{
    "componentChunkName": "component---src-templates-article-page-js",
    "path": "/journals/biology/micropub-biology-002273",
    "result": {"data":{"article":{"manuscript":{"id":"3a9dec70-c901-4257-9176-adc26dc38b13","submissionTypes":["new finding"],"citations":[],"doi":"10.17912/micropub.biology.002273","dbReferenceId":null,"pmcId":null,"pmId":null,"proteopedia":null,"reviewPanel":null,"species":["other"],"integrations":[],"corrections":null,"history":{"received":"2026-07-08T16:03:13.475Z","revisionReceived":"2026-07-23T15:35:20.018Z","accepted":"2026-07-28T23:51:52.471Z","published":"2026-07-29T20:03:53.215Z","indexed":"2026-08-12T20:03:53.215Z"},"versions":[{"id":"44a8b9d3-0d23-4242-9292-508b8829c0ed","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p>Nurdles are small, pre-production plastic pellets. Globally, nurdles are the second largest source of microplastic pollution due to release during manufacture and transport. As these nurdles persist in the environment, they undergo weathering—a process that significantly increases surface area and colonization by microbes. To gain an understanding of the composition of the microbiome found on nurdles, full-length 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Sequencing data showed a greater amount and diversity of microbes found to be associated with nurdles than with the sand from which the nurdles were collected.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p></p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative "],"credit":["dataCuration","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"vibha.annaswamy@utexas.edu","firstName":"Vibha","lastName":"Annaswamy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0009-6167-5398"},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology"],"email":"mfmikesh@austin.utexas.edu","firstName":"Michelle","lastName":"Mikesh","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["conceptualization","writing_originalDraft","supervision","resources","methodology"],"email":"kdinkeloo@utexas.edu","firstName":"Kasia","lastName":"Dinkeloo","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9264-3131"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>Support for this research provided by the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Freshman Research Initiative at the University of Texas at Austin</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/142159731562f06342972c22bb94101d.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>Nurdles collected from the wrack line (A). Rinsed nurdles imaged via stereomicroscopy (B). Scanning Electron Microscopy of the surface of a nurdle showing microbial cells (C). Relative abundance of top nine genera represented in the targeted metagenomic sequencing data set of nurdles compared to sand.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast Harbor a Unique Microbiome. </p>","methods":"<p><u>Nurdle Collection</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nurdles and sand were collected from the wrack line of the Bob Hall Pier beach in Port Aransas, TX, USA. They were harvested using forceps and rinsed lightly with 1X PBS buffer before storage. Nurdles were placed in 50 mL conical tubes and transported on ice to the lab. They were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>DNA Extraction</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Aliquots of 50 nurdles (or 100 mg of sand) were rinsed in 1X PBS and placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were vortexed for 15 minutes with 1 mL of CD1 lysis buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (Add CAT#), and DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C. DNA concentrations was measured using a QuBit Fluorometer with the HS dsDNA kit (CAT#).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>Microscopy</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stereomicroscopy was performed with a ZEISS Stemi 508 stereo microscope with an Axiocam 208 color camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze microbes on the surface of nurdles. Briefly, sample preparation entailed: fix with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 2% paraformaldehyde, wash with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and stain using 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1% osmium tetroxide, and 1% tannic acid. Samples dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and exchanged to hexamethyldisilazane before air drying. Samples were then mounted to stubs, sputter coated with platinum/palladium, and imaged at accelerating voltage using a Zeiss Scanning Electron Microscope.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>16S Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing</u></p><p>Microbial DNA extracted from nurdles and sand was used to prepare samples for metagenomic sequencing using the 16S Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (ONT, SQK-16S114-24). PCR amplification and barcoding was completed with 10 ng template DNA, using Hot-Start Q5 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs). Initial denaturation at 98°C was followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, 30 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. Purification of amplicons was performed using the AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter) as per ONT’s instructions. Samples were measured via Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and pooled in an equimolar ratio to a total of 150 ng. Prepared libraries were run on a MinION Mk1B sequencer using a FLO-FLG114 flow cell. MINKNOW v24.06.8 with high-accuracy model v4.3.0, 400 bps basecalling was used for data acquisition.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>Metagenomic Sequencing Data Analysis</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Data analysis was performed on the EPI2ME platform using the standard wf-metagenomics nextflow workflow (v2.11.0) and Minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) with the following parameters: 90% minimum percent identity, 90% minimum reference coverage, ncbi_16s_18s reference database.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Microplastics present an immense crisis for the marine environment. Nurdles represent the second largest source of microplastic emissions globally, with over 445,000 tons of nurdles discharged into the environment yearly (Sewwandi et al. 2023). These small, pre-production plastic pellets are typically composed of a single polymer, but may contain chemical additives (Mato et al. 2001). They are spilled or released into the environment during transport from production factories to manufacturing facilities, often discharging directly into the ocean from shipping accidents or into secondary waterways from transport via train or truck (Sewwandi et al. 2023). Large numbers of nurdles have been documented on the Texas gulf coast since 2018, with some spill events resulting in an estimated 300,000 to 1 million nurdles per mile present for at least 24 miles of Mustang and North Padre Islands (Tunnell et al. 2020) (Fig 1A). As nurdles spend time in the environment, they are exposed to heat, moisture, sunlight, and physical forces. All of these elements contribute to a process known as weathering, which can result in changes to plastics such as increases in surface area from cracking or pitting, color changes, creation of chemical by-products from polymer degradation, and a decrease in mechanical strength (Andrady 2022) (Fig 1B).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The effects of nurdles in the environment have been investigated with regards to ingestion by sea life and incidence in different habitats, but little is known about how microbes may interact with or act upon these primary microplastics. Since these pellets are resilient and buoyant, they serve as ideal surfaces for the formation of biofilm and accumulation of various microbes as they travel through the environment over long periods of time (Wright et al. 2020)(Oberbeckmann et al. 2015). The nurdles we collected showed visual evidence of diverse microbial colonization (Fig 1C). Several studies have shown that plastic debris from marine environments collect unique microbiomes (Zettler et al. 2013) and that nurdles may host human pathogens (Rodrigues et al. 2019), but there is no published data available on the full composition of the microbiome associated with Gulf Coast nurdles.