Adult stem cells are required to maintain tissue homeostasis and understanding their regulation is essential to leveraging their utility. Here we report that seven transgenic ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit reporter lines are variably expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, suggesting a novel form of inter-organ communication for this tissue. While HCR-FISH confirms that one of the iGluR subunits, GluRIIA, is transcribed in hub cells, we do not detect GluRIIA protein expression. Furthermore, hub cells are not sensitive to exogenous glutamate and hub-specific knockdown of the essential iGluR subunits does not phenotypically affect cells of the testis apex. Altogether this suggests that iGluRs are not essential for stem cell niche homeostasis.
","acknowledgements":"We thank D. Andrew and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; FlyBase for its resources; and M. Piacentino for comments. Illustration created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ntripat2@alumni.jh.edu","firstName":"Neha","lastName":"Tripathi","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-6354-9190"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","fundingAcquisition"],"email":"jgrey2@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jasmine","lastName":"Grey","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-6095-4461"},{"affiliations":["Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","methodology","investigation"],"email":"brennand@stanford.edu","firstName":"Brennan","lastName":"McDonald","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-2321-0149"},{"affiliations":["Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Genetics"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"leif_benner@hms.harvard.edu","firstName":"Leif","lastName":"Benner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3716-4522"},{"affiliations":["Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA"],"departments":["The O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","resources","project"],"email":"brioliv@iu.edu","firstName":"Brian","lastName":"Oliver","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3455-4891"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, US"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","conceptualization"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5439-4656"}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jasmine Grey"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R35GM136665 (E.M.) and an National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (J.V. and J.G.). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (DGE2139757). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/adba29ac9897f49b770f0219c793d735.png"},"imageCaption":"(A – B) Illustration of the Drosophila (A) testis and (B) the testis apex. The testis is a coiled blind ended tubule in which the germline cells (purple) exit the apex as they differentiate, ultimately becoming sperm (grey). The testis wall is composed of an outer pigment cell layer (pink) and inner muscle cell layer (orange) with basal laminae underlying each layer. At the testis apex, the niche cells (hub, green) maintain Germline Stem Cells (GSCs, dark purple) and Cyst Stem Cells (CySCs, dark blue). As the stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSC daughters, or gonialblasts, undergo four rounds of transit amplification (spermatogonia). CySCs divide and give rise to quiescent daughter cyst cells that wrap and support adjacent germ cells. (C – P) Representative (C – I) single confocal sections through testis apices or (J – P) maximum intensity projections of testes from (C,J) GluRIA, (D,K) GluRIB, (E,L) GluRIIA, (F,M) GluRIIB, (G,N) GluRIIC, (H,O) GluRIID, or (I,P) GluRIIE expression reporter flies. Testes were stained for enhancer reporter expression (V5, green; insets), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (J – P) hub cell membranes (N-cadherin (N-Cad), magenta). (Q) Representative single confocal section through Oregon-R testis apex labeled using HCR-FISH probes against upd1 (orange) and GluRIIA (green; inset) mRNA transcripts and counterstained with DAPI (nuclei, blue). (R – S) Representative single confocal sections through Oregon-R (R) testis wall or (S) testis apex stained for GluRIIA (green; inset), basement membranes (Concanavalin A), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (T) Representative single confocal section through GluRIIA > RedStinger testis apex stained for GAL4 expression (RFP; inset), hub cell membranes (N-Cad, green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (U) Quantification of relative GCaMP signal within the hub of explanted control testes or testes treated with 1 mM L-glutamate over time (vertical line indicates frame timing of L-glutamate addition). For each testis, GCaMP signal was normalized to the mean fluorescence intensity of the first frame. 10 testes were imaged per condition. Scale bars, (C – I) 100 µm or (J – P, Q – T) 10 µm. Hubs outlined (dashed white lines). Insets display fluorescent signals in greyscale.
","imageTitle":"Glutamate receptor enhancers are active, but receptors are not expressed in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were maintained on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast, as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Stocks were kept at 25°C and crosses were set and matured at 25°C. GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger males were collected at 0—4 days old and transferred to 29°C for 4 days to enhance GAL4 driver expression. Male flies less than 8 days old were used for all experiments. See table of Reagents for list of fly stocks. We used FlyBase (release FB2025_05) to find information on phenotypes/function/stocks/gene expression (Öztürk-Çolak et al., 2024).
Generation of transgenic fly lines
Enhancer reporter lines of GluRIA, GluRIB, GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE were generated as previously described (Mahadevaraju et al., 2024). For each gene, the 1.25 kb region upstream and 250 bp region downstream of the transcriptional start site was cloned and inserted upstream of the basal P-element promoter driving expression of the histone H2A coding sequence and three V5 tag sequences. Injections of transgenes were performed by BestGene (Chino Hills, CA).
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997; Viveiros and Matunis, 2026). Unless noted, all steps were executed at room temperature (RT), and a nutating platform was used for all incubation steps. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) and incubated for 20 min. Fixed testes were rinsed twice and washed for 30 min in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at RT or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then transferred to primary antibodies diluted in block and incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by two rinses, and an hour wash in 1X PBX, and then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed briefly then washed for an hour in 1X PBX. Finally, to remove detergent, testes were rinsed and washed for 10 min in 1X PBS before transferring to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin 3 (1:50, DSHB, 7610), N-cadherin (N-Cad; 1:20, DSHB, DN-Ex #8), GluRIIA (1:50, DSHB, 8B4D2), Vasa (1:20, DSHB), Zfh1 (1:500, our lab), V5 tag (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, R960-25), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11029), Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11001), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11006), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11077), Goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11075), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236). Basement membranes were stained with Concanavalin A, Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate (1:50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, C-11253).
Hybridization Chain Reaction-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (HCR-FISH)
Testes were processed for HCR-FISH using Molecular Instruments HCR (v3.0) buffers, hairpins, and probes and an adapted version of a previously described protocol (Grmai et al., 2024; Slaidina et al., 2020). All steps were performed on a nutator at room temperature unless otherwise noted. Testes from Oregon-R males were dissected in 1X PBS on ice then moved to an Eppendorf tube containing 1X PBS on ice after every five pairs of testes for up to 30 min. Testes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1X Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 0.1% Tween-20 (DPBS-Tw) for 20 min and then washed 2 x 5 min in DPBS-Tw. Tissues were then dehydrated in sequential washes with 25%. 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice prior to storage at -20°C overnight. Testes were rehydrated with sequential washes with 75%, 50%, 25%, 0% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice, followed by a 2 hr permeabilization with 1% Triton-X in 1X DPBS, and a 20 min post-fix in 4% paraformaldehyde in DPBS-Tw. After fixation, testes were washed 2 x 5 min DPBS-Tw, 1 x 5 min 50%/50% DPBS-Tw/5X SSC with 0.1% Tween-20 diluted in 1X DPBS (SSC-Tw), and 2 x 5 min SSC-Tw, on ice. Tissues were pre-hybridized in probe hybridization buffer (Molecular Instruments) for 30 min at 37°C and then incubated in diluted probes (0.8 pmol in 1 mL in probe hybridization buffer) for 12-16 hrs at 37°C. Following hybridization, testes were washed 4 x 15 min at 37°C with probe wash buffer warmed to 37°C (Molecular Instruments), then with SSC-Tw for 2 x 5 min at room temperature. To equilibrate, testes were incubated in amplification buffer for 10 min at room temperature (not nutating). Hairpin solutions were prepared by heating 6 pmol of each hairpin (B3 488 and B1 546 HCR™ Amplifier (v3.0)) for 90 seconds at 95°C, snap cooling at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, and then adding to 100uL of room temperature amplification buffer (Molecular Instruments). Testes were incubated in hairpin solutions overnight at room temperature followed by washes in SSC-Tw: 2 x 5 min on benchtop, 2 x 30 min, and 1 x 5 min. DAPI (1:1000) was added to the final SSC-Tw wash during the final 15 min. Detergent was removed by washing in 1X PBS for 5 min. Testes were stored briefly in Vectashield prior to mounting (same day).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness glass coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom, and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, respectively, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI. Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices and maximum intensity projections are shown in this paper as indicated.
Live imaging of testes
E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s testes were dissected, cultured, and live imaged as previously described using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope. Experiment design was adapted from previous calcium imaging performed in explanted testes (Martin-Diaz and Herrera, 2024). Two testes of each dish (10 dishes total) were designated as either control or experimental. Testes were imaged for 10 minutes with frames approximately every 2.5 seconds (variability due to definite focus). For each dish, the control testis was imaged first, followed by imaging of the experimental testis. For the experimental testis, 1 mM L-glutamate (diluted in live imaging solution) was added to the dish after 32 frames were collected.
Quantifications and statistical analysis
FIJI was used to determine the E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity measurements. A region of interest was manually drawn around the hub, and the mean grey value of that region was acquired. Measurements of each frame were normalized to that of the first frame of the same testis.
All statistical analysis and generation of graphical representation were performed using GraphPad Prism 11.
","reagents":"Reagents
Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
Oregon-R | Oregon-R | Gift of D. Andrew |
GluRIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIC:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIC[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIID:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIID[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIE:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIE[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
UAS-RedStinger | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
GluR-T2A-GAL4 | w[*]; TI{2A-GAL4}GluRIIA[2A-GAL4] | BDSC_84637 |
E132-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}E132, w[*] | BDSC_26796 |
GCaMP6s | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=UASp-GCaMP6s}30/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_91366 |
GluRIIC RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01854}attP2 | BDSC_25836 |
GluRIID RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF02035}attP2 | BDSC_26010 |
GluRIIE RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01962}attP2 | BDSC_25942 |
mCherry RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=VALIUM20-mCherry.RNAi}attP2 | BDSC_35785 |
HCR probe | Description | Source |
upd1 | Fruit fly upd1 HCR v3.0 probe set (B1) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
GlurIIA | Fruit fly GlurRIIA HCR v3.0 probe set (B3) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
Adult stem cells are critical to the maintenance and regeneration of tissues. By using model systems like that of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, we can better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate stem cell behaviors. Adult stem cells reside in dynamic microenvironments, or niches, that are composed of cellular and molecular constituents including extracellular matrix and support cells (reviewed in (Morrison and Spradling, 2008)). The Drosophila testis is a blind-ended tubule that houses a single stem cell niche located at its apex (Fig. 1A). This stem cell niche maintains two stem cell populations, the germline stem cells (GSCs) and somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs), both of which reside in direct contact with somatic niche, or hub, cells (Fig. 1B). The hub acts as both a signaling center and an adhesion platform to maintain both stem cell populations (reviewed in (de Cuevas and Matunis, 2011; Siddall and Hime, 2017)). Therefore, gaining insight into the hub is fundamental to our understanding of the biology of this stem cell niche.
Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are heterotetrameric channels that facilitate neuromuscular junction activity in response to the primary neurotransmitter glutamate (DiAntonio et al., 1999; Han et al., 2015; Han et al., 2024; Jan and Jan, 1976). Following an action potential, motor neurons release glutamate into the post-synaptic space, where it binds to the iGluRs on muscle cells, allowing the influx of calcium to trigger muscle contraction (Schuster et al., 1991; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1963; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1964). In mammals, glutamate acts as the primary neurotransmitter in the brain and its concentration is tightly regulated via a gradient maintained by the blood brain barrier; the concentration of glutamate is low in the brain and high in the blood (Vandenberg and Ryan, 2013). Similarly, Drosophila hemolymph contains high concentrations of glutamate, which may act as its source for the testis apex (Chen et al., 2009; Echalier, 1997; Fairchild et al., 2016). Furthermore, glutamatergic neurons innervate the internal male reproductive system, including the base of the testis, to coordinate copulation (Chaverra et al., 2025; Pavlou et al., 2016). Surprisingly, previous single-nuclei RNA sequencing of the testis detected mRNA transcripts encoding kainate-type and ⍺-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA)-like iGluRs subunits (Li et al., 2016) in the hub cells, a population of cells not thought to express such proteins (Li et al., 2022; Mahadevaraju et al., 2021; Raz et al., 2023). Therefore, the presence of iGluR transcripts within the niche suggests an avenue for inter-organ communication.
To begin our characterization of iGluR expression in the testis, we generated enhancer reporter transgenic fly strains for kainate-type (GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) and AMPA-like (GluRIA and GluRIB) iGluR subunits (see methods for details). Kainate-type iGluRs are tetramers consisting of three obligate subunits (GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) combined with one of two variable subunits (GluRIIA and GluRIIB) (Featherstone et al., 2005; Marrus et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2005). We examined testes of each transgenic fly and found that hub cell expression of iGluR subunits is highly variable, with some reporters showing high expression and others displaying little to none. Within the hub, reporters of GluRIIA (Fig. 1E), GluRIIB (Fig. 1F), and GluRIIC (Fig. 1G) were among the most highly expressed, while GluRIA (Fig. 1C) and GluRIB reporters (Fig. 1D) were expressed at moderate levels. Reporters of GluRIIE (Fig. 1I) and GluRIID (Fig. 1H) showed little to no expression in the hub cells. Reporter activity was not restricted to hub cells but also marked the muscle cells and pigment cells in a strain-specific manner. For instance, GluRIIA (Fig. 1L) and GluRIIC (Fig. 1N) were highly expressed in both muscle and pigment cells, GluRIIE (Fig. 1P) was predominantly expressed in muscle cells, and GluRIB (Fig. 1K), GluRIIB (Fig. 1M), and GluRIID (Fig. 1O) were expressed in pigment cells, while GluRIA (Fig. 1J) was not detected in either cell population. The variation between GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE reporter expression was surprising, as these subunits are all necessary to form the final heterotetrameric protein complexes. Furthermore, estimates of transcript abundance in larval body wall tissue suggest that GluRIID and GluRIIE transcripts are more abundant than those of GluRIIC (Qin et al., 2005), but expression patterns of our reporters revealed the opposite relationship in the hub cells. Altogether, our analysis of the iGluR subunit expression reporter fly lines suggests that both AMPA-like iGluR subunits are detectable in hub cells, whereas the full complement of kainite-type iGluR subunits is not.
