP RNAi (control), (C,F) UAS-Rbf RNAi, or (D – E,G) UAS-RFP in the (B – E) absence or (F – G) presence of hh-GAL80. Testes were stained for hub cell membranes (Fasciclin3 (FasIII), green), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (B – C,F) mitotic cells (phospho-histone H3 (PH3), green) or (D – E,G) RFP (DsRed, magenta, insets). Duration and temperature of GAL4 induction indicated on images. Scale bars, 20μm. Hubs outlined (dashed yellow lines).
","imageTitle":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 drivers can robustly drive UAS-transgene expression in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were raised on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Crosses were set and matured at 18°C. Male flies were used for all experiments and subjected to conditions as noted within the text, figure legend, and methods. See Reagents Table for a list of strains used in this study. The hh-GAL80 transgene was used in combination with GAL4 transgenes to inhibit GAL4 expression in hub cells (Herrera et al., 2021).
Temperature-based transgene induction
As previously described (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004), flies containing UAS and Gal4 constructs together with tub-Gal80TS transgenes were raised at the permissive temperature (18°C). Following eclosion, approximately 25 young male progeny (0-4 days old) were transferred into new vials and either kept at 18°C or incubated at restrictive temperatures (29°C or 31°C) for 7-10 days.
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997). All steps were performed at room temperature and on a nutating platform unless otherwise noted. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) for 20 min. After fixation, testes were rinsed two times followed by a 30 min wash in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then incubated in primary antibodies diluted in block overnight at 4°C , rinsed as above, incubated for an hour in PBX, then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) then diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed and washed for an hour in PBX with final rinses and a 10 min wash in 1X PBS before transferred to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin3 (FasIII; 1:50, DSHB, 7610) and phosho-histone H3 (PH3; 1:500, Cell Signaling, 9701), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11073), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5μm step, respectively, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI. Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices are shown in this paper.
Quantification of dividing hub cells
To identify hub cells in mitosis, testes were immunostained with an antibody to the mitotic marker PH3 as previously described (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). Testes with at least one hub cell (as identified by the membrane marker FasIII), that was PH3-positive were scored as positive for dividing hub cells.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11. For all statistical analysis, significant pairwise comparisons are shown as follows: ns = not significant, *p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001, and ***p value < 0.0001.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
c587-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}C587, w[*] | BDSC_67747 |
tj-GAL4 | y w; P{GawB}NP1624/CyO, UAS-LacZ | DGRC 104055 |
zfh1-GAL4 | zfh1::T2A::GAL4/TM6B, Tb | Gift of E. Bach (Albert et al., 2018) |
eyaA3-GAL4 | eyaA3-GAL4 | S. DiNardo (Leatherman and DiNardo, 2008) |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}10; TM2/TM6B, Tb[1] | BDSC_7108 |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}2/TM2 | BDSC_7017 |
UAS-Rbf RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS03004}attP2/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_36744 |
UAS-GFP RNAi | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-GFP.RNAi.R}142 | BDSC_9330 |
UAS-RFP | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
hh-GAL80 | hh-GAL80 | E. Bach (Herrara, et al., 2021) |
Among its numerous attributes, the ability to regulate gene expression in both a temporal and spatial manner makes Drosophila melanogaster one of the leading model organisms. Additionally, the public availability of numerous tissue-specific GAL4 transgenes allows for even greater genetic control (Brand & Perrimon, 1993; McGuire, Roman, et al., 2004; Jenkins et al., 2022; Zirin et al., 2024).
Studies using the Drosophila testis stem cell niche have relied upon the specificity of GAL4 transgenes to spatially restrict UAS transgene expression to specific groups of cells. The adult testis niche is located within the apical end of the testis, a coiled, blind-ended tubule. The niche houses three cell types: the germline stem cells (GSCs), the cyst stem cells (CySCs), and the niche cells, which are referred to as the hub. The GSCs are the sperm-producing cells of the testis and the somatic CySCs and daughter cyst cells (CCs) act to support GSCs and their daughters. The maintenance of the stem cell populations relies on the hub, a small cluster of tightly packed, quiescent cells, anchored to the testis’ apical end. (reviewed in (Greenspan et al., 2015; Siddall & Hime, 2017)).
To accurately interrogate stem cell niche biology there must be GAL4 transgenes specific to each cell type. The nature of the germline makes specificity achievable with transgenes like nanos-GAL4 (Van Doren et al., 1998) and bam-GAL4 (Chen & McKearin, 2003). In contrast, the hub cells, CySCs, and CCs are all somatic cells, descending from the same population of mesodermal cells in the embryo (Gehring et al., 1976; Lawrence & Johnston, 1986; Szabad & Nöthiger, 1992). Previous work has relied on the E132-GAL4 (also known as upd1-GAL4) to control UAS transgene expression in hub cells (Kawase et al., 2004). For expression in CySCs and/or their daughters, several GAL4 transgenes have been frequently used, with differing degrees of expression patterns ranging from broad (c587-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004) and tj-GAL4 (Li et al., 2003; Tanentzapf et al., 2007)) to more restricted (CySCs and early CCs: zfh1-GAL4 (Albert et al., 2018), fng-Gal4 (DiNardo et al., 2011), c833-GAL4 (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009), and ptc-GAL4 (Schulz et al., 2004); early and late CCs: spict-GAL4 (Chiang et al., 2017) and eyaA3-GAL4 (Leatherman & DiNardo, 2008)). However, these expression patterns can vary; when flies are incubated at higher temperatures the range of eyaA3-GAL4 expression has been shown to extend into CySCs (Ma et al., 2014) and Zfh1 protein expression increases in hub cells (Hétié et al., 2014). And of most significance, studies have noted that some of these GAL4 drivers (c833-GAL4 and tj-GAL4 in particular) are also expressed in hub cells, often demonstrated through fluorescent reporter expression (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009; Joti et al., 2011; Fairchild et al., 2016). However, the extent of CySC lineage driver expression in hub cells has not been well assayed.
To better understand the degree of CySC lineage GAL4 expression in the adult hub, we surveyed expression of four well-used transgenes: c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, and zfh1-GAL4. We combined each GAL4 driver with a ubiquitously expressed temperature sensitive (TS) GAL4 inhibitor, tub-GAL80TS, to suppress UAS construct expression during development (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004). After eclosion, adult flies were transferred from 18°C to 29°C or 31°C, to inactivate GAL80TS and trigger GAL4 activation of UAS transgenes. Due to the subjective nature of fluorescent reporter expression, we sought a reliable and sensitive read-out of GAL4 activity. We have previously demonstrated that hub cells are kept quiescent by the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma-family protein (Rbf) and that when hub cells lose Rbf (E132-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS/ UAS-Rbf RNAi), they enter mitosis and proliferate. Therefore, we hypothesized that if CySC lineage GAL4 drivers are active in hub cells, we would see an increase in the frequency of loss of hub cell quiescence upon GAL4-mediated Rbf reduction. As previously described, mitotic hub cells were identified by immunostaining testes for the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 (PH3); testes with at least one PH3-positive hub cell were scored as positives (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). As expected, expression of the control RNAi transgene (UAS-GFP RNAi) did not produce mitotic hub cells in any genotype under any condition (Fig. 1B, Table 1). In contrast, Rbf reduction by any one of the four CySC lineage GAL4 genotypes resulted in significantly higher frequencies of PH3-positive hub cell(s) following incubation at 31°C compared to control RNAi (Fig. 1C, Table 1). Surprisingly, the frequencies of testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) were similar to that of Rbf reduction in hub cells alone using the hub specific E132-GAL4 driver following 7 days at 31°C (29% of testes (Greenspan et al., 2022)). However, incubation of GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown flies at 29°C produced fewer or no testes with PH3-positive hub cells(s) (Table 1). This finding supports previous work that CySC lineage GAL4 driver expression is dependent on temperature and extends this expression pattern to include hub cells (Ma et al., 2014; Greenspan & Matunis, 2018). Altogether, these results demonstrate that GAL4 transgenes typically used for their expression in CySCs and their daughters can drive robustly in hub cells as well, especially when subjected to higher temperatures.