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>While nurdles account for an increasing percentage of primary microplastic pollution in many environments, they lack any sort of hazard classification that might aid in their mitigation or clean-up support from U.S government sources. Studies have been conducted on their polymer composition, showing that a majority of nurdles recovered from beaches are made of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) (Jiang et al. 2022).Most of these nurdles likely originate from the Texas gulf coast(Cisco et al. 2025). Further studies demonstrate an association of toxic chemicals with nurdles as they weather and travel throughout the environment (Jiang et al. 2021). Understanding the microbiome composition of nurdles will provide a foundation for further research on the impact of this type of pollution. Future studies can examine potential hazards against human health, aquaculture, and agriculture, and prospect for the discovery and characterization of novel marine bacteria with an eye towards plastic degradation, spill-origin tracking, or other useful characteristics.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To gain this initial understanding of the nurdle microbiome, targeted metagenomic sequencing was conducted on microbial DNA isolated from groups of nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Genomic DNA extracted from the groups of nurdles ranged from 32.6-133 ng. PCR amplification and purification of the full-length 16S region yielded 49-204 ng of amplicon DNA. Genomic DNA was also extracted and amplified from sand collected at the sampling location, yielding 272 ng of genomic DNA and 97.4 ng of purified 16S amplicon. This suggests a roughly equivalent microbial presence in both sand and nurdle samples. Samples were normalized such that the pooled library included 10 ng of amplicon DNA from each sample, and full-length 16S metagenomic sequencing was completed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The relative abundances of microbial genera identified from nurdle-associated microbial DNA were compared with sand-associated microbial DNA (1D).</p><p>Sequencing results were analyzed using the Minimap2 pipeline via EPI2ME to generate a rarefied abundance table at the genus rank. We saw a greater variety of microbial genera associated with nurdles that were notably distinct from the sand sample, suggesting that the nurdle microbiome is unique to its plastic environment. Of the top nine genera represented in nurdle samples, only one was found to be shared with the sand sample (<i>Sulfitobacter</i>), which was represented as 8-16% of reads for nurdle samples compared to 0.8% of reads from the sand sample (1D). The average effective number of species for nurdle samples was 65, compared with 33 for the sand sample. This trend in diversity was reflected in the Shannon’s Diversity index as well, with the nurdle samples scoring an average of 4.17, compared to 3.5 for sand.</p><p>This data shows a great diversity of microbes associated with the surface of nurdles, some of which may also contribute to a “hazard” classification for the marine pollutant: several genera of pathogenic bacteria were found, with <i>Vibrio</i> species displayed in the highest abundance and found in all samples. Members of the genus vibrio can be pathogens of fish and humans (Vandeputte et al. 2024). Other pathogenic genera represented in the nurdle data set are <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Escherichia, Tenacibaculum, Flavobacterium, </i>and <i>Salmonella </i>---(The et al. 2016)(Fernández-Álvarez and Santos 2018)(Lee Bo-Hyung et al. 2023). Further investigation into the presence of these pathogenic genera on nurdles could impact guidelines for recreation or aquaculture in areas with high nurdle pollution.</p><p>Overall, we conclude that nurdles, like other marine microplastics, carry a unique microbiome that is distinct from the sand upon which they were collected. This microbiome is composed of a diverse set of both known and unknown microbes. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the full scale of the metagenome surrounding the nurdle and the roles that these bacteria play for their “host” and adjacent environments. The presence of these microbes give rise to additional questions regarding seasonality, influence of polymer composition or weathering status, and location of nurdles.</p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Sewwandi M, Keerthanan S, Perera KI, Vithanage M. 2023. Plastic Nurdles in Marine Environments Due to Accidental Spillage. Microplastics in the Ecosphere : 415-432.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/9781119879534.ch26"},{"reference":"<p>Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T. 2000. Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 35: 318-324.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es0010498"},{"reference":"<p>Tunnell JW, Dunning KH, Scheef LP, Swanson KM. 2020. Measuring plastic pellet (nurdle) abundance on shorelines throughout the Gulf of Mexico using citizen scientists: Establishing a platform for policy-relevant research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151: 110794.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110794"},{"reference":"<p>Andrady AL. 2022. Weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 180: 113761.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113761"},{"reference":"<p>Wright RJ, Erni-Cassola G, Zadjelovic V, Latva M, Christie-Oleza JA. 2020. Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 54: 11657-11672.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.0c02305"},{"reference":"<p>Oberbeckmann S, Löder MGJ, Labrenz M. 2015. Marine microplastic-associated biofilms – a review. Environmental Chemistry 12: 551-562.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1071/EN15069"},{"reference":"<p>Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 47: 7137-7146.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es401288x"},{"reference":"<p>Rodrigues A, Oliver DM, McCarron A, Quilliam RS. 2019. Colonisation of plastic pellets (nurdles) by E. coli at public bathing beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 139: 376-380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.011"},{"reference":"<p>Cisco J, Hua J, Jiang X, Xue J, Tunnell J, Du J, Liu Z. 2025. Evaluating the weathering and transport of plastic nurdles along the north- and southwestern Gulf of Mexico coasts. Environmental Research Letters 20: 114008.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ae08cd"},{"reference":"<p>Jiang X, Lu K, Tunnell JW, Liu Z. 2021. The impacts of weathering on concentration and bioaccessibility of organic pollutants associated with plastic pellets (nurdles) in coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170: 112592.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112592"},{"reference":"<p>Vandeputte M, Kashem MA, Bossier P, Vanrompay D. 2024. <i>Vibrio</i> pathogens and their toxins in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Reviews in Aquaculture 16: 1858-1878.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12926"},{"reference":"<p>The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. 2016. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14: 235-250.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrmicro.2016.10"},{"reference":"<p>Fernández-Álvarez C, Santos Y. 2018. Identification and typing of fish pathogenic species of the genus Tenacibaculum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 9973-9989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00253-018-9370-1"},{"reference":"<p>Lee BH, Nicolas P, Saticioglu IB, Fradet B, Bernardet JFo, Rigaudeau D, Rochat T, Duchaud E. 2023. Investigation of the Genus\n            <i>Flavobacterium</i>\n            as a Reservoir for Fish-Pathogenic Bacterial Species: the Case of Flavobacterium collinsii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89: 10.1128/aem.02162-22.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/aem.02162-22"}],"title":"<p>The Microbiome of Nurdles: Life on the Primary Microplastics of the Texas Gulf Coast</p>","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Jace Tunnell"},"openAcknowledgement":true,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"a99cbb09-c690-4360-9efd-cf0e44039977","decision":"edit","abstract":"<p>Nurdles are small, pre-production plastic pellets. Globally, nurdles are the second largest source of microplastic pollution due to release during manufacture and transport. As these nurdles persist in the environment, they undergo weathering—a process that significantly increases surface area and colonization by microbes. To gain an understanding of the composition of the microbiome found on nurdles, full-length 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Sequencing data showed a greater amount and diversity of microbes found to be associated with nurdles than with the sand from which the nurdles were collected.