We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae: a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fecundity of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of triploid offspring (x axis). b. New method for measuring cell size to assess ploidy (mTR = medial Triple Row). See Methods. c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock, while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults.
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each, five vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and ~10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation, Drop (Dr) on one third chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation, Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) has been described (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then screened for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, and eventually pupariate and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a defined region of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is subject to the fickleness of hair siting in the square area. We devised a more precise metric (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where bristles abut one another, with no intervening cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We bend a wire to (1) trace the curve of the mTR,(2) stretch it along a ruler to measure mTR length, and (3) divide that length, adjusted for magnification, by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR.
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Description
Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed larvae colcemid, an anti-mitotic drug. Colcemid’s ability to double germ cell ploidy was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploid offspring was limited by the toxicity of the drug. The frequency of triploid (3n) offspring rose to 18% at 5 µg/ml, but 90% of the treated mothers did not survive this dose.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid should be as vexing as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fecundity, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µm/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fecundity. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more dose before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fecund) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. F1 larvae from Brood #3 were transferred to drug-free food after 6 days to enhance survival. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, whereas none were found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies do not recombine.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found—28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were definite intersexes, and the 3n ploidy of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Figure 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females, 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare event, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 3, 2).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was equally impotent when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We settled upon testing the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the remainder of their development. Five control vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (average = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (average =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fecundity of these 55 mothers decreased as the percent of their offspring that were 3n increased (see Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution as was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons are that (1) adult females digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females use a different (colcemid-resistent) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289(21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be so much more resistant than those of their sisters in the same vials?
","references":[{"reference":"Dobzhansky, T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. W. Roux' Arch. 115(3): 363-379. PubMed ID: 28353864
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein, V, Posakony, JW 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107: 389-405. PubMed ID: 2517255
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 94: 87-101. PubMed ID: 6808392
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI Jr. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly 19(1): Article #2572865. PubMed ID: 41074402
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held, L I, Jr., Banerjee SJ, Roy, S, Nawaz, HA, Hanes, JR, Ritte, G, … et al. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPub. Biol.: 10.17912/001439. PubMed ID: 39967798
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada, MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz, K. 2020. Regulation of body size and growth control. Genetics 216: 269-313. PubMed ID: 33023929
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut, W, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat. Res. 23: 179-188. PubMed ID: 4209294
","pubmedId":"","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"79724dd8-2636-45e4-a3fe-79df0f58ff6c","decision":"revise","abstract":"We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah M.","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fertility of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of adult triploid offspring (x axis). The trend line, which has a non-zero slope (p<0.0001), was plotted by linear regression (see Methods): y = 1.705*x + 164.7 (R2 = 0.3861). b. Our new technique for measuring average cell diameter along the wing margin (mTR = medial Triple Row) in order to assess a fly's level of ploidy (see Methods). c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. Blue triangles denote means. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock (64 wings total; mean = 15.8; s.d. = 0.68), while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults (47 wings total; mean = 18.6; s.d. = 0.70). The 2n vs. 3n distributions are significantly different (p<0.0001; t test).
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each dose, 5 vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and 10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation Drop (Dr) on one 3rd chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) is 100% reliable (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then inspected for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in the food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, pupariate, and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a sample square area in the middle of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is hampered by (1) the fickleness of hair scattering from fly to fly and (2) the difficulty of distinguishing upper vs. lower surfaces of the wing in the plane of focus. We devised a more accurate method (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where adjacent bristles are not separated by any intervening epidermal cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We used a flexible wire to trace the curve of the mTR and then stretched the wire along a ruler to measure mTR length. Dividing that length (adjusted for magnification) by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR gives the average cell diameter (or a fixed multiple thereof).
We tested the accuracy of this approach by modeling cells as spheres. Given the proportionality of cell volume to ploidy (Fankauser, 1945), we expect the volume of a 3n cell to be 1.5 times that of a 2n cell. Hence, the diameter of a 3n cell should be the cube root of 1.5 (1.145) times the diameter of a 2n cell. If we multiply the mean interval between mTR bristles on 2n wings (15.8 µm) by 1.145, we calculate the expected interval between mTR bristles on 3n wings to be 18.1 µm. This number agrees well with the observed interval of 18.6 µm: the discrepancy (0.5 µm) is within one standard deviation (0.7 µm).
4. Statistics
To define the negative correlation between the fertility of colcemid-fed females and the proportion of 3n individuals among their offspring (Fig. 1a), we calculated the linear regression between these two parameters to obtain its equation. To compare the difference in cell diameter along the wing margin between 2n and 3n flies (Fig. 1c), we performed a two-tailed unpaired t test (p<0.0001), after verifying the normality of both datasets with the Shapiro-Wilk test (no statistical deviation was detected: p=0.053 for 2n; p=0.801 for 3n).
