{
    "componentChunkName": "component---src-templates-article-page-js",
    "path": "/journals/biology/micropub-biology-002261",
    "result": {"data":{"article":{"manuscript":{"id":"963adccd-19d0-40bf-a476-2b61ec2d6bd4","submissionTypes":["new finding","methodology"],"citations":[],"doi":"10.17912/micropub.biology.002261","dbReferenceId":null,"pmcId":null,"pmId":null,"proteopedia":null,"reviewPanel":null,"species":["other"],"integrations":[],"corrections":null,"history":{"received":"2026-06-25T15:59:51.926Z","revisionReceived":"2026-07-20T17:29:21.397Z","accepted":"2026-08-15T04:25:53.267Z","published":"2026-08-17T21:50:45.876Z","indexed":"2026-08-31T21:50:45.876Z"},"versions":[{"id":"629a3083-650e-4877-a54b-9803784aa16f","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease for which existing treatments can be toxic and costly, and resistance to current therapies is becoming increasingly common. This study implemented a systematic review of data regarding antileishmanial activity in plant-derived compounds and used machine learning techniques to train and test a Random Forest algorithm to predict the antileishmanial activity of plant-derived compounds. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae plant families were identified for their high or moderate antileishmanial activity and nativity to areas of high leishmaniasis prevalence. The Random Forest model had 89% prediction accuracy, with an out-of-bag error rate of 16%.</p>","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"adriannahighgate@spelman.edu","firstName":"Adrianna","lastName":"Highgate","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","software","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"patrick.stillson@emory.edu","firstName":"Patrick T.","lastName":"Stillson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5382-7704"},{"affiliations":["Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jewashington@msm.edu","firstName":"Jandolyn","lastName":"Washington","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","resources","formalAnalysis","software","supervision","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"dwann.davenport@morehouse.edu","firstName":"Dwann","lastName":"Davenport","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-6770-3600"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>This research received no external funding.</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c5ec4ecc70f994636b272a3875895d2e.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Bioactive activity of plant families against the different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis. In the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;analysis, the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;of a plant compound was considered \"high\" if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was less than or equal to 10 µg/mL against the promastigote or amastigote forms. Moderate&nbsp;activity&nbsp;was defined as an IC<sub>50</sub> greater than 10 and less than 50 µg/mL, and low activity if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was greater than 50 µg/mL and less than 100 µg/mL. (B) The geographic distribution of plant species with high antileishmanial activity. (C) Random Forest model predicted antileishmanial activity with 89% accuracy.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Identification, Classification, and Prediction of Antileishmanial Plant Compounds using Random Forest </p>","methods":"<p></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoa parasites that spread via the bite of infected sandflies (Torres-Guerrero et al., 2017). Over 20 species of <i>Leishmania</i> have been characterized, and there are three clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis: visceral, cutaneous, and mucocutaneous (Mann et al., 2021). Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by <i>L. donovani</i> and <i>L. infantum</i> species, affects the body systemically and targets the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Visceral leishmaniasis is the most severe form of leishmaniasis and has the highest mortality and morbidity of the three forms (Mann et al., 2021). The disease burden is concentrated in East Africa, South America, and South Asia (World Health Organization, 2023). Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, <i>L. major</i>, and <i>L. tropica</i>, is characterized by skin lesions and ulcers. CL is the most common form of leishmaniasis, and cases occur primarily in the Americas, Central Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East (World Health Organization, 2023). Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ML), caused by strains including, but not limited to, <i>L. aethiopica</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i>, deteriorates tissues in the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and throat (Steverding, 2017). Cases of ML occur in Bolivia, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Peru (World Health Organization, 2023).</p><p>Leishmaniasis has an estimated prevalence of 12 million cases worldwide, with 1.5-2 million new cases each year (Costa-da-Silva et al., 2022). It causes high morbidity and severe mortality (Fiuza et al., 2016). Current treatment for leishmaniasis is dependent on the clinical manifestation, Leishmania species, and geographic location&nbsp;(where treatment is administered). Liposomal amphotericin B,&nbsp;miltefosine, and pentavalent antimonials are the preferred treatments for VL and ML; while miltefosine, paromomycin, pentavalent antimonials, and topical therapies are preferred for CL (Aronson et al., 2017; Li et al., 2026).&nbsp; Despite the availability of treatment options for leishmaniasis, these can be toxic and cost-prohibitive, and Leishmania resistance to many of the existing medications has become increasingly common (Li et al., 2026; Ponte-Sucre et al., 2017). Discovering additional antileishmanial compounds would contribute to efforts to overcome the limitations of current treatments (Croft et al., 2006).</p><p>Researchers have looked to nature as a source for new alternatives in drug development (Li et al., 2026; Oryan, 2015).&nbsp;These plant-derived compounds have been recognized as bioactive agents with several immunomodulatory effects (Sadeghi-Nejad et al., 2011). However, most plant-derived compounds have not been scientifically evaluated (Oryan, 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2015) and their mechanism of action is unknown (Rodrigues et al., 2015). Large scale experiments are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the large number of potential natural compounds. (Yoo et al., 2020)</p><p>Previous studies have primarily focused on in vitro experimentation to identify medicinal uses for natural compounds (Yoo et al., 2020). However, drug therapies may be identified using machine learning. One of the major applications of machine learning is to develop predictive models to assist the drug discovery process (Kore et al., 2025). This study 1) evaluated and compared plant families with antileishmanial activity against different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis and 2) used Random Forest, a supervised machine learning approach, to predict antileishmanial activity. The approach was selected over more complex deep-learning methods because of its historic and widespread use (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023; Carracedo-Reboredo et al., 2021; Dara et al., 2022) and because it can analyze and establish relationships between multiple predictor variables (Bonifacio-Velez De Villa et al., 2025).</p><p>A systematic literature review based on the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist (Page et al., 2021) was conducted to identify articles to create a dataset of plant-derived compounds with antileishmanial properties. Databases searched included PubMed, PubChem, and WorldCat, yielding an initial total of over 1,500 results. Keywords used as search terms included “plant compounds” AND “leishmaniasis”; “plant compounds” AND “<i>Leishmania</i>”; “leishmaniasis” AND “extract”; and “<i>Leishmania</i>” AND “extract.” Results were screened to only include peer-reviewed and non-duplicated sources, yielding 1,200 articles. Initial exclusion criteria included a date of publication and access. Sources that were published prior to 2000 or sources that could not be accessed from research libraries were excluded, yielding 1,100 articles. Full-text review exclusions included relevance to the study and utility of content, yielding 33 articles. Data was collected from 12 of the remaining 33 articles. The plant family, genus, and species; plant bioactive compounds; Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>); 50% Cytotoxicity Concentration (CC<sub>50</sub>); Selectivity Index (SI); <i>Leishmania</i> species; and <i>Leishmania</i> form were used to create the dataset.