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p></p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative "],"credit":["dataCuration","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"vibha.annaswamy@utexas.edu","firstName":"Vibha","lastName":"Annaswamy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0009-6167-5398"},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology"],"email":"mfmikesh@austin.utexas.edu","firstName":"Michelle","lastName":"Mikesh","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["conceptualization","writing_originalDraft","supervision","resources","methodology"],"email":"kdinkeloo@utexas.edu","firstName":"Kasia","lastName":"Dinkeloo","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9264-3131"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>Support for this research provided by the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Freshman Research Initiative at the University of Texas at Austin</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/142159731562f06342972c22bb94101d.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>Nurdles collected from the wrack line (A). Rinsed nurdles imaged via stereomicroscopy (B). Scanning Electron Microscopy of the surface of a nurdle showing microbial cells (C). Relative abundance of top nine genera represented in the targeted metagenomic sequencing data set of nurdles compared to sand.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast Harbor a Unique Microbiome. </p>","methods":"<p><u>Nurdle Collection</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nurdles and sand were collected from the wrack line of the Horace Caldwell Pier beach in Port Aransas, TX, USA. They were harvested using forceps and rinsed lightly with 1X PBS buffer before storage. Nurdles were placed in 50 mL conical tubes and transported on ice to the lab. They were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>DNA Extraction</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Aliquots of 50 nurdles per sample (or 100 mg of sand) were rinsed in 1X PBS and placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were vortexed for 15 minutes with 1 mL of CD1 lysis buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (CAT#47014), and DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C. DNA concentrations was measured using a QuBit Fluorometer with the HS dsDNA kit (CAT# Q32851).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>Microscopy</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stereomicroscopy was performed with a ZEISS Stemi 508 stereo microscope with an Axiocam 208 color camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze microbes on the surface of nurdles. Briefly, sample preparation entailed: fix with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 2% paraformaldehyde, wash with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and stain using 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1% osmium tetroxide, and 1% tannic acid. Samples dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and exchanged to hexamethyldisilazane before air drying. Samples were then mounted to stubs, sputter coated with platinum/palladium, and imaged at accelerating voltage using a Zeiss Scanning Electron Microscope.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>16S Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing</u></p><p>Microbial DNA extracted from nurdles and sand was used to prepare samples for metagenomic sequencing using the 16S Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (ONT, SQK-16S114-24). PCR amplification and barcoding was completed with 10 ng template DNA, using Hot-Start Q5 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, CAT# M0494S). Initial denaturation at 98°C was followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, 30 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. Purification of amplicons was performed using the AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter) as per ONT’s instructions. Samples were measured via Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and pooled in an equimolar ratio to a total of 150 ng. Prepared libraries were run on a MinION Mk1B sequencer using a FLO-FLG114 flow cell. MINKNOW v24.06.8 with high-accuracy model v4.3.0, 400 bps basecalling was used for data acquisition.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><u>Metagenomic Sequencing Data Analysis</u></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Data analysis was performed on the EPI2ME platform using the standard wf-metagenomics nextflow workflow (v2.11.0) and Minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) with the following parameters: 90% minimum percent identity, 90% minimum reference coverage, ncbi_16s_18s reference database.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Microplastics present an immense crisis for the marine environment. Nurdles represent the second largest source of microplastic emissions globally, with over 445,000 tons of nurdles discharged into the environment yearly (Sewwandi et al. 2023). These small, pre-production plastic pellets are typically composed of a single polymer, but may contain chemical additives (Mato et al. 2001). They are spilled or released into the environment during transport from production factories to manufacturing facilities, often discharging directly into the ocean from shipping accidents or into secondary waterways from transport via train or truck (Sewwandi et al. 2023). Large numbers of nurdles have been documented on the Texas Gulf Coast since 2018, with some spill events resulting in an estimated 300,000 to 1 million nurdles per mile present for at least 24 miles of Mustang and North Padre Islands (Tunnell et al. 2020) (Fig 1A). As nurdles spend time in the environment, they are exposed to heat, moisture, sunlight, and physical forces. All of these elements contribute to a process known as weathering, which can result in changes to plastics such as increases in surface area from cracking or pitting, color changes, creation of chemical by-products from polymer degradation, and a decrease in mechanical strength (Andrady 2022) (Fig 1B).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The effects of nurdles in the environment have been investigated with regard to ingestion by sea life and incidence in different habitats, but little is known about how microbes may interact with or act upon these primary microplastics. Since these pellets are resilient and buoyant, they serve as ideal surfaces for the formation of biofilm and accumulation of various microbes as they travel through the environment over long periods of time (Wright et al. 2020), (Oberbeckmann et al. 2015). The nurdles we collected showed visual evidence of diverse microbial colonization (Fig 1C). Several studies have shown that pieces of plastic debris from marine environments collect unique microbiomes (Zettler et al. 2013) and that nurdles may host human pathogens (Rodrigues et al. 2019), but there is no published data available on the full composition of the microbiome associated with Gulf Coast nurdles.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>While nurdles account for an increasing percentage of primary microplastic pollution in many environments, they lack any sort of hazard classification that might aid in their mitigation or clean-up support from U.S. government sources. Studies have been conducted on their polymer composition, showing that a majority of nurdles recovered from Gulf Coast beaches are made of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) (Jiang et al. 2022). Most of these nurdles likely originate from the Texas Gulf Coast (Cisco et al. 2025). Further studies demonstrate an association of toxic chemicals with nurdles as they weather and travel throughout the environment (Jiang et al. 2021). Understanding the microbiome composition of nurdles will provide a foundation for further research on the impact of this type of pollution. Future studies can examine potential hazards against human health, aquaculture, and agriculture, and prospect for the discovery and characterization of novel marine bacteria with an eye towards plastic degradation, spill-origin tracking, or other useful characteristics.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To gain this initial understanding of the nurdle microbiome, targeted metagenomic sequencing was conducted on microbial DNA isolated from groups of nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Genomic DNA extracted from the groups of nurdles ranged from 32.6-133 ng. PCR amplification and purification of the full-length 16S region yielded 49-204 ng of amplicon DNA. Genomic DNA was also extracted and amplified from sand collected at the sampling location, yielding 272 ng of genomic DNA and 97.4 ng of purified 16S amplicon. This suggests a roughly equivalent microbial presence in both sand and nurdle samples. Samples were normalized such that the pooled library included 10 ng of amplicon DNA from each sample, and full-length 16S metagenomic sequencing was completed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The relative abundances of microbial genera identified from nurdle-associated microbial DNA were compared with sand-associated microbial DNA (Fig 1D).