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed them colcemid, which disables the mitotic spindle. Colcemid’s ability to double the ploidy of germ cells in larvae was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploids fell sharply at higher doses. The percentage of triploid (3n) offspring peaked at 5 µg/ml (18%), but 90% of the mothers exposed to this dose died before adulthood. One of our goals in the present investigation was to devise a less toxic protocol.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid is as futile as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fertility, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µg/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fertility. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more exposure before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fertile) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the Sb-bearing TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, while only a single +/+ fly was found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies in this species do not undergo meiotic recombination, though crossovers might rarely occur during germ cell mitotic divisions.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found: 28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were intersexual (with sex combs, deformed genitalia, and incised wings), and the 3n status of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Fig. 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females and 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare spurt, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 2, and 3/vial).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was effective when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We tested the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the rest of their development. Five control (non-drug) vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (mean = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (mean =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fertility of these 55 mothers was negatively correlated with the percentage of their offspring that were 3n (Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution that was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons for the discrepancy in adult vs. larval sensitivity (aside from colcemid impotence) include: (1) adult females might digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females might use a different (colcemid-resistent?) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289 (21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be more resistant than those of their sisters, who were raised alongside them in the same vials? The disparity might be due to a male-specific (colcemid-resistant?) beta-tubulin isoform that exists in testes (Kemphues et al., 1982).
","references":[{"reference":"Dobzhansky T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. W. Roux' Arch. 115(3): 363-379. PubMed ID: 28353864
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Fankhauser G. 1945. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 20-78.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein V, Posakony JW. 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107: 389-405. PubMed ID: 2517255
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 94: 87-101. PubMed ID: 6808392
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly 19(1): Article #2572865. PubMed ID: 41074402
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held, LI, Jr., Banerjee SJ, Roy S, Nawaz HA, Hanes JR, Ritte G, … et al. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPub. Biol.: 10.17912/001439. PubMed ID: 39967798
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC. 1982. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31(3 Pt 2): 655-70.
","pubmedId":"6819086","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz, K. 2020. Regulation of body size and growth control. Genetics 216: 269-313. PubMed ID: 33023929
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut W, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat. Res. 23: 179-188. PubMed ID: 4209294
","pubmedId":"","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Artyom Kopp"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1780902025460"}]},{"id":"79cacfbc-68b8-403a-8fec-a51eed459b76","decision":"accept","abstract":"We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah M.","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fertility of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of adult triploid offspring (x axis). The trend line, which has a non-zero slope (p<0.0001), was plotted by linear regression (see Methods): y = 1.705*x + 164.7 (R2 = 0.3861). b. Our new technique for measuring average cell diameter along the wing margin (mTR = medial Triple Row) in order to assess a fly's level of ploidy (see Methods). c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. Blue triangles denote means. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock (64 wings total; mean = 15.8; s.d. = 0.68), while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults (47 wings total; mean = 18.6; s.d. = 0.70). The 2n vs. 3n distributions are significantly different (p<0.0001; t test).
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each dose, 5 vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and 10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation Drop (Dr) on one 3rd chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) is 100% reliable (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then inspected for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in the food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, pupariate, and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a sample square area in the middle of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is hampered by (1) the fickleness of hair scattering from fly to fly and (2) the difficulty of distinguishing upper vs. lower surfaces of the wing in the plane of focus. We devised a more accurate method (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where adjacent bristles are not separated by any intervening epidermal cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We used a flexible wire to trace the curve of the mTR and then stretched the wire along a ruler to measure mTR length. Dividing that length (adjusted for magnification) by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR gives the average cell diameter (or a fixed multiple thereof).
We tested the accuracy of this approach by modeling cells as spheres. Given the proportionality of cell volume to ploidy (Fankauser, 1945), we expect the volume of a 3n cell to be 1.5 times that of a 2n cell. Hence, the diameter of a 3n cell should be the cube root of 1.5 (1.145) times the diameter of a 2n cell. If we multiply the mean interval between mTR bristles on 2n wings (15.8 µm) by 1.145, we calculate the expected interval between mTR bristles on 3n wings to be 18.1 µm. This number agrees well with the observed interval of 18.6 µm: the discrepancy (0.5 µm) is within one standard deviation (0.7 µm).
4. Statistics
To define the negative correlation between the fertility of colcemid-fed females and the proportion of 3n individuals among their offspring (Fig. 1a), we calculated the linear regression between these two parameters to obtain its equation. To compare the difference in cell diameter along the wing margin between 2n and 3n flies (Fig. 1c), we performed a two-tailed unpaired t test (p<0.0001), after verifying the normality of both datasets with the Shapiro-Wilk test (no statistical deviation was detected: p=0.053 for 2n; p=0.801 for 3n).