Expression of enhancer reporter elements does not necessarily mean that the respective proteins are expressed. To investigate whether iGluR gene products are produced in hub cells, we assessed both transcript and protein expression of GluRIIA, the subunit with the strongest enhancer reporter expression. Using HCR-FISH, we observed that GluRIIA mRNA is detectable in hub cells, which were co-labeled with probes against the stemness-conferring signaling ligand upd1 (Fig. 1Q) (Kiger et al., 2001; Tulina and Matunis, 2001). Further, using antisera against GluRIIA, we detected GluRIIA protein in the muscles of the testis wall, which is consistent with their contractile role (Fig. 1R). However, we did not observe GluRIIA protein expression in hub cells (Fig. 1S). To verify the absence of GlurIIA protein in hub cells, we examined the expression pattern of a GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 driver line, which produces GAL4 as a separate protein under endogenous GluRIIA control (Deng et al., 2019). We surveyed testes from GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger flies for RedStinger expression in hub cells and apart from one hub cell (n = 1/40 testes), we did not detect GAL4 activity in the hub (Fig. 1T). Altogether, this suggests that iGluR genes are transcribed in hub cells, but that the corresponding proteins are not produced, indicating potential post-transcriptional regulation of iGluR subunit genes.
Given the inconsistency between transcript expression and lack of detectable GluRIIA protein in hub cells, we investigated whether iGluRs have a functional role in the testis stem cell niche. To measure hub cell reactivity to glutamate, we live imaged testes expressing a fluorescent calcium reporter, GCaMP6s (Parkhurst, 2020), specifically in hub cells using the hub specific driver, E132-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004). At the onset of imaging, GFP fluorescence, the calcium reporter signal, was detected in all the hub cells. However, we did not observe any change in GFP fluorescence signal following addition of 1 mM L-glutamate to the imaging media (Huang et al., 2019), and relative GCaMP intensity plots were similar to control testes (Fig. 1U). This suggests that hub cells are not responsive to glutamate. We also asked whether iGluR expression in hub cells is necessary to support the stem cell niche, which could suggest that iGluRs have a non-excitatory role in the hub (reviewed in (Featherstone, 2010)). We hypothesized that if hub cells need iGluRs to coordinate stem cell niche homeostasis, we would observe a loss of cells in the apices of testes with reduced iGluR expression in hub cells. Using E132-GAL4, we expressed RNAi transgenes targeting the essential subunits, GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE, and assayed for differences in cellular composition within the testis apex relative to testes expressing the control RNAi transgene (UAS-mCherry RNAi). In testes with hub cell-specific knockdown (KD) of GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE we observed hub cells (Fasciclin 3-positive), germ cells (Vasa-positive) and early cyst cells (Zfh1-positive) in comparable abundance to control testes (GluRIIC KD: 61/61 testes; GluRIID: 62/62 testes; GluRIIE: 93/95 testes, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.4975; mCherry KD: 91/91 testes). Of the two outlier testes from the GluRIIE KD flies, one had fewer germ cells than control testes (n = 1/95) and one had a germline tumor (n = 1/95). Overall, these results indicate that iGluRs likely do not function in hub cells to maintain homeostasis of this stem cell niche. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that reduced iGluR function affects the stem cell niche in more subtle ways (i.e. reduced stem cell division rate). Furthermore, iGluRs may be necessary under varying environmental or physiological conditions not assayed here, including starvation, aging, and excessive mating.
Through this work we have demonstrated that reporters of iGluR gene expression are variably detected in hub cells as well as pigment cells and muscle cells of the testis. While we confirmed that transcripts of one iGluR subunit, GluRIIA, are detectable in hub cells, we did not detect respective protein expression in hub cells, although GluRIIA expression in the muscle cells of the testis wall confirmed that the antisera is functional. This absence of protein expression was reflected in a lack of response to exogenous glutamate and the absence of deleterious effects following hub-specific knockdown of essential kainate-type iGluR subunits. This work demonstrates that despite transcriptional activity, iGluRs are not expressed in hub cells and do not function in hub cells to maintain testis homeostasis. Future work will need to be performed to investigate the role of iGluRs in the muscle cells and pigment cells of the testis.
","references":[{"reference":"Chaverra M, Toney JP, Dardenne-Ankringa LD, Knee JT, Morris AR, Wadhams JB, Certel SJ, Stowers RS. 2025. Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs. : 10.7554/elife.108225.2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.108225.2"},{"reference":"Chen K, Augustin H, Featherstone DE. 2008. Effect of ambient extracellular glutamate on Drosophila glutamate receptor trafficking and function. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195: 10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3"},{"reference":"de Cuevas M, Matunis EL. 2011. The stem cell niche: lessons from theDrosophilatestis. Development 138: 2861-2869.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.056242"},{"reference":"Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al., Rao. 2019. Chemoconnectomics: Mapping Chemical Transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101: 876-893.e4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045"},{"reference":"DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Heckmann M, Goodman CS. 1999. Glutamate Receptor Expression Regulates Quantal Size and Quantal Content at theDrosophilaNeuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 3023-3032.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03023.1999"},{"reference":"Echalier G. 1997. Composition of the Body Fluid of Drosophila and the Design of Culture Media for Drosophila Cells. Drosophila Cells in Culture : 1-67.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/B978-012229460-0/50002-6"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE. 2009. Intercellular Glutamate Signaling in the Nervous System and Beyond. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 1: 4-12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/cn900006n"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Rohrbough J, Liebl F, Karr J, Sheng Q, Rodesch CK, Broadie K. 2005. An EssentialDrosophilaGlutamate Receptor Subunit That Functions in Both Central Neuropil and Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3199-3208.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-04.2005"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2023. Live Imaging of the Drosophila Testis Stem Cell Niche. Methods in Molecular Biology,Germline Stem Cells : 113-125.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-3259-8_6"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Grmai L, Jimenez E, Baxter K, Van Doren M. 2023. Steroid signaling controls sex-specific development in an invertebrate. : 10.1101/2023.12.22.573099.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.22.573099"},{"reference":"Han TH, Dharkar P, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2015. Functional reconstitution of\n Drosophila melanogaster\n NMJ glutamate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6182-6187.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1500458112"},{"reference":"Han TH, Vicidomini R, Ramos CI, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2024. The gating properties of Drosophila NMJ glutamate receptors and their dependence on Neto. The Journal of Physiology 602: 7043-7064.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/JP287331"},{"reference":"Huang H, Liu S, Kornberg TB. 2019. Glutamate signaling at cytoneme synapses. Science 363: 948-955.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.aat5053"},{"reference":"Jan LY, Jan YN. 1976. L‐glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction.. The Journal of Physiology 262: 215-236.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressingbamtranscription in theDrosophilatestis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Kiger AA, Jones DL, Schulz C, Rogers MB, Fuller MT. 2001. Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue. Science 294: 2542-2545.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066707"},{"reference":"Li Y, Dharkar P, Han TH, Serpe M, Lee CH, Mayer ML. 2016. Novel Functional Properties of Drosophila CNS Glutamate Receptors. Neuron 92: 1036-1048.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.058"},{"reference":"Li H, Janssens J, De Waegeneer M, Kolluru SS, Davie K, Gardeux V, et al., Zinzen. 2022. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375: 10.1126/science.abk2432.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.abk2432"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Fear JM, Akeju M, Galletta BJ, Pinheiro MMLS, Avelino CC, et al., Oliver. 2021. Dynamic sex chromosome expression in Drosophila male germ cells. Nature Communications 12: 10.1038/s41467-021-20897-y.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/S41467-021-20897-Y"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Pal S, Bhaskar P, McDonald BD, Benner L, Denti L, et al., Oliver. 2024. Diverse somatic Transformer and sex chromosome karyotype pathways regulate gene expression in Drosophila gonad development. : 10.7554/elife.101641.1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.101641.1"},{"reference":"Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A. 2004. Differential Localization of Glutamate Receptor Subunits at theDrosophilaNeuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 24: 1406-1415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-03.2004"},{"reference":"Martin-Diaz J, Herrera SC. 2024. A stem cell activation state coupling spermatogenesis with social interactions in Drosophila males. Cell Reports 43: 114647.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114647"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. 2008. Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life. Cell 132: 598-611.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038"},{"reference":"Öztürk-Çolak A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, et al., Lovato. 2024. FlyBase: updates to the\n Drosophila\n genes and genomes database. GENETICS 227: 10.1093/genetics/iyad211.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyad211"},{"reference":"Parkhurst, S. (2020). Personal communication to FlyBase [FBrf0246936].
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Pavlou HJ, Lin AC, Neville MC, Nojima T, Diao F, Chen BE, White BH, Goodwin SF. 2016. Neural circuitry coordinating male copulation. eLife 5: 10.7554/elife.20713.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.20713"},{"reference":"Qin G, Schwarz T, Kittel RJ, Schmid A, Rasse TM, Kappei D, et al., Sigrist. 2005. Four Different Subunits Are Essential for Expressing the Synaptic Glutamate Receptor at Neuromuscular Junctions ofDrosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3209-3218.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4194-04.2005"},{"reference":"Raz AA, Vida GS, Stern SR, Mahadevaraju S, Fingerhut JM, Viveiros JM, et al., Fuller. 2023. Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.82201.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.82201"},{"reference":"Schuster CM, Ultsch A, Schloss P, Cox JA, Schmitt B, Betz H. 1991. Molecular Cloning of an Invertebrate Glutamate Receptor Subunit Expressed in\n Drosophila\n Muscle. Science 254: 112-114.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1681587"},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Slaidina M, Banisch TU, Gupta S, Lehmann R. 2020. A single-cell atlas of the developing\n Drosophila\n ovary identifies follicle stem cell progenitors. Genes & Development 34: 239-249.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/gad.330464.119"},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1964. The effect on crayfish muscle of iontophoretically applied glutamate. The Journal of Physiology 170: 296-317.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332"},{"reference":"TAKEUCHI A, TAKEUCHI N. 1963. Glutamate-induced Depolarization in Crustacean Muscle. Nature 198: 490-491.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/198490a0"},{"reference":"Tulina N, Matunis E. 2001. Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal in\n Drosophila\n Spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT Signaling. Science 294: 2546-2549.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066700"},{"reference":"Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM. 2013. Mechanisms of Glutamate Transport. Physiological Reviews 93: 1621-1657.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1152/physrev.00007.2013"},{"reference":"Viveiros J, Matunis E. 2026. Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. MicroPubl Biol 2026: 10.17912/micropub.biology.002106.
","pubmedId":"42079377","doi":""}],"title":"Ionotropic glutamate receptor expression and function in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Benjamin Ohlstein"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"3c5e701b-8ef7-4d0f-800f-d9125697d217","decision":"accept","abstract":"Adult stem cells are required to maintain tissue homeostasis and understanding their regulation is essential to leveraging their utility. Here we report that seven transgenic ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit reporter lines are variably expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, suggesting a novel form of inter-organ communication for this tissue. While HCR-FISH confirms that one of the iGluR subunits, GluRIIA, is transcribed in hub cells, we do not detect GluRIIA protein expression. Furthermore, hub cells are not sensitive to exogenous glutamate and hub-specific knockdown of the essential iGluR subunits does not phenotypically affect cells of the testis apex. Altogether this suggests that iGluRs are not essential for stem cell niche homeostasis.