</p><p>Sequencing results were analyzed using the Minimap2 pipeline via EPI2ME to generate a rarefied abundance table at the genus rank. We saw a greater variety of microbial genera associated with nurdles that were notably distinct from the sand sample, suggesting that the nurdle microbiome is unique to its plastic environment. Of the top nine genera represented in nurdle samples, only one was found to be shared with the sand sample (<i>Sulfitobacter</i>), which was represented as 8-16% of reads for nurdle samples compared to 0.8% of reads from the sand sample (Fig 1D). The average effective number of species for nurdle samples was 65, compared with 33 for the sand sample. This trend in diversity was reflected in the Shannon’s diversity index as well, with the nurdle samples scoring an average of 4.17, compared to 3.5 for sand.</p><p>This data shows a great diversity of microbes associated with the surface of nurdles, some of which may also contribute to a “hazard” classification for the marine pollutant: several genera of pathogenic bacteria were found, with <i>Vibrio</i> species displayed in the highest abundance and found in all samples. Members of the genus Vibrio can be pathogens of fish and humans (Vandeputte et al. 2024). Other pathogenic genera represented in the nurdle data set are <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Escherichia, Tenacibaculum, Flavobacterium, </i>and <i>Salmonella </i>(The et al. 2016), (Fernández-Álvarez and Santos 2018), (Lee et al. 2023). Further investigation into the presence of these pathogenic genera on nurdles could impact guidelines for recreation or aquaculture in areas with high nurdle pollution.</p><p>Overall, we conclude that nurdles, like other marine microplastics, carry a unique microbiome that is distinct from the sand upon which they were collected. This microbiome is composed of a diverse set of both known and unknown microbes. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the full scale of the metagenome surrounding the nurdle and the roles that these bacteria play for their “host” and adjacent environments. The presence of these microbes gives rise to additional questions regarding seasonality, influence of polymer composition or weathering status, and location of nurdles.</p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Sewwandi M, Keerthanan S, Perera KI, Vithanage M. 2023. Plastic Nurdles in Marine Environments Due to Accidental Spillage. Microplastics in the Ecosphere : 415-432.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/9781119879534.ch26"},{"reference":"<p>Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T. 2000. Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 35: 318-324.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es0010498"},{"reference":"<p>Tunnell JW, Dunning KH, Scheef LP, Swanson KM. 2020. Measuring plastic pellet (nurdle) abundance on shorelines throughout the Gulf of Mexico using citizen scientists: Establishing a platform for policy-relevant research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151: 110794.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110794"},{"reference":"<p>Andrady AL. 2022. Weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 180: 113761.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113761"},{"reference":"<p>Wright RJ, Erni-Cassola G, Zadjelovic V, Latva M, Christie-Oleza JA. 2020. Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 54: 11657-11672.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.0c02305"},{"reference":"<p>Oberbeckmann S, Löder MGJ, Labrenz M. 2015. Marine microplastic-associated biofilms – a review. Environmental Chemistry 12: 551-562.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1071/EN15069"},{"reference":"<p>Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 47: 7137-7146.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es401288x"},{"reference":"<p>Rodrigues A, Oliver DM, McCarron A, Quilliam RS. 2019. Colonisation of plastic pellets (nurdles) by E. coli at public bathing beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 139: 376-380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.011"},{"reference":"<p>Cisco J, Hua J, Jiang X, Xue J, Tunnell J, Du J, Liu Z. 2025. Evaluating the weathering and transport of plastic nurdles along the north- and southwestern Gulf of Mexico coasts. Environmental Research Letters 20: 114008.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ae08cd"},{"reference":"<p>Jiang X, Lu K, Tunnell JW, Liu Z. 2021. The impacts of weathering on concentration and bioaccessibility of organic pollutants associated with plastic pellets (nurdles) in coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170: 112592.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112592"},{"reference":"<p>Vandeputte M, Kashem MA, Bossier P, Vanrompay D. 2024. <i>Vibrio</i> pathogens and their toxins in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Reviews in Aquaculture 16: 1858-1878.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12926"},{"reference":"<p>The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. 2016. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14: 235-250.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrmicro.2016.10"},{"reference":"<p>Fernández-Álvarez C, Santos Y. 2018. Identification and typing of fish pathogenic species of the genus Tenacibaculum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 9973-9989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00253-018-9370-1"},{"reference":"<p>Lee BH, Nicolas P, Saticioglu IB, Fradet B, Bernardet JFo, Rigaudeau D, Rochat T, Duchaud E. 2023. Investigation of the Genus\n            <i>Flavobacterium</i>\n            as a Reservoir for Fish-Pathogenic Bacterial Species: the Case of Flavobacterium collinsii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89: 10.1128/aem.02162-22.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/aem.02162-22"}],"title":"<p>The Microbiome of Nurdles: Life on the Primary Microplastics of the Texas Gulf Coast</p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"1d242273-9551-41aa-9a14-cb5f6ca42a06","decision":"accept","abstract":"<p>Nurdles are small, pre-production plastic pellets. Globally, nurdles are the second largest source of microplastic pollution due to release during manufacture and transport. As these nurdles persist in the environment, they undergo weathering—a process that significantly increases surface area and colonization by microbes. To gain an understanding of the composition of the microbiome found on nurdles, full-length 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Sequencing data showed a greater amount and diversity of microbes found to be associated with nurdles than with the sand from which the nurdles were collected.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p></p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["dataCuration","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"vibha.annaswamy@utexas.edu","firstName":"Vibha","lastName":"Annaswamy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0009-6167-5398"},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology"],"email":"mfmikesh@austin.utexas.edu","firstName":"Michelle","lastName":"Mikesh","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["conceptualization","writing_originalDraft","supervision","resources","methodology"],"email":"kdinkeloo@utexas.edu","firstName":"Kasia","lastName":"Dinkeloo","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9264-3131"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>Support for this research provided by the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Freshman Research Initiative at the University of Texas at Austin</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/142159731562f06342972c22bb94101d.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>Nurdles collected from the wrack line (A). Rinsed nurdles imaged via stereomicroscopy (B). Scanning Electron Microscopy of the surface of a nurdle showing microbial cells (C). Relative abundance of top nine genera represented in the targeted metagenomic sequencing data set of nurdles compared to sand.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast Harbor a Unique Microbiome</p>","methods":"<p><u>Nurdle Collection</u></p><p>Nurdles and sand were collected from the wrack line of the Horace Caldwell Pier beach in Port Aransas, TX, USA. They were harvested using forceps and rinsed lightly with 1X PBS buffer before storage. Nurdles were placed in 50 mL conical tubes and transported on ice to the lab. They were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.