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed them colcemid, which disables the mitotic spindle. Colcemid’s ability to double the ploidy of germ cells in larvae was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploids fell sharply at higher doses. The percentage of triploid (3n) offspring peaked at 5 µg/ml (18%), but 90% of the mothers exposed to this dose died before adulthood. One of our goals in the present investigation was to devise a less toxic protocol.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid is as futile as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fertility, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µg/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fertility. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more exposure before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fertile) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the Sb-bearing TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, while only a single +/+ fly was found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies in this species do not undergo meiotic recombination, though crossovers might rarely occur during germ cell mitotic divisions.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found: 28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were intersexual (with sex combs, deformed genitalia, and incised wings), and the 3n status of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Fig. 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females and 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare spurt, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 2, and 3/vial).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was effective when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We tested the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the rest of their development. Five control (non-drug) vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (mean = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (mean =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fertility of these 55 mothers was negatively correlated with the percentage of their offspring that were 3n (Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution that was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons for the discrepancy in adult vs. larval sensitivity (aside from colcemid impotence) include: (1) adult females might digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females might use a different (colcemid-resistent?) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289 (21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be more resistant than those of their sisters, who were raised alongside them in the same vials? The disparity might be due to a male-specific (colcemid-resistant?) beta-tubulin isoform that exists in testes (Kemphues et al., 1982).
Alternatively, might diploid sperm be induced by colcemid but afterwards unable to fertilize eggs for some reason? In theory, yes, but this explanation is unlikely because compound-2, compound-3 fly stocks are known to be stable (Ashburner, 1989), presumably because nullo-2, nullo-3 eggs are regularly fertilized by 2n (double-compound) sperm.
","references":[{"reference":"Ashburner M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Pr., NY.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dobzhansky T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. W. Roux' Arch. 115(3): 363-379. PubMed ID: 28353864
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Fankhauser G. 1945. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 20-78.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein V, Posakony JW. 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107: 389-405. PubMed ID: 2517255
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 94: 87-101. PubMed ID: 6808392
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly 19(1): Article #2572865. PubMed ID: 41074402
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held, LI, Jr., Banerjee SJ, Roy S, Nawaz HA, Hanes JR, Ritte G, … et al. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPub. Biol.: 10.17912/001439. PubMed ID: 39967798
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC. 1982. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31(3 Pt 2): 655-70.
","pubmedId":"6819086","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz, K. 2020. Regulation of body size and growth control. Genetics 216: 269-313. PubMed ID: 33023929
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut W, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat. Res. 23: 179-188. PubMed ID: 4209294
","pubmedId":"","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"c71ee967-d7fb-4ae3-9874-cf4764e4fd55","decision":"revise","abstract":"We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah M.","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fertility of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of adult triploid offspring (x axis). The trend line, which has a non-zero slope (p<0.0001), was plotted by linear regression (see Methods): y = 1.705*x + 164.7 (R2 = 0.3861). b. Our new technique for measuring average cell diameter along the wing margin (mTR = medial Triple Row) in order to assess a fly's level of ploidy (see Methods). c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. Blue triangles denote means. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock (64 wings total; mean = 15.8; s.d. = 0.68), while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults (47 wings total; mean = 18.6; s.d. = 0.70). The 2n vs. 3n distributions are significantly different (p<0.0001; t test).
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each dose, 5 vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and 10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation Drop (Dr) on one 3rd chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) is 100% reliable (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then inspected for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in the food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, pupariate, and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a sample square area in the middle of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is hampered by (1) the fickleness of hair scattering from fly to fly and (2) the difficulty of distinguishing upper vs. lower surfaces of the wing in the plane of focus. We devised a more accurate method (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where adjacent bristles are not separated by any intervening epidermal cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We used a flexible wire to trace the curve of the mTR and then stretched the wire along a ruler to measure mTR length. Dividing that length (adjusted for magnification) by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR gives the average cell diameter (or a fixed multiple thereof).
We tested the accuracy of this approach by modeling cells as spheres. Given the proportionality of cell volume to ploidy (Fankauser, 1945), we expect the volume of a 3n cell to be 1.5 times that of a 2n cell. Hence, the diameter of a 3n cell should be the cube root of 1.5 (1.145) times the diameter of a 2n cell. If we multiply the mean interval between mTR bristles on 2n wings (15.8 µm) by 1.145, we calculate the expected interval between mTR bristles on 3n wings to be 18.1 µm. This number agrees well with the observed interval of 18.6 µm: the discrepancy (0.5 µm) is within one standard deviation (0.7 µm).
4. Statistics
To define the negative correlation between the fertility of colcemid-fed females and the proportion of 3n individuals among their offspring (Fig. 1a), we calculated the linear regression between these two parameters to obtain its equation. To compare the difference in cell diameter along the wing margin between 2n and 3n flies (Fig. 1c), we performed a two-tailed unpaired t test (p<0.0001), after verifying the normality of both datasets with the Shapiro-Wilk test (no statistical deviation was detected: p=0.053 for 2n; p=0.801 for 3n).