</p><p>Associations between the bioactivity level of screened plant families and clinical manifestation of leishmaniasis were analyzed using the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2016). The geographic distribution of screened plant species with high antileishmanial activity was mined using the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) API via the rgbif package (Chamberlain et al., 2012). Occurrence records were retrieved, filtered for valid geographic coordinates, and mapped using ggplot2. All analyses were conducted in R v.4.3.2&nbsp;(R Core Team, 2025).</p><p>The plant families most commonly represented in the dataset had activity against CL (26 families), followed by VL (23), and ML (10) (Figure 1A). Several of the plant families located in areas with high <i>Leishmania</i> prevalence, such as Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae, had high or moderate activity against at least one form of <i>Leishmania</i> species. The screened plant species located in areas where the disease is most prevalent were: <i>Aniba riparia</i> (Lauraceae) and <i>Eugenia uniflora</i> (Myrtaceae), densely located in Central and South America; <i>Croton caudatus</i> (Euphorbiaceae), found mainly in Southeast Asia; <i>Mentha pulegium</i> (Lamiaceae), found in South Asia; and <i>Artemisia herba-alba</i> (Asteraceae), found in Northern Africa (Figure 1B).</p><p>The Random Forest algorithm was applied to train a prediction model for antileishmanial activity. The dataset was analyzed by applying random trees and making associations between data points using the function randomForest (package = randomForest) (Liaw &amp; Wiener, 2002). Highly correlated predictor variables were removed, and the predictors used in the model were clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> strain, <i>Leishmania</i> form, bioactive compound, and plant family. The number of trees was set at n = 500, and the class weight was set to (No = 1 and Yes = 0.2) with “No” weighted more to account for the close correlation between “Yes” and <i>Leishmania</i> clearance. The Random Forest model (Figure 1C) predicted the antileishmanial activity of the plants with 89% accuracy, with the balanced accuracy, accounting for both error rates, is 73%. The out-of-bag error, an estimate of predictive performance based on samples not used in the tree construction, was 16%.</p><p>Drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly process that involves the screening of bioactive compounds to identify potential candidates (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023). Machine learning algorithms may accelerate the drug identification process by predicting the bioactivity of plant compounds (Yabuuchi et al., 2023). This study distinguished between antileishmanial activity levels based on plant family relative to clinical manifestation; identified the geographic location of plants with high antileishmanial activity; and supported the use of machine learning to predict antileishmanial activity in plant compounds. Researchers may use machine learning to assist in determining which plants may be screened for antileishmanial activity in the lab.</p>","references":[{"reference":"Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez Velez R, Weina P, et al., Magill A. 2017. Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 96: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256"},{"reference":"Atas Guvenilir H, Dogan T. 2023. How to approach machine learning-based prediction of drug/compound–target interactions. Journal of Cheminformatics. 15: 16.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13321-023-00689-w"},{"reference":"Bonifacio Velez De Villa EI, Montoya Alfaro ME, Negron Ballarte LP, Solis Calero C. 2025. Predicting Antimicrobial Peptide Activity: A Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Approach. Pharmaceutics. 17: 993.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17080993"},{"reference":"Carracedo Reboredo P, Linares Blanco J, Rodriguez Fernandez N, Cedron F, Novoa FJ, Carballal A, et al., Fernandez Lozano C. 2021. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 19: 4538.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011"},{"reference":"Chamberlain S, Oldoni D, Waller J. 2012. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.32614/CRAN.package.rgbif"},{"reference":"Costa Da Silva AC, Nascimento DDO, Ferreira JRM, Guimaraes Pinto K, Freire De Lima L, Morrot A, et al., Freire De Lima CG. 2022. Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: An Overview. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 7: 54.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed7040054"},{"reference":"Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. 2006. Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 19: 111.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006"},{"reference":"Dara S, Dhamercherla S, Jadav SS, Babu CM, Ahsan MJ. 2022. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 55: 1947.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4"},{"reference":"Fiuza JA, Dey R, Davenport D, Abdeladhim M, Meneses C, Oliveira F, et al., Nakhasi HL. 2016. Intradermal Immunization of Leishmania donovani Centrin Knock-Out Parasites in Combination with Salivary Protein LJM19 from Sand Fly Vector Induces a Durable Protective Immune Response in Hamsters. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 10: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0004322"},{"reference":"Kore M, Acharya D, Sharma L, Vembar SS, Sundriyal S. 2025. Development and experimental validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of new antimalarials. BMC Chemistry. 19: 28.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01395-4"},{"reference":"Li S, Zhang L, Wang X. 2026. Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for visceral leishmaniasis. Microbial Pathogenesis. 212: 108318.","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108318"},{"reference":"Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2: 18.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Mann S, Frasca K, Scherrer S, Henao Martinez AF, Newman S, Ramanan P, Suarez JA. 2021. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 8: 121.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7"},{"reference":"Oryan A. 2015. Plant-derived compounds in treatment of leishmaniasis. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 16: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Page MJ, Mc Kenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al., Moher D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ: n71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1136/bmj.n71"},{"reference":"Ponte Sucre A, Gamarro F, Dujardin JC, Barrett MP, Lopez Velez R, Garcia Hernandez R, et al., Papadopoulou B. 2017. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11: e0006052.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052"},{"reference":"R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rodrigues IA, Mazotto AM, Cardoso V, Alves RL, Amaral ACF, Silva JRDA, Pinheiro AS, Vermelho AB. 2015. Natural Products: Insights into Leishmaniasis Inflammatory Response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2015: 835910.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/835910"},{"reference":"Sadeghi Nejad B, Saki J, Khademvatan S, Nanaei S. 2011. In vitro antileishmanial activity of the medicinal plant—Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad. J Med Plant Res. 5: 5912.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Steverding D. 2017. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasites & Vectors. 10: 82.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5"},{"reference":"Torres Guerrero E, Quintanilla Cedillo MR, Ruiz Esmenjaud J, Arenas R. 2017. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000Research. 6: 750.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.11120.1"},{"reference":"Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R!: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"World Health Organization. 2023. Leishmaniasis [Fact Sheet].","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Yabuuchi H, Hayashi K, Shigemoto A, Fujiwara M, Nomura Y, Nakashima M, et al., Miyai K. 2023. Virtual screening of antimicrobial plant extracts by machine-learning classification of chemical compounds in semantic space. PLOS ONE. 18: e0285716.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0285716"},{"reference":"Yamamoto ES, Campos BLS, Jesus JA, Laurenti MD, Ribeiro SP, Kallas EG, et al., Passero LFD. 2015. The Effect of Ursolic Acid on Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Is Related to Programed Cell Death and Presents Therapeutic Potential in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLOS ONE. 10: e0144946.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0144946"},{"reference":"Yoo S, Yang HC, Lee S, Shin J, Min S, Lee E, Song M, Lee D. 2020. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Identifying the Medicinal Uses of Plant-Derived Natural Compounds. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 11: 584875.