Studies have started to consider the expression of CySC lineage GAL4 drivers in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021; Grace et al., in prep). As such, a hub-specific GAL80 controlled by the endogenous hedgehog locus (hh-GAL80) was created to inactivate GAL4 expression in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021). In a similar approach, we introduced the hh-GAL80 transgene into the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers to demonstrate that the occurrence of PH3-positive hub cells following Rbf knockdown was indeed due to expression of GAL4 protein in hub cells. We first sought to confirm that the hh-GAL80 does suppress GAL4 expression in adult hub cells. First, we assessed testes from flies expressing UAS-RFP under the control of one of the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS) in the absence of hh-GAL80. As anticipated, we did not observe RFP in testes of flies kept at 18°C (Fig. 1D). However, after incubation at 31°C, we observed robust expression of RFP in the cyst lineage as well as some, but not all, hub cells (Fig. 1E). When we added hh-GAL80 to this genetic background (c587-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS; hh-GAL80), RFP expression in the hub was eliminated, confirming the specificity and efficacy of the GAL80 transgene (Fig. 1G). Further, when we assayed loss of hub quiescence, the addition of hh-GAL80 resulted in significant loss of PH3-positive hub cell(s) in testes of all four CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (Fig. 1F, Table 1). This confirms that indeed the loss of hub cell quiescence observed following Rbf reduction by the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers was due to GAL4 activity within hub cells, as opposed to a non-cell autonomous mechanism caused by Rbf reduction in surrounding CySCs.
| % Testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) | ||||
CySC Lineage GAL4 Driver | Presence of hh-GAL80 transgene | UAS line | 7-10 days at 18°C | 7-10 days at 29°C | 7-10 days at 31°C |
c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/99) | 0% (0/28) | 0% (0/123) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/97) | 5% (4/74)§,ns | 42% (83/199)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/35) | -- | 0% (0/148)a,**** | ||
tj-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/70) | 0% (0/123) | 0% (0/179) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/98) | 0% (0/105)§,ns | 37% (122/333)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/27) | -- | 0% (0/109)a,**** | ||
eyaA3-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/80) | 0% (0/45) | 0% (0/104) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/112) | 3% (3/90)§,ns | 41% (115/278)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/37) | -- | 0% (0/78)a,**** | ||
tub-GAL80TS; zfh1-GAL4 | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/25) | 0% (0/59) | 0% (0/35) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/39) | 12% (3/25)§,* | 18% (12/66)§,** | |
+ | 0% (0/10) | -- | 1% (1/108)a,**** |
Table 1. Concomitant inhibition of cyst stem cell lineage GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown in hub cells eliminates loss of hub cell quiescence.
Analyses using Fisher's exact test. (§) denotes comparison to respective GFP control. (a) denotes comparison between expression of UAS-Rbf RNAi with or without the hh-GAL80 transgene.
This work demonstrates that GAL4 transgenes commonly used to drive gene expression in CySCs and their daughters are also active in hub cells. Further, this expression is to such a degree that it can regulate UAS transgenes to generate pathological phenotypes, including the proliferation of normally quiescent cells. Future work using cyst lineage GAL4 drivers should consider hub expression and verify the specificity with transgenes like hh-GAL80.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert EA, Puretskaia OA, Terekhanova NV, Labudina A, Bökel C. 2018. Direct control of somatic stem cell proliferation factors by the\n Drosophila\n testis stem cell niche. Development 145: 10.1242/dev.156315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.156315"},{"reference":"Brand AH, Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.118.2.401"},{"reference":"Chen D, McKearin DM. 2003. A discrete transcriptional silencer in thebamgene determines asymmetric division of theDrosophilagermline stem cell. Development 130: 1159-1170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.00325"},{"reference":"Chiang ACY, Yang H, Yamashita YM. 2017. spict, a cyst cell-specific gene, regulates starvation-induced spermatogonial cell death in the Drosophila testis. Scientific Reports 7: 10.1038/srep40245.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep40245"},{"reference":"DiNardo S, Okegbe T, Wingert L, Freilich S, Terry N. 2011. linesandbowlaffect the specification of cyst stem cells and niche cells in theDrosophilatestis. Development 138: 1687-1696.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.057364"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Gehring WJ, Wieschaus E, Holliger M. 1976. The use of ‘normal’ and ‘transformed’ gynandromorphs in mapping the primordial germ cells and the gonadal mesoderm inDrosophila. Development 35: 607-616.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.35.3.607"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2015. Genetics of Gonadal Stem Cell Renewal. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31: 291-315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013344"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2018. Retinoblastoma Intrinsically Regulates Niche Cell Quiescence, Identity, and Niche Number in the Adult Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 24: 3466-3476.e8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.083"},{"reference":"Herrera SC, Sainz de la Maza D, Grmai L, Margolis S, Plessel R, Burel M, et al., Bach. 2021. Proliferative stem cells maintain quiescence of their niche by secreting the Activin inhibitor Follistatin. Developmental Cell 56: 2284-2294.e6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.010"},{"reference":"Hétié P, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2014. Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 7: 715-721.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.058"},{"reference":"Jenkins VK, Larkin A, Thurmond J, The FlyBase Consortium. 2022. Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology,Drosophila : 1-34.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-2541-5_1"},{"reference":"Joti P, Ghosh-Roy A, Ray K. 2011. Dynein light chain 1 functions in somatic cyst cells regulate spermatogonial divisions in Drosophila. Scientific Reports 1: 10.1038/srep00173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep00173"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressingbamtranscription in theDrosophilatestis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Lawrence PA, Johnston P. 1986. Observations on cell lineage of internal organs of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 91: 251-66.
","pubmedId":"3711788","doi":""},{"reference":"Leatherman JL, DiNardo S. 2008. Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Cell Stem Cell 3: 44-54.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.001"},{"reference":"Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D. 2003. The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biology 5: 994-1000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1058"},{"reference":"Ma Q, Wawersik M, Matunis EL. 2014. The Jak-STAT Target Chinmo Prevents Sex Transformation of Adult Stem Cells in the Drosophila Testis Niche. Developmental Cell 31: 474-486.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.004"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"McGuire SE, Mao Z, Davis RL. 2004. Spatiotemporal Gene Expression Targeting with the TARGET and Gene-Switch Systems in\n Drosophila. Science's STKE 2004: 10.1126/stke.2202004pl6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/stke.2202004pl6"},{"reference":"MCGUIRE S. 2004. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends in Genetics 20: 384-391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.012"},{"reference":"Papagiannouli F, Mechler BM. 2009. discs large regulates somatic cyst cell survival and expansion in Drosophila testis. Cell Research 19: 1139-1149.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/CR.2009.71"},{"reference":"Schulz C, Kiger AA, Tazuke SI, Yamashita YM, Pantalena-Filho LC, Jones DL, Wood CG, Fuller MT. 2004. A misexpression screen reveals effects of bag-of-marbles and TGF beta class signaling on the Drosophila male germ-line stem cell lineage. Genetics 167(2): 707-23.
","pubmedId":"15238523","doi":""},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Szabad Jn, Nöthiger R. 1992. Gynandromorphs of Drosophila suggest one common primordium for the somatic cells of the female and male gonads in the region of abdominal segments 4 and 5. Development 115: 527-533.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.115.2.527"},{"reference":"Tanentzapf G, Devenport D, Godt D, Brown NH. 2007. Integrin-dependent anchoring of a stem-cell niche. Nature Cell Biology 9: 1413-1418.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1660"},{"reference":"Doren MV, Williamson AL, Lehmann R. 1998. Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells. Current Biology 8: 243-246.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70091-0"},{"reference":"Zirin J, Jusiak B, Lopes R, Ewen-Campen B, Bosch JA, Risbeck A, et al., Perrimon. 2024. Expanding the Drosophila toolkit for dual control of gene expression. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.94073.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.94073"}],"title":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Benjamin Ohlstein"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"32a31ffc-268f-4c66-abd5-1c7d8f7b68d1","decision":"accept","abstract":"Manipulating gene expression in the different cell types of the Drosophila melanogaster testis stem cell niche is critical to understanding its biology. Here, we tested the specificity of commonly used somatic cyst stem cell (CySC) lineage GAL4 drivers by assessing their abilities to promote loss of hub cell quiescence. We found that conditional reduction of the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma (Rbf) using c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, or zfh1-GAL4 is sufficient to drive quiescent hub cells into mitosis, with increased penetrance at higher temperature due to higher GAL4 activity. Concomitant inhibition of GAL4 expression in hub cells via hh-GAL80 eliminates hub cell proliferation, supporting that hub cells autonomously require Rbf to maintain quiescence. Thus, the activity of GAL4 drivers commonly used to manipulate the CySC lineage also functionally affect hub cells.
","acknowledgements":"We thank E. Bach, S. DiNardo, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; and M. de Cuevas and J. Grey for comments. Illustration created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","visualization"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"},{"awardId":"HD052937","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/fec39da5c040e4f64ada2ec758ed5272.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) Illustration of testis apex containing niche (hub) cells (green) which are surrounded by and maintain Germline Stem Cells (GSCs, purple) and Cyst Stem Cells (CySCs, blue). As stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSCs give rise to gonialblasts (GBs) that divide to produce spermatogonia (SG) which undergo three additional rounds of transit amplification and ultimately produce sperm. CySCs divide and produce daughter cyst cells (CCs) that differentiate as they support adjacent germ cells. (B – G) Representative single confocal sections through testis apices from flies carrying the cyst cell driver, c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS, controlling expression of (B) UAS-GFP RNAi (control), (C,F) UAS-Rbf RNAi, or (D – E,G) UAS-RFP in the (B – E) absence or (F – G) presence of hh-GAL80. Testes were stained for hub cell membranes (Fasciclin3 (FasIII), green), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (B – C,F) mitotic cells (phospho-histone H3 (PH3), green) or (D – E,G) RFP (DsRed, magenta, insets). Duration and temperature of GAL4 induction indicated on images. Scale bars, 20μm. Hubs outlined (dashed yellow lines).