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed them colcemid, which disables the mitotic spindle. Colcemid’s ability to double the ploidy of germ cells in larvae was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploids fell sharply at higher doses. The percentage of triploid (3n) offspring peaked at 5 µg/ml (18%), but 90% of the mothers exposed to this dose died before adulthood. One of our goals in the present investigation was to devise a less toxic protocol.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid is as futile as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fertility, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µg/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fertility. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more exposure before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fertile) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the Sb-bearing TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, while only a single +/+ fly was found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies in this species do not undergo meiotic recombination, though crossovers might rarely occur during germ cell mitotic divisions.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found: 28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were intersexual (with sex combs, deformed genitalia, and incised wings), and the 3n status of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Fig. 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females and 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare spurt, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 2, and 3/vial).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was effective when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We tested the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the rest of their development. Five control (non-drug) vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (mean = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (mean =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fertility of these 55 mothers was negatively correlated with the percentage of their offspring that were 3n (Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution that was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons for the discrepancy in adult vs. larval sensitivity (aside from colcemid impotence) include: (1) adult females might digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females might use a different (colcemid-resistent?) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289 (21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be more resistant than those of their sisters, who were raised alongside them in the same vials? The disparity might be due to a male-specific (colcemid-resistant?) beta-tubulin isoform that exists in testes (Kemphues et al., 1982).
Alternatively, might diploid sperm be induced by colcemid but afterwards unable to fertilize eggs for some reason? In theory, yes, but this explanation is unlikely because compound-2, compound-3 fly stocks are known to be stable (Ashburner, 1989), presumably because nullo-2, nullo-3 eggs are regularly fertilized by 2n (double-compound) sperm.
","references":[{"reference":"Ashburner M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Pr., NY.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dobzhansky T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. W. Roux' Arch. 115(3): 363-379. PubMed ID: 28353864
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Fankhauser G. 1945. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 20-78.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein V, Posakony JW. 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107: 389-405. PubMed ID: 2517255
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 94: 87-101. PubMed ID: 6808392
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly 19(1): Article #2572865. PubMed ID: 41074402
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held, LI, Jr., Banerjee SJ, Roy S, Nawaz HA, Hanes JR, Ritte G, … et al. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPub. Biol.: 10.17912/001439. PubMed ID: 39967798
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC. 1982. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31(3 Pt 2): 655-70.
","pubmedId":"6819086","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz, K. 2020. Regulation of body size and growth control. Genetics 216: 269-313. PubMed ID: 33023929
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut W, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat. Res. 23: 179-188. PubMed ID: 4209294
","pubmedId":"","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"721b5518-2d9f-4291-8489-035329ec753e","decision":"edit","abstract":"We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences",""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah M.","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech University"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fertility of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of adult triploid offspring (x axis). The trend line, which has a non-zero slope (p<0.0001), was plotted by linear regression (see Methods): y = 1.705*x + 164.7 (R2 = 0.3861). b. Our new technique for measuring average cell diameter along the wing margin (mTR = medial Triple Row) in order to assess a fly's level of ploidy (see Methods). c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. Blue triangles denote means. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock (64 wings total; mean = 15.8; s.d. = 0.68), while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults (47 wings total; mean = 18.6; s.d. = 0.70). The 2n vs. 3n distributions are significantly different (p<0.0001; t test).
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each dose, 5 vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and 10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation Drop (Dr) on one 3rd chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) is 100% reliable (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then inspected for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in the food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, pupariate, and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a sample square area in the middle of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is hampered by (1) the fickleness of hair scattering from fly to fly and (2) the difficulty of distinguishing upper vs. lower surfaces of the wing in the plane of focus. We devised a more accurate method (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where adjacent bristles are not separated by any intervening epidermal cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We used a flexible wire to trace the curve of the mTR and then stretched the wire along a ruler to measure mTR length. Dividing that length (adjusted for magnification) by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR gives the average cell diameter (or a fixed multiple thereof).
We tested the accuracy of this approach by modeling cells as spheres. Given the proportionality of cell volume to ploidy (Fankauser, 1945), we expect the volume of a 3n cell to be 1.5 times that of a 2n cell. Hence, the diameter of a 3n cell should be the cube root of 1.5 (1.145) times the diameter of a 2n cell. If we multiply the mean interval between mTR bristles on 2n wings (15.8 µm) by 1.145, we calculate the expected interval between mTR bristles on 3n wings to be 18.1 µm. This number agrees well with the observed interval of 18.6 µm: the discrepancy (0.5 µm) is within one standard deviation (0.7 µm).
4. Statistics
To define the negative correlation between the fertility of colcemid-fed females and the proportion of 3n individuals among their offspring (Fig. 1a), we calculated the linear regression between these two parameters to obtain its equation. To compare the difference in cell diameter along the wing margin between 2n and 3n flies (Fig. 1c), we performed a two-tailed unpaired t test (p<0.0001), after verifying the normality of both datasets with the Shapiro-Wilk test (no statistical deviation was detected: p=0.053 for 2n; p=0.801 for 3n).