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2020.584875"}],"title":"Predicting Antileishmanial Activity of Plant-Derived Compounds Using Random Forest Modeling","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Justin Davis"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"4ab022b7-72e3-49fd-9561-93e7b0c94360","decision":"accept","abstract":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease for which existing treatments can be toxic and costly, and resistance to current therapies is becoming increasingly common. This study implemented a systematic review of data regarding antileishmanial activity in plant-derived compounds and used machine learning techniques to train and test a Random Forest algorithm to predict the antileishmanial activity of plant-derived compounds. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae plant families were identified for their high or moderate antileishmanial activity and nativity to areas of high leishmaniasis prevalence. The Random Forest model had 89% prediction accuracy, with an out-of-bag error rate of 16%.</p>","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"adriannahighgate@spelman.edu","firstName":"Adrianna","lastName":"Highgate","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","software","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"patrick.stillson@emory.edu","firstName":"Patrick T.","lastName":"Stillson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5382-7704"},{"affiliations":["Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jewashington@msm.edu","firstName":"Jandolyn","lastName":"Washington","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","resources","formalAnalysis","software","supervision","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"dwann.davenport@morehouse.edu","firstName":"Dwann","lastName":"Davenport","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-6770-3600"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>This research received no external funding.</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c5ec4ecc70f994636b272a3875895d2e.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Bioactive activity of plant families against the different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis. In the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;analysis, the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;of a plant compound was considered \"high\" if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was less than or equal to 10 µg/mL against the promastigote or amastigote forms. Moderate&nbsp;activity&nbsp;was defined as an IC<sub>50</sub> greater than 10 and less than 50 µg/mL, and low activity if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was greater than 50 µg/mL and less than 100 µg/mL. The screens for bioactive activity were done against cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. tropica</i>, <i>L. major</i>, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. braziliensis</i>, <i>L. aethiopica</i>, <i>L. guyanesis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; and visceral leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. infantum</i> and/or <i>L. donovani</i>. (B) The geographic distribution of plant species with high antileishmanial activity. (C) Random Forest model predicted antileishmanial activity with 89% accuracy.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Identification, Classification, and Prediction of Antileishmanial Plant Compounds using Random Forest </p>","methods":"<p></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoa parasites that spread via the bite of infected sandflies (Torres-Guerrero et al., 2017). Over 20 species of <i>Leishmania</i> have been characterized, and there are three clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis: visceral, cutaneous, and mucocutaneous (Mann et al., 2021). Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by <i>L. donovani</i> and <i>L. infantum</i> species, affects the body systemically and targets the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Visceral leishmaniasis is the most severe form of leishmaniasis and has the highest mortality and morbidity of the three forms (Mann et al., 2021). The disease burden is concentrated in East Africa, South America, and South Asia (World Health Organization, 2023). Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, <i>L. major</i>, and <i>L. tropica</i>, is characterized by skin lesions and ulcers. CL is the most common form of leishmaniasis, and cases occur primarily in the Americas, Central Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East (World Health Organization, 2023). Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ML), caused by strains including, but not limited to, <i>L. aethiopica</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i>, deteriorates tissues in the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and throat (Steverding, 2017). Cases of ML occur in Bolivia, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Peru (World Health Organization, 2023).</p><p>Leishmaniasis has an estimated prevalence of 12 million cases worldwide, with 1.5-2 million new cases each year (Costa-da-Silva et al., 2022). It causes high morbidity and severe mortality (Fiuza et al., 2016). Current treatment for leishmaniasis is dependent on the clinical manifestation, Leishmania species, and geographic location&nbsp;(where treatment is administered). Liposomal amphotericin B,&nbsp;miltefosine, and pentavalent antimonials are the preferred treatments for VL and ML; while miltefosine, paromomycin, pentavalent antimonials, and topical therapies are preferred for CL (Aronson et al., 2017; Li et al., 2026).&nbsp; Despite the availability of treatment options for leishmaniasis, these can be toxic and cost-prohibitive, and Leishmania resistance to many of the existing medications has become increasingly common (Li et al., 2026; Ponte-Sucre et al., 2017). Discovering additional antileishmanial compounds would contribute to efforts to overcome the limitations of current treatments (Croft et al., 2006).</p><p>Researchers have looked to nature as a source for new alternatives in drug development (Li et al., 2026; Oryan, 2015).&nbsp;These plant-derived compounds have been recognized as bioactive agents with several immunomodulatory effects (Sadeghi-Nejad et al., 2011). However, most plant-derived compounds have not been scientifically evaluated (Oryan, 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2015) and their mechanism of action is unknown (Rodrigues et al., 2015). Large scale experiments are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the large number of potential natural compounds. (Yoo et al., 2020)</p><p>Previous studies have primarily focused on in vitro experimentation to identify medicinal uses for natural compounds (Yoo et al., 2020). However, drug therapies may be identified using machine learning. One of the major applications of machine learning is to develop predictive models to assist the drug discovery process (Kore et al., 2025). This study 1) evaluated and compared plant families with antileishmanial activity against different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis and 2) used Random Forest, a supervised machine learning approach, to predict antileishmanial activity. The approach was selected over more complex deep-learning methods because of its historic and widespread use (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023; Carracedo-Reboredo et al., 2021; Dara et al., 2022) and because it can analyze and establish relationships between multiple predictor variables (Bonifacio-Velez De Villa et al., 2025).</p><p>A systematic literature review based on the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist (Page et al., 2021) was conducted to identify articles to create a dataset of plant-derived compounds with antileishmanial properties. Databases searched included PubMed, PubChem, and WorldCat, yielding an initial total of over 1,500 results. Keywords used as search terms included “plant compounds” AND “leishmaniasis”; “plant compounds” AND “<i>Leishmania</i>”; “leishmaniasis” AND “extract”; and “<i>Leishmania</i>” AND “extract.” Results were screened to only include peer-reviewed and non-duplicated sources, yielding 1,200 articles. Initial exclusion criteria included a date of publication and access. Sources that were published prior to 2000 or sources that could not be accessed from research libraries were excluded, yielding 1,100 articles. Full-text review exclusions included relevance to the study and utility of content, yielding 33 articles. Data was collected from 12 of the remaining 33 articles. The plant family, genus, and species; plant bioactive compounds; Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>); 50% Cytotoxicity Concentration (CC<sub>50</sub>); Selectivity Index (SI); <i>Leishmania</i> species; and <i>Leishmania</i> form were used to create the dataset.</p><p>Associations between the bioactivity level of screened plant families and clinical manifestation of leishmaniasis were analyzed using the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2016). The geographic distribution of screened plant species with high antileishmanial activity was mined using the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) API via the rgbif package (Chamberlain et al., 2012). Occurrence records were retrieved, filtered for valid geographic coordinates, and mapped using ggplot2. All analyses were conducted in R v.4.3.2&nbsp;(R Core Team, 2025).