","imageTitle":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 drivers can robustly drive UAS-transgene expression in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were raised on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Crosses were set and matured at 18°C. Male flies were used for all experiments and subjected to conditions as noted within the text, figure legend, and methods. See Reagents Table for a list of strains used in this study. The hh-GAL80 transgene was used in combination with GAL4 transgenes to inhibit GAL4 expression in hub cells (Herrera et al., 2021).
Temperature-based transgene induction
As previously described (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004), flies containing UAS and Gal4 constructs together with tub-Gal80TS transgenes were raised at the permissive temperature (18°C). Following eclosion, approximately 25 young male progeny (0-4 days old) were transferred into new vials and either kept at 18°C or incubated at restrictive temperatures (29°C or 31°C) for 7-10 days.
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997). All steps were performed at room temperature and on a nutating platform unless otherwise noted. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) for 20 min. After fixation, testes were rinsed two times followed by a 30 min wash in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then incubated in primary antibodies diluted in block overnight at 4°C , rinsed as above, incubated for an hour in PBX, then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) then diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed and washed for an hour in PBX with final rinses and a 10 min wash in 1X PBS before transferred to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin3 (FasIII; 1:50, DSHB, 7610) and phosho-histone H3 (PH3; 1:500, Cell Signaling, 9701), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11073), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5μm step, respectively, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI. Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices are shown in this paper.
Quantification of dividing hub cells
To identify hub cells in mitosis, testes were immunostained with an antibody to the mitotic marker PH3 as previously described (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). Testes with at least one hub cell (as identified by the membrane marker FasIII), that was PH3-positive were scored as positive for dividing hub cells.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11. For all statistical analysis, significant pairwise comparisons are shown as follows: ns = not significant, *p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001, and ***p value < 0.0001.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
c587-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}C587, w[*] | BDSC_67747 |
tj-GAL4 | y w; P{GawB}NP1624/CyO, UAS-LacZ | DGRC 104055 |
zfh1-GAL4 | zfh1::T2A::GAL4/TM6B, Tb | Gift of E. Bach (Albert et al., 2018) |
eyaA3-GAL4 | eyaA3-GAL4 | S. DiNardo (Leatherman and DiNardo, 2008) |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}10; TM2/TM6B, Tb[1] | BDSC_7108 |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}2/TM2 | BDSC_7017 |
UAS-Rbf RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS03004}attP2/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_36744 |
UAS-GFP RNAi | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-GFP.RNAi.R}142 | BDSC_9330 |
UAS-RFP | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
hh-GAL80 | GAL80hh-MI10526-T3XG80.0 | E. Bach (Herrera, et al., 2021) |
Among its numerous attributes, the ability to regulate gene expression in both a temporal and spatial manner makes Drosophila melanogaster one of the leading model organisms. Additionally, the public availability of numerous tissue-specific GAL4 transgenes allows for even greater genetic control (Brand & Perrimon, 1993; McGuire, Roman, et al., 2004; Jenkins et al., 2022; Zirin et al., 2024).
Studies using the Drosophila testis stem cell niche have relied upon the specificity of GAL4 transgenes to spatially restrict UAS transgene expression to specific groups of cells. The adult testis niche is located within the apical end of the testis, a coiled, blind-ended tubule. The niche houses three cell types: the germline stem cells (GSCs), the cyst stem cells (CySCs), and the niche cells, which are referred to as the hub. The GSCs are the sperm-producing cells of the testis and the somatic CySCs and daughter cyst cells (CCs) act to support GSCs and their daughters. The maintenance of the stem cell populations relies on the hub, a small cluster of tightly packed, quiescent cells, anchored to the testis’ apical end. (reviewed in (Greenspan et al., 2015; Siddall & Hime, 2017)).
To accurately interrogate stem cell niche biology there must be GAL4 transgenes specific to each cell type. The nature of the germline makes specificity achievable with transgenes like nanos-GAL4 (Van Doren et al., 1998) and bam-GAL4 (Chen & McKearin, 2003). By contrast, the hub cells, CySCs, and CCs are all somatic cells, descending from the same population of mesodermal cells in the embryo (Gehring et al., 1976; Lawrence & Johnston, 1986; Szabad & Nöthiger, 1992). Previous work has relied on the E132-GAL4 (also known as upd1-GAL4) to control UAS transgene expression in hub cells (Kawase et al., 2004). For expression in CySCs and/or their daughters, several GAL4 transgenes have been frequently used, with differing degrees of expression patterns ranging from broad (c587-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004) and tj-GAL4 (Li et al., 2003; Tanentzapf et al., 2007)) to more restricted (CySCs and early CCs: zfh1-GAL4 (Albert et al., 2018), fng-Gal4 (DiNardo et al., 2011), c833-GAL4 (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009), and ptc-GAL4 (Schulz et al., 2004); early and late CCs: spict-GAL4 (Chiang et al., 2017) and eyaA3-GAL4 (Leatherman & DiNardo, 2008)). However, these expression patterns can vary; when flies are incubated at higher temperatures the range of eyaA3-GAL4 expression has been shown to extend into CySCs (Ma et al., 2014) and Zfh1 protein expression increases in hub cells (Hétié et al., 2014). And of most significance, studies have noted that some of these GAL4 drivers (c833-GAL4 and tj-GAL4 in particular) are also expressed in hub cells, often demonstrated through fluorescent reporter expression (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009; Joti et al., 2011; Fairchild et al., 2016). However, the extent of CySC lineage driver expression in hub cells has not been well assayed.
To better understand the degree of CySC lineage GAL4 expression in the adult hub, we surveyed expression of four well-used transgenes: c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, and zfh1-GAL4. We combined each GAL4 driver with a ubiquitously expressed temperature sensitive (TS) GAL4 inhibitor, tub-GAL80TS, to suppress UAS construct expression during development (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004). After eclosion, adult flies were transferred from 18°C to 29°C or 31°C, to inactivate GAL80TS and trigger GAL4 activation of UAS transgenes. Due to the subjective nature of fluorescent reporter expression, we sought a reliable and sensitive read-out of GAL4 activity. We have previously demonstrated that hub cells are kept quiescent by the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma-family protein (Rbf) and that when hub cells lose Rbf (E132-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS/ UAS-Rbf RNAi), they enter mitosis and proliferate. Therefore, we hypothesized that if CySC lineage GAL4 drivers are active in hub cells, we would see an increase in the frequency of loss of hub cell quiescence upon GAL4-mediated Rbf reduction. As previously described, mitotic hub cells were identified by immunostaining testes for the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 (PH3); testes with at least one PH3-positive hub cell were scored as positives (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). As expected, expression of the control RNAi transgene (UAS-GFP RNAi) did not produce mitotic hub cells in any genotype under any condition (Fig. 1B, Table 1). By contrast, Rbf reduction by any one of the four CySC lineage GAL4 genotypes resulted in significantly higher frequencies of PH3-positive hub cell(s) following incubation at 31°C compared to control RNAi (Fig. 1C, Table 1). Surprisingly, the frequencies of testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) were similar to that of Rbf reduction in hub cells alone using the hub specific E132-GAL4 driver following 7 days at 31°C (29% of testes (Greenspan et al., 2022)). However, incubation of GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown flies at 29°C produced fewer or no testes with PH3-positive hub cells(s) (Table 1). This finding supports previous work that CySC lineage GAL4 driver expression is dependent on temperature and extends this expression pattern to include hub cells (Ma et al., 2014; Greenspan & Matunis, 2018). Altogether, these results demonstrate that GAL4 transgenes typically used for their expression in CySCs and their daughters can drive robustly in hub cells as well, especially when subjected to higher temperatures.