</p><p><u>DNA Extraction</u></p><p>Aliquots of 50 nurdles per sample (or 100 mg of sand) were rinsed in 1X PBS and placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were vortexed for 15 minutes with 1 mL of CD1 lysis buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (CAT#47014), and DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C. DNA concentrations was measured using a QuBit Fluorometer with the HS dsDNA kit (CAT# Q32851).</p><p><u>Microscopy</u></p><p>Stereomicroscopy was performed with a ZEISS Stemi 508 stereo microscope with an Axiocam 208 color camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze microbes on the surface of nurdles. Briefly, sample preparation entailed: fix with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 2% paraformaldehyde, wash with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and stain using 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1% osmium tetroxide, and 1% tannic acid. Samples dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and exchanged to hexamethyldisilazane before air drying. Samples were then mounted to stubs, sputter coated with platinum/palladium, and imaged at accelerating voltage using a Zeiss Scanning Electron Microscope.</p><p><u>16S Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing</u></p><p>Microbial DNA extracted from nurdles and sand was used to prepare samples for metagenomic sequencing using the 16S Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (ONT, SQK-16S114-24). PCR amplification and barcoding was completed with 10 ng template DNA, using Hot-Start Q5 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, CAT# M0494S). Initial denaturation at 98°C was followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, 30 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. Purification of amplicons was performed using the AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter) as per ONT’s instructions. Samples were measured via Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and pooled in an equimolar ratio to a total of 150 ng. Prepared libraries were run on a MinION Mk1B sequencer using a FLO-FLG114 flow cell. MINKNOW v24.06.8 with high-accuracy model v4.3.0, 400 bps basecalling was used for data acquisition.</p><p><u>Metagenomic Sequencing Data Analysis</u></p><p>Data analysis was performed on the EPI2ME platform using the standard wf-metagenomics nextflow workflow (v2.11.0) and Minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) with the following parameters: 90% minimum percent identity, 90% minimum reference coverage, ncbi_16s_18s reference database.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Microplastics present an immense crisis for the marine environment. Nurdles represent the second largest source of microplastic emissions globally, with over 445,000 tons of nurdles discharged into the environment yearly (Sewwandi et al. 2023). These small, pre-production plastic pellets are typically composed of a single polymer, but may contain chemical additives (Mato et al. 2001). They are spilled or released into the environment during transport from production factories to manufacturing facilities, often discharging directly into the ocean from shipping accidents or into secondary waterways from transport via train or truck (Sewwandi et al. 2023). Large numbers of nurdles have been documented on the Texas Gulf Coast since 2018, with some spill events resulting in an estimated 300,000 to 1 million nurdles per mile present for at least 24 miles of Mustang and North Padre Islands (Tunnell et al. 2020) (Fig 1A). As nurdles spend time in the environment, they are exposed to heat, moisture, sunlight, and physical forces. All of these elements contribute to a process known as weathering, which can result in changes to plastics such as increases in surface area from cracking or pitting, color changes, creation of chemical by-products from polymer degradation, and a decrease in mechanical strength (Andrady 2022) (Fig 1B).</p><p>The effects of nurdles in the environment have been investigated with regard to ingestion by sea life and incidence in different habitats, but little is known about how microbes may interact with or act upon these primary microplastics. Since these pellets are resilient and buoyant, they serve as ideal surfaces for the formation of biofilm and accumulation of various microbes as they travel through the environment over long periods of time (Wright et al. 2020, Oberbeckmann et al. 2015). The nurdles we collected showed visual evidence of diverse microbial colonization (Fig 1C). Several studies have shown that pieces of plastic debris from marine environments collect unique microbiomes (Zettler et al. 2013) and that nurdles may host human pathogens (Rodrigues et al. 2019), but there is no published data available on the full composition of the microbiome associated with Gulf Coast nurdles.</p><p>While nurdles account for an increasing percentage of primary microplastic pollution in many environments, they lack any sort of hazard classification that might aid in their mitigation or clean-up support from U.S. government sources. Studies have been conducted on their polymer composition, showing that a majority of nurdles recovered from Gulf Coast beaches are made of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) (Jiang et al. 2022). Most of these nurdles likely originate from the Texas Gulf Coast (Cisco et al. 2025). Further studies demonstrate an association of toxic chemicals with nurdles as they weather and travel throughout the environment (Jiang et al. 2021). Understanding the microbiome composition of nurdles will provide a foundation for further research on the impact of this type of pollution. Future studies can examine potential hazards against human health, aquaculture, and agriculture, and prospect for the discovery and characterization of novel marine bacteria with an eye towards plastic degradation, spill-origin tracking, or other useful characteristics.</p><p>To gain this initial understanding of the nurdle microbiome, targeted metagenomic sequencing was conducted on microbial DNA isolated from groups of nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Genomic DNA extracted from the groups of nurdles ranged from 32.6-133 ng. PCR amplification and purification of the full-length 16S region yielded 49-204 ng of amplicon DNA. Genomic DNA was also extracted and amplified from sand collected at the sampling location, yielding 272 ng of genomic DNA and 97.4 ng of purified 16S amplicon. This suggests a roughly equivalent microbial presence in both sand and nurdle samples. Samples were normalized such that the pooled library included 10 ng of amplicon DNA from each sample, and full-length 16S metagenomic sequencing was completed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The relative abundances of microbial genera identified from nurdle-associated microbial DNA were compared with sand-associated microbial DNA (Fig 1D).</p><p>Sequencing results were analyzed using the Minimap2 pipeline via EPI2ME to generate a rarefied abundance table at the genus rank. We saw a greater variety of microbial genera associated with nurdles that were notably distinct from the sand sample, suggesting that the nurdle microbiome is unique to its plastic environment. Of the top nine genera represented in nurdle samples, only one was found to be shared with the sand sample (<i>Sulfitobacter</i>), which was represented as 8-16% of reads for nurdle samples compared to 0.8% of reads from the sand sample (Fig 1D). The average effective number of species for nurdle samples was 65, compared with 33 for the sand sample. This trend in diversity was reflected in the Shannon’s diversity index as well, with the nurdle samples scoring an average of 4.17, compared to 3.5 for sand.</p><p>This data shows a great diversity of microbes associated with the surface of nurdles, some of which may also contribute to a “hazard” classification for the marine pollutant: several genera of pathogenic bacteria were found, with <i>Vibrio</i> species displayed in the highest abundance and found in all samples. Members of the genus Vibrio can be pathogens of fish and humans (Vandeputte et al. 2024). Other pathogenic genera represented in the nurdle data set are <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Escherichia, Tenacibaculum, Flavobacterium, </i>and <i>Salmonella </i>(The et al. 2016, Fernández-Álvarez and Santos 2018, Lee et al. 2023). Further investigation into the presence of these pathogenic genera on nurdles could impact guidelines for recreation or aquaculture in areas with high nurdle pollution.</p><p>Overall, we conclude that nurdles, like other marine microplastics, carry a unique microbiome that is distinct from the sand upon which they were collected. This microbiome is composed of a diverse set of both known and unknown microbes. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the full scale of the metagenome surrounding the nurdle and the roles that these bacteria play for their “host” and adjacent environments. The presence of these microbes gives rise to additional questions regarding seasonality, influence of polymer composition or weathering status, and location of nurdles.