</p><p>The plant families most commonly represented in the dataset had activity against CL (26 families), followed by VL (23), and ML (10) (Figure 1A). Several of the plant families located in areas with high <i>Leishmania</i> prevalence, such as Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae, had high or moderate activity against at least one form of <i>Leishmania</i> species. The screened plant species located in areas where the disease is most prevalent were: <i>Aniba riparia</i> (Lauraceae) and <i>Eugenia uniflora</i> (Myrtaceae), densely located in Central and South America; <i>Croton caudatus</i> (Euphorbiaceae), found mainly in Southeast Asia; <i>Mentha pulegium</i> (Lamiaceae), found in South Asia; and <i>Artemisia herba-alba</i> (Asteraceae), found in Northern Africa (Figure 1B).</p><p>The Random Forest algorithm was applied to train a prediction model for antileishmanial activity. The dataset was analyzed by applying random trees and making associations between data points using the function randomForest (package = randomForest) (Liaw &amp; Wiener, 2002). Highly correlated predictor variables were removed, and the predictors used in the model were clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> strain, <i>Leishmania</i> form, bioactive compound, and plant family. The number of trees was set at n = 500, and the class weight was set to (No = 1 and Yes = 0.2) with “No” weighted more to account for the close correlation between “Yes” and <i>Leishmania</i> clearance. The Random Forest model (Figure 1C) predicted the antileishmanial activity of the plants with 89% accuracy, with the balanced accuracy, accounting for both error rates, is 73%. The out-of-bag error, an estimate of predictive performance based on samples not used in the tree construction, was 16%.</p><p>Drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly process that involves the screening of bioactive compounds to identify potential candidates (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023). Machine learning algorithms may accelerate the drug identification process by predicting the bioactivity of plant compounds (Yabuuchi et al., 2023). This study distinguished between antileishmanial activity levels based on plant family relative to clinical manifestation; identified the geographic location of plants with high antileishmanial activity; and supported the use of machine learning to predict antileishmanial activity in plant compounds. Researchers may use machine learning to assist in determining which plants may be screened for antileishmanial activity in the lab.</p>","references":[{"reference":"Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez Velez R, Weina P, et al., Magill A. 2017. Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 96: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256"},{"reference":"Atas Guvenilir H, Dogan T. 2023. How to approach machine learning-based prediction of drug/compound–target interactions. Journal of Cheminformatics. 15: 16.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13321-023-00689-w"},{"reference":"Bonifacio Velez De Villa EI, Montoya Alfaro ME, Negron Ballarte LP, Solis Calero C. 2025. Predicting Antimicrobial Peptide Activity: A Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Approach. Pharmaceutics. 17: 993.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17080993"},{"reference":"Carracedo Reboredo P, Linares Blanco J, Rodriguez Fernandez N, Cedron F, Novoa FJ, Carballal A, et al., Fernandez Lozano C. 2021. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 19: 4538.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011"},{"reference":"Chamberlain S, Oldoni D, Waller J. 2012. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.32614/CRAN.package.rgbif"},{"reference":"Costa Da Silva AC, Nascimento DDO, Ferreira JRM, Guimaraes Pinto K, Freire De Lima L, Morrot A, et al., Freire De Lima CG. 2022. Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: An Overview. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 7: 54.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed7040054"},{"reference":"Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. 2006. Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 19: 111.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006"},{"reference":"Dara S, Dhamercherla S, Jadav SS, Babu CM, Ahsan MJ. 2022. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 55: 1947.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4"},{"reference":"Fiuza JA, Dey R, Davenport D, Abdeladhim M, Meneses C, Oliveira F, et al., Nakhasi HL. 2016. Intradermal Immunization of Leishmania donovani Centrin Knock-Out Parasites in Combination with Salivary Protein LJM19 from Sand Fly Vector Induces a Durable Protective Immune Response in Hamsters. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 10: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0004322"},{"reference":"Kore M, Acharya D, Sharma L, Vembar SS, Sundriyal S. 2025. Development and experimental validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of new antimalarials. BMC Chemistry. 19: 28.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01395-4"},{"reference":"Li S, Zhang L, Wang X. 2026. Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for visceral leishmaniasis. Microbial Pathogenesis. 212: 108318.","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108318"},{"reference":"Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2: 18.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Mann S, Frasca K, Scherrer S, Henao Martinez AF, Newman S, Ramanan P, Suarez JA. 2021. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 8: 121.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7"},{"reference":"Oryan A. 2015. Plant-derived compounds in treatment of leishmaniasis. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 16: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Page MJ, Mc Kenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al., Moher D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ: n71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1136/bmj.n71"},{"reference":"Ponte Sucre A, Gamarro F, Dujardin JC, Barrett MP, Lopez Velez R, Garcia Hernandez R, et al., Papadopoulou B. 2017. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11: e0006052.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052"},{"reference":"R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rodrigues IA, Mazotto AM, Cardoso V, Alves RL, Amaral ACF, Silva JRDA, Pinheiro AS, Vermelho AB. 2015. Natural Products: Insights into Leishmaniasis Inflammatory Response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2015: 835910.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/835910"},{"reference":"Sadeghi Nejad B, Saki J, Khademvatan S, Nanaei S. 2011. In vitro antileishmanial activity of the medicinal plant—Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad. J Med Plant Res. 5: 5912.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Steverding D. 2017. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasites & Vectors. 10: 82.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5"},{"reference":"Torres Guerrero E, Quintanilla Cedillo MR, Ruiz Esmenjaud J, Arenas R. 2017. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000Research. 6: 750.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.11120.1"},{"reference":"Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R!: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"World Health Organization. 2023. Leishmaniasis [Fact Sheet].","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Yabuuchi H, Hayashi K, Shigemoto A, Fujiwara M, Nomura Y, Nakashima M, et al., Miyai K. 2023. Virtual screening of antimicrobial plant extracts by machine-learning classification of chemical compounds in semantic space. PLOS ONE. 18: e0285716.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0285716"},{"reference":"Yamamoto ES, Campos BLS, Jesus JA, Laurenti MD, Ribeiro SP, Kallas EG, et al., Passero LFD. 2015. The Effect of Ursolic Acid on Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Is Related to Programed Cell Death and Presents Therapeutic Potential in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLOS ONE. 10: e0144946.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0144946"},{"reference":"Yoo S, Yang HC, Lee S, Shin J, Min S, Lee E, Song M, Lee D. 2020. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Identifying the Medicinal Uses of Plant-Derived Natural Compounds. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 11: 584875.