","acknowledgements":"We thank D. Andrew and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; FlyBase for its resources; and M. Piacentino for comments. Illustrations created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ntripat2@alumni.jh.edu","firstName":"Neha","lastName":"Tripathi","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-6354-9190"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","fundingAcquisition"],"email":"jgrey2@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jasmine","lastName":"Grey","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-6095-4461"},{"affiliations":["Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","methodology","investigation"],"email":"brennand@stanford.edu","firstName":"Brennan","lastName":"McDonald","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-2321-0149"},{"affiliations":["Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Genetics"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"leif_benner@hms.harvard.edu","firstName":"Leif","lastName":"Benner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3716-4522"},{"affiliations":["Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA"],"departments":["The O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","resources","project"],"email":"brioliv@iu.edu","firstName":"Brian","lastName":"Oliver","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3455-4891"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","conceptualization"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5439-4656"}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jasmine Grey"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R35GM136665 (E.M.) and an National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (J.V. and J.G.). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (DGE2139757). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/adba29ac9897f49b770f0219c793d735.png"},"imageCaption":"(A – B) Illustration of the Drosophila (A) testis and (B) the testis apex. The testis is a coiled blind ended tubule in which the germline cells (purple) exit the apex as they differentiate, ultimately becoming sperm (grey). The testis wall is composed of an outer pigment cell layer (pink) and inner muscle cell layer (orange) with basal laminae underlying each layer. At the testis apex, the niche cells (hub, green) maintain germline stem cells (GSCs, dark purple) and cyst stem cells (CySCs, dark blue). As the stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSC daughters, or gonialblasts, undergo four rounds of transit amplification (spermatogonia, light purple). CySCs divide and give rise to quiescent daughter cyst cells (light blue) that wrap and support adjacent germ cells. (C – P) Representative (C – I) single confocal sections through testis apices or (J – P) maximum intensity projections of testes from (C,J) GluRIA, (D,K) GluRIB, (E,L) GluRIIA, (F,M) GluRIIB, (G,N) GluRIIC, (H,O) GluRIID, or (I,P) GluRIIE expression reporter flies. Testes were stained for enhancer reporter expression (V5, green; insets), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (C – I) hub cell membranes (N-cadherin (N-Cad), magenta). (Q) Representative single confocal section through Oregon-R testis apex labeled using HCR-FISH probes against upd1 (orange) and GluRIIA (green; inset) mRNA transcripts and counterstained with DAPI (nuclei, blue). (R – S) Representative single confocal sections through Oregon-R (R) testis wall or (S) testis apex stained for GluRIIA (green; inset), basement membranes (Concanavalin A), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (T) Representative single confocal section through GluRIIA > RedStinger testis apex stained for GAL4 expression (DsRed; inset), hub cell membranes (N-Cad, green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (U) Quantification of relative GCaMP signal within the hub of explanted control testes or testes treated with 1 mM L-glutamate over time (vertical line indicates frame timing of L-glutamate addition). For each testis, GCaMP signal was normalized to the mean fluorescence intensity of the first frame. 10 testes were imaged per condition. Scale bars, (C – I, Q – T) 10 µm or (J – P) 100 µm. Hubs outlined (dashed white lines). Insets display fluorescent signals in greyscale.
","imageTitle":"Glutamate receptor enhancers are active, but receptors are not expressed in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were maintained on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast, as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Stocks were kept at 25°C and crosses were set and matured at 25°C. GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger males were collected at 0 – 4 days old and transferred to 29°C for 4 days to enhance GAL4 driver expression. Male flies less than 8 days old were used for all experiments. See table of Reagents for list of fly stocks. We used FlyBase (release FB2025_05) to find information on phenotypes/function/stocks/gene expression (Öztürk-Çolak et al., 2024).
Generation of transgenic fly lines
Enhancer reporter lines of GluRIA, GluRIB, GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE were generated as previously described (Mahadevaraju et al., 2024). For each gene, the 1.25 kb region upstream and 250 bp region downstream of the transcriptional start site was cloned and inserted upstream of the basal P-element promoter driving expression of the histone H2A coding sequence and three V5 tag sequences. Injections of transgenes were performed by BestGene (Chino Hills, CA).
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997; Viveiros and Matunis, 2026). Unless noted, all steps were executed at room temperature (RT), and a nutating platform was used for all incubation steps. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) and incubated for 20 min. Fixed testes were rinsed twice and washed for 30 min in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at RT or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then transferred to primary antibodies diluted in block and incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by two rinses, and an hour wash in 1X PBX, and then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1 μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed briefly then washed for an hour in 1X PBX. Finally, to remove detergent, testes were rinsed and washed for 10 min in 1X PBS before transferring to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin 3 (1:50, DSHB, 7610), N-cadherin (N-Cad; 1:20, DSHB, DN-Ex #8), GluRIIA (1:50, DSHB, 8B4D2), Vasa (1:20, DSHB), Zfh1 (1:500, our lab), V5 tag (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, R960-25), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11029), Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11001), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11006), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11077), Goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11075), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236). Basement membranes were stained with Concanavalin A, Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate (1:50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, C-11253).
Hybridization Chain Reaction-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (HCR-FISH)
Testes were processed for HCR-FISH using Molecular Instruments HCR (v3.0) buffers, hairpins, and probes and an adapted version of a previously described protocol (Grmai et al., 2024; Slaidina et al., 2020). All steps were performed on a nutator at room temperature unless otherwise noted. Testes from Oregon-R males were dissected in 1X PBS on ice then moved to an Eppendorf tube containing 1X PBS on ice after every five pairs of testes for up to 30 min. Testes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1X Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 0.1% Tween-20 (DPBS-Tw) for 20 min and then washed 2 x 5 min in DPBS-Tw. Tissues were then dehydrated in sequential washes with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice prior to storage at -20°C overnight. Testes were rehydrated with sequential washes with 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice, followed by a 2 hr permeabilization with 1% Triton-X in 1X DPBS, and a 20 min post-fix in 4% paraformaldehyde in DPBS-Tw. After fixation, testes were washed 2 x 5 min DPBS-Tw, 1 x 5 min 50%/50% DPBS-Tw/5X SSC with 0.1% Tween-20 diluted in 1X DPBS (SSC-Tw), and 2 x 5 min SSC-Tw, on ice. Tissues were pre-hybridized in probe hybridization buffer (Molecular Instruments) for 30 min at 37°C and then incubated in diluted probes (0.8 pmol in 1 mL in probe hybridization buffer) for 12-16 hrs at 37°C. Following hybridization, testes were washed 4 x 15 min at 37°C with probe wash buffer warmed to 37°C (Molecular Instruments), and then with SSC-Tw for 2 x 5 min at room temperature. To equilibrate, testes were incubated in amplification buffer for 10 min at room temperature (not nutating). Hairpin solutions were prepared by heating 6 pmol of each hairpin (B3 488 and B1 546 HCR™ Amplifier (v3.0)) for 90 seconds at 95°C, snap cooling at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, and then adding to 100 μL of room temperature amplification buffer (Molecular Instruments). Testes were incubated in hairpin solutions overnight at room temperature followed by washes in SSC-Tw: 2 x 5 min on benchtop, 2 x 30 min, and 1 x 5 min. DAPI (1:1000) was added to the final 30 min SSC-Tw wash during the last 15 min. Detergent was removed by washing in 1X PBS for 5 min. Testes were stored briefly in Vectashield prior to mounting (same day).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness glass coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom, and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012). Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices and maximum intensity projections are shown in this paper as indicated.
Live imaging of testes
E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s testes were dissected, cultured, and live imaged as previously described (Greenspan and Matunis, 2023) using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope. Experiment design was adapted from previous calcium imaging performed in explanted testes (Martin-Diaz and Herrera, 2024). Two testes of each dish (10 dishes total) were designated as either control or experimental. Testes were imaged for 10 minutes with frames approximately every 2.5 seconds (variability due to definite focus). For each dish, the control testis was imaged first, followed by imaging of the experimental testis. For the experimental testis, 1 mM L-glutamate (diluted in live imaging solution; (Huang et al., 2019)) was added to the dish after 32 frames were collected.
Quantifications and statistical analysis
FIJI was used to determine the E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity measurements. A region of interest was manually drawn around the hub, and the mean grey value of that region was acquired. Measurements of each frame were normalized to that of the first frame of the same testis.
All statistical analysis and generation of graphical representation were performed using GraphPad Prism 11.
","reagents":"Reagents
Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
Oregon-R | Oregon-R | Gift of D. Andrew |
GluRIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIC:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIC[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIID:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIID[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIE:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIE[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
UAS-RedStinger | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
GluR-T2A-GAL4 | w[*]; TI{2A-GAL4}GluRIIA[2A-GAL4] | BDSC_84637 |
E132-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}E132, w[*] | BDSC_26796 |
GCaMP6s | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=UASp-GCaMP6s}30/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_91366 |
GluRIIC RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01854}attP2 | BDSC_25836 |
GluRIID RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF02035}attP2 | BDSC_26010 |
GluRIIE RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01962}attP2 | BDSC_25942 |
mCherry RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=VALIUM20-mCherry.RNAi}attP2 | BDSC_35785 |
HCR probe | Description | Source |
upd1 | Fruit fly upd1 HCR v3.0 probe set (B1) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
GlurIIA | Fruit fly GlurRIIA HCR v3.0 probe set (B3) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
Adult stem cells are critical to the maintenance and regeneration of tissues. By using model systems like that of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, we can better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate stem cell behaviors. Adult stem cells reside in dynamic microenvironments, or niches, that are composed of cellular and molecular constituents including extracellular matrix and support cells (reviewed in (Morrison and Spradling, 2008)). The Drosophila testis is a blind-ended tubule that houses a single stem cell niche located at its apex (Fig. 1A). This stem cell niche maintains two stem cell populations, the germline stem cells (GSCs) and the somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs), both of which reside in direct contact with somatic niche, or hub, cells (Fig. 1B). The hub acts as both a signaling center and an adhesion platform to maintain both stem cell populations (reviewed in (de Cuevas and Matunis, 2011; Siddall and Hime, 2017)). Therefore, gaining insight into the hub is fundamental to our understanding of the biology of this stem cell niche.
Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are heterotetrameric channels that facilitate neuromuscular junction activity in response to the primary neurotransmitter glutamate (DiAntonio et al., 1999; Han et al., 2015; Han et al., 2024; Jan and Jan, 1976). Following an action potential, motor neurons release glutamate into the post-synaptic space, where it binds to the iGluRs on muscle cells, allowing the influx of calcium to trigger muscle contraction (Schuster et al., 1991; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1963; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1964). In mammals, glutamate acts as the primary neurotransmitter in the brain and its concentration is tightly regulated via a gradient maintained by the blood brain barrier; the concentration of glutamate is low in the brain and high in the blood (Vandenberg and Ryan, 2013). Similarly, Drosophila hemolymph contains high concentrations of glutamate, which may act as its source for the testis apex (Chen et al., 2009; Echalier, 1997; Fairchild et al., 2016). Furthermore, glutamatergic neurons innervate the internal male reproductive system, including the base of the testis, to coordinate copulation (Chaverra et al., 2025; Pavlou et al., 2016). Surprisingly, previous single-nuclei RNA sequencing of the testis detected mRNA transcripts encoding kainate-type and ⍺-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA)-like iGluRs subunits (Li et al., 2016) in the hub cells, a population of cells not thought to express such proteins (Li et al., 2022; Mahadevaraju et al., 2021; Raz et al., 2023). Therefore, the presence of iGluR transcripts within the niche suggests an avenue for inter-organ communication.
To begin our characterization of iGluR expression in the testis, we generated enhancer reporter transgenic fly strains for kainate-type (GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) and AMPA-like (GluRIA and GluRIB) iGluR subunits (see methods for details). Kainate-type iGluRs are tetramers consisting of three obligate subunits (GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) combined with one of two variable subunits (GluRIIA and GluRIIB) (Featherstone et al., 2005; Marrus et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2005). We examined testes of each transgenic fly and found that hub cell expression of iGluR subunits is highly variable, with some reporters showing high expression and others displaying little to none. Within the hub, reporters of GluRIIA (Fig. 1E), GluRIIB (Fig. 1F), and GluRIIC (Fig. 1G) were among the most highly expressed, while GluRIA (Fig. 1C) and GluRIB reporters (Fig. 1D) were expressed at moderate levels. Reporters of GluRIIE (Fig. 1I) and GluRIID (Fig. 1H) showed little to no expression in the hub cells. Reporter activity was not restricted to hub cells but also marked the muscle cells and pigment cells in a strain-specific manner. For instance, GluRIIA (Fig. 1L) and GluRIIC (Fig. 1N) were highly expressed in both muscle and pigment cells, GluRIIE (Fig. 1P) was predominantly expressed in muscle cells, and GluRIB (Fig. 1K), GluRIIB (Fig. 1M), and GluRIID (Fig. 1O) were expressed in pigment cells, while GluRIA (Fig. 1J) was not detected in either cell population. The variation between GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE reporter expression was surprising, as these subunits are all necessary to form the final heterotetrameric protein complexes. Furthermore, estimates of transcript abundance in larval body wall tissue suggest that GluRIID and GluRIIE transcripts are more abundant than those of GluRIIC (Qin et al., 2005), but expression patterns of our reporters revealed the opposite relationship in the hub cells. However, it should be noted that the reporter fly strains may not fully reflect the endogenous expression patterns of each gene due to their design (see methods for details). Altogether, our analysis of the iGluR subunit expression reporter fly lines suggests that both AMPA-like iGluR subunits are detectable in hub cells, whereas the full complement of kainite-type iGluR subunits is not.
Expression of enhancer reporter elements does not necessarily mean that the respective proteins are expressed. To investigate whether iGluR gene products are produced in hub cells, we assessed both transcript and protein expression of GluRIIA, the subunit with the strongest enhancer reporter expression. Using HCR-FISH, we observed that GluRIIA mRNA is detectable in hub cells, which were co-labeled with probes against the stemness-conferring signaling ligand upd1 (Fig. 1Q) (Kiger et al., 2001; Tulina and Matunis, 2001). Further, using antisera against GluRIIA, we detected GluRIIA protein in the muscles of the testis wall, which is consistent with their contractile role (Fig. 1R). However, we did not observe GluRIIA protein expression in hub cells (Fig. 1S). To verify the absence of GlurIIA protein in hub cells, we examined the expression pattern of a GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 driver line, which produces GAL4 as a separate protein under endogenous GluRIIA control (Deng et al., 2019). We surveyed testes from GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger flies for RedStinger expression in hub cells and apart from one hub cell (n = 1/40 testes), we did not detect GAL4 activity in the hub (Fig. 1T). Altogether, this suggests that iGluR genes are transcribed in hub cells, but that the corresponding proteins are not produced, indicating potential post-transcriptional or post-translational regulation of iGluR subunit genes. Analogous de-coupling of iGluR subunit gene transcription and translation has also been observed during Drosophila embryogenesis (Ganesan et al., 2011).