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed them colcemid, which disables the mitotic spindle. Colcemid’s ability to double the ploidy of germ cells in larvae was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploids fell sharply at higher doses. The percentage of triploid (3n) offspring peaked at 5 µg/ml (18%), but 90% of the mothers exposed to this dose died before adulthood. One of our goals in the present investigation was to devise a less toxic protocol.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid is as futile as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fertility, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µg/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fertility. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more exposure before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fertile) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the Sb-bearing TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, while only a single +/+ fly was found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies in this species do not undergo meiotic recombination, though crossovers might rarely occur during germ cell mitotic divisions.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found: 28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were intersexual (with sex combs, deformed genitalia, and incised wings), and the 3n status of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Fig. 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females and 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare spurt, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 2, and 3/vial).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was effective when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We tested the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the rest of their development. Five control (non-drug) vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (mean = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (mean =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fertility of these 55 mothers was negatively correlated with the percentage of their offspring that were 3n (Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution that was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons for the discrepancy in adult vs. larval sensitivity (aside from colcemid impotence) include: (1) adult females might digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females might use a different (colcemid-resistent?) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289 (21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be more resistant than those of their sisters, who were raised alongside them in the same vials? The disparity might be due to a male-specific (colcemid-resistant?) beta-tubulin isoform that exists in testes (Kemphues et al., 1982).
Alternatively, might diploid sperm be induced by colcemid but afterwards unable to fertilize eggs for some reason? In theory, yes, but this explanation is unlikely because compound-2, compound-3 fly stocks are known to be stable (Ashburner, 1989), presumably because nullo-2, nullo-3 eggs are regularly fertilized by 2n (double-compound) sperm.
","references":[{"reference":"Ashburner M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Pr., NY.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dobzhansky T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. W. Roux' Arch. 115(3): 363-379. PubMed ID: 28353864
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Fankhauser G. 1945. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 20-78.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein V, Posakony JW. 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107: 389-405. PubMed ID: 2517255
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 94: 87-101. PubMed ID: 6808392
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI, Jr. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly 19(1): Article #2572865. PubMed ID: 41074402
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Held, LI, Jr., Banerjee SJ, Roy S, Nawaz HA, Hanes JR, Ritte G, … et al. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPub. Biol.: 10.17912/001439. PubMed ID: 39967798
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC. 1982. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31(3 Pt 2): 655-70.
","pubmedId":"6819086","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz, K. 2020. Regulation of body size and growth control. Genetics 216: 269-313. PubMed ID: 33023929
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut W, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat. Res. 23: 179-188. PubMed ID: 4209294
","pubmedId":"","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"4ea7e60c-abd4-4658-b677-b9d29c3d123b","decision":"publish","abstract":"We successfully repeated an experiment where the anti-mitotic drug colcemid was fed to Drosophila larvae. Our aims were to (1) expand sample sizes, (2) improve survival at higher doses, (3) extend the treatment to adults, and (4) devise an improved method for assessing ploidy. We found that (1) colcemid has virtually no effect on germ cell ploidy in male larvae or female adults, (2) survival of larvae is increased by removing colcemid to allow metamorphosis, and (3) the wing margin offers a simple way to measure cell size, which is proportional to ploidy.
","acknowledgements":"The authors thank Dr. Dylan Schwilk for advising us on statistical methodology.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"tenureop@gmail.com","firstName":"Lewis I.","lastName":"Held, Jr.","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0003-3884-0032"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"anuspati@ttu.edu","firstName":"Anushka V.","lastName":"Patil","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"mturrero@ttu.edu","firstName":"Miguel","lastName":"Turrero García","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-7294-169X"},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ovajnar@ttu.edu","firstName":"Owen F.","lastName":"Vajnar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"copry@ttu.edu","firstName":"Cassandra G.","lastName":"O'pry","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences",""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology"],"email":"kadewitt@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kaitlyn N.","lastName":"Dewitt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ebehanfa@ttu.edu","firstName":"Elman","lastName":"Behanfar","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"she20797@ttu.edu","firstName":"Alexis H.","lastName":"Shepard","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"caromurp@ttu.edu","firstName":"Caroline G.","lastName":"Murphy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"aubbenso@ttu.edu","firstName":"Aubriana M.","lastName":"Benson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"ccarneva@ttu.edu","firstName":"Claire C.","lastName":"Carnevale","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","supervision"],"email":"pchemudu@ttu.edu","firstName":"Pranav","lastName":"Chemudupaty","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"karima.assal28@gmail.com","firstName":"Karima H.","lastName":"Assal","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jamiemeuth@gmail.com","firstName":"Jamie F. ","lastName":"Meuth","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"kybaroni@ttu.edu","firstName":"Kyle B.","lastName":"Baronia","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"rumbrani@ttu.edu","firstName":"Ria","lastName":"Umbrani","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"lilyruss@ttu.edu","firstName":"Lily M.","lastName":"Russell","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"hanawaz@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hariz A.","lastName":"Nawaz","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"nguhl@ttu.edu","firstName":"Natasha N.","lastName":"Guhl","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"whi21589@ttu.edu","firstName":"Hannah M.","lastName":"White","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX, United States"],"departments":["Dept. of Biological Sciences"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jasonshin2019@gmail.com","firstName":"Jason J.","lastName":"Shin","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by TTU's TRUE Scholars Program.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/bc6cca92088752c0d41a7b7c1b600cf3.jpg"},"imageCaption":"a. Inverse correlation (semi-log plot) of the fertility of colcemid-fed females (y axis) with the percent of adult triploid offspring (x axis). The trend line, which has a non-zero slope (p<0.0001), was plotted by linear regression (see Methods): y = 1.705*x + 164.7 (R2 = 0.3861). b. Our new technique for measuring average cell diameter along the wing margin (mTR = medial Triple Row) in order to assess a fly's level of ploidy (see Methods). c. Differences in cell size along the wing margin of diploid (2n) vs. triploid (3n) flies. Blue triangles denote means. The 2n flies were females from a control Dr/Sb stock (64 wings total; mean = 15.8; s.d. = 0.68), while the 3n flies were female offspring from colcemid-fed adults (47 wings total; mean = 18.6; s.d. = 0.70). The 2n vs. 3n distributions are significantly different (p<0.0001; t test).