Studies have started to consider the expression of CySC lineage GAL4 drivers in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021; Grace et al., in prep). As such, a hub-specific GAL80 controlled by the endogenous hedgehog locus (hh-GAL80) was created to inactivate GAL4 expression in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021; Sainz de la Maza et al., 2025). In a similar approach, we introduced the hh-GAL80 transgene into the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers to demonstrate that the occurrence of PH3-positive hub cells following Rbf knockdown was indeed due to expression of GAL4 protein in hub cells. We first sought to confirm that the hh-GAL80 does suppress GAL4 expression in adult hub cells. First, we assessed testes from flies expressing UAS-RFP under the control of one of the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS) in the absence of hh-GAL80. As anticipated, we did not observe RFP in testes of flies kept at 18°C (Fig. 1D). However, after incubation at 31°C, we observed robust expression of RFP in the cyst lineage as well as some, but not all, hub cells (Fig. 1E). When we added hh-GAL80 to this genetic background (c587-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS; hh-GAL80), RFP expression in the hub was eliminated, confirming the specificity and efficacy of the GAL80 transgene (Fig. 1G). Further, when we assayed loss of hub quiescence, the addition of hh-GAL80 resulted in significant loss of PH3-positive hub cell(s) in testes of all four CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (Fig. 1F, Table 1). This confirms that indeed the loss of hub cell quiescence observed following Rbf reduction by the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers was due to GAL4 activity within hub cells, as opposed to a non-cell autonomous mechanism caused by Rbf reduction in surrounding CySCs.
| % Testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) | ||||
CySC Lineage GAL4 Driver | Presence of hh-GAL80 transgene | UAS line | 7-10 days at 18°C | 7-10 days at 29°C | 7-10 days at 31°C |
c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/99) | 0% (0/28) | 0% (0/123) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/97) | 5% (4/74)§,ns | 42% (83/199)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/35) | -- | 0% (0/148)a,**** | ||
tj-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/70) | 0% (0/123) | 0% (0/179) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/98) | 0% (0/105)§,ns | 37% (122/333)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/27) | -- | 0% (0/109)a,**** | ||
eyaA3-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/80) | 0% (0/45) | 0% (0/104) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/112) | 3% (3/90)§,ns | 41% (115/278)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/37) | -- | 0% (0/78)a,**** | ||
tub-GAL80TS; zfh1-GAL4 | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/25) | 0% (0/59) | 0% (0/35) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/39) | 12% (3/25)§,* | 18% (12/66)§,** | |
+ | 0% (0/10) | -- | 1% (1/108)a,**** |
Table 1. Concomitant inhibition of cyst stem cell lineage GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown in hub cells eliminates loss of hub cell quiescence.
Analyses using Fisher's exact test. (§) denotes comparison to respective GFP control. (a) denotes comparison between expression of UAS-Rbf RNAi with or without the hh-GAL80 transgene.
This work demonstrates that GAL4 transgenes commonly used to drive gene expression in CySCs and their daughters are also active in hub cells. Further, this expression is to such a degree that it can regulate UAS transgenes to generate pathological phenotypes, including the proliferation of normally quiescent cells. Future work using cyst lineage GAL4 drivers should consider hub expression and verify the specificity with transgenes like hh-GAL80.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert EA, Puretskaia OA, Terekhanova NV, Labudina A, Bökel C. 2018. Direct control of somatic stem cell proliferation factors by the\n Drosophila\n testis stem cell niche. Development 145: 10.1242/dev.156315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.156315"},{"reference":"Brand AH, Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.118.2.401"},{"reference":"Chen D, McKearin DM. 2003. A discrete transcriptional silencer in thebamgene determines asymmetric division of theDrosophilagermline stem cell. Development 130: 1159-1170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.00325"},{"reference":"Chiang ACY, Yang H, Yamashita YM. 2017. spict, a cyst cell-specific gene, regulates starvation-induced spermatogonial cell death in the Drosophila testis. Scientific Reports 7: 10.1038/srep40245.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep40245"},{"reference":"DiNardo S, Okegbe T, Wingert L, Freilich S, Terry N. 2011. linesandbowlaffect the specification of cyst stem cells and niche cells in theDrosophilatestis. Development 138: 1687-1696.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.057364"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Gehring WJ, Wieschaus E, Holliger M. 1976. The use of ‘normal’ and ‘transformed’ gynandromorphs in mapping the primordial germ cells and the gonadal mesoderm inDrosophila. Development 35: 607-616.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.35.3.607"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2015. Genetics of Gonadal Stem Cell Renewal. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31: 291-315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013344"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2018. Retinoblastoma Intrinsically Regulates Niche Cell Quiescence, Identity, and Niche Number in the Adult Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 24: 3466-3476.e8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.083"},{"reference":"Herrera SC, Sainz de la Maza D, Grmai L, Margolis S, Plessel R, Burel M, et al., Bach. 2021. Proliferative stem cells maintain quiescence of their niche by secreting the Activin inhibitor Follistatin. Developmental Cell 56: 2284-2294.e6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.010"},{"reference":"Hétié P, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2014. Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 7: 715-721.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.058"},{"reference":"Jenkins VK, Larkin A, Thurmond J, The FlyBase Consortium. 2022. Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology,Drosophila : 1-34.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-2541-5_1"},{"reference":"Joti P, Ghosh-Roy A, Ray K. 2011. Dynein light chain 1 functions in somatic cyst cells regulate spermatogonial divisions in Drosophila. Scientific Reports 1: 10.1038/srep00173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep00173"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressingbamtranscription in theDrosophilatestis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Lawrence PA, Johnston P. 1986. Observations on cell lineage of internal organs of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 91: 251-66.
","pubmedId":"3711788","doi":""},{"reference":"Leatherman JL, DiNardo S. 2008. Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Cell Stem Cell 3: 44-54.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.001"},{"reference":"Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D. 2003. The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biology 5: 994-1000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1058"},{"reference":"Ma Q, Wawersik M, Matunis EL. 2014. The Jak-STAT Target Chinmo Prevents Sex Transformation of Adult Stem Cells in the Drosophila Testis Niche. Developmental Cell 31: 474-486.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.004"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"McGuire SE, Mao Z, Davis RL. 2004. Spatiotemporal Gene Expression Targeting with the TARGET and Gene-Switch Systems in\n Drosophila. Science's STKE 2004: 10.1126/stke.2202004pl6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/stke.2202004pl6"},{"reference":"MCGUIRE S. 2004. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends in Genetics 20: 384-391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.012"},{"reference":"Papagiannouli F, Mechler BM. 2009. discs large regulates somatic cyst cell survival and expansion in Drosophila testis. Cell Research 19: 1139-1149.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/CR.2009.71"},{"reference":"Sainz de la Maza D, Jefferson H, Brucker CI, Paoli S, Amoyel M. 2025. Somatic cells compartmentalise their metabolism to sustain germ cell survival. : 10.1101/2025.07.22.666113.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2025.07.22.666113"},{"reference":"Schulz C, Kiger AA, Tazuke SI, Yamashita YM, Pantalena-Filho LC, Jones DL, Wood CG, Fuller MT. 2004. A misexpression screen reveals effects of bag-of-marbles and TGF beta class signaling on the Drosophila male germ-line stem cell lineage. Genetics 167(2): 707-23.
","pubmedId":"15238523","doi":""},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Szabad Jn, Nöthiger R. 1992. Gynandromorphs of Drosophila suggest one common primordium for the somatic cells of the female and male gonads in the region of abdominal segments 4 and 5. Development 115: 527-533.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.115.2.527"},{"reference":"Tanentzapf G, Devenport D, Godt D, Brown NH. 2007. Integrin-dependent anchoring of a stem-cell niche. Nature Cell Biology 9: 1413-1418.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1660"},{"reference":"Van Doren M, Williamson AL, Lehmann R. 1998. Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells. Current Biology 8: 243-246.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70091-0"},{"reference":"Zirin J, Jusiak B, Lopes R, Ewen-Campen B, Bosch JA, Risbeck A, et al., Perrimon. 2024. Expanding the Drosophila toolkit for dual control of gene expression. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.94073.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.94073"}],"title":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1775715883976"}]},{"id":"87fb4d78-486f-4a44-a306-19a3d1288524","decision":"revise","abstract":"Manipulating gene expression in the different cell types of the Drosophila melanogaster testis stem cell niche is critical to understanding its biology. Here, we tested the specificity of commonly used somatic cyst stem cell (CySC) lineage GAL4 drivers by assessing their abilities to promote loss of hub cell quiescence. We found that conditional reduction of the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma (Rbf) using c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, or zfh1-GAL4 is sufficient to drive quiescent hub cells into mitosis, with increased penetrance at higher temperature due to higher GAL4 activity. Concomitant inhibition of GAL4 expression in hub cells via hh-GAL80 eliminates hub cell proliferation, supporting that hub cells autonomously require Rbf to maintain quiescence. Thus, the activity of GAL4 drivers commonly used to manipulate the CySC lineage also functionally affect hub cells.