Given the inconsistency between transcript expression and lack of detectable GluRIIA protein in hub cells, we investigated whether iGluRs have a functional role in the testis stem cell niche. To measure hub cell reactivity to glutamate, we live imaged testes expressing a fluorescent calcium reporter, GCaMP6s (Parkhurst, 2020), specifically in hub cells using the hub specific driver, E132-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004). At the onset of imaging, GFP fluorescence, the calcium reporter signal, was detected in all the hub cells. However, we did not observe any change in GFP fluorescence signal following addition of 1 mM L-glutamate to the imaging media (Huang et al., 2019), and relative GCaMP intensity plots were similar to control testes (Fig. 1U). This suggests that hub cells are not responsive to glutamate. We also asked whether iGluR expression in hub cells is necessary to support the stem cell niche, which could suggest that iGluRs have a non-excitatory role in the hub (reviewed in (Featherstone, 2010)). We hypothesized that if hub cells need iGluRs to coordinate stem cell niche homeostasis, we would observe a loss of cells in the apices of testes with reduced iGluR expression in hub cells. Using E132-GAL4, we expressed RNAi transgenes targeting the essential subunits, GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE, and assayed for differences in cellular composition within the testis apex relative to testes expressing the control RNAi transgene (UAS-mCherry RNAi). In testes with hub cell-specific knockdown (KD) of GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE we observed hub cells (Fasciclin 3-positive), germ cells (Vasa-positive) and early cyst cells (Zfh1-positive) in comparable abundance to control testes (GluRIIC KD: 61/61 testes; GluRIID KD: 62/62 testes; GluRIIE KD: 93/95 testes, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.4975; mCherry KD: 91/91 testes). Of the two outlier testes from the GluRIIE KD flies, one had fewer germ cells than control testes (n = 1/95) and one had a germline tumor (n = 1/95). Overall, these results indicate that iGluRs likely do not function in hub cells to maintain homeostasis of this stem cell niche. A caveat of this result is that the RNAi-mediated knockdown may not have sufficiently reduced protein abundance. However, these same RNAi transgenes have been shown to effectively produce loss-of-function phenotypes in other tissues (Sulkowski et al., 2014). We also cannot rule out the possibility that reduced iGluR function affects the testis stem cell niche in more subtle ways (i.e. reduced stem cell division rate). Finally, iGluRs may be necessary under varying environmental or physiological conditions not assayed here, including starvation, aging, and excessive mating.
Through this work we have demonstrated that reporters of iGluR gene expression are variably detected in hub cells as well as pigment cells and muscle cells of the testis. While we confirmed that transcripts of one iGluR subunit, GluRIIA, are detectable in hub cells, we did not detect respective protein expression in hub cells, although GluRIIA expression in the muscle cells of the testis wall confirmed that the antisera is functional. This absence of protein expression was reflected in a lack of response to exogenous glutamate and the absence of deleterious effects following hub-specific knockdown of essential kainate-type iGluR subunits. This work demonstrates that despite transcriptional activity, iGluRs are not expressed in hub cells and do not function in hub cells to maintain testis homeostasis. Future work will need to be performed to investigate the role of iGluRs in the muscle cells and pigment cells of the testis.
","references":[{"reference":"Chaverra M, Toney JP, Dardenne-Ankringa LD, Knee JT, Morris AR, Wadhams JB, Certel SJ, Stowers RS. 2025. Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs. : 10.7554/elife.108225.2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.108225.2"},{"reference":"Chen K, Augustin H, Featherstone DE. 2009. Effect of ambient extracellular glutamate on Drosophila glutamate receptor trafficking and function. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195: 10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3"},{"reference":"de Cuevas M, Matunis EL. 2011. The stem cell niche: lessons from the Drosophila testis. Development 138: 2861-2869.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.056242"},{"reference":"Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al., Rao. 2019. Chemoconnectomics: Mapping Chemical Transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101: 876-893.e4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045"},{"reference":"DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Heckmann M, Goodman CS. 1999. Glutamate Receptor Expression Regulates Quantal Size and Quantal Content at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 3023-3032.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03023.1999"},{"reference":"Echalier G. 1997. Composition of the Body Fluid of Drosophila and the Design of Culture Media for Drosophila Cells. Drosophila Cells in Culture : 1-67.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/B978-012229460-0/50002-6"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE. 2010. Intercellular Glutamate Signaling in the Nervous System and Beyond. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 1: 4-12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/cn900006n"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Rohrbough J, Liebl F, Karr J, Sheng Q, Rodesch CK, Broadie K. 2005. An Essential Drosophila Glutamate Receptor Subunit That Functions in Both Central Neuropil and Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3199-3208.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-04.2005"},{"reference":"Ganesan S, Karr JE, Featherstone DE. 2011. Drosophila glutamate receptor mRNA expression and mRNP particles. RNA Biol 8(5): 771-81.
","pubmedId":"21743295","doi":""},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2023. Live Imaging of the Drosophila Testis Stem Cell Niche. Methods in Molecular Biology,Germline Stem Cells : 113-125.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-3259-8_6"},{"reference":"Grmai L, Jimenez E, Baxter K, Van Doren M. 2024. Steroid signaling controls sex-specific development in an invertebrate. : 10.1101/2023.12.22.573099.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.22.573099"},{"reference":"Han TH, Dharkar P, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2015. Functional reconstitution of\n Drosophila melanogaster\n NMJ glutamate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6182-6187.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1500458112"},{"reference":"Han TH, Vicidomini R, Ramos CI, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2024. The gating properties of Drosophila NMJ glutamate receptors and their dependence on Neto. The Journal of Physiology 602: 7043-7064.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/JP287331"},{"reference":"Huang H, Liu S, Kornberg TB. 2019. Glutamate signaling at cytoneme synapses. Science 363: 948-955.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.aat5053"},{"reference":"Jan LY, Jan YN. 1976. L‐glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction.. The Journal of Physiology 262: 215-236.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressing bam transcription in the Drosophila testis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Kiger AA, Jones DL, Schulz C, Rogers MB, Fuller MT. 2001. Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue. Science 294: 2542-2545.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066707"},{"reference":"Li H, Janssens J, De Waegeneer M, Kolluru SS, Davie K, Gardeux V, et al., Zinzen. 2022. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375: 10.1126/science.abk2432.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.abk2432"},{"reference":"Li Y, Dharkar P, Han TH, Serpe M, Lee CH, Mayer ML. 2016. Novel Functional Properties of Drosophila CNS Glutamate Receptors. Neuron 92: 1036-1048.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.058"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Fear JM, Akeju M, Galletta BJ, Pinheiro MMLS, Avelino CC, et al., Oliver. 2021. Dynamic sex chromosome expression in Drosophila male germ cells. Nature Communications 12: 10.1038/s41467-021-20897-y.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/S41467-021-20897-Y"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Pal S, Bhaskar P, McDonald BD, Benner L, Denti L, et al., Oliver. 2024. Diverse somatic Transformer and sex chromosome karyotype pathways regulate gene expression in Drosophila gonad development. : 10.7554/elife.101641.1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.101641.1"},{"reference":"Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A. 2004. Differential Localization of Glutamate Receptor Subunits at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 24: 1406-1415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-03.2004"},{"reference":"Martin-Diaz J, Herrera SC. 2024. A stem cell activation state coupling spermatogenesis with social interactions in Drosophila males. Cell Reports 43: 114647.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114647"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. 2008. Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life. Cell 132: 598-611.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038"},{"reference":"Öztürk-Çolak A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, et al., Lovato. 2024. FlyBase: updates to the\n Drosophila\n genes and genomes database. GENETICS 227: 10.1093/genetics/iyad211.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyad211"},{"reference":"Parkhurst, S. (2020). Personal communication to FlyBase [FBrf0246936].
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Pavlou HJ, Lin AC, Neville MC, Nojima T, Diao F, Chen BE, White BH, Goodwin SF. 2016. Neural circuitry coordinating male copulation. eLife 5: 10.7554/elife.20713.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.20713"},{"reference":"Qin G, Schwarz T, Kittel RJ, Schmid A, Rasse TM, Kappei D, et al., Sigrist. 2005. Four Different Subunits Are Essential for Expressing the Synaptic Glutamate Receptor at Neuromuscular Junctions of Drosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3209-3218.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4194-04.2005"},{"reference":"Raz AA, Vida GS, Stern SR, Mahadevaraju S, Fingerhut JM, Viveiros JM, et al., Fuller. 2023. Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.82201.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.82201"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 676-682.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schuster CM, Ultsch A, Schloss P, Cox JA, Schmitt B, Betz H. 1991. Molecular Cloning of an Invertebrate Glutamate Receptor Subunit Expressed in\n Drosophila\n Muscle. Science 254: 112-114.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1681587"},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Slaidina M, Banisch TU, Gupta S, Lehmann R. 2020. A single-cell atlas of the developing\n Drosophila\n ovary identifies follicle stem cell progenitors. Genes & Development 34: 239-249.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/gad.330464.119"},{"reference":"Sulkowski M, Kim YJ, Serpe M. 2014. Postsynaptic glutamate receptors regulate local BMP signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Development 141(2): 436-47.
","pubmedId":"24353060","doi":""},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1963. Glutamate-induced Depolarization in Crustacean Muscle. Nature 198: 490-491.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/198490a0"},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1964. The effect on crayfish muscle of iontophoretically applied glutamate. The Journal of Physiology 170: 296-317.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332"},{"reference":"Tulina N, Matunis E. 2001. Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal in\n Drosophila\n Spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT Signaling. Science 294: 2546-2549.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066700"},{"reference":"Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM. 2013. Mechanisms of Glutamate Transport. Physiological Reviews 93: 1621-1657.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1152/physrev.00007.2013"},{"reference":"Viveiros J, Matunis E. 2026. Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. MicroPubl Biol 2026: 10.17912/micropub.biology.002106.
","pubmedId":"42079377","doi":""}],"title":"Ionotropic glutamate receptor expression and function in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1785827899460"}]},{"id":"10145b57-392d-46ad-9db3-909f58422a7c","decision":"edit","abstract":"Adult stem cells are required to maintain tissue homeostasis and understanding their regulation is essential to leveraging their utility. Here we report that seven transgenic ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit reporter lines are variably expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, suggesting a novel form of inter-organ communication for this tissue. While HCR-FISH confirms that one of the iGluR subunits, GluRIIA, is transcribed in hub cells, we do not detect GluRIIA protein expression. Furthermore, hub cells are not sensitive to exogenous glutamate and hub-specific knockdown of the essential iGluR subunits does not phenotypically affect cells of the testis apex. Altogether this suggests that iGluRs are not essential for stem cell niche homeostasis.
","acknowledgements":"We thank D. Andrew and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; FlyBase for its resources; and M. Piacentino for comments. Illustrations created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ntripat2@alumni.jh.edu","firstName":"Neha","lastName":"Tripathi","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-6354-9190"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","fundingAcquisition"],"email":"jgrey2@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jasmine","lastName":"Grey","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-6095-4461"},{"affiliations":["Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","methodology","investigation"],"email":"brennand@stanford.edu","firstName":"Brennan","lastName":"McDonald","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-2321-0149"},{"affiliations":["Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Genetics"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"leif_benner@hms.harvard.edu","firstName":"Leif","lastName":"Benner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3716-4522"},{"affiliations":["Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA"],"departments":["The O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","resources","project"],"email":"brioliv@iu.edu","firstName":"Brian","lastName":"Oliver","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3455-4891"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","conceptualization"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5439-4656"}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jasmine Grey"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R35GM136665 (E.M.) and an National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (J.V. and J.G.). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (DGE2139757). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/adba29ac9897f49b770f0219c793d735.png"},"imageCaption":"(A – B) Illustration of the Drosophila (A) testis and (B) the testis apex. The testis is a coiled blind ended tubule in which the germline cells (purple) exit the apex as they differentiate, ultimately becoming sperm (grey). The testis wall is composed of an outer pigment cell layer (pink) and inner muscle cell layer (orange) with basal laminae underlying each layer. At the testis apex, the niche cells (hub, green) maintain germline stem cells (GSCs, dark purple) and cyst stem cells (CySCs, dark blue). As the stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSC daughters, or gonialblasts, undergo four rounds of transit amplification (spermatogonia, light purple). CySCs divide and give rise to quiescent daughter cyst cells (light blue) that wrap and support adjacent germ cells. (C – P) Representative (C – I) single confocal sections through testis apices or (J – P) maximum intensity projections of testes from (C,J) GluRIA, (D,K) GluRIB, (E,L) GluRIIA, (F,M) GluRIIB, (G,N) GluRIIC, (H,O) GluRIID, or (I,P) GluRIIE expression reporter flies. Testes were stained for enhancer reporter expression (V5, green; insets), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (C – I) hub cell membranes (N-cadherin (N-Cad), magenta). (Q) Representative single confocal section through Oregon-R testis apex labeled using HCR-FISH probes against upd1 (orange) and GluRIIA (green; inset) mRNA transcripts and counterstained with DAPI (nuclei, blue). (R – S) Representative single confocal sections through Oregon-R (R) testis wall or (S) testis apex stained for GluRIIA (green; inset), basement membranes (Concanavalin A, magenta), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (T) Representative single confocal section through GluRIIA-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger testis apex stained for GAL4 expression (DsRed, magenta; inset), hub cell membranes (N-Cad, green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (U) Quantification of relative GCaMP signal within the hub of explanted control testes or testes treated with 1 mM L-glutamate over time (vertical line indicates frame timing of L-glutamate addition). For each testis, GCaMP signal was normalized to the mean fluorescence intensity of the first frame. 10 testes were imaged per condition. Scale bars, (C – I, Q – T) 10 µm or (J – P) 100 µm. Hubs outlined (dashed white lines). Insets display fluorescent signals in greyscale.