","imageTitle":"Effects of feeding colcemid to larvae
","methods":"1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Five mg of colcemid was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% Ethanol and diluted in water containing Tegosept (fungicide). Six ml of the desired colcemid concentration was added to 3 mg of dry food flakes per vial with a calibrated syringe. The jelled food was compacted with a latex glove to ensure coherence during transfers. Grains of live yeast were sprinkled atop the food surface and wetted with the same colcemid dose before adding parental flies. Five concentrations of colcemid were used (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 µg/ml) plus the control (0 µg/ml). For each dose, 5 vials of parents were used: 50 virgin females and 10 wild-type males/vial. The strategy of detecting 3n F1 offspring by using the eye-shape mutation Drop (Dr) on one 3rd chromosome and the bristle-shape mutation Stubble (Sb) on the other (TM3 balancer) is 100% reliable (Held et al., 2025). The males were from an Oregon R stock. Dr/Sb virgin females were pre-treated with colcemid-containing food for 6 days before transferring them to fresh food with the same concentration and adding wild-type males. Further transfers to fresh (colcemid) food were performed at 5-day intervals, and the eggs from each brood were allowed to develop until eclosion, whereupon F1 adults were then inspected for 3n individuals based upon the presence of both Dr and Sb in the same fly.
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
A single concentration of colcemid was used (6 µg/ml) for the entire experimental series, consisting of 20 food vials, each containing 50 virgin Dr/Sb females and 30 Oregon R males. Five vials of control flies (no colcemid in the food) were also established. Parents were allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, and all of the hatched larvae were rinsed and transferred to fresh, non-drug vials on the 6th day, where they were allowed to recover, re-commence mitosis, pupariate, and eclose.
3. Devising a better way to gauge cell size
The traditional way of assessing cell size is to count wing hairs (each secreted by one cell) in a sample square area in the middle of the fly wing (Dobzhansky, 1929), but this approach is hampered by (1) the fickleness of hair scattering from fly to fly and (2) the difficulty of distinguishing upper vs. lower surfaces of the wing in the plane of focus. We devised a more accurate method (Fig. 1b) by using the medial triple row (mTR) of the wing margin, where adjacent bristles are not separated by any intervening epidermal cells (Hartenstein and Posakony, 1989). We used a flexible wire to trace the curve of the mTR and then stretched the wire along a ruler to measure mTR length. Dividing that length (adjusted for magnification) by the number of bristle intervals in the mTR gives the average cell diameter (or a fixed multiple thereof).
We tested the accuracy of this approach by modeling cells as spheres. Given the proportionality of cell volume to ploidy (Fankauser, 1945), we expect the volume of a 3n cell to be 1.5 times that of a 2n cell. Hence, the diameter of a 3n cell should be the cube root of 1.5 (1.145) times the diameter of a 2n cell. If we multiply the mean interval between mTR bristles on 2n wings (15.8 µm) by 1.145, we calculate the expected interval between mTR bristles on 3n wings to be 18.1 µm. This number agrees well with the observed interval of 18.6 µm: the discrepancy (0.5 µm) is within one standard deviation (0.7 µm).
4. Statistics
To define the negative correlation between the fertility of colcemid-fed females and the proportion of 3n individuals among their offspring (Fig. 1a), we calculated the linear regression between these two parameters to obtain its equation. To compare the difference in cell diameter along the wing margin between 2n and 3n flies (Fig. 1c), we performed a two-tailed unpaired t test (p<0.0001), after verifying the normality of both datasets with the Shapiro-Wilk test (no statistical deviation was detected: p=0.053 for 2n; p=0.801 for 3n).
","reagents":"Colcemid was obtained from MP Biomedicals. Fly food (Formula 4-24) was purchased from Carolina Biological Supply.