","acknowledgements":"We thank E. Bach, S. DiNardo, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; and M. de Cuevas and J. Grey for comments. Illustration created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","visualization"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"},{"awardId":"HD052937","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/fec39da5c040e4f64ada2ec758ed5272.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) Illustration of the testis apex containing niche (hub) cells (green) which are surrounded by and maintain Germline Stem Cells (GSCs, purple) and Cyst Stem Cells (CySCs, blue). As stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSCs give rise to gonialblasts (GBs) that divide to produce spermatogonia (SG) which undergo three additional rounds of transit amplification and ultimately produce sperm. CySCs divide and produce daughter cyst cells (CCs) that differentiate as they support adjacent germ cells. (B – G) Representative single confocal sections through testis apices from flies carrying the cyst cell driver, c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS, controlling expression of (B) UAS-GFP RNAi (control), (C,F) UAS-Rbf RNAi, or (D – E,G) UAS-RFP in the (B – E) absence or (F – G) presence of hh-GAL80. Testes were stained for hub cell membranes (Fasciclin3 (FasIII), green), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (B – C,F) mitotic cells (phospho-histone H3 (PH3), green) or (D – E,G) RFP (DsRed, magenta, insets). Duration and temperature of GAL4 induction indicated on images. Scale bars, 20 μm. Hubs outlined (dashed yellow lines).
","imageTitle":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 drivers can robustly drive UAS-transgene expression in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were raised on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Crosses were set and matured at 18°C. Male flies were used for all experiments and subjected to conditions as noted within the text, figure legend, and methods. See Reagents Table for a list of strains used in this study. The hh-GAL80 transgene was used in combination with GAL4 transgenes to inhibit GAL4 expression in hub cells (Herrera et al., 2021).
Temperature-based transgene induction
As previously described (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004), flies containing UAS and Gal4 constructs together with tub-GAL80TS transgenes were raised at the permissive temperature (18°C). Following eclosion, approximately 25 young male progeny (0-4 days old) were transferred into new vials and either kept at 18°C or incubated at restrictive temperatures (29°C or 31°C) for 7-10 days.
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997). All steps were performed at room temperature and on a nutating platform unless otherwise noted. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) for 20 min. After fixation, testes were rinsed two times followed by a 30 min wash in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then incubated in primary antibodies diluted in block overnight at 4°C, rinsed as above, incubated for an hour in PBX, then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed and washed for an hour in PBX with final rinses and a 10 min wash in 1X PBS before transfer to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin3 (FasIII; 1:50, DSHB, 7610) and phosho-histone H3 (PH3; 1:500, Cell Signaling, 9701), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11073), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI. Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices are shown in this paper.
Quantification of dividing hub cells
To identify hub cells in mitosis, testes were immunostained with an antibody to the mitotic marker PH3 as previously described (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). Testes with at least one hub cell (as identified by the membrane marker FasIII), that was PH3-positive were scored as positive for dividing hub cells.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11. For all statistical analysis, significant pairwise comparisons are shown as follows: ns = not significant, *p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001, and ***p value < 0.0001.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
c587-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}C587, w[*] | BDSC_67747 |
tj-GAL4 | y w; P{GawB}NP1624/CyO, UAS-LacZ | DGRC 104055 |
zfh1-GAL4 | zfh1::T2A::GAL4/TM6B, Tb | Gift of E. Bach (Albert et al., 2018) |
eyaA3-GAL4 | eyaA3-GAL4 | S. DiNardo (Leatherman and DiNardo, 2008) |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}10; TM2/TM6B, Tb[1] | BDSC_7108 |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}2/TM2 | BDSC_7017 |
UAS-Rbf RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS03004}attP2/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_36744 |
UAS-GFP RNAi | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-GFP.RNAi.R}142 | BDSC_9330 |
UAS-RFP | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
hh-GAL80 | GAL80hh-MI10526-T3XG80.0 | E. Bach (Herrera, et al., 2021) |
Among its numerous attributes, the ability to regulate gene expression in both a temporal and spatial manner makes Drosophila melanogaster one of the leading model organisms. Additionally, the public availability of numerous tissue-specific GAL4 transgenes allows for even greater genetic control (Brand & Perrimon, 1993; McGuire, Roman, et al., 2004; Jenkins et al., 2022; Zirin et al., 2024).
Studies using the Drosophila testis stem cell niche have relied upon the specificity of GAL4 transgenes to spatially restrict UAS transgene expression to specific groups of cells. The adult testis niche is located within the apical end of the testis, a coiled, blind-ended tubule. The niche houses three cell types: the germline stem cells (GSCs), the cyst stem cells (CySCs), and the niche cells, which are referred to as the hub. The GSCs are the sperm-producing cells of the testis and the somatic CySCs and daughter cyst cells (CCs) act to support GSCs and their daughters. The maintenance of the stem cell populations relies on the hub, a small cluster of tightly packed, quiescent cells, anchored to the testis’ apical end. (reviewed in (Greenspan et al., 2015; Siddall & Hime, 2017)).
To accurately interrogate stem cell niche biology there must be GAL4 transgenes specific to each cell type. The nature of the germline makes specificity achievable with transgenes like nanos-GAL4 (Van Doren et al., 1998) and bam-GAL4 (Chen & McKearin, 2003). By contrast, the hub cells, CySCs, and CCs are all somatic cells, descending from the same population of mesodermal cells in the embryo (Gehring et al., 1976; Lawrence & Johnston, 1986; Szabad & Nöthiger, 1992). Previous work has relied on the E132-GAL4 (also known as upd1-GAL4) to control UAS transgene expression in hub cells (Kawase et al., 2004). For expression in CySCs and/or their daughters, several GAL4 transgenes have been frequently used, with differing degrees of expression patterns ranging from broad (c587-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004) and tj-GAL4 (Li et al., 2003; Tanentzapf et al., 2007)) to more restricted (CySCs and early CCs: zfh1-GAL4 (Albert et al., 2018), fng-Gal4 (DiNardo et al., 2011), c833-GAL4 (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009), and ptc-GAL4 (Schulz et al., 2004); early and late CCs: spict-GAL4 (Chiang et al., 2017) and eyaA3-GAL4 (Leatherman & DiNardo, 2008)). However, these expression patterns can vary; when flies are incubated at higher temperatures the range of eyaA3-GAL4 expression has been shown to extend into CySCs (Ma et al., 2014) and Zfh1 protein expression increases in hub cells (Hétié et al., 2014). And of most significance, studies have noted that some of these GAL4 drivers (c833-GAL4 and tj-GAL4 in particular) are also expressed in hub cells, often demonstrated through fluorescent reporter expression (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009; Joti et al., 2011; Fairchild et al., 2016). However, the extent of CySC lineage driver expression in hub cells has not been well assayed.
To better understand the degree of CySC lineage GAL4 expression in the adult hub, we surveyed expression of four well-used transgenes: c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, and zfh1-GAL4. We combined each GAL4 driver with a ubiquitously expressed temperature sensitive (TS) GAL4 inhibitor, tub-GAL80TS, to suppress UAS construct expression during development (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004). After eclosion, adult flies were transferred from 18°C to 29°C or 31°C, to inactivate GAL80TS and trigger GAL4 activation of UAS transgenes. Due to the subjective nature of fluorescent reporter expression, we sought a reliable and sensitive read-out of GAL4 activity. We have previously demonstrated that hub cells are kept quiescent by the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma-family protein (Rbf) and that when hub cells lose Rbf (E132-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS/ UAS-Rbf RNAi), they enter mitosis and proliferate. Therefore, we hypothesized that if CySC lineage GAL4 drivers are active in hub cells, we would see an increase in the frequency of loss of hub cell quiescence upon GAL4-mediated Rbf reduction. As previously described, mitotic hub cells were identified by immunostaining testes for the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 (PH3); testes with at least one PH3-positive hub cell were scored as positives (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). As expected, expression of the control RNAi transgene (UAS-GFP RNAi) did not produce mitotic hub cells in any genotype under any condition (Fig. 1B, Table 1). By contrast, Rbf reduction by any one of the four CySC lineage GAL4 genotypes resulted in significantly higher frequencies of PH3-positive hub cell(s) following incubation at 31°C compared to control RNAi (Fig. 1C, Table 1). Surprisingly, the frequencies of testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) were similar to that of Rbf reduction in hub cells alone using the hub specific E132-GAL4 driver following 7 days at 31°C (29% of testes (Greenspan et al., 2022)). However, incubation of GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown flies at 29°C produced fewer or no testes with PH3-positive hub cells(s) (Table 1). This finding supports previous work that CySC lineage GAL4 driver expression is dependent on temperature and extends this expression pattern to include hub cells (Ma et al., 2014; Greenspan & Matunis, 2018). Altogether, these results demonstrate that GAL4 transgenes typically used for their expression in CySCs and their daughters can drive robustly in hub cells as well, especially when subjected to higher temperatures.