","imageTitle":"Glutamate receptor enhancers are active, but receptors are not expressed in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were maintained on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast, as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Stocks were kept at 25°C and crosses were set and matured at 25°C. GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger males were collected at 0 – 4 days old and transferred to 29°C for 4 days to enhance GAL4 driver expression. Male flies less than 8 days old were used for all experiments. See table of Reagents for list of fly stocks. We used FlyBase (release FB2025_05) to find information on phenotypes/function/stocks/gene expression (Öztürk-Çolak et al., 2024).
Generation of transgenic fly lines
Enhancer reporter lines of GluRIA, GluRIB, GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE were generated as previously described (Mahadevaraju et al., 2024). For each gene, the 1.25 kb region upstream and 250 bp region downstream of the transcriptional start site was cloned and inserted upstream of the basal P-element promoter driving expression of the histone H2A coding sequence and three V5 tag sequences. Injections of transgenes were performed by BestGene (Chino Hills, CA).
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997; Viveiros and Matunis, 2026). Unless noted, all steps were executed at room temperature (RT), and a nutating platform was used for all incubation steps. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) and incubated for 20 min. Fixed testes were rinsed twice and washed for 30 min in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at RT or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then transferred to primary antibodies diluted in block and incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by two rinses, and an hour wash in 1X PBX, and then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1 μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed briefly then washed for an hour in 1X PBX. Finally, to remove detergent, testes were rinsed and washed for 10 min in 1X PBS before transferring to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin 3 (1:50, DSHB, 7610), N-cadherin (N-Cad; 1:20, DSHB, DN-Ex #8), GluRIIA (1:50, DSHB, 8B4D2), Vasa (1:20, DSHB), Zfh1 (1:500, our lab), V5 tag (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, R960-25), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11029), Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11001), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11006), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11077), Goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11075), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236). Basement membranes were stained with Concanavalin A, Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate (1:50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, C-11253).
Hybridization Chain Reaction-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (HCR-FISH)
Testes were processed for HCR-FISH using Molecular Instruments HCR (v3.0) buffers, hairpins, and probes and an adapted version of a previously described protocol (Grmai et al., 2024; Slaidina et al., 2020). All steps were performed on a nutator at room temperature unless otherwise noted. Testes from Oregon-R males were dissected in 1X PBS on ice then moved to an Eppendorf tube containing 1X PBS on ice after every five pairs of testes for up to 30 min. Testes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1X Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 0.1% Tween-20 (DPBS-Tw) for 20 min and then washed 2 x 5 min in DPBS-Tw. Tissues were then dehydrated in sequential washes with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice prior to storage at -20°C overnight. Testes were rehydrated with sequential washes with 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice, followed by a 2 hr permeabilization with 1% Triton-X in 1X DPBS, and a 20 min post-fix in 4% paraformaldehyde in DPBS-Tw. After fixation, testes were washed 2 x 5 min DPBS-Tw, 1 x 5 min 50%/50% DPBS-Tw/5X SSC with 0.1% Tween-20 diluted in 1X DPBS (SSC-Tw), and 2 x 5 min SSC-Tw, on ice. Tissues were pre-hybridized in probe hybridization buffer (Molecular Instruments) for 30 min at 37°C and then incubated in diluted probes (0.8 pmol in 1 mL in probe hybridization buffer) for 12-16 hrs at 37°C. Following hybridization, testes were washed 4 x 15 min at 37°C with probe wash buffer warmed to 37°C (Molecular Instruments), and then with SSC-Tw for 2 x 5 min at room temperature. To equilibrate, testes were incubated in amplification buffer for 10 min at room temperature (not nutating). Hairpin solutions were prepared by heating 6 pmol of each hairpin (B3 488 and B1 546 HCR™ Amplifier (v3.0)) for 90 seconds at 95°C, snap cooling at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, and then adding to 100 μL of room temperature amplification buffer (Molecular Instruments). Testes were incubated in hairpin solutions overnight at room temperature followed by washes in SSC-Tw: 2 x 5 min on benchtop, 2 x 30 min, and 1 x 5 min. DAPI (1:1000) was added to the final 30 min SSC-Tw wash during the last 15 min. Detergent was removed by washing in 1X PBS for 5 min. Testes were stored briefly in Vectashield prior to mounting (same day).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness glass coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom, and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012). Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices and maximum intensity projections are shown in this paper as indicated.
Live imaging of testes
E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s testes were dissected, cultured, and live imaged as previously described (Greenspan and Matunis, 2023) using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope. Experiment design was adapted from previous calcium imaging performed in explanted testes (Martin-Diaz and Herrera, 2024). Two testes of each dish (10 dishes total) were designated as either control or experimental. Testes were imaged for 10 minutes with frames approximately every 2.5 seconds (variability due to definite focus). For each dish, the control testis was imaged first, followed by imaging of the experimental testis. For the experimental testis, 1 mM L-glutamate (diluted in live imaging solution; (Huang et al., 2019)) was added to the dish after 32 frames were collected.
Quantifications and statistical analysis
FIJI was used to determine the E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity measurements. A region of interest was manually drawn around the hub, and the mean grey value of that region was acquired. Measurements of each frame were normalized to that of the first frame of the same testis.
All statistical analysis and generation of graphical representation were performed using GraphPad Prism 11.
","reagents":"Reagents
Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
Oregon-R | Oregon-R | Gift of D. Andrew |
GluRIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIC:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIC[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIID:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIID[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIE:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIE[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
UAS-RedStinger | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
GluR-T2A-GAL4 | w[*]; TI{2A-GAL4}GluRIIA[2A-GAL4] | BDSC_84637 |
E132-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}E132, w[*] | BDSC_26796 |
GCaMP6s | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=UASp-GCaMP6s}30/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_91366 |
GluRIIC RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01854}attP2 | BDSC_25836 |
GluRIID RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF02035}attP2 | BDSC_26010 |
GluRIIE RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01962}attP2 | BDSC_25942 |
mCherry RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=VALIUM20-mCherry.RNAi}attP2 | BDSC_35785 |
HCR probe | Description | Source |
upd1 | Fruit fly upd1 HCR v3.0 probe set (B1) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
GlurIIA | Fruit fly GlurRIIA HCR v3.0 probe set (B3) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
Adult stem cells are critical to the maintenance and regeneration of tissues. By using model systems like that of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, we can better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate stem cell behaviors. Adult stem cells reside in dynamic microenvironments, or niches, that are composed of cellular and molecular constituents including extracellular matrix and support cells (reviewed in (Morrison and Spradling, 2008)). The Drosophila testis is a blind-ended tubule that houses a single stem cell niche located at its apex (Fig. 1A). This stem cell niche maintains two stem cell populations, the germline stem cells (GSCs) and the somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs), both of which reside in direct contact with somatic niche, or hub, cells (Fig. 1B). The hub acts as both a signaling center and an adhesion platform to maintain both stem cell populations (reviewed in (de Cuevas and Matunis, 2011; Siddall and Hime, 2017)). Therefore, gaining insight into the hub is fundamental to our understanding of the biology of this stem cell niche.
Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are heterotetrameric channels that facilitate neuromuscular junction activity in response to the primary neurotransmitter glutamate (DiAntonio et al., 1999; Han et al., 2015; Han et al., 2024; Jan and Jan, 1976). Following an action potential, motor neurons release glutamate into the post-synaptic space, where it binds to the iGluRs on muscle cells, allowing the influx of calcium to trigger muscle contraction (Schuster et al., 1991; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1963; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1964). In mammals, glutamate acts as the primary neurotransmitter in the brain and its concentration is tightly regulated via a gradient maintained by the blood brain barrier; the concentration of glutamate is low in the brain and high in the blood (Vandenberg and Ryan, 2013). Similarly, Drosophila hemolymph contains high concentrations of glutamate, which may act as its source for the testis apex (Chen et al., 2009; Echalier, 1997; Fairchild et al., 2016). Furthermore, glutamatergic neurons innervate the internal male reproductive system, including the base of the testis, to coordinate copulation (Chaverra et al., 2025; Pavlou et al., 2016). Surprisingly, previous single-nuclei RNA sequencing of the testis detected mRNA transcripts encoding kainate-type and ⍺-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA)-like iGluRs subunits (Li et al., 2016) in the hub cells, a population of cells not thought to express such proteins (Li et al., 2022; Mahadevaraju et al., 2021; Raz et al., 2023). Therefore, the presence of iGluR transcripts within the niche suggests an avenue for inter-organ communication.
To begin our characterization of iGluR expression in the testis, we generated enhancer reporter transgenic fly strains for kainate-type (GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) and AMPA-like (GluRIA and GluRIB) iGluR subunits (see methods for details). Kainate-type iGluRs are tetramers consisting of three obligate subunits (GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) combined with one of two variable subunits (GluRIIA and GluRIIB) (Featherstone et al., 2005; Marrus et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2005). We examined testes of each transgenic fly and found that hub cell expression of iGluR subunits is highly variable, with some reporters showing high expression and others displaying little to none. Within the hub, reporters of GluRIIA (Fig. 1E), GluRIIB (Fig. 1F), and GluRIIC (Fig. 1G) were among the most highly expressed, while GluRIA (Fig. 1C) and GluRIB reporters (Fig. 1D) were expressed at moderate levels. Reporters of GluRIIE (Fig. 1I) and GluRIID (Fig. 1H) showed little to no expression in the hub cells. Reporter activity was not restricted to hub cells but also marked the muscle cells and pigment cells in a strain-specific manner. For instance, GluRIIA (Fig. 1L) and GluRIIC (Fig. 1N) were highly expressed in both muscle and pigment cells, GluRIIE (Fig. 1P) was predominantly expressed in muscle cells, and GluRIB (Fig. 1K), GluRIIB (Fig. 1M), and GluRIID (Fig. 1O) were expressed in pigment cells, while GluRIA (Fig. 1J) was not detected in either cell population. The variation between GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE reporter expression was surprising, as these subunits are all necessary to form the final heterotetrameric protein complexes. Furthermore, estimates of transcript abundance in larval body wall tissue suggest that GluRIID and GluRIIE transcripts are more abundant than those of GluRIIC (Qin et al., 2005), but expression patterns of our reporters revealed the opposite relationship in the hub cells. However, it should be noted that the reporter fly strains may not fully reflect the endogenous expression patterns of each gene due to their design (see methods for details). Altogether, our analysis of the iGluR subunit expression reporter fly lines suggests that both AMPA-like iGluR subunits are detectable in hub cells, whereas the full complement of kainite-type iGluR subunits is not.
Expression of enhancer reporter elements does not necessarily mean that the respective proteins are expressed. To investigate whether iGluR gene products are produced in hub cells, we assessed both transcript and protein expression of GluRIIA, the subunit with the strongest enhancer reporter expression. Using HCR-FISH, we observed that GluRIIA mRNA is detectable in hub cells, which were co-labeled with probes against the stemness-conferring signaling ligand upd1 (Fig. 1Q) (Kiger et al., 2001; Tulina and Matunis, 2001). Further, using antisera against GluRIIA, we detected GluRIIA protein in the muscles of the testis wall, which is consistent with their contractile role (Fig. 1R). However, we did not observe GluRIIA protein expression in hub cells (Fig. 1S). To verify the absence of GlurIIA protein in hub cells, we examined the expression pattern of a GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 driver line, which produces GAL4 as a separate protein under endogenous GluRIIA control (Deng et al., 2019). We surveyed testes from GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger flies for RedStinger expression in hub cells and apart from one hub cell (n = 1/40 testes), we did not detect GAL4 activity in the hub (Fig. 1T). Altogether, this suggests that iGluR genes are transcribed in hub cells, but that the corresponding proteins are not produced, indicating potential post-transcriptional or post-translational regulation of iGluR subunit genes. Analogous de-coupling of iGluR subunit gene transcription and translation has also been observed during Drosophila embryogenesis (Ganesan et al., 2011).