</p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Sewwandi M, Keerthanan S, Perera KI, Vithanage M. 2023. Plastic Nurdles in Marine Environments Due to Accidental Spillage. Microplastics in the Ecosphere : 415-432.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/9781119879534.ch26"},{"reference":"<p>Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T. 2000. Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 35: 318-324.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es0010498"},{"reference":"<p>Tunnell JW, Dunning KH, Scheef LP, Swanson KM. 2020. Measuring plastic pellet (nurdle) abundance on shorelines throughout the Gulf of Mexico using citizen scientists: Establishing a platform for policy-relevant research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151: 110794.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110794"},{"reference":"<p>Andrady AL. 2022. Weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 180: 113761.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113761"},{"reference":"<p>Wright RJ, Erni-Cassola G, Zadjelovic V, Latva M, Christie-Oleza JA. 2020. Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 54: 11657-11672.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.0c02305"},{"reference":"<p>Oberbeckmann S, Löder MGJ, Labrenz M. 2015. Marine microplastic-associated biofilms – a review. Environmental Chemistry 12: 551-562.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1071/EN15069"},{"reference":"<p>Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 47: 7137-7146.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es401288x"},{"reference":"<p>Rodrigues A, Oliver DM, McCarron A, Quilliam RS. 2019. Colonisation of plastic pellets (nurdles) by E. coli at public bathing beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 139: 376-380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.011"},{"reference":"<p>Cisco J, Hua J, Jiang X, Xue J, Tunnell J, Du J, Liu Z. 2025. Evaluating the weathering and transport of plastic nurdles along the north- and southwestern Gulf of Mexico coasts. Environmental Research Letters 20: 114008.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ae08cd"},{"reference":"<p>Jiang X, Lu K, Tunnell JW, Liu Z. 2021. The impacts of weathering on concentration and bioaccessibility of organic pollutants associated with plastic pellets (nurdles) in coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170: 112592.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112592"},{"reference":"<p>Vandeputte M, Kashem MA, Bossier P, Vanrompay D. 2024. <i>Vibrio</i> pathogens and their toxins in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Reviews in Aquaculture 16: 1858-1878.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12926"},{"reference":"<p>The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. 2016. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14: 235-250.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrmicro.2016.10"},{"reference":"<p>Fernández-Álvarez C, Santos Y. 2018. Identification and typing of fish pathogenic species of the genus Tenacibaculum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 9973-9989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00253-018-9370-1"},{"reference":"<p>Lee BH, Nicolas P, Saticioglu IB, Fradet B, Bernardet JFo, Rigaudeau D, Rochat T, Duchaud E. 2023. Investigation of the Genus\n            <i>Flavobacterium</i>\n            as a Reservoir for Fish-Pathogenic Bacterial Species: the Case of Flavobacterium collinsii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89: 10.1128/aem.02162-22.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/aem.02162-22"}],"title":"<p>The Microbiome of Nurdles: Life on the Primary Microplastics of the Texas Gulf Coast</p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"e3da1925-263a-4030-ab68-acc0cb3f3277","decision":"edit","abstract":"<p>Nurdles are small, pre-production plastic pellets. Globally, nurdles are the second largest source of microplastic pollution due to release during manufacture and transport. As these nurdles persist in the environment, they undergo weathering—a process that significantly increases surface area and colonization by microbes. To gain an understanding of the composition of the microbiome found on nurdles, full-length 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Sequencing data showed a greater amount and diversity of microbes found to be associated with nurdles than with the sand from which the nurdles were collected.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p></p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["dataCuration","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"vibha.annaswamy@utexas.edu","firstName":"Vibha","lastName":"Annaswamy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0009-6167-5398"},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology"],"email":"mfmikesh@austin.utexas.edu","firstName":"Michelle","lastName":"Mikesh","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["conceptualization","writing_originalDraft","supervision","resources","methodology"],"email":"kdinkeloo@utexas.edu","firstName":"Kasia","lastName":"Dinkeloo","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9264-3131"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>Support for this research provided by the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Freshman Research Initiative at the University of Texas at Austin</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/142159731562f06342972c22bb94101d.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>Nurdles collected from the wrack line (A). Rinsed nurdles imaged via stereomicroscopy (B). Scanning Electron Microscopy of the surface of a nurdle showing microbial cells (C). Relative abundance of top nine genera represented in the targeted metagenomic sequencing data set of nurdles compared to sand.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast Harbor a Unique Microbiome</p>","methods":"<p><u>Nurdle Collection</u></p><p>Nurdles and sand were collected from the wrack line of the Horace Caldwell Pier beach in Port Aransas, TX, USA. They were harvested using forceps and rinsed lightly with 1X PBS buffer before storage. Nurdles were placed in 50 mL conical tubes and transported on ice to the lab. They were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.</p><p><u>DNA Extraction</u></p><p>Aliquots of 50 nurdles per sample (or 100 mg of sand) were rinsed in 1X PBS and placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were vortexed for 15 minutes with 1 mL of CD1 lysis buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (CAT#47014), and DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C. DNA concentrations was measured using a QuBit Fluorometer with the HS dsDNA kit (CAT# Q32851).</p><p><u>Microscopy</u></p><p>Stereomicroscopy was performed with a ZEISS Stemi 508 stereo microscope with an Axiocam 208 color camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze microbes on the surface of nurdles. Briefly, sample preparation entailed: fix with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 2% paraformaldehyde, wash with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and stain using 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1% osmium tetroxide, and 1% tannic acid. Samples dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and exchanged to hexamethyldisilazane before air drying. Samples were then mounted to stubs, sputter coated with platinum/palladium, and imaged at accelerating voltage using a Zeiss Scanning Electron Microscope.</p><p><u>16S Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing</u></p><p>Microbial DNA extracted from nurdles and sand was used to prepare samples for metagenomic sequencing using the 16S Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (ONT, SQK-16S114-24). PCR amplification and barcoding was completed with 10 ng template DNA, using Hot-Start Q5 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, CAT# M0494S). Initial denaturation at 98°C was followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, 30 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. Purification of amplicons was performed using the AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter) as per ONT’s instructions. Samples were measured via Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and pooled in an equimolar ratio to a total of 150 ng. Prepared libraries were run on a MinION Mk1B sequencer using a FLO-FLG114 flow cell. MINKNOW v24.06.8 with high-accuracy model v4.3.0, 400 bps basecalling was used for data acquisition.