Studies have started to consider the expression of CySC lineage GAL4 drivers in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021; ; Sainz de la Maza et al., 2025; Grace et al., in prep). As such, a hub-specific GAL80 controlled by the endogenous hedgehog locus (hh-GAL80) was created to inactivate GAL4 expression in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021). In a similar approach, we introduced the hh-GAL80 transgene into the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers to demonstrate that the occurrence of PH3-positive hub cells following Rbf knockdown was indeed due to expression of GAL4 protein in hub cells. We first sought to confirm that the hh-GAL80 does suppress GAL4 expression in adult hub cells. First, we assessed testes from flies expressing UAS-RFP under the control of one of the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS) in the absence of hh-GAL80. As anticipated, we did not observe RFP in testes of flies kept at 18°C (Fig. 1D). However, after incubation at 31°C, we observed robust expression of RFP in the cyst lineage as well as some, but not all, hub cells (Fig. 1E). When we added hh-GAL80 to this genetic background (c587-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS; hh-GAL80), RFP expression in the hub was eliminated, confirming the specificity and efficacy of the GAL80 transgene (Fig. 1G). Further, when we assayed loss of hub quiescence, the addition of hh-GAL80 resulted in significant loss of PH3-positive hub cell(s) in testes of all four CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (Fig. 1F, Table 1). This confirms that indeed the loss of hub cell quiescence observed following Rbf reduction by the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers was due to GAL4 activity within hub cells, as opposed to a non-cell autonomous mechanism caused by Rbf reduction in surrounding CySCs.
Table 1. Concomitant inhibition of cyst stem cell lineage GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown in hub cells eliminates loss of hub cell quiescence.
| % Testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) | ||||
CySC Lineage GAL4 Driver | Presence of hh-GAL80 transgene | UAS line | 7-10 days at 18°C | 7-10 days at 29°C | 7-10 days at 31°C |
c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/99) | 0% (0/28) | 0% (0/123) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/97) | 5% (4/74)§,ns | 42% (83/199)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/35) | -- | 0% (0/148)a,**** | ||
tj-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/70) | 0% (0/123) | 0% (0/179) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/98) | 0% (0/105)§,ns | 37% (122/333)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/27) | -- | 0% (0/109)a,**** | ||
eyaA3-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/80) | 0% (0/45) | 0% (0/104) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/112) | 3% (3/90)§,ns | 41% (115/278)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/37) | -- | 0% (0/78)a,**** | ||
tub-GAL80TS; zfh1-GAL4 | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/25) | 0% (0/59) | 0% (0/35) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi | 0% (0/39) | 12% (3/25)§,* | 18% (12/66)§,** | |
+ | 0% (0/10) | -- | 1% (1/108)a,**** |
Analyses using Fisher's exact test. (§) denotes comparison to respective GFP control. (a) denotes comparison between expression of UAS-Rbf RNAi with or without the hh-GAL80 transgene.
This work demonstrates that GAL4 transgenes commonly used to drive gene expression in CySCs and their daughters are also active in hub cells. Further, this expression is to such a degree that it can regulate UAS transgenes to generate pathological phenotypes, including the proliferation of normally quiescent cells. Future work using cyst lineage GAL4 drivers should consider hub expression and verify the specificity with transgenes like hh-GAL80.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert EA, Puretskaia OA, Terekhanova NV, Labudina A, Bökel C. 2018. Direct control of somatic stem cell proliferation factors by the\n Drosophila\n testis stem cell niche. Development 145: 10.1242/dev.156315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.156315"},{"reference":"Brand AH, Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.118.2.401"},{"reference":"Chen D, McKearin DM. 2003. A discrete transcriptional silencer in thebamgene determines asymmetric division of theDrosophilagermline stem cell. Development 130: 1159-1170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.00325"},{"reference":"Chiang ACY, Yang H, Yamashita YM. 2017. spict, a cyst cell-specific gene, regulates starvation-induced spermatogonial cell death in the Drosophila testis. Scientific Reports 7: 10.1038/srep40245.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep40245"},{"reference":"DiNardo S, Okegbe T, Wingert L, Freilich S, Terry N. 2011. linesandbowlaffect the specification of cyst stem cells and niche cells in theDrosophilatestis. Development 138: 1687-1696.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.057364"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Gehring WJ, Wieschaus E, Holliger M. 1976. The use of ‘normal’ and ‘transformed’ gynandromorphs in mapping the primordial germ cells and the gonadal mesoderm inDrosophila. Development 35: 607-616.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.35.3.607"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2015. Genetics of Gonadal Stem Cell Renewal. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31: 291-315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013344"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2018. Retinoblastoma Intrinsically Regulates Niche Cell Quiescence, Identity, and Niche Number in the Adult Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 24: 3466-3476.e8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.083"},{"reference":"Herrera SC, Sainz de la Maza D, Grmai L, Margolis S, Plessel R, Burel M, et al., Bach. 2021. Proliferative stem cells maintain quiescence of their niche by secreting the Activin inhibitor Follistatin. Developmental Cell 56: 2284-2294.e6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.010"},{"reference":"Hétié P, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2014. Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 7: 715-721.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.058"},{"reference":"Jenkins VK, Larkin A, Thurmond J, The FlyBase Consortium. 2022. Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology,Drosophila : 1-34.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-2541-5_1"},{"reference":"Joti P, Ghosh-Roy A, Ray K. 2011. Dynein light chain 1 functions in somatic cyst cells regulate spermatogonial divisions in Drosophila. Scientific Reports 1: 10.1038/srep00173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep00173"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressingbamtranscription in theDrosophilatestis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Lawrence PA, Johnston P. 1986. Observations on cell lineage of internal organs of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 91: 251-66.
","pubmedId":"3711788","doi":""},{"reference":"Leatherman JL, DiNardo S. 2008. Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Cell Stem Cell 3: 44-54.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.001"},{"reference":"Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D. 2003. The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biology 5: 994-1000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1058"},{"reference":"Ma Q, Wawersik M, Matunis EL. 2014. The Jak-STAT Target Chinmo Prevents Sex Transformation of Adult Stem Cells in the Drosophila Testis Niche. Developmental Cell 31: 474-486.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.004"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"McGuire SE, Mao Z, Davis RL. 2004. Spatiotemporal Gene Expression Targeting with the TARGET and Gene-Switch Systems in\n Drosophila. Science's STKE 2004: 10.1126/stke.2202004pl6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/stke.2202004pl6"},{"reference":"MCGUIRE S. 2004. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends in Genetics 20: 384-391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.012"},{"reference":"Papagiannouli F, Mechler BM. 2009. discs large regulates somatic cyst cell survival and expansion in Drosophila testis. Cell Research 19: 1139-1149.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/CR.2009.71"},{"reference":"Sainz de la Maza D, Jefferson H, Brucker CI, Paoli S, Amoyel M. 2025. Somatic cells compartmentalise their metabolism to sustain germ cell survival. : 10.1101/2025.07.22.666113.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2025.07.22.666113"},{"reference":"Schulz C, Kiger AA, Tazuke SI, Yamashita YM, Pantalena-Filho LC, Jones DL, Wood CG, Fuller MT. 2004. A misexpression screen reveals effects of bag-of-marbles and TGF beta class signaling on the Drosophila male germ-line stem cell lineage. Genetics 167(2): 707-23.
","pubmedId":"15238523","doi":""},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Szabad Jn, Nöthiger R. 1992. Gynandromorphs of Drosophila suggest one common primordium for the somatic cells of the female and male gonads in the region of abdominal segments 4 and 5. Development 115: 527-533.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.115.2.527"},{"reference":"Tanentzapf G, Devenport D, Godt D, Brown NH. 2007. Integrin-dependent anchoring of a stem-cell niche. Nature Cell Biology 9: 1413-1418.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1660"},{"reference":"Van Doren M, Williamson AL, Lehmann R. 1998. Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells. Current Biology 8: 243-246.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70091-0"},{"reference":"Zirin J, Jusiak B, Lopes R, Ewen-Campen B, Bosch JA, Risbeck A, et al., Perrimon. 2024. Expanding the Drosophila toolkit for dual control of gene expression. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.94073.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.94073"}],"title":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"236e0f44-b50e-4fbe-bdfb-3dd672ceb806","decision":"publish","abstract":"Manipulating gene expression in the different cell types of the Drosophila melanogaster testis stem cell niche is critical to understanding its biology. Here, we tested the specificity of commonly used somatic cyst stem cell (CySC) lineage GAL4 drivers by assessing their abilities to promote loss of hub cell quiescence. We found that conditional reduction of the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma (Rbf) using c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, or zfh1-GAL4 is sufficient to drive quiescent hub cells into mitosis, with increased penetrance at higher temperature due to higher GAL4 activity. Concomitant inhibition of GAL4 expression in hub cells via hh-GAL80 eliminates hub cell proliferation, supporting that hub cells autonomously require Rbf to maintain quiescence. Thus, the activity of GAL4 drivers commonly used to manipulate the CySC lineage also functionally affect hub cells.