Given the inconsistency between transcript expression and lack of detectable GluRIIA protein in hub cells, we investigated whether iGluRs have a functional role in the testis stem cell niche. To measure hub cell reactivity to glutamate, we live imaged testes expressing a fluorescent calcium reporter, GCaMP6s (Parkhurst, 2020), specifically in hub cells using the hub specific driver, E132-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004). At the onset of imaging, GFP fluorescence, the calcium reporter signal, was detected in all the hub cells. However, we did not observe any change in GFP fluorescence signal following addition of 1 mM L-glutamate to the imaging media (Huang et al., 2019), and relative GCaMP intensity plots were similar to control testes (Fig. 1U). This suggests that hub cells are not responsive to glutamate. We also asked whether iGluR expression in hub cells is necessary to support the stem cell niche, which could suggest that iGluRs have a non-excitatory role in the hub (reviewed in (Featherstone, 2010)). We hypothesized that if hub cells need iGluRs to coordinate stem cell niche homeostasis, we would observe a loss of cells in the apices of testes with reduced iGluR expression in hub cells. Using E132-GAL4, we expressed RNAi transgenes targeting the essential subunits, GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE, and assayed for differences in cellular composition within the testis apex relative to testes expressing the control RNAi transgene (UAS-mCherry RNAi). In testes with hub cell-specific knockdown (KD) of GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE we observed hub cells (Fasciclin 3-positive), germ cells (Vasa-positive) and early cyst cells (Zfh1-positive) in comparable abundance to control testes (GluRIIC KD: 61/61 testes; GluRIID KD: 62/62 testes; GluRIIE KD: 93/95 testes, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.4975; mCherry KD: 91/91 testes). Of the two outlier testes from the GluRIIE KD flies, one had fewer germ cells than control testes (n = 1/95) and one had a germline tumor (n = 1/95). Overall, these results indicate that iGluRs likely do not function in hub cells to maintain homeostasis of this stem cell niche. A caveat of this result is that the RNAi-mediated knockdown may not have sufficiently reduced protein abundance. However, these same RNAi transgenes have been shown to effectively produce loss-of-function phenotypes in other tissues (Sulkowski et al., 2014). We also cannot rule out the possibility that reduced iGluR function affects the testis stem cell niche in more subtle ways (i.e. reduced stem cell division rate). Finally, iGluRs may be necessary under varying environmental or physiological conditions not assayed here, including starvation, aging, and excessive mating.
Through this work we have demonstrated that reporters of iGluR gene expression are variably detected in hub cells as well as pigment cells and muscle cells of the testis. While we confirmed that transcripts of one iGluR subunit, GluRIIA, are detectable in hub cells, we did not detect respective protein expression in hub cells, although GluRIIA expression in the muscle cells of the testis wall confirmed that the antisera is functional. This absence of protein expression was reflected in a lack of response to exogenous glutamate and the absence of deleterious effects following hub-specific knockdown of essential kainate-type iGluR subunits. This work demonstrates that despite transcriptional activity, iGluRs are not expressed in hub cells and do not function in hub cells to maintain testis homeostasis. Future work will need to be performed to investigate the role of iGluRs in the muscle cells and pigment cells of the testis.
","references":[{"reference":"Chaverra M, Toney JP, Dardenne-Ankringa LD, Knee JT, Morris AR, Wadhams JB, Certel SJ, Stowers RS. 2025. Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs. : 10.7554/elife.108225.2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.108225.2"},{"reference":"Chen K, Augustin H, Featherstone DE. 2009. Effect of ambient extracellular glutamate on Drosophila glutamate receptor trafficking and function. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195: 10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3"},{"reference":"de Cuevas M, Matunis EL. 2011. The stem cell niche: lessons from the Drosophila testis. Development 138: 2861-2869.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.056242"},{"reference":"Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al., Rao. 2019. Chemoconnectomics: Mapping Chemical Transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101: 876-893.e4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045"},{"reference":"DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Heckmann M, Goodman CS. 1999. Glutamate Receptor Expression Regulates Quantal Size and Quantal Content at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 3023-3032.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03023.1999"},{"reference":"Echalier G. 1997. Composition of the Body Fluid of Drosophila and the Design of Culture Media for Drosophila Cells. Drosophila Cells in Culture : 1-67.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/B978-012229460-0/50002-6"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE. 2010. Intercellular Glutamate Signaling in the Nervous System and Beyond. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 1: 4-12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/cn900006n"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Rohrbough J, Liebl F, Karr J, Sheng Q, Rodesch CK, Broadie K. 2005. An Essential Drosophila Glutamate Receptor Subunit That Functions in Both Central Neuropil and Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3199-3208.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-04.2005"},{"reference":"Ganesan S, Karr JE, Featherstone DE. 2011. Drosophila glutamate receptor mRNA expression and mRNP particles. RNA Biol 8(5): 771-81.
","pubmedId":"21743295","doi":""},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2023. Live Imaging of the Drosophila Testis Stem Cell Niche. Methods in Molecular Biology,Germline Stem Cells : 113-125.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-3259-8_6"},{"reference":"Grmai L, Jimenez E, Baxter K, Van Doren M. 2024. Steroid signaling controls sex-specific development in an invertebrate. : 10.1101/2023.12.22.573099.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.22.573099"},{"reference":"Han TH, Dharkar P, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2015. Functional reconstitution of\n Drosophila melanogaster\n NMJ glutamate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6182-6187.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1500458112"},{"reference":"Han TH, Vicidomini R, Ramos CI, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2024. The gating properties of Drosophila NMJ glutamate receptors and their dependence on Neto. The Journal of Physiology 602: 7043-7064.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/JP287331"},{"reference":"Huang H, Liu S, Kornberg TB. 2019. Glutamate signaling at cytoneme synapses. Science 363: 948-955.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.aat5053"},{"reference":"Jan LY, Jan YN. 1976. L‐glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction.. The Journal of Physiology 262: 215-236.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressing bam transcription in the Drosophila testis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Kiger AA, Jones DL, Schulz C, Rogers MB, Fuller MT. 2001. Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue. Science 294: 2542-2545.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066707"},{"reference":"Li H, Janssens J, De Waegeneer M, Kolluru SS, Davie K, Gardeux V, et al., Zinzen. 2022. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375: 10.1126/science.abk2432.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.abk2432"},{"reference":"Li Y, Dharkar P, Han TH, Serpe M, Lee CH, Mayer ML. 2016. Novel Functional Properties of Drosophila CNS Glutamate Receptors. Neuron 92: 1036-1048.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.058"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Fear JM, Akeju M, Galletta BJ, Pinheiro MMLS, Avelino CC, et al., Oliver. 2021. Dynamic sex chromosome expression in Drosophila male germ cells. Nature Communications 12: 10.1038/s41467-021-20897-y.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/S41467-021-20897-Y"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Pal S, Bhaskar P, McDonald BD, Benner L, Denti L, et al., Oliver. 2024. Diverse somatic Transformer and sex chromosome karyotype pathways regulate gene expression in Drosophila gonad development. : 10.7554/elife.101641.1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.101641.1"},{"reference":"Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A. 2004. Differential Localization of Glutamate Receptor Subunits at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 24: 1406-1415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-03.2004"},{"reference":"Martin-Diaz J, Herrera SC. 2024. A stem cell activation state coupling spermatogenesis with social interactions in Drosophila males. Cell Reports 43: 114647.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114647"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. 2008. Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life. Cell 132: 598-611.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038"},{"reference":"Öztürk-Çolak A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, et al., Lovato. 2024. FlyBase: updates to the\n Drosophila\n genes and genomes database. GENETICS 227: 10.1093/genetics/iyad211.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyad211"},{"reference":"Parkhurst, S. (2020). Personal communication to FlyBase [FBrf0246936].
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Pavlou HJ, Lin AC, Neville MC, Nojima T, Diao F, Chen BE, White BH, Goodwin SF. 2016. Neural circuitry coordinating male copulation. eLife 5: 10.7554/elife.20713.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.20713"},{"reference":"Qin G, Schwarz T, Kittel RJ, Schmid A, Rasse TM, Kappei D, et al., Sigrist. 2005. Four Different Subunits Are Essential for Expressing the Synaptic Glutamate Receptor at Neuromuscular Junctions of Drosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3209-3218.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4194-04.2005"},{"reference":"Raz AA, Vida GS, Stern SR, Mahadevaraju S, Fingerhut JM, Viveiros JM, et al., Fuller. 2023. Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.82201.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.82201"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 676-682.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schuster CM, Ultsch A, Schloss P, Cox JA, Schmitt B, Betz H. 1991. Molecular Cloning of an Invertebrate Glutamate Receptor Subunit Expressed in\n Drosophila\n Muscle. Science 254: 112-114.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1681587"},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Slaidina M, Banisch TU, Gupta S, Lehmann R. 2020. A single-cell atlas of the developing\n Drosophila\n ovary identifies follicle stem cell progenitors. Genes & Development 34: 239-249.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/gad.330464.119"},{"reference":"Sulkowski M, Kim YJ, Serpe M. 2014. Postsynaptic glutamate receptors regulate local BMP signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Development 141(2): 436-47.
","pubmedId":"24353060","doi":""},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1963. Glutamate-induced Depolarization in Crustacean Muscle. Nature 198: 490-491.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/198490a0"},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1964. The effect on crayfish muscle of iontophoretically applied glutamate. The Journal of Physiology 170: 296-317.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332"},{"reference":"Tulina N, Matunis E. 2001. Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal in\n Drosophila\n Spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT Signaling. Science 294: 2546-2549.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066700"},{"reference":"Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM. 2013. Mechanisms of Glutamate Transport. Physiological Reviews 93: 1621-1657.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1152/physrev.00007.2013"},{"reference":"Viveiros J, Matunis E. 2026. Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. MicroPubl Biol 2026: 10.17912/micropub.biology.002106.
","pubmedId":"42079377","doi":""}],"title":"Ionotropic glutamate receptor expression and function in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"5ff72cd0-ac07-4f79-8e93-65b3e35e96ac","decision":"publish","abstract":"Adult stem cells are required to maintain tissue homeostasis and understanding their regulation is essential to leveraging their utility. Here we report that seven transgenic ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit reporter lines are variably expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, suggesting a novel form of inter-organ communication for this tissue. While HCR-FISH confirms that one of the iGluR subunits, GluRIIA, is transcribed in hub cells, we do not detect GluRIIA protein expression. Furthermore, hub cells are not sensitive to exogenous glutamate and hub-specific knockdown of the essential iGluR subunits does not phenotypically affect cells of the testis apex. Altogether this suggests that iGluRs are not essential for stem cell niche homeostasis.
","acknowledgements":"We thank D. Andrew and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) for flies; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies; FlyBase for its resources; and M. Piacentino for comments. Illustrations created in BioRender.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","fundingAcquisition","investigation","methodology","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jviveir1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jennifer","lastName":"Viveiros","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-9785-7371"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"ntripat2@alumni.jh.edu","firstName":"Neha","lastName":"Tripathi","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-6354-9190"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["investigation","methodology","writing_reviewEditing","fundingAcquisition"],"email":"jgrey2@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Jasmine","lastName":"Grey","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-6095-4461"},{"affiliations":["Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["writing_reviewEditing","methodology","investigation"],"email":"brennand@stanford.edu","firstName":"Brennan","lastName":"McDonald","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0007-2321-0149"},{"affiliations":["Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA"],"departments":["Department of Genetics"],"credit":["methodology","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"leif_benner@hms.harvard.edu","firstName":"Leif","lastName":"Benner","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3716-4522"},{"affiliations":["Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA"],"departments":["The O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","resources","project"],"email":"brioliv@iu.edu","firstName":"Brian","lastName":"Oliver","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0002-3455-4891"},{"affiliations":["Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA"],"departments":["Department of Cell Biology"],"credit":["fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","conceptualization"],"email":"ematuni1@jhmi.edu","firstName":"Erika","lastName":"Matunis","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5439-4656"}],"awards":[{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jennifer Viveiros"},{"awardId":"DGE2139757","funderName":"National Science Foundation (United States)","awardRecipient":"Jasmine Grey"},{"awardId":"GM136665","funderName":"National Institutes of Health (United States)","awardRecipient":"Erika Matunis"}],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R35GM136665 (E.M.) and an National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (J.V. and J.G.). This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (DGE2139757). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/adba29ac9897f49b770f0219c793d735.png"},"imageCaption":"(A – B) Illustration of the Drosophila (A) testis and (B) the testis apex. The testis is a coiled blind ended tubule in which the germline cells (purple) exit the apex as they differentiate, ultimately becoming sperm (grey). The testis wall is composed of an outer pigment cell layer (pink) and inner muscle cell layer (orange) with basal laminae underlying each layer. At the testis apex, the niche cells (hub, green) maintain germline stem cells (GSCs, dark purple) and cyst stem cells (CySCs, dark blue). As the stem cells divide, their progeny move away from the hub and differentiate. GSC daughters, or gonialblasts, undergo four rounds of transit amplification (spermatogonia, light purple). CySCs divide and give rise to quiescent daughter cyst cells (light blue) that wrap and support adjacent germ cells. (C – P) Representative (C – I) single confocal sections through testis apices or (J – P) maximum intensity projections of testes from (C,J) GluRIA, (D,K) GluRIB, (E,L) GluRIIA, (F,M) GluRIIB, (G,N) GluRIIC, (H,O) GluRIID, or (I,P) GluRIIE expression reporter flies. Testes were stained for enhancer reporter expression (V5, green; insets), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and (C – I) hub cell membranes (N-cadherin (N-Cad), magenta). (Q) Representative single confocal section through Oregon-R testis apex labeled using HCR-FISH probes against upd1 (orange) and GluRIIA (green; inset) mRNA transcripts and counterstained with DAPI (nuclei, blue). (R – S) Representative single confocal sections through Oregon-R (R) testis wall or (S) testis apex stained for GluRIIA (green; inset), basement membranes (Concanavalin A, magenta), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (T) Representative single confocal section through GluRIIA-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger testis apex stained for GAL4 expression (DsRed, magenta; inset), hub cell membranes (N-Cad, green), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (U) Quantification of relative GCaMP signal within the hub of explanted control testes or testes treated with 1 mM L-glutamate over time (vertical line indicates frame timing of L-glutamate addition). For each testis, GCaMP signal was normalized to the mean fluorescence intensity of the first frame. 10 testes were imaged per condition. Scale bars, (C – I, Q – T) 10 µm or (J – P) 100 µm. Hubs outlined (dashed white lines). Insets display fluorescent signals in greyscale.