</p><p><u>Metagenomic Sequencing Data Analysis</u></p><p>Data analysis was performed on the EPI2ME platform using the standard wf-metagenomics nextflow workflow (v2.11.0) and Minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) with the following parameters: 90% minimum percent identity, 90% minimum reference coverage, ncbi_16s_18s reference database.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Microplastics present an immense crisis for the marine environment. Nurdles represent the second largest source of microplastic emissions globally, with over 445,000 tons of nurdles discharged into the environment yearly (Sewwandi et al. 2023). These small, pre-production plastic pellets are typically composed of a single polymer, but may contain chemical additives (Mato et al. 2001). They are spilled or released into the environment during transport from production factories to manufacturing facilities, often discharging directly into the ocean from shipping accidents or into secondary waterways from transport via train or truck (Sewwandi et al. 2023). Large numbers of nurdles have been documented on the Texas Gulf Coast since 2018, with some spill events resulting in an estimated 300,000 to 1 million nurdles per mile present for at least 24 miles of Mustang and North Padre Islands (Tunnell et al. 2020) (Fig 1A). As nurdles spend time in the environment, they are exposed to heat, moisture, sunlight, and physical forces. All of these elements contribute to a process known as weathering, which can result in changes to plastics such as increases in surface area from cracking or pitting, color changes, creation of chemical by-products from polymer degradation, and a decrease in mechanical strength (Andrady 2022) (Fig 1B).</p><p>The effects of nurdles in the environment have been investigated with regard to ingestion by sea life and incidence in different habitats, but little is known about how microbes may interact with or act upon these primary microplastics. Since these pellets are resilient and buoyant, they serve as ideal surfaces for the formation of biofilm and accumulation of various microbes as they travel through the environment over long periods of time (Wright et al. 2020, Oberbeckmann et al. 2015). The nurdles we collected showed visual evidence of diverse microbial colonization (Fig 1C). Several studies have shown that pieces of plastic debris from marine environments collect unique microbiomes (Zettler et al. 2013) and that nurdles may host human pathogens (Rodrigues et al. 2019), but there is no published data available on the full composition of the microbiome associated with Gulf Coast nurdles.</p><p>While nurdles account for an increasing percentage of primary microplastic pollution in many environments, they lack any sort of hazard classification that might aid in their mitigation or clean-up support from U.S. government sources. Studies have been conducted on their polymer composition, showing that a majority of nurdles recovered from Gulf Coast beaches are made of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) (Jiang et al. 2022). Most of these nurdles likely originate from the Texas Gulf Coast (Cisco et al. 2025). Further studies demonstrate an association of toxic chemicals with nurdles as they weather and travel throughout the environment (Jiang et al. 2021). Understanding the microbiome composition of nurdles will provide a foundation for further research on the impact of this type of pollution. Future studies can examine potential hazards against human health, aquaculture, and agriculture, and prospect for the discovery and characterization of novel marine bacteria with an eye towards plastic degradation, spill-origin tracking, or other useful characteristics.</p><p>To gain this initial understanding of the nurdle microbiome, targeted metagenomic sequencing was conducted on microbial DNA isolated from groups of nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Genomic DNA extracted from the groups of nurdles ranged from 32.6-133 ng. PCR amplification and purification of the full-length 16S region yielded 49-204 ng of amplicon DNA. Genomic DNA was also extracted and amplified from sand collected at the sampling location, yielding 272 ng of genomic DNA and 97.4 ng of purified 16S amplicon. This suggests a roughly equivalent microbial presence in both sand and nurdle samples. Samples were normalized such that the pooled library included 10 ng of amplicon DNA from each sample, and full-length 16S metagenomic sequencing was completed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The relative abundances of microbial genera identified from nurdle-associated microbial DNA were compared with sand-associated microbial DNA (Fig 1D).</p><p>Sequencing results were analyzed using the Minimap2 pipeline via EPI2ME to generate a rarefied abundance table at the genus rank. We saw a greater variety of microbial genera associated with nurdles that were notably distinct from the sand sample, suggesting that the nurdle microbiome is unique to its plastic environment. Of the top nine genera represented in nurdle samples, only one was found to be shared with the sand sample (<i>Sulfitobacter</i>), which was represented as 8-16% of reads for nurdle samples compared to 0.8% of reads from the sand sample (Fig 1D). The average effective number of species for nurdle samples was 65, compared with 33 for the sand sample. This trend in diversity was reflected in the Shannon’s diversity index as well, with the nurdle samples scoring an average of 4.17, compared to 3.5 for sand.</p><p>This data shows a great diversity of microbes associated with the surface of nurdles, some of which may also contribute to a “hazard” classification for the marine pollutant: several genera of pathogenic bacteria were found, with <i>Vibrio</i> species displayed in the highest abundance and found in all samples. Members of the genus Vibrio can be pathogens of fish and humans (Vandeputte et al. 2024). Other pathogenic genera represented in the nurdle data set are <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Escherichia, Tenacibaculum, Flavobacterium, </i>and <i>Salmonella </i>(The et al. 2016, Fernández-Álvarez and Santos 2018, Lee et al. 2023). Further investigation into the presence of these pathogenic genera on nurdles could impact guidelines for recreation or aquaculture in areas with high nurdle pollution.</p><p>Overall, we conclude that nurdles, like other marine microplastics, carry a unique microbiome that is distinct from the sand upon which they were collected. This microbiome is composed of a diverse set of both known and unknown microbes. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the full scale of the metagenome surrounding the nurdle and the roles that these bacteria play for their “host” and adjacent environments. The presence of these microbes gives rise to additional questions regarding seasonality, influence of polymer composition or weathering status, and location of nurdles.</p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Sewwandi M, Keerthanan S, Perera KI, Vithanage M. 2023. Plastic Nurdles in Marine Environments Due to Accidental Spillage. Microplastics in the Ecosphere : 415-432.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/9781119879534.ch26"},{"reference":"<p>Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T. 2000. Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 35: 318-324.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es0010498"},{"reference":"<p>Tunnell JW, Dunning KH, Scheef LP, Swanson KM. 2020. Measuring plastic pellet (nurdle) abundance on shorelines throughout the Gulf of Mexico using citizen scientists: Establishing a platform for policy-relevant research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151: 110794.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110794"},{"reference":"<p>Andrady AL. 2022. Weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 180: 113761.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113761"},{"reference":"<p>Wright RJ, Erni-Cassola G, Zadjelovic V, Latva M, Christie-Oleza JA. 2020. Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 54: 11657-11672.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.0c02305"},{"reference":"<p>Oberbeckmann S, Löder MGJ, Labrenz M. 2015. Marine microplastic-associated biofilms – a review. Environmental Chemistry 12: 551-562.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1071/EN15069"},{"reference":"<p>Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 47: 7137-7146.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es401288x"},{"reference":"<p>Rodrigues A, Oliver DM, McCarron A, Quilliam RS. 2019. Colonisation of plastic pellets (nurdles) by E. coli at public bathing beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 139: 376-380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.011"},{"reference":"<p>Cisco J, Hua J, Jiang X, Xue J, Tunnell J, Du J, Liu Z. 2025. Evaluating the weathering and transport of plastic nurdles along the north- and southwestern Gulf of Mexico coasts. Environmental Research Letters 20: 114008.