","acknowledgements":"We thank E. Bach, S. DiNardo, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537), and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; and M. de Cuevas and J. Grey for comments. Illustration created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","visualization"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"},{"awardId":"HD052937","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/fec39da5c040e4f64ada2ec758ed5272.png"},"imageCaption":"(A) Illustration of the testis apex containing niche (hub) cells (green) which are surrounded by and maintain Germline Stem Cells (GSCs, purple) and Cyst Stem Cells (CySCs, blue). As stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSCs give rise to gonialblasts (GBs) that divide to produce spermatogonia (SG) which undergo three additional rounds of transit amplification and ultimately produce sperm. CySCs divide and produce daughter cyst cells (CCs) that differentiate as they support adjacent germ cells. (B – G) Representative single confocal sections through testis apices from flies carrying the cyst cell driver, c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS, controlling expression of (B) UAS-GFP RNAi (control), (C,F) UAS-Rbf RNAi, or (D – E,G) UAS-RFP in the (B – E) absence or (F – G) presence of hh-GAL80. Testes were stained for hub cell membranes (Fasciclin3 (FasIII), green), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (B – C,F) mitotic cells (phospho-histone H3 (PH3), green) or (D – E,G) RFP (DsRed, magenta, insets). Duration and temperature of GAL4 induction indicated on images. Scale bars, 20 μm. Hubs outlined (dashed yellow lines).
","imageTitle":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 drivers can robustly drive UAS-transgene expression in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were raised on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Crosses were set and matured at 18°C. Male flies were used for all experiments and subjected to conditions as noted within the text, figure legend, and methods. See Reagents Table for a list of strains used in this study. The hh-GAL80 transgene was used in combination with GAL4 transgenes to inhibit GAL4 expression in hub cells (Herrera et al., 2021).
Temperature-based transgene induction
As previously described (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004), flies containing UAS and Gal4 constructs together with tub-GAL80TS transgenes were raised at the permissive temperature (18°C). Following eclosion, approximately 25 young male progeny (0-4 days old) were transferred into new vials and either kept at 18°C or incubated at restrictive temperatures (29°C or 31°C) for 7-10 days.
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997). All steps were performed at room temperature and on a nutating platform unless otherwise noted. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) for 20 min. After fixation, testes were rinsed two times followed by a 30 min wash in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then incubated in primary antibodies diluted in block overnight at 4°C, rinsed as above, incubated for an hour in PBX, then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed and washed for an hour in PBX with final rinses and a 10 min wash in 1X PBS before transfer to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin3 (FasIII; 1:50, DSHB, 7610) and phosho-histone H3 (PH3; 1:500, Cell Signaling, 9701), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11073), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI. Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices are shown in this paper.
Quantification of dividing hub cells
To identify hub cells in mitosis, testes were immunostained with an antibody to the mitotic marker PH3 as previously described (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). Testes with at least one hub cell (as identified by the membrane marker FasIII), that was PH3-positive were scored as positive for dividing hub cells.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11. For all statistical analysis, significant pairwise comparisons are shown as follows: ns = not significant, *p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001, and ***p value < 0.0001.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
c587-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}C587, w[*] | BDSC_67747 |
tj-GAL4 | y w; P{GawB}NP1624/CyO, UAS-LacZ | DGRC 104055 |
zfh1-GAL4 | zfh1::T2A::GAL4/TM6B, Tb | Gift of E. Bach (Albert et al., 2018) |
eyaA3-GAL4 | eyaA3-GAL4 | S. DiNardo (Leatherman and DiNardo, 2008) |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}10; TM2/TM6B, Tb[1] | BDSC_7108 |
tub-GAL80TS | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=tubP-GAL80[ts]}2/TM2 | BDSC_7017 |
UAS-Rbf RNAi (III) | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS03004}attP2/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_36744 |
UAS-Rbf RNAi (II) | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.GL01293}attP40 | BDSC_41863 |
UAS-GFP RNAi | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-GFP.RNAi.R}142 | BDSC_9330 |
UAS-RFP | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
hh-GAL80 | GAL80hh-MI10526-T3XG80.0 | E. Bach (Herrera, et al., 2021) |
Among its numerous attributes, the ability to regulate gene expression in both a temporal and spatial manner makes Drosophila melanogaster one of the leading model organisms. Additionally, the public availability of numerous tissue-specific GAL4 transgenes allows for even greater genetic control (Brand & Perrimon, 1993; McGuire, Roman, et al., 2004; Jenkins et al., 2022; Zirin et al., 2024).
Studies using the Drosophila testis stem cell niche have relied upon the specificity of GAL4 transgenes to spatially restrict UAS transgene expression to specific groups of cells. The adult testis niche is located within the apical end of the testis, a coiled, blind-ended tubule. The niche houses three cell types: the germline stem cells (GSCs), the cyst stem cells (CySCs), and the niche cells, which are referred to as the hub. The GSCs are the sperm-producing cells of the testis and the somatic CySCs and daughter cyst cells (CCs) act to support GSCs and their daughters. The maintenance of the stem cell populations relies on the hub, a small cluster of tightly packed, quiescent cells, anchored to the testis’ apical end. (reviewed in (Greenspan et al., 2015; Siddall & Hime, 2017)).
To accurately interrogate stem cell niche biology there must be GAL4 transgenes specific to each cell type. The nature of the germline makes specificity achievable with transgenes like nanos-GAL4 (Van Doren et al., 1998) and bam-GAL4 (Chen & McKearin, 2003). By contrast, the hub cells, CySCs, and CCs are all somatic cells, descending from the same population of mesodermal cells in the embryo (Gehring et al., 1976; Lawrence & Johnston, 1986; Szabad & Nöthiger, 1992). Previous work has relied on the E132-GAL4 (also known as upd1-GAL4) to control UAS transgene expression in hub cells (Kawase et al., 2004). For expression in CySCs and/or their daughters, several GAL4 transgenes have been frequently used, with differing degrees of expression patterns ranging from broad (c587-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004) and tj-GAL4 (Li et al., 2003; Tanentzapf et al., 2007)) to more restricted (CySCs and early CCs: zfh1-GAL4 (Albert et al., 2018), fng-Gal4 (DiNardo et al., 2011), c833-GAL4 (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009), and ptc-GAL4 (Schulz et al., 2004); early and late CCs: spict-GAL4 (Chiang et al., 2017) and eyaA3-GAL4 (Leatherman & DiNardo, 2008)). However, these expression patterns can vary; when flies are incubated at higher temperatures the range of eyaA3-GAL4 expression has been shown to extend into CySCs (Ma et al., 2014) and Zfh1 protein expression increases in hub cells (Hétié et al., 2014). And of most significance, studies have noted that some of these GAL4 drivers (c833-GAL4 and tj-GAL4 in particular) are also expressed in hub cells, often demonstrated through fluorescent reporter expression (Papagiannouli & Mechler, 2009; Joti et al., 2011; Fairchild et al., 2016). However, the extent of CySC lineage driver expression in hub cells has not been well assayed.
To better understand the degree of CySC lineage GAL4 expression in the adult hub, we surveyed expression of four well-used transgenes: c587-GAL4, tj-GAL4, eyaA3-GAL4, and zfh1-GAL4. We combined each GAL4 driver with a ubiquitously expressed temperature sensitive (TS) GAL4 inhibitor, tub-GAL80TS, to suppress UAS construct expression during development (McGuire, Mao, et al., 2004). After eclosion, adult flies were transferred from 18°C to 29°C or 31°C, to inactivate GAL80TS and trigger GAL4 activation of UAS transgenes. Due to the subjective nature of fluorescent reporter expression, we sought a reliable and sensitive read-out of GAL4 activity. We have previously demonstrated that hub cells are kept quiescent by the cell cycle inhibitor Retinoblastoma-family protein (Rbf) and that when hub cells lose Rbf (E132-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS/ UAS-Rbf RNAi), they enter mitosis and proliferate. Therefore, we hypothesized that if CySC lineage GAL4 drivers are active in hub cells, we would see an increase in the frequency of loss of hub cell quiescence upon GAL4-mediated Rbf reduction. As previously described, mitotic hub cells were identified by immunostaining testes for the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 (PH3); testes with at least one PH3-positive hub cell were scored as positives (Greenspan & Matunis, 2018; Greenspan et al., 2022). As expected, expression of the control RNAi transgene (UAS-GFP RNAi) did not produce mitotic hub cells in any genotype under any condition (Fig. 1B, Table 1). By contrast, Rbf reduction by any one of the four CySC lineage GAL4 genotypes resulted in significantly higher frequencies of PH3-positive hub cell(s) following incubation at 31°C compared to control RNAi (Fig. 1C, Table 1). Surprisingly, the frequencies of testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) were similar to that of Rbf reduction in hub cells alone using the hub specific E132-GAL4 driver following 7 days at 31°C (29% of testes (Greenspan et al., 2022)). However, incubation of GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown flies at 29°C produced fewer or no testes with PH3-positive hub cells(s) (Table 1). This finding supports previous work that CySC lineage GAL4 driver expression is dependent on temperature and extends this expression pattern to include hub cells (Ma et al., 2014; Greenspan & Matunis, 2018). Altogether, these results demonstrate that GAL4 transgenes typically used for their expression in CySCs and their daughters can drive robustly in hub cells as well, especially when subjected to higher temperatures.