","imageTitle":"Glutamate receptor enhancers are active, but receptors are not expressed in hub cells
","methods":"Fly husbandry and stocks
Flies were maintained on a standard yeast/cornmeal/molasses medium supplemented with dry yeast, as previously described (Greenspan et al., 2022). Stocks were kept at 25°C and crosses were set and matured at 25°C. GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger males were collected at 0 – 4 days old and transferred to 29°C for 4 days to enhance GAL4 driver expression. Male flies less than 8 days old were used for all experiments. See table of Reagents for list of fly stocks. We used FlyBase (release FB2025_05) to find information on phenotypes/function/stocks/gene expression (Öztürk-Çolak et al., 2024).
Generation of transgenic fly lines
Enhancer reporter lines of GluRIA, GluRIB, GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE were generated as previously described (Mahadevaraju et al., 2024). For each gene, the 1.25 kb region upstream and 250 bp region downstream of the transcriptional start site was cloned and inserted upstream of the basal P-element promoter driving expression of the histone H2A coding sequence and three V5 tag sequences. Injections of transgenes were performed by BestGene (Chino Hills, CA).
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence
Testis dissection and immunofluorescence were performed as previously described (Matunis et al., 1997; Viveiros and Matunis, 2026). Unless noted, all steps were executed at room temperature (RT), and a nutating platform was used for all incubation steps. CO2-anesthetized male flies were dissected in 1X Ringer’s solution. Testes with attached cuticle were transferred to fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (1X PBX)) and incubated for 20 min. Fixed testes were rinsed twice and washed for 30 min in 1X PBX and then incubated in block solution (3% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 in 1X PBX) supplemented with 2% normal goat serum (Millipore/Sigma, G9023) for one hour at RT or overnight at 4°C. Testes were then transferred to primary antibodies diluted in block and incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by two rinses, and an hour wash in 1X PBX, and then incubated in secondary antibodies and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1 μg/mL, Millipore/Sigma, 10236276001) diluted in block for 1.5 hrs at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Testes were rinsed briefly then washed for an hour in 1X PBX. Finally, to remove detergent, testes were rinsed and washed for 10 min in 1X PBS before transferring to Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Samples were stored at -20°C prior to imaging. Primary antibodies used were against Fasciclin 3 (1:50, DSHB, 7610), N-cadherin (N-Cad; 1:20, DSHB, DN-Ex #8), GluRIIA (1:50, DSHB, 8B4D2), Vasa (1:20, DSHB), Zfh1 (1:500, our lab), V5 tag (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, R960-25), and DsRed (1:5,000, Takara Bio, 632496). Secondary antibodies used were Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11029), Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11001), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11006), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11011), Goat anti-Rat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11077), Goat anti-Guinea Pig IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 568 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11075), and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 647 (1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21236). Basement membranes were stained with Concanavalin A, Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate (1:50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, C-11253).
Hybridization Chain Reaction-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (HCR-FISH)
Testes were processed for HCR-FISH using Molecular Instruments HCR (v3.0) buffers, hairpins, and probes and an adapted version of a previously described protocol (Grmai et al., 2024; Slaidina et al., 2020). All steps were performed on a nutator at room temperature unless otherwise noted. Testes from Oregon-R males were dissected in 1X PBS on ice then moved to an Eppendorf tube containing 1X PBS on ice after every five pairs of testes for up to 30 min. Testes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1X Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 0.1% Tween-20 (DPBS-Tw) for 20 min and then washed 2 x 5 min in DPBS-Tw. Tissues were then dehydrated in sequential washes with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice prior to storage at -20°C overnight. Testes were rehydrated with sequential washes with 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% MeOH in DPBS-Tw for 5 min each on ice, followed by a 2 hr permeabilization with 1% Triton-X in 1X DPBS, and a 20 min post-fix in 4% paraformaldehyde in DPBS-Tw. After fixation, testes were washed 2 x 5 min DPBS-Tw, 1 x 5 min 50%/50% DPBS-Tw/5X SSC with 0.1% Tween-20 diluted in 1X DPBS (SSC-Tw), and 2 x 5 min SSC-Tw, on ice. Tissues were pre-hybridized in probe hybridization buffer (Molecular Instruments) for 30 min at 37°C and then incubated in diluted probes (0.8 pmol in 1 mL in probe hybridization buffer) for 12-16 hrs at 37°C. Following hybridization, testes were washed 4 x 15 min at 37°C with probe wash buffer warmed to 37°C (Molecular Instruments), and then with SSC-Tw for 2 x 5 min at room temperature. To equilibrate, testes were incubated in amplification buffer for 10 min at room temperature (not nutating). Hairpin solutions were prepared by heating 6 pmol of each hairpin (B3 488 and B1 546 HCR™ Amplifier (v3.0)) for 90 seconds at 95°C, snap cooling at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, and then adding to 100 μL of room temperature amplification buffer (Molecular Instruments). Testes were incubated in hairpin solutions overnight at room temperature followed by washes in SSC-Tw: 2 x 5 min on benchtop, 2 x 30 min, and 1 x 5 min. DAPI (1:1000) was added to the final 30 min SSC-Tw wash during the last 15 min. Detergent was removed by washing in 1X PBS for 5 min. Testes were stored briefly in Vectashield prior to mounting (same day).
Microscopy and image analysis
Testes were mounted on standard slides under #1.5 thickness glass coverslips. Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope equipped with a 63x oil immersion objective, 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm diode lasers with digital zoom, and GaAsP and Airyscan detectors. Images were acquired using Zen software with Z-stacks acquired using a 0.5 μm step, followed by processing using Zen or FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012). Brightness for individual channels from single confocal slices was enhanced using Zen or FIJI, and then the channels were overlaid to form a merged image. Single slices and maximum intensity projections are shown in this paper as indicated.
Live imaging of testes
E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s testes were dissected, cultured, and live imaged as previously described (Greenspan and Matunis, 2023) using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope. Experiment design was adapted from previous calcium imaging performed in explanted testes (Martin-Diaz and Herrera, 2024). Two testes of each dish (10 dishes total) were designated as either control or experimental. Testes were imaged for 10 minutes with frames approximately every 2.5 seconds (variability due to definite focus). For each dish, the control testis was imaged first, followed by imaging of the experimental testis. For the experimental testis, 1 mM L-glutamate (diluted in live imaging solution; (Huang et al., 2019)) was added to the dish after 32 frames were collected.
Quantifications and statistical analysis
FIJI was used to determine the E132-GAL4 > UAS-GCaMP6s fluorescence intensity measurements. A region of interest was manually drawn around the hub, and the mean grey value of that region was acquired. Measurements of each frame were normalized to that of the first frame of the same testis.
All statistical analysis and generation of graphical representation were performed using GraphPad Prism 11.
","reagents":"Strain | Genotype | Source or Reference |
Oregon-R | Oregon-R | Gift of D. Andrew |
GluRIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIA:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIA[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIB:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIB[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIC:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIC[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIID:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIID[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
GluRIIE:H2A-V5 | y[1] w[1118]; P{y[+] DsRed[+]=GluRIIE[Enhancer]-PeleP-H2A-3xV5}attP40/CyO | This paper |
UAS-RedStinger | w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=UAS-RedStinger}6 | BDSC_8547 |
GluR-T2A-GAL4 | w[*]; TI{2A-GAL4}GluRIIA[2A-GAL4] | BDSC_84637 |
E132-GAL4 | P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}E132, w[*] | BDSC_26796 |
GCaMP6s | w[*]; P{w[+mC]=UASp-GCaMP6s}30/TM3, Sb[1] | BDSC_91366 |
GluRIIC RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01854}attP2 | BDSC_25836 |
GluRIID RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF02035}attP2 | BDSC_26010 |
GluRIIE RNAi | y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01962}attP2 | BDSC_25942 |
mCherry RNAi | y[1] sc[*] v[1] sev[21]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=VALIUM20-mCherry.RNAi}attP2 | BDSC_35785 |
HCR probe | Description | Source |
upd1 | Fruit fly upd1 HCR v3.0 probe set (B1) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
GlurIIA | Fruit fly GlurRIIA HCR v3.0 probe set (B3) set size: 20 | Molecular Instruments |
Adult stem cells are critical to the maintenance and regeneration of tissues. By using model systems like that of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche, we can better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate stem cell behaviors. Adult stem cells reside in dynamic microenvironments, or niches, that are composed of cellular and molecular constituents including extracellular matrix and support cells (reviewed in (Morrison and Spradling, 2008)). The Drosophila testis is a blind-ended tubule that houses a single stem cell niche located at its apex (Fig. 1A). This stem cell niche maintains two stem cell populations, the germline stem cells (GSCs) and the somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs), both of which reside in direct contact with somatic niche, or hub, cells (Fig. 1B). The hub acts as both a signaling center and an adhesion platform to maintain both stem cell populations (reviewed in (de Cuevas and Matunis, 2011; Siddall and Hime, 2017)). Therefore, gaining insight into the hub is fundamental to our understanding of the biology of this stem cell niche.
Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are heterotetrameric channels that facilitate neuromuscular junction activity in response to the primary neurotransmitter glutamate (DiAntonio et al., 1999; Han et al., 2015; Han et al., 2024; Jan and Jan, 1976). Following an action potential, motor neurons release glutamate into the post-synaptic space, where it binds to the iGluRs on muscle cells, allowing the influx of calcium to trigger muscle contraction (Schuster et al., 1991; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1963; Takeuchi and Takeuchi, 1964). In mammals, glutamate acts as the primary neurotransmitter in the brain and its concentration is tightly regulated via a gradient maintained by the blood brain barrier; the concentration of glutamate is low in the brain and high in the blood (Vandenberg and Ryan, 2013). Similarly, Drosophila hemolymph contains high concentrations of glutamate, which may act as its source for the testis apex (Chen et al., 2009; Echalier, 1997; Fairchild et al., 2016). Furthermore, glutamatergic neurons innervate the internal male reproductive system, including the base of the testis, to coordinate copulation (Chaverra et al., 2025; Pavlou et al., 2016). Surprisingly, previous single-nuclei RNA sequencing of the testis detected mRNA transcripts encoding kainate-type and ⍺-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA)-like iGluRs subunits (Li et al., 2016) in the hub cells, a population of cells not thought to express such proteins (Li et al., 2022; Mahadevaraju et al., 2021; Raz et al., 2023). Therefore, the presence of iGluR transcripts within the niche suggests an avenue for inter-organ communication.
To begin our characterization of iGluR expression in the testis, we generated enhancer reporter transgenic fly strains for kainate-type (GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) and AMPA-like (GluRIA and GluRIB) iGluR subunits (see methods for details). Kainate-type iGluRs are tetramers consisting of three obligate subunits (GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE) combined with one of two variable subunits (GluRIIA and GluRIIB) (Featherstone et al., 2005; Marrus et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2005). We examined testes of each transgenic fly and found that hub cell expression of iGluR subunits is highly variable, with some reporters showing high expression and others displaying little to none. Within the hub, reporters of GluRIIA (Fig. 1E), GluRIIB (Fig. 1F), and GluRIIC (Fig. 1G) were among the most highly expressed, while GluRIA (Fig. 1C) and GluRIB reporters (Fig. 1D) were expressed at moderate levels. Reporters of GluRIIE (Fig. 1I) and GluRIID (Fig. 1H) showed little to no expression in the hub cells. Reporter activity was not restricted to hub cells but also marked the muscle cells and pigment cells in a strain-specific manner. For instance, GluRIIA (Fig. 1L) and GluRIIC (Fig. 1N) were highly expressed in both muscle and pigment cells, GluRIIE (Fig. 1P) was predominantly expressed in muscle cells, and GluRIB (Fig. 1K), GluRIIB (Fig. 1M), and GluRIID (Fig. 1O) were expressed in pigment cells, while GluRIA (Fig. 1J) was not detected in either cell population. The variation between GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE reporter expression was surprising, as these subunits are all necessary to form the final heterotetrameric protein complexes. Furthermore, estimates of transcript abundance in larval body wall tissue suggest that GluRIID and GluRIIE transcripts are more abundant than those of GluRIIC (Qin et al., 2005), but expression patterns of our reporters revealed the opposite relationship in the hub cells. However, it should be noted that the reporter fly strains may not fully reflect the endogenous expression patterns of each gene due to their design (see methods for details). Altogether, our analysis of the iGluR subunit expression reporter fly lines suggests that both AMPA-like iGluR subunits are detectable in hub cells, whereas the full complement of kainite-type iGluR subunits is not.