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2020.584875"}],"title":"Predicting Antileishmanial Activity of Plant-Derived Compounds Using Random Forest Modeling","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Justin Davis"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"534eb506-ed72-40d2-b53e-8a21d8da7402","decision":"accept","abstract":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease for which existing treatments can be toxic and costly, and resistance to current therapies is becoming increasingly common. This study implemented a systematic review of data regarding antileishmanial activity in plant-derived compounds and used machine learning techniques to train and test a Random Forest algorithm to predict the antileishmanial activity of plant-derived compounds. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae plant families were identified for their high or moderate antileishmanial activity and nativity to areas of high leishmaniasis prevalence. The Random Forest model had 89% prediction accuracy, with an out-of-bag error rate of 16%.</p>","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"adriannahighgate@spelman.edu","firstName":"Adrianna","lastName":"Highgate","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","software","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"patrick.stillson@emory.edu","firstName":"Patrick T.","lastName":"Stillson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5382-7704"},{"affiliations":["Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jewashington@msm.edu","firstName":"Jandolyn","lastName":"Washington","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","resources","formalAnalysis","software","supervision","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"dwann.davenport@morehouse.edu","firstName":"Dwann","lastName":"Davenport","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-6770-3600"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>This research received no external funding.</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c5ec4ecc70f994636b272a3875895d2e.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Bioactive activity of plant families against the different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis. In the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;analysis, the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;of a plant compound was considered \"high\" if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was less than or equal to 10 µg/mL against the promastigote or amastigote forms. Moderate&nbsp;activity&nbsp;was defined as an IC<sub>50</sub> greater than 10 µg/mL and less than 50 µg/mL, and low activity if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was greater than 50 µg/mL and less than 100 µg/mL. The screens for bioactive activity were done against cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. tropica</i>, <i>L. major</i>, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. braziliensis</i>, <i>L. aethiopica</i>, <i>L. guyanesis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; and visceral leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. infantum</i> and/or <i>L. donovani</i>. (B) The geographic distribution of plant species with high antileishmanial activity. (C) Random Forest model predicted antileishmanial activity with 89% accuracy.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Identification, Classification, and Prediction of Antileishmanial Plant Compounds using Random Forest </p>","methods":"<p></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoan parasites that spread via the bite of infected sandflies (Torres-Guerrero et al., 2017). Over 20 species of <i>Leishmania</i> have been characterized, and there are three main clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis: visceral, cutaneous, and mucocutaneous (Mann et al., 2021). Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by <i>L. donovani</i> and <i>L. infantum</i> species, affects the body systemically and targets the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. VL is the most severe form of leishmaniasis and has the highest mortality and morbidity of the three forms (Mann et al., 2021). The disease burden is concentrated in East Africa, South America, and South Asia (World Health Organization, 2023). Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, <i>L. major</i>, and <i>L. tropica</i>, is characterized by skin lesions and ulcers. CL is the most common form of leishmaniasis, and cases occur primarily in the Americas, Central Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East (World Health Organization, 2023). Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ML), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. aethiopica</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i>, deteriorates tissues in the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and throat (Steverding, 2017). Cases of ML occur in Bolivia, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Peru (World Health Organization, 2023).</p><p>Leishmaniasis has an estimated prevalence of 12 million cases worldwide, with 1.5-2 million new cases each year (Costa-da-Silva et al., 2022). It causes high morbidity and severe mortality (Fiuza et al., 2016). Current treatment for leishmaniasis is dependent on the clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> species, and geographic location&nbsp;(where treatment is administered). Liposomal amphotericin B,&nbsp;miltefosine, and pentavalent antimonials are the preferred treatments for VL and ML;  miltefosine, paromomycin, pentavalent antimonials, and topical therapies are preferred for CL (Aronson et al., 2017; Li et al., 2026).&nbsp; Despite the availability of treatment options for leishmaniasis, treatment can be toxic and cost-prohibitive, and <i>Leishmania</i> resistance to many of the existing medications has become increasingly common (Li et al., 2026; Ponte-Sucre et al., 2017). Discovering additional antileishmanial compounds would contribute to efforts to overcome the limitations of current treatments (Croft et al., 2006).</p><p>Researchers look at nature as a source for new alternatives in drug development (Li et al., 2026; Oryan, 2015). Plant-derived compounds have been recognized as bioactive agents with several immunomodulatory effects (Sadeghi-Nejad et al., 2011). However, most plant-derived compounds have not been scientifically evaluated (Oryan, 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2015) and their mechanism of action is unknown (Rodrigues et al., 2015). Large scale experiments are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the large number of potential natural compounds. (Yoo et al., 2020)</p><p>Previous studies have primarily focused on in vitro experimentation to identify medicinal uses for natural compounds (Yoo et al., 2020). However, drug therapies may be identified using machine learning. One of the major applications of machine learning is to develop predictive models to assist the drug discovery process (Kore et al., 2025). This study 1) evaluated and compared plant families with antileishmanial activity against different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis and 2) used Random Forest, a supervised machine learning approach, to predict antileishmanial activity. The approach was selected over more complex deep-learning methods because of its historic and widespread use (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023; Carracedo-Reboredo et al., 2021; Dara et al., 2022) and because it can analyze and establish relationships between multiple predictor variables (Bonifacio-Velez De Villa et al., 2025).</p><p>A systematic literature review based on the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist (Page et al., 2021) was conducted to identify articles to create a dataset of plant-derived compounds with antileishmanial properties. Databases searched included PubMed, PubChem, and WorldCat, yielding an initial total of over 1,500 results. Keywords used as search terms included “plant compounds” AND “leishmaniasis”; “plant compounds” AND “<i>Leishmania</i>”; “leishmaniasis” AND “extract”; and “<i>Leishmania</i>” AND “extract.” Results were screened to only include peer-reviewed and non-duplicated sources, yielding 1,200 articles. Initial exclusion criteria included a date of publication and access. Sources that were published prior to 2000 and sources that could not be accessed from research libraries were excluded, yielding 1,100 articles. Full-text review exclusions included relevance to the study and utility of content, yielding 33 articles. Data was collected from 12 of the remaining 33 articles. The plant family, genus, and species; plant bioactive compounds; Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>); 50% Cytotoxicity Concentration (CC<sub>50</sub>); Selectivity Index (SI); <i>Leishmania</i> species; and <i>Leishmania</i> form were used to create the dataset.</p><p>Associations between the bioactivity level of screened plant families and clinical manifestation of leishmaniasis were analyzed using the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2016). The geographic distribution of screened plant species with high antileishmanial activity was mined using the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) API via the rgbif package (Chamberlain et al., 2012). Occurrence records were retrieved, filtered for valid geographic coordinates, and mapped using ggplot2. All analyses were conducted in R v.4.3.2&nbsp;(R Core Team, 2025).