Studies have started to consider the expression of CySC lineage GAL4 drivers in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021; ; Sainz de la Maza et al., 2025; Grace et al., in prep). As such, a hub-specific GAL80 controlled by the endogenous hedgehog locus (hh-GAL80) was created to inactivate GAL4 expression in the hub (Herrera et al., 2021). In a similar approach, we introduced the hh-GAL80 transgene into the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers to demonstrate that the occurrence of PH3-positive hub cells following Rbf knockdown was indeed due to expression of GAL4 protein in hub cells. We first sought to confirm that the hh-GAL80 does suppress GAL4 expression in adult hub cells. First, we assessed testes from flies expressing UAS-RFP under the control of one of the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS) in the absence of hh-GAL80. As anticipated, we did not observe RFP in testes of flies kept at 18°C (Fig. 1D). However, after incubation at 31°C, we observed robust expression of RFP in the cyst lineage as well as some, but not all, hub cells (Fig. 1E). When we added hh-GAL80 to this genetic background (c587-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS; hh-GAL80), RFP expression in the hub was eliminated, confirming the specificity and efficacy of the GAL80 transgene (Fig. 1G). Further, when we assayed loss of hub quiescence, the addition of hh-GAL80 resulted in significant loss of PH3-positive hub cell(s) in testes of all four CySC lineage GAL4 drivers (Fig. 1F, Table 1). This confirms that indeed the loss of hub cell quiescence observed following Rbf reduction by the CySC lineage GAL4 drivers was due to GAL4 activity within hub cells, as opposed to a non-cell autonomous mechanism caused by Rbf reduction in surrounding CySCs.
Table 1. Concomitant inhibition of cyst stem cell lineage GAL4-mediated Rbf knockdown in hub cells eliminates loss of hub cell quiescence.
| % Testes with PH3-positive hub cell(s) | ||||
CySC Lineage GAL4 Driver | Presence of hh-GAL80 transgene | UAS line | 7-10 days at 18°C | 7-10 days at 29°C | 7-10 days at 31°C |
c587-GAL4;; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/99) | 0% (0/28) | 0% (0/123) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi (III) | 0% (0/97) | 5% (4/74)§,ns | 42% (83/199)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/35) | -- | 0% (0/148)a,**** | ||
tj-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/70) | 0% (0/123) | 0% (0/179) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi (III) | 0% (0/98) | 0% (0/105)§,ns | 37% (122/333)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/27) | -- | 0% (0/109)a,**** | ||
eyaA3-GAL4; tub-GAL80TS | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/80) | 0% (0/45) | 0% (0/104) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi (III) | 0% (0/112) | 3% (3/90)§,ns | 41% (115/278)§,**** | |
+ | 0% (0/37) | -- | 0% (0/78)a,**** | ||
tub-GAL80TS; zfh1-GAL4 | - | UAS-GFP RNAi | 0% (0/25) | 0% (0/59) | 0% (0/35) |
- | UAS-Rbf RNAi (II) | 0% (0/39) | 12% (3/25)§,* | 18% (12/66)§,** | |
+ | 0% (0/10) | -- | 1% (1/108)a,**** |
Analyses using Fisher's exact test. (§) denotes comparison to respective GFP control. (a) denotes comparison between expression of UAS-Rbf RNAi with or without the hh-GAL80 transgene.
This work demonstrates that GAL4 transgenes commonly used to drive gene expression in CySCs and their daughters are also active in hub cells. Further, this expression is to such a degree that it can regulate UAS transgenes to generate pathological phenotypes, including the proliferation of normally quiescent cells. Future work using cyst lineage GAL4 drivers should consider hub expression and verify the specificity with transgenes like hh-GAL80.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert EA, Puretskaia OA, Terekhanova NV, Labudina A, Bökel C. 2018. Direct control of somatic stem cell proliferation factors by the\n Drosophila\n testis stem cell niche. Development 145: 10.1242/dev.156315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.156315"},{"reference":"Brand AH, Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401-415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.118.2.401"},{"reference":"Chen D, McKearin DM. 2003. A discrete transcriptional silencer in thebamgene determines asymmetric division of theDrosophilagermline stem cell. Development 130: 1159-1170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.00325"},{"reference":"Chiang ACY, Yang H, Yamashita YM. 2017. spict, a cyst cell-specific gene, regulates starvation-induced spermatogonial cell death in the Drosophila testis. Scientific Reports 7: 10.1038/srep40245.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep40245"},{"reference":"DiNardo S, Okegbe T, Wingert L, Freilich S, Terry N. 2011. linesandbowlaffect the specification of cyst stem cells and niche cells in theDrosophilatestis. Development 138: 1687-1696.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.057364"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Gehring WJ, Wieschaus E, Holliger M. 1976. The use of ‘normal’ and ‘transformed’ gynandromorphs in mapping the primordial germ cells and the gonadal mesoderm inDrosophila. Development 35: 607-616.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.35.3.607"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2015. Genetics of Gonadal Stem Cell Renewal. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31: 291-315.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013344"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2018. Retinoblastoma Intrinsically Regulates Niche Cell Quiescence, Identity, and Niche Number in the Adult Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 24: 3466-3476.e8.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.083"},{"reference":"Herrera SC, Sainz de la Maza D, Grmai L, Margolis S, Plessel R, Burel M, et al., Bach. 2021. Proliferative stem cells maintain quiescence of their niche by secreting the Activin inhibitor Follistatin. Developmental Cell 56: 2284-2294.e6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.010"},{"reference":"Hétié P, de Cuevas M, Matunis E. 2014. Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis. Cell Reports 7: 715-721.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.058"},{"reference":"Jenkins VK, Larkin A, Thurmond J, The FlyBase Consortium. 2022. Using FlyBase: A Database of Drosophila Genes and Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology,Drosophila : 1-34.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-2541-5_1"},{"reference":"Joti P, Ghosh-Roy A, Ray K. 2011. Dynein light chain 1 functions in somatic cyst cells regulate spermatogonial divisions in Drosophila. Scientific Reports 1: 10.1038/srep00173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep00173"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressingbamtranscription in theDrosophilatestis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"doi.org/10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Lawrence PA, Johnston P. 1986. Observations on cell lineage of internal organs of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 91: 251-66.
","pubmedId":"3711788","doi":""},{"reference":"Leatherman JL, DiNardo S. 2008. Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Cell Stem Cell 3: 44-54.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.001"},{"reference":"Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D. 2003. The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biology 5: 994-1000.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1058"},{"reference":"Ma Q, Wawersik M, Matunis EL. 2014. The Jak-STAT Target Chinmo Prevents Sex Transformation of Adult Stem Cells in the Drosophila Testis Niche. Developmental Cell 31: 474-486.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.004"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"McGuire SE, Mao Z, Davis RL. 2004. Spatiotemporal Gene Expression Targeting with the TARGET and Gene-Switch Systems in\n Drosophila. Science's STKE 2004: 10.1126/stke.2202004pl6.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/stke.2202004pl6"},{"reference":"MCGUIRE S. 2004. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: a synthesis of time and space. Trends in Genetics 20: 384-391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.012"},{"reference":"Papagiannouli F, Mechler BM. 2009. discs large regulates somatic cyst cell survival and expansion in Drosophila testis. Cell Research 19: 1139-1149.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/CR.2009.71"},{"reference":"Sainz de la Maza D, Jefferson H, Brucker CI, Paoli S, Amoyel M. 2025. Somatic cells compartmentalise their metabolism to sustain germ cell survival. : 10.1101/2025.07.22.666113.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2025.07.22.666113"},{"reference":"Schulz C, Kiger AA, Tazuke SI, Yamashita YM, Pantalena-Filho LC, Jones DL, Wood CG, Fuller MT. 2004. A misexpression screen reveals effects of bag-of-marbles and TGF beta class signaling on the Drosophila male germ-line stem cell lineage. Genetics 167(2): 707-23.
","pubmedId":"15238523","doi":""},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Szabad Jn, Nöthiger R. 1992. Gynandromorphs of Drosophila suggest one common primordium for the somatic cells of the female and male gonads in the region of abdominal segments 4 and 5. Development 115: 527-533.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.115.2.527"},{"reference":"Tanentzapf G, Devenport D, Godt D, Brown NH. 2007. Integrin-dependent anchoring of a stem-cell niche. Nature Cell Biology 9: 1413-1418.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/ncb1660"},{"reference":"Van Doren M, Williamson AL, Lehmann R. 1998. Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells. Current Biology 8: 243-246.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70091-0"},{"reference":"Zirin J, Jusiak B, Lopes R, Ewen-Campen B, Bosch JA, Risbeck A, et al., Perrimon. 2024. Expanding the Drosophila toolkit for dual control of gene expression. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.94073.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.94073"}],"title":"Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"c04e52ef-ddcc-4424-883d-88d4fc3c8db9","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}