Expression of enhancer reporter elements does not necessarily mean that the respective proteins are expressed. To investigate whether iGluR gene products are produced in hub cells, we assessed both transcript and protein expression of GluRIIA, the subunit with the strongest enhancer reporter expression. Using HCR-FISH, we observed that GluRIIA mRNA is detectable in hub cells, which were co-labeled with probes against the stemness-conferring signaling ligand upd1 (Fig. 1Q) (Kiger et al., 2001; Tulina and Matunis, 2001). Further, using antisera against GluRIIA, we detected GluRIIA protein in the muscles of the testis wall, which is consistent with their contractile role (Fig. 1R). However, we did not observe GluRIIA protein expression in hub cells (Fig. 1S). To verify the absence of GlurIIA protein in hub cells, we examined the expression pattern of a GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 driver line, which produces GAL4 as a separate protein under endogenous GluRIIA control (Deng et al., 2019). We surveyed testes from GluRIIA-T2A-GAL4 > UAS-RedStinger flies for RedStinger expression in hub cells and apart from one hub cell (n = 1/40 testes), we did not detect GAL4 activity in the hub (Fig. 1T). Altogether, this suggests that iGluR genes are transcribed in hub cells, but that the corresponding proteins are not produced, indicating potential post-transcriptional or post-translational regulation of iGluR subunit genes. Analogous de-coupling of iGluR subunit gene transcription and translation has also been observed during Drosophila embryogenesis (Ganesan et al., 2011).
Given the inconsistency between transcript expression and lack of detectable GluRIIA protein in hub cells, we investigated whether iGluRs have a functional role in the testis stem cell niche. To measure hub cell reactivity to glutamate, we live imaged testes expressing a fluorescent calcium reporter, GCaMP6s (Parkhurst, 2020), specifically in hub cells using the hub specific driver, E132-GAL4 (Kawase et al., 2004). At the onset of imaging, GFP fluorescence, the calcium reporter signal, was detected in all the hub cells. However, we did not observe any change in GFP fluorescence signal following addition of 1 mM L-glutamate to the imaging media (Huang et al., 2019), and relative GCaMP intensity plots were similar to control testes (Fig. 1U). This suggests that hub cells are not responsive to glutamate. We also asked whether iGluR expression in hub cells is necessary to support the stem cell niche, which could suggest that iGluRs have a non-excitatory role in the hub (reviewed in (Featherstone, 2010)). We hypothesized that if hub cells need iGluRs to coordinate stem cell niche homeostasis, we would observe a loss of cells in the apices of testes with reduced iGluR expression in hub cells. Using E132-GAL4, we expressed RNAi transgenes targeting the essential subunits, GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE, and assayed for differences in cellular composition within the testis apex relative to testes expressing the control RNAi transgene (UAS-mCherry RNAi). In testes with hub cell-specific knockdown (KD) of GluRIIC, GluRIID, or GluRIIE we observed hub cells (Fasciclin 3-positive), germ cells (Vasa-positive) and early cyst cells (Zfh1-positive) in comparable abundance to control testes (GluRIIC KD: 61/61 testes; GluRIID KD: 62/62 testes; GluRIIE KD: 93/95 testes, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.4975; mCherry KD: 91/91 testes). Of the two outlier testes from the GluRIIE KD flies, one had fewer germ cells than control testes (n = 1/95) and one had a germline tumor (n = 1/95). Overall, these results indicate that iGluRs likely do not function in hub cells to maintain homeostasis of this stem cell niche. A caveat of this result is that the RNAi-mediated knockdown may not have sufficiently reduced protein abundance. However, these same RNAi transgenes have been shown to effectively produce loss-of-function phenotypes in other tissues (Sulkowski et al., 2014). We also cannot rule out the possibility that reduced iGluR function affects the testis stem cell niche in more subtle ways (i.e. reduced stem cell division rate). Finally, iGluRs may be necessary under varying environmental or physiological conditions not assayed here, including starvation, aging, and excessive mating.
Through this work we have demonstrated that reporters of iGluR gene expression are variably detected in hub cells as well as pigment cells and muscle cells of the testis. While we confirmed that transcripts of one iGluR subunit, GluRIIA, are detectable in hub cells, we did not detect respective protein expression in hub cells, although GluRIIA expression in the muscle cells of the testis wall confirmed that the antisera is functional. This absence of protein expression was reflected in a lack of response to exogenous glutamate and the absence of deleterious effects following hub-specific knockdown of essential kainate-type iGluR subunits. This work demonstrates that despite transcriptional activity, iGluRs are not expressed in hub cells and do not function in hub cells to maintain testis homeostasis. Future work will need to be performed to investigate the role of iGluRs in the muscle cells and pigment cells of the testis.
","references":[{"reference":"Chaverra M, Toney JP, Dardenne-Ankringa LD, Knee JT, Morris AR, Wadhams JB, Certel SJ, Stowers RS. 2025. Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs. : 10.7554/elife.108225.2.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.108225.2"},{"reference":"Chen K, Augustin H, Featherstone DE. 2009. Effect of ambient extracellular glutamate on Drosophila glutamate receptor trafficking and function. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195: 10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00359-008-0378-3"},{"reference":"de Cuevas M, Matunis EL. 2011. The stem cell niche: lessons from the Drosophila testis. Development 138: 2861-2869.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.056242"},{"reference":"Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al., Rao. 2019. Chemoconnectomics: Mapping Chemical Transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101: 876-893.e4.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045"},{"reference":"DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Heckmann M, Goodman CS. 1999. Glutamate Receptor Expression Regulates Quantal Size and Quantal Content at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 3023-3032.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03023.1999"},{"reference":"Echalier G. 1997. Composition of the Body Fluid of Drosophila and the Design of Culture Media for Drosophila Cells. Drosophila Cells in Culture : 1-67.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/B978-012229460-0/50002-6"},{"reference":"Fairchild MJ, Yang L, Goodwin K, Tanentzapf G. 2016. Occluding Junctions Maintain Stem Cell Niche Homeostasis in the Fly Testes. Current Biology 26: 2492-2499.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.012"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE. 2010. Intercellular Glutamate Signaling in the Nervous System and Beyond. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 1: 4-12.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/cn900006n"},{"reference":"Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Rohrbough J, Liebl F, Karr J, Sheng Q, Rodesch CK, Broadie K. 2005. An Essential Drosophila Glutamate Receptor Subunit That Functions in Both Central Neuropil and Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3199-3208.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-04.2005"},{"reference":"Ganesan S, Karr JE, Featherstone DE. 2011. Drosophila glutamate receptor mRNA expression and mRNP particles. RNA Biol 8(5): 771-81.
","pubmedId":"21743295","doi":""},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, de Cuevas M, Le KH, Viveiros JM, Matunis EL. 2022. Activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway drives transdifferentiation of quiescent niche cells to stem cells in the Drosophila testis niche. eLife 11: 10.7554/elife.70810.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.70810"},{"reference":"Greenspan LJ, Matunis EL. 2023. Live Imaging of the Drosophila Testis Stem Cell Niche. Methods in Molecular Biology,Germline Stem Cells : 113-125.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/978-1-0716-3259-8_6"},{"reference":"Grmai L, Jimenez E, Baxter K, Van Doren M. 2024. Steroid signaling controls sex-specific development in an invertebrate. : 10.1101/2023.12.22.573099.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.22.573099"},{"reference":"Han TH, Dharkar P, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2015. Functional reconstitution of\n Drosophila melanogaster\n NMJ glutamate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 6182-6187.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1500458112"},{"reference":"Han TH, Vicidomini R, Ramos CI, Mayer ML, Serpe M. 2024. The gating properties of Drosophila NMJ glutamate receptors and their dependence on Neto. The Journal of Physiology 602: 7043-7064.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/JP287331"},{"reference":"Huang H, Liu S, Kornberg TB. 2019. Glutamate signaling at cytoneme synapses. Science 363: 948-955.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.aat5053"},{"reference":"Jan LY, Jan YN. 1976. L‐glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction.. The Journal of Physiology 262: 215-236.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593"},{"reference":"Kawase E, Wong MD, Ding BC, Xie T. 2004. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressing bam transcription in the Drosophila testis. Development 131: 1365-1375.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.01025"},{"reference":"Kiger AA, Jones DL, Schulz C, Rogers MB, Fuller MT. 2001. Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue. Science 294: 2542-2545.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066707"},{"reference":"Li H, Janssens J, De Waegeneer M, Kolluru SS, Davie K, Gardeux V, et al., Zinzen. 2022. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375: 10.1126/science.abk2432.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.abk2432"},{"reference":"Li Y, Dharkar P, Han TH, Serpe M, Lee CH, Mayer ML. 2016. Novel Functional Properties of Drosophila CNS Glutamate Receptors. Neuron 92: 1036-1048.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.058"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Fear JM, Akeju M, Galletta BJ, Pinheiro MMLS, Avelino CC, et al., Oliver. 2021. Dynamic sex chromosome expression in Drosophila male germ cells. Nature Communications 12: 10.1038/s41467-021-20897-y.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/S41467-021-20897-Y"},{"reference":"Mahadevaraju S, Pal S, Bhaskar P, McDonald BD, Benner L, Denti L, et al., Oliver. 2024. Diverse somatic Transformer and sex chromosome karyotype pathways regulate gene expression in Drosophila gonad development. : 10.7554/elife.101641.1.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.101641.1"},{"reference":"Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A. 2004. Differential Localization of Glutamate Receptor Subunits at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 24: 1406-1415.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-03.2004"},{"reference":"Martin-Diaz J, Herrera SC. 2024. A stem cell activation state coupling spermatogenesis with social interactions in Drosophila males. Cell Reports 43: 114647.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114647"},{"reference":"Matunis E, Tran J, Gönczy P, Caldwell K, DiNardo S. 1997. punt and schnurri regulate a somatically derived signal that restricts proliferation of committed progenitors in the germline. Development 124: 4383-4391.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1242/dev.124.21.4383"},{"reference":"Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. 2008. Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life. Cell 132: 598-611.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038"},{"reference":"Öztürk-Çolak A, Marygold SJ, Antonazzo G, Attrill H, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, et al., Lovato. 2024. FlyBase: updates to the\n Drosophila\n genes and genomes database. GENETICS 227: 10.1093/genetics/iyad211.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyad211"},{"reference":"Parkhurst, S. (2020). Personal communication to FlyBase [FBrf0246936].
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Pavlou HJ, Lin AC, Neville MC, Nojima T, Diao F, Chen BE, White BH, Goodwin SF. 2016. Neural circuitry coordinating male copulation. eLife 5: 10.7554/elife.20713.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.20713"},{"reference":"Qin G, Schwarz T, Kittel RJ, Schmid A, Rasse TM, Kappei D, et al., Sigrist. 2005. Four Different Subunits Are Essential for Expressing the Synaptic Glutamate Receptor at Neuromuscular Junctions of Drosophila. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 3209-3218.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4194-04.2005"},{"reference":"Raz AA, Vida GS, Stern SR, Mahadevaraju S, Fingerhut JM, Viveiros JM, et al., Fuller. 2023. Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes. eLife 12: 10.7554/elife.82201.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.7554/eLife.82201"},{"reference":"Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al., Cardona. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 676-682.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nmeth.2019"},{"reference":"Schuster CM, Ultsch A, Schloss P, Cox JA, Schmitt B, Betz H. 1991. Molecular Cloning of an Invertebrate Glutamate Receptor Subunit Expressed in\n Drosophila\n Muscle. Science 254: 112-114.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1681587"},{"reference":"Siddall NA, Hime GR. 2017. A\n Drosophila\n toolkit for defining gene function in spermatogenesis. Reproduction 153: R121-R132.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1530/REP-16-0347"},{"reference":"Slaidina M, Banisch TU, Gupta S, Lehmann R. 2020. A single-cell atlas of the developing\n Drosophila\n ovary identifies follicle stem cell progenitors. Genes & Development 34: 239-249.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1101/gad.330464.119"},{"reference":"Sulkowski M, Kim YJ, Serpe M. 2014. Postsynaptic glutamate receptors regulate local BMP signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Development 141(2): 436-47.
","pubmedId":"24353060","doi":""},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1963. Glutamate-induced Depolarization in Crustacean Muscle. Nature 198: 490-491.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/198490a0"},{"reference":"Takeuchi A, Takeuchi N. 1964. The effect on crayfish muscle of iontophoretically applied glutamate. The Journal of Physiology 170: 296-317.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332"},{"reference":"Tulina N, Matunis E. 2001. Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal in\n Drosophila\n Spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT Signaling. Science 294: 2546-2549.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1066700"},{"reference":"Vandenberg RJ, Ryan RM. 2013. Mechanisms of Glutamate Transport. Physiological Reviews 93: 1621-1657.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1152/physrev.00007.2013"},{"reference":"Viveiros J, Matunis E. 2026. Cyst stem cell lineage GAL4 transgenes are robustly expressed in hub cells of the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. MicroPubl Biol 2026: 10.17912/micropub.biology.002106.
","pubmedId":"42079377","doi":""}],"title":"Ionotropic glutamate receptor expression and function in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"FlyBase Curators"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"74677dde-186b-4077-b866-f458c9f38bb0","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}