","patternDescription":"Polyploid flies offer a chance to probe how cell size affects anatomy because cell volume is proportional to ploidy in animals, and many structures (e.g., neural circuits) depend upon cell number, which is reduced in polyploids (Held, 2025). One of the simplest ways to increase ploidy in flies is to feed them colcemid, which disables the mitotic spindle. Colcemid’s ability to double the ploidy of germ cells in larvae was analyzed 44 years ago by one of us (Held, 1982), but the yield of polyploids fell sharply at higher doses. The percentage of triploid (3n) offspring peaked at 5 µg/ml (18%), but 90% of the mothers exposed to this dose died before adulthood. One of our goals in the present investigation was to devise a less toxic protocol.
Adults should be less sensitive than larvae to a drug like colcemid because they already have enough cells, whereas larvae must make more cells to build their bodies, and trying to do so while eating colcemid is as futile as Sisyphus trying to push a boulder uphill. Indeed, fly larvae delay metamorphosis until their imaginal discs grow large enough to complete that process (Texada et al., 2020). In contrast, adult females have been shown to survive 5 µg/ml of colcemid in their food for at least four days (Traut and Scheid, 1974), albeit with reduced fertility, so we decided to try treating adults instead of larvae.
1. Feeding colcemid to adults
Our colcemid-fed females had dominant markers (Dr or Sb) on their 3rd chromosomes and were mated with unmarked (wild-type) males, which allowed us to detect 3n F1 offspring by the presence of both traits (thin eyes and short bristles) in the same fly (see Methods). To our surprise, virtually no larvae were detected in the 1st 5-day brood at concentrations above 4 µg/ml, so we used drug-free food for the 2nd brood to try to restore fertility. This strategy worked, so we put the parents back onto colcemid for the 3rd brood for one more exposure before the final drug-free broods (4th & 5th). Table 1 presents the results.
Table 1. Number of F1 offspring obtained from colcemid-fed adult mothers*
Colcemid dose (µg/ml) | Brood #1 (+ colcemid) | Brood #2 (no colcemid) | Brood #3 (+ colcemid) | Brood #4 (no colcemid) | Brood #5 (no colcemid) |
0 | 7141 (0) | 9035 (1) | 5434 (1) | 4396 (0) | 5545 (0) |
2 | 2723 (0) | 8055 (1) | 4802 (1) | 5159 (1) | 3247 (1) |
4 | 306 (0) | 5392 (0) | 574 (0) | 1149 (0) | 193 (0) |
6 | 21 (0) | 8962 (3) | 722 (0) | 5423 (1) | 2437 (1) |
8 | 0 (0) | 5941 (0) | 97 (0) | 3000 (1) | 2482 (1) |
10 | 0 (0) | 5994 (6) | 8 (0) | 1979 (0) | 1742 (11) |
*Each cell in the table is the pooled total from the 5 vials in that cohort, each of which contained 50 mothers. In parentheses are the number of Dr/Sb (3n) offspring within the total (to the left). Broods lasted for 5 days, except for controls, whose (more fertile) parents had to be transferred every 4 days to avoid drowning in the scrum of larvae. The low survival of F1 in Broods #1 and #3 (where parents ate colcemid food) was not due to lower rates of egg laying by the parents, which appeared normal. Rather, the eggs failed to hatch (due to blocked mitosis?). Not tallied here were 7 +/+ (non-Dr, non-Sb) offspring: 3 from controls, 1 from 2 µg/ml, and 3 from 8 µg/ml. These F1 flies likely arose from double crossover events between the Sb-bearing TM3 balancer and the Dr homolog—a conjecture supported by the fact that 10 +/+ flies occurred among 26,900 F1 from colcemid-fed female larvae, while only a single +/+ fly was found among 27,229 F1 from colcemid-fed male larvae. (Male flies in this species do not undergo meiotic recombination, though crossovers might rarely occur during germ cell mitotic divisions.)
A total of 30 Dr/Sb F1 flies was found: 28 from colcemid-fed mothers and 2 from controls. Four of the 30 Dr/Sb flies had to be 3n because they were intersexual (with sex combs, deformed genitalia, and incised wings), and the 3n status of the 26 Dr/Sb females was confirmed by measuring cell size along the wing margin (see Methods and Fig. 1c). A “burst” of 11 3n flies (9 females and 2 intersexes) was found in one of the five Brood #5 vials from the 10 µg/ml series, but other than this rare spurt, the distribution of 3n flies across other broods and doses was sporadic. The six 3n flies in Brood #2 of the 10 µg/ml series were distributed among 3 different vials (totals = 1, 2, and 3/vial).
2. Feeding colcemid to larvae
This weak effect of colcemid on adult females is basically a negative result, and negative results are hard to interpret. One remote possibility was that the drug itself was defective upon arrival from the manufacturer. To rule out this explanation, we decided to test a stock solution that was left over from the experiment to see if it was effective when fed to larvae (as an internal control). We tested the 6 µg/ml dose because it was tolerated by Brood #3 F1 larvae better than the higher (8 or 10 µg/ml) concentrations. We decided to further enhance survival by removing larvae from colcemid before pupariation.