</p><p>The plant families most commonly represented in the dataset had activity against CL (26 families), followed by VL (23), and ML (10) (Figure 1A). Several of the plant families located in areas with high <i>Leishmania</i> prevalence, such as Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae, had high or moderate activity against at least one form of <i>Leishmania</i> species. The screened plant species located in areas where the disease is most prevalent were: <i>Aniba riparia</i> (Lauraceae) and <i>Eugenia uniflora</i> (Myrtaceae), densely located in Central and South America; <i>Croton caudatus</i> (Euphorbiaceae), found mainly in Southeast Asia; <i>Mentha pulegium</i> (Lamiaceae), found in South Asia; and <i>Artemisia herba-alba</i> (Asteraceae), found in Northern Africa (Figure 1B).</p><p>The Random Forest algorithm was applied to train a prediction model for antileishmanial activity. The dataset was analyzed by applying random trees and making associations between data points using the function randomForest (package = randomForest) (Liaw &amp; Wiener, 2002). Highly correlated predictor variables were removed, and the predictors used in the model were clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> strain, <i>Leishmania</i> form, bioactive compound, and plant family. The number of trees was set at n = 500, and the class weight was set to (No = 1 and Yes = 0.2) with “No” weighted more to account for the close correlation between “Yes” and <i>Leishmania</i> clearance. The Random Forest model (Figure 1C) predicted the antileishmanial activity of the plants with 89% accuracy, with the balanced accuracy, accounting for both error rates, at 73%. The out-of-bag error, an estimate of predictive performance based on samples not used in the tree construction, was 16%.</p><p>Drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly process that involves the screening of bioactive compounds to identify potential candidates (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023). Machine learning algorithms may accelerate the drug identification process by predicting the bioactivity of plant compounds (Yabuuchi et al., 2023). This study distinguished between antileishmanial activity levels based on plant family relative to clinical manifestation; identified the geographic location of plants with high antileishmanial activity; and supported the use of machine learning to predict antileishmanial activity in plant compounds. Researchers may use machine learning to assist in determining which plants may be screened for antileishmanial activity in the lab.</p>","references":[{"reference":"Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez Velez R, Weina P, et al., Magill A. 2017. Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 96: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256"},{"reference":"Atas Guvenilir H, Dogan T. 2023. How to approach machine learning-based prediction of drug/compound–target interactions. Journal of Cheminformatics. 15: 16.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13321-023-00689-w"},{"reference":"Bonifacio Velez De Villa EI, Montoya Alfaro ME, Negron Ballarte LP, Solis Calero C. 2025. Predicting Antimicrobial Peptide Activity: A Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Approach. Pharmaceutics. 17: 993.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17080993"},{"reference":"Carracedo Reboredo P, Linares Blanco J, Rodriguez Fernandez N, Cedron F, Novoa FJ, Carballal A, et al., Fernandez Lozano C. 2021. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 19: 4538.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011"},{"reference":"Chamberlain S, Oldoni D, Waller J. 2012. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.32614/CRAN.package.rgbif"},{"reference":"Costa Da Silva AC, Nascimento DDO, Ferreira JRM, Guimaraes Pinto K, Freire De Lima L, Morrot A, et al., Freire De Lima CG. 2022. Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: An Overview. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 7: 54.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed7040054"},{"reference":"Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. 2006. Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 19: 111.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006"},{"reference":"Dara S, Dhamercherla S, Jadav SS, Babu CM, Ahsan MJ. 2022. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 55: 1947.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4"},{"reference":"Fiuza JA, Dey R, Davenport D, Abdeladhim M, Meneses C, Oliveira F, et al., Nakhasi HL. 2016. Intradermal Immunization of Leishmania donovani Centrin Knock-Out Parasites in Combination with Salivary Protein LJM19 from Sand Fly Vector Induces a Durable Protective Immune Response in Hamsters. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 10: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0004322"},{"reference":"Kore M, Acharya D, Sharma L, Vembar SS, Sundriyal S. 2025. Development and experimental validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of new antimalarials. BMC Chemistry. 19: 28.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01395-4"},{"reference":"Li S, Zhang L, Wang X. 2026. Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for visceral leishmaniasis. Microbial Pathogenesis. 212: 108318.","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108318"},{"reference":"Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2: 18.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Mann S, Frasca K, Scherrer S, Henao Martinez AF, Newman S, Ramanan P, Suarez JA. 2021. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 8: 121.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7"},{"reference":"Oryan A. 2015. Plant-derived compounds in treatment of leishmaniasis. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 16: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Page MJ, Mc Kenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al., Moher D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ: n71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1136/bmj.n71"},{"reference":"Ponte Sucre A, Gamarro F, Dujardin JC, Barrett MP, Lopez Velez R, Garcia Hernandez R, et al., Papadopoulou B. 2017. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11: e0006052.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052"},{"reference":"R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rodrigues IA, Mazotto AM, Cardoso V, Alves RL, Amaral ACF, Silva JRDA, Pinheiro AS, Vermelho AB. 2015. Natural Products: Insights into Leishmaniasis Inflammatory Response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2015: 835910.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/835910"},{"reference":"Sadeghi Nejad B, Saki J, Khademvatan S, Nanaei S. 2011. In vitro antileishmanial activity of the medicinal plant—Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad. J Med Plant Res. 5: 5912.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Steverding D. 2017. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasites & Vectors. 10: 82.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5"},{"reference":"Torres Guerrero E, Quintanilla Cedillo MR, Ruiz Esmenjaud J, Arenas R. 2017. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000Research. 6: 750.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.11120.1"},{"reference":"Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R!: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"World Health Organization. 2023. Leishmaniasis [Fact Sheet].","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Yabuuchi H, Hayashi K, Shigemoto A, Fujiwara M, Nomura Y, Nakashima M, et al., Miyai K. 2023. Virtual screening of antimicrobial plant extracts by machine-learning classification of chemical compounds in semantic space. PLOS ONE. 18: e0285716.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0285716"},{"reference":"Yamamoto ES, Campos BLS, Jesus JA, Laurenti MD, Ribeiro SP, Kallas EG, et al., Passero LFD. 2015. The Effect of Ursolic Acid on Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Is Related to Programed Cell Death and Presents Therapeutic Potential in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLOS ONE. 10: e0144946.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0144946"},{"reference":"Yoo S, Yang HC, Lee S, Shin J, Min S, Lee E, Song M, Lee D. 2020. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Identifying the Medicinal Uses of Plant-Derived Natural Compounds. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 11: 584875.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2020.584875"}],"title":"Predicting Antileishmanial Activity of Plant-Derived Compounds Using Random Forest Modeling","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"2681b0d4-85e1-4662-860a-ef39f2c66888","decision":"publish","abstract":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease for which existing treatments can be toxic and costly, and resistance to current therapies is becoming increasingly common. This study implemented a systematic review of data regarding antileishmanial activity in plant-derived compounds and used machine learning techniques to train and test a Random Forest algorithm to predict the antileishmanial activity of plant-derived compounds. Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae plant families were identified for their high or moderate antileishmanial activity and nativity to areas of high leishmaniasis prevalence. The Random Forest model had 89% prediction accuracy, with an out-of-bag error rate of 16%.</p>","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology","investigation","formalAnalysis","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"adriannahighgate@spelman.edu","firstName":"Adrianna","lastName":"Highgate","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["formalAnalysis","software","validation","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"patrick.stillson@emory.edu","firstName":"Patrick T.","lastName":"Stillson","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-5382-7704"},{"affiliations":["Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"jewashington@msm.edu","firstName":"Jandolyn","lastName":"Washington","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","resources","formalAnalysis","software","supervision","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"dwann.davenport@morehouse.edu","firstName":"Dwann","lastName":"Davenport","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0002-6770-3600"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>This research received no external funding.</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/c5ec4ecc70f994636b272a3875895d2e.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Bioactive activity of plant families against the different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis. In the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;analysis, the&nbsp;activity&nbsp;of a plant compound was considered \"high\" if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was less than or equal to 10 µg/mL against the promastigote or amastigote forms. Moderate&nbsp;activity&nbsp;was defined as an IC<sub>50</sub> greater than 10 µg/mL and less than 50 µg/mL, and low activity if the IC<sub>50</sub> value was greater than 50 µg/mL and less than 100 µg/mL. The screens for bioactive activity were done against cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. tropica</i>, <i>L. major</i>, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. braziliensis</i>, <i>L. aethiopica</i>, <i>L. guyanesis</i>, and/or <i>L. panamensis</i>; and visceral leishmaniasis caused by <i>L. infantum</i> and/or <i>L. donovani</i>. (B) The geographic distribution of plant species with high antileishmanial activity. (C) Random Forest model predicted antileishmanial activity with 89% accuracy.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Identification, Classification, and Prediction of Antileishmanial Plant Compounds using Random Forest </p>","methods":"<p></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by protozoan parasites that spread via the bite of infected sandflies (Torres-Guerrero et al., 2017). Over 20 species of <i>Leishmania</i> have been characterized, and there are three main clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis: visceral, cutaneous, and mucocutaneous (Mann et al., 2021). Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by <i>L. donovani</i> and <i>L. infantum</i> species, affects the body systemically and targets the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. VL is the most severe form of leishmaniasis and has the highest mortality and morbidity of the three forms (Mann et al., 2021). The disease burden is concentrated in East Africa, South America, and South Asia (World Health Organization, 2023). Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. amazonensis</i>, <i>L. major</i>, and <i>L. tropica</i>, is characterized by skin lesions and ulcers. CL is the most common form of leishmaniasis, and cases occur primarily in the Americas, Central Asia, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East (World Health Organization, 2023). Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ML), caused by species including, but not limited to, <i>L. aethiopica</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i>, deteriorates tissues in the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and throat (Steverding, 2017). Cases of ML occur in Bolivia, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Peru (World Health Organization, 2023).</p><p>Leishmaniasis has an estimated prevalence of 12 million cases worldwide, with 1.5-2 million new cases each year (Costa-da-Silva et al., 2022). It causes high morbidity and severe mortality (Fiuza et al., 2016). Current treatment for leishmaniasis is dependent on the clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> species, and geographic location&nbsp;(where treatment is administered). Liposomal amphotericin B,&nbsp;miltefosine, and pentavalent antimonials are the preferred treatments for VL and ML;  miltefosine, paromomycin, pentavalent antimonials, and topical therapies are preferred for CL (Aronson et al., 2017; Li et al., 2026).&nbsp; Despite the availability of treatment options for leishmaniasis, treatment can be toxic and cost-prohibitive, and <i>Leishmania</i> resistance to many of the existing medications has become increasingly common (Li et al., 2026; Ponte-Sucre et al., 2017). Discovering additional antileishmanial compounds would contribute to efforts to overcome the limitations of current treatments (Croft et al., 2006).</p><p>Researchers look at nature as a source for new alternatives in drug development (Li et al., 2026; Oryan, 2015). Plant-derived compounds have been recognized as bioactive agents with several immunomodulatory effects (Sadeghi-Nejad et al., 2011). However, most plant-derived compounds have not been scientifically evaluated (Oryan, 2015; Yamamoto et al., 2015) and their mechanism of action is unknown (Rodrigues et al., 2015). Large scale experiments are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the large number of potential natural compounds. (Yoo et al., 2020)</p><p>Previous studies have primarily focused on in vitro experimentation to identify medicinal uses for natural compounds (Yoo et al., 2020). However, drug therapies may be identified using machine learning. One of the major applications of machine learning is to develop predictive models to assist the drug discovery process (Kore et al., 2025). This study 1) evaluated and compared plant families with antileishmanial activity against different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis and 2) used Random Forest, a supervised machine learning approach, to predict antileishmanial activity. The approach was selected over more complex deep-learning methods because of its historic and widespread use (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023; Carracedo-Reboredo et al., 2021; Dara et al., 2022) and because it can analyze and establish relationships between multiple predictor variables (Bonifacio-Velez De Villa et al., 2025).</p><p>A systematic literature review based on the widely accepted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist (Page et al., 2021) was conducted to identify articles to create a dataset of plant-derived compounds with antileishmanial properties. Databases searched included PubMed, PubChem, and WorldCat, yielding an initial total of over 1,500 results. Keywords used as search terms included “plant compounds” AND “leishmaniasis”; “plant compounds” AND “<i>Leishmania</i>”; “leishmaniasis” AND “extract”; and “<i>Leishmania</i>” AND “extract.” Results were screened to only include peer-reviewed and non-duplicated sources, yielding 1,200 articles. Initial exclusion criteria included a date of publication and access. Sources that were published prior to 2000 and sources that could not be accessed from research libraries were excluded, yielding 1,100 articles. Full-text review exclusions included relevance to the study and utility of content, yielding 33 articles. Data was collected from 12 of the remaining 33 articles. The plant family, genus, and species; plant bioactive compounds; Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>); 50% Cytotoxicity Concentration (CC<sub>50</sub>); Selectivity Index (SI); <i>Leishmania</i> species; and <i>Leishmania</i> form were used to create the dataset.</p><p>Associations between the bioactivity level of screened plant families and clinical manifestation of leishmaniasis were analyzed using the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2016). The geographic distribution of screened plant species with high antileishmanial activity was mined using the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) API via the rgbif package (Chamberlain et al., 2012). Occurrence records were retrieved, filtered for valid geographic coordinates, and mapped using ggplot2. All analyses were conducted in R v.4.3.2&nbsp;(R Core Team, 2025).