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ae08cd"},{"reference":"<p>Jiang X, Lu K, Tunnell JW, Liu Z. 2021. The impacts of weathering on concentration and bioaccessibility of organic pollutants associated with plastic pellets (nurdles) in coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170: 112592.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112592"},{"reference":"<p>Vandeputte M, Kashem MA, Bossier P, Vanrompay D. 2024. <i>Vibrio</i> pathogens and their toxins in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Reviews in Aquaculture 16: 1858-1878.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12926"},{"reference":"<p>The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. 2016. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14: 235-250.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrmicro.2016.10"},{"reference":"<p>Fernández-Álvarez C, Santos Y. 2018. Identification and typing of fish pathogenic species of the genus Tenacibaculum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 9973-9989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00253-018-9370-1"},{"reference":"<p>Lee BH, Nicolas P, Saticioglu IB, Fradet B, Bernardet JFo, Rigaudeau D, Rochat T, Duchaud E. 2023. Investigation of the Genus\n            <i>Flavobacterium</i>\n            as a Reservoir for Fish-Pathogenic Bacterial Species: the Case of Flavobacterium collinsii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89: 10.1128/aem.02162-22.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/aem.02162-22"}],"title":"<p>The Microbiome of Nurdles: Life on the Primary Microplastics of the Texas Gulf Coast</p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"9c71bf7a-d0ed-431d-b20a-c9041aaae3b0","decision":"publish","abstract":"<p>Nurdles are small, pre-production plastic pellets. Globally, nurdles are the second largest source of microplastic pollution due to release during manufacture and transport. As these nurdles persist in the environment, they undergo weathering—a process that significantly increases surface area and colonization by microbes. To gain an understanding of the composition of the microbiome found on nurdles, full-length 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Sequencing data showed a greater amount and diversity of microbes found to be associated with nurdles than with the sand from which the nurdles were collected.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p></p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["dataCuration","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"vibha.annaswamy@utexas.edu","firstName":"Vibha","lastName":"Annaswamy","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0009-6167-5398"},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":[""],"credit":["dataCuration","methodology"],"email":"mfmikesh@austin.utexas.edu","firstName":"Michelle","lastName":"Mikesh","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States"],"departments":["Freshman Research Initiative"],"credit":["conceptualization","writing_originalDraft","supervision","resources","methodology"],"email":"kdinkeloo@utexas.edu","firstName":"Kasia","lastName":"Dinkeloo","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0000-0001-9264-3131"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>Support for this research provided by the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Freshman Research Initiative at the University of Texas at Austin</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/142159731562f06342972c22bb94101d.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>Nurdles collected from the wrack line (A). Rinsed nurdles imaged via stereomicroscopy (B). Scanning Electron Microscopy of the surface of a nurdle showing microbial cells (C). Relative abundance of top nine genera represented in the targeted metagenomic sequencing data set of nurdles compared to sand.</p>","imageTitle":"<p>Nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast Harbor a Unique Microbiome</p>","methods":"<p><u>Nurdle Collection</u></p><p>Nurdles and sand were collected from the wrack line of the Horace Caldwell Pier beach in Port Aransas, TX, USA. They were harvested using forceps and rinsed lightly with 1X PBS buffer before storage. Nurdles were placed in 50 mL conical tubes and transported on ice to the lab. They were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction.</p><p><u>DNA Extraction</u></p><p>Aliquots of 50 nurdles per sample (or 100 mg of sand) were rinsed in 1X PBS and placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Samples were vortexed for 15 minutes with 1 mL of CD1 lysis buffer from the Qiagen DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (CAT#47014), and DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and stored at -20°C. DNA concentrations was measured using a QuBit Fluorometer with the HS dsDNA kit (CAT# Q32851).</p><p><u>Microscopy</u></p><p>Stereomicroscopy was performed with a ZEISS Stemi 508 stereo microscope with an Axiocam 208 color camera. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze microbes on the surface of nurdles. Briefly, sample preparation entailed: fix with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 2% paraformaldehyde, wash with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and stain using 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, 1% osmium tetroxide, and 1% tannic acid. Samples dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and exchanged to hexamethyldisilazane before air drying. Samples were then mounted to stubs, sputter coated with platinum/palladium, and imaged at accelerating voltage using a Zeiss Scanning Electron Microscope.</p><p><u>16S Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing</u></p><p>Microbial DNA extracted from nurdles and sand was used to prepare samples for metagenomic sequencing using the 16S Barcoding Kit 24 V14 (ONT, SQK-16S114-24). PCR amplification and barcoding was completed with 10 ng template DNA, using Hot-Start Q5 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, CAT# M0494S). Initial denaturation at 98°C was followed by 25 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, 30 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. Purification of amplicons was performed using the AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter) as per ONT’s instructions. Samples were measured via Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and pooled in an equimolar ratio to a total of 150 ng. Prepared libraries were run on a MinION Mk1B sequencer using a FLO-FLG114 flow cell. MINKNOW v24.06.8 with high-accuracy model v4.3.0, 400 bps basecalling was used for data acquisition.</p><p><u>Metagenomic Sequencing Data Analysis</u></p><p>Data analysis was performed on the EPI2ME platform using the standard wf-metagenomics nextflow workflow (v2.11.0) and Minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) with the following parameters: 90% minimum percent identity, 90% minimum reference coverage, ncbi_16s_18s reference database.</p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Microplastics present an immense crisis for the marine environment. Nurdles represent the second largest source of microplastic emissions globally, with over 445,000 tons of nurdles discharged into the environment yearly (Sewwandi et al. 2023). These small, pre-production plastic pellets are typically composed of a single polymer, but may contain chemical additives (Mato et al. 2001). They are spilled or released into the environment during transport from production factories to manufacturing facilities, often discharging directly into the ocean from shipping accidents or into secondary waterways from transport via train or truck (Sewwandi et al. 2023). Large numbers of nurdles have been documented on the Texas Gulf Coast since 2018, with some spill events resulting in an estimated 300,000 to 1 million nurdles per mile present for at least 24 miles of Mustang and North Padre Islands (Tunnell et al. 2020) (Fig 1A). As nurdles spend time in the environment, they are exposed to heat, moisture, sunlight, and physical forces. All of these elements contribute to a process known as weathering, which can result in changes to plastics such as increases in surface area from cracking or pitting, color changes, creation of chemical by-products from polymer degradation, and a decrease in mechanical strength (Andrady 2022) (Fig 1B).</p><p>The effects of nurdles in the environment have been investigated with regard to ingestion by sea life and incidence in different habitats, but little is known about how microbes may interact with or act upon these primary microplastics. Since these pellets are resilient and buoyant, they serve as ideal surfaces for the formation of biofilm and accumulation of various microbes as they travel through the environment