Twenty vials of Dr/Sb females (50/vial) were crossed with Oregon R (wild-type) males (20/vial) and allowed to lay eggs for 5 days, with all of the hatched larvae allowed to feed on the colcemid-containing food until the 6th day, at which point they were rinsed and transferred to fresh, drug-free food for the rest of their development. Five control (non-drug) vials were handled similarly. The 5 control vials yielded a total of 11,222 F1 offspring (mean = 2244 adults/vial), while the 20 colcemid vials only produced 468 F1 offspring (mean =23 adults/vial), which is two orders of magnitude fewer than the controls.
Each of the 179 surviving F1 colcemid-fed females was crossed with 2 Oregon R males, and their offspring were screened for Dr/Sb (3n) individuals. Ten of the 179 females (6%) were sterile (vs. 0% sterility among control females). The remaining 169 crosses yielded 26,890 offspring, of which 538 (2%) were both Dr and Sb. These 538 3n offspring (432 females and 106 intersexes) were distributed among 55 (33%) of the 169 mothers, with the number of 3n offspring/vial ranging from 1 to 43 flies/mother. The fertility of these 55 mothers was negatively correlated with the percentage of their offspring that were 3n (Fig. 1a).
Among the 20 colcemid vials, 7 (35%) were prepared with the same 6 µg/ml stock solution that was used in the adult-feeding experiment, and these crosses yielded 22/55 (40%) of the triploid-producing mothers and 239/538 (44%) of the 3n offspring, vs. the five 3n offspring from adults fed 6 µg/ml (Table 1). Based on this data, the low yield of 3n flies from adult (vs. larval) feeding can’t be attributed to defective colcemid. Possible reasons for the discrepancy in adult vs. larval sensitivity (aside from colcemid impotence) include: (1) adult females might digest colcemid in their gut before it can affect their germ cells, or (2) adult females might use a different (colcemid-resistent?) tubulin isoform in their spindles.
An equally baffling result was that no 3n F1 flies were obtained from colcemid-fed males. Among the 468 flies that survived a 6-day diet of 6 µg/ml colcemid during the larval period, 289 were males, and each of those was mated with 2 Oregon R virgins. Sterility was much greater than that of the females, with 62/289 (21%) of them failing to yield viable progeny. Among the remaining 227 fertile males, no Dr/Sb flies were recovered among their total of 27,229 offspring (nor were any found among 2,631 control F1). Why should the germ cells of these males be more resistant than those of their sisters, who were raised alongside them in the same vials? The disparity might be due to a male-specific (colcemid-resistant?) beta-tubulin isoform that exists in testes (Kemphues et al., 1982).
Alternatively, might diploid sperm be induced by colcemid but afterwards unable to fertilize eggs for some reason? In theory, yes, but this explanation is unlikely because compound-2, compound-3 fly stocks are known to be stable (Ashburner, 1989), presumably because nullo-2, nullo-3 eggs are regularly fertilized by 2n (double-compound) sperm.
","references":[{"reference":"Ashburner M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Pr., NY.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Dobzhansky T. 1929. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org 115(3): 363-379.
","pubmedId":"28353864","doi":""},{"reference":"Fankhauser G. 1945. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q. Rev. Biol. 20: 20-78.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hartenstein V, Posakony JW. 1989. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 107(2): 389-405.
","pubmedId":"2517255","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI Jr. 1982. Polyploidy and aneuploidy induced by colcemid in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 94(1): 87-101.
","pubmedId":"6808392","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI. 2025. Recounting the history of polyploid research in D. melanogaster: 1 century since 2 reports of 3 flies with 4 sets of chromosomes. Fly (Austin) 19(1): 2572865.
","pubmedId":"41074402","doi":""},{"reference":"Held LI Jr, Banerjee SJ, Roy S, Nawaz HA, Hanes JR, Ritte G, et al., Shin JJ. 2025. Cold-induced meiotic nondisjunction in D. melanogaster. MicroPubl Biol 2025: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001439.
","pubmedId":"39967798","doi":""},{"reference":"Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC. 1982. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31(3 Pt 2): 655-70.
","pubmedId":"6819086","doi":""},{"reference":"Texada MJ, Koyama T, Rewitz K. 2020. Regulation of Body Size and Growth Control. Genetics 216(2): 269-313.
","pubmedId":"33023929","doi":""},{"reference":"Traut H, Scheid W. 1974. The induction of aneuploidy by colcemid fed to Drosophila melanogaster females. Mutat Res 23(2): 179-88.
","pubmedId":"4209294","doi":""}],"title":"Colcemid can double the ploidy of germ cells in female larvae, but not in male larvae, and only rarely in female adults.
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"0c038aef-7509-405f-86ba-0cdce093d737","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}