</p><p>The plant families most commonly represented in the dataset had activity against CL (26 families), followed by VL (23), and ML (10) (Figure 1A). Several of the plant families located in areas with high <i>Leishmania</i> prevalence, such as Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Myrtaceae, had high or moderate activity against at least one form of <i>Leishmania</i> species. The screened plant species located in areas where the disease is most prevalent were: <i>Aniba riparia</i> (Lauraceae) and <i>Eugenia uniflora</i> (Myrtaceae), densely located in Central and South America; <i>Croton caudatus</i> (Euphorbiaceae), found mainly in Southeast Asia; <i>Mentha pulegium</i> (Lamiaceae), found in South Asia; and <i>Artemisia herba-alba</i> (Asteraceae), found in Northern Africa (Figure 1B).</p><p>The Random Forest algorithm was applied to train a prediction model for antileishmanial activity. The dataset was analyzed by applying random trees and making associations between data points using the function randomForest (package = randomForest) (Liaw &amp; Wiener, 2002). Highly correlated predictor variables were removed, and the predictors used in the model were clinical manifestation, <i>Leishmania</i> strain, <i>Leishmania</i> form, bioactive compound, and plant family. The number of trees was set at n = 500, and the class weight was set to (No = 1 and Yes = 0.2) with “No” weighted more to account for the close correlation between “Yes” and <i>Leishmania</i> clearance. The Random Forest model (Figure 1C) predicted the antileishmanial activity of the plants with 89% accuracy, with the balanced accuracy, accounting for both error rates, at 73%. The out-of-bag error, an estimate of predictive performance based on samples not used in the tree construction, was 16%.</p><p>Drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly process that involves the screening of bioactive compounds to identify potential candidates (Atas Guvenilir &amp; Doğan, 2023). Machine learning algorithms may accelerate the drug identification process by predicting the bioactivity of plant compounds (Yabuuchi et al., 2023). This study distinguished between antileishmanial activity levels based on plant family relative to clinical manifestation; identified the geographic location of plants with high antileishmanial activity; and supported the use of machine learning to predict antileishmanial activity in plant compounds. Researchers may use machine learning to assist in determining which plants may be screened for antileishmanial activity in the lab.</p>","references":[{"reference":"Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez Velez R, Weina P, et al., Magill A. 2017. Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 96: 24.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256"},{"reference":"Atas Guvenilir H, Dogan T. 2023. How to approach machine learning-based prediction of drug/compound–target interactions. Journal of Cheminformatics. 15: 16.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13321-023-00689-w"},{"reference":"Bonifacio Velez De Villa EI, Montoya Alfaro ME, Negron Ballarte LP, Solis Calero C. 2025. Predicting Antimicrobial Peptide Activity: A Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Approach. Pharmaceutics. 17: 993.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17080993"},{"reference":"Carracedo Reboredo P, Linares Blanco J, Rodriguez Fernandez N, Cedron F, Novoa FJ, Carballal A, et al., Fernandez Lozano C. 2021. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 19: 4538.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011"},{"reference":"Chamberlain S, Oldoni D, Waller J. 2012. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.32614/CRAN.package.rgbif"},{"reference":"Costa Da Silva AC, Nascimento DDO, Ferreira JRM, Guimaraes Pinto K, Freire De Lima L, Morrot A, et al., Freire De Lima CG. 2022. Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: An Overview. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 7: 54.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed7040054"},{"reference":"Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. 2006. Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 19: 111.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006"},{"reference":"Dara S, Dhamercherla S, Jadav SS, Babu CM, Ahsan MJ. 2022. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 55: 1947.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s10462-021-10058-4"},{"reference":"Fiuza JA, Dey R, Davenport D, Abdeladhim M, Meneses C, Oliveira F, et al., Nakhasi HL. 2016. Intradermal Immunization of Leishmania donovani Centrin Knock-Out Parasites in Combination with Salivary Protein LJM19 from Sand Fly Vector Induces a Durable Protective Immune Response in Hamsters. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 10: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0004322"},{"reference":"Kore M, Acharya D, Sharma L, Vembar SS, Sundriyal S. 2025. Development and experimental validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of new antimalarials. BMC Chemistry. 19: 28.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01395-4"},{"reference":"Li S, Zhang L, Wang X. 2026. Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for visceral leishmaniasis. Microbial Pathogenesis. 212: 108318.","pubmedId":"","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108318"},{"reference":"Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2: 18.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Mann S, Frasca K, Scherrer S, Henao Martinez AF, Newman S, Ramanan P, Suarez JA. 2021. A Review of Leishmaniasis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 8: 121.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7"},{"reference":"Oryan A. 2015. Plant-derived compounds in treatment of leishmaniasis. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 16: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Page MJ, Mc Kenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al., Moher D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ: n71.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1136/bmj.n71"},{"reference":"Ponte Sucre A, Gamarro F, Dujardin JC, Barrett MP, Lopez Velez R, Garcia Hernandez R, et al., Papadopoulou B. 2017. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11: e0006052.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052"},{"reference":"R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Rodrigues IA, Mazotto AM, Cardoso V, Alves RL, Amaral ACF, Silva JRDA, Pinheiro AS, Vermelho AB. 2015. Natural Products: Insights into Leishmaniasis Inflammatory Response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2015: 835910.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/835910"},{"reference":"Sadeghi Nejad B, Saki J, Khademvatan S, Nanaei S. 2011. In vitro antileishmanial activity of the medicinal plant—Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad. J Med Plant Res. 5: 5912.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Steverding D. 2017. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasites & Vectors. 10: 82.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5"},{"reference":"Torres Guerrero E, Quintanilla Cedillo MR, Ruiz Esmenjaud J, Arenas R. 2017. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000Research. 6: 750.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.11120.1"},{"reference":"Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Use R!: 1.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"World Health Organization. 2023. Leishmaniasis [Fact Sheet].","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Yabuuchi H, Hayashi K, Shigemoto A, Fujiwara M, Nomura Y, Nakashima M, et al., Miyai K. 2023. Virtual screening of antimicrobial plant extracts by machine-learning classification of chemical compounds in semantic space. PLOS ONE. 18: e0285716.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0285716"},{"reference":"Yamamoto ES, Campos BLS, Jesus JA, Laurenti MD, Ribeiro SP, Kallas EG, et al., Passero LFD. 2015. The Effect of Ursolic Acid on Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Is Related to Programed Cell Death and Presents Therapeutic Potential in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PLOS ONE. 10: e0144946.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0144946"},{"reference":"Yoo S, Yang HC, Lee S, Shin J, Min S, Lee E, Song M, Lee D. 2020. A Deep Learning-Based Approach for Identifying the Medicinal Uses of Plant-Derived Natural Compounds. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 11: 584875.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2020.584875"}],"title":"Predicting Antileishmanial Activity of Plant-Derived Compounds Using Random Forest Modeling","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","label":"Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stewartia floidana","label":"Stewartia floridana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"963adccd-19d0-40bf-a476-2b61ec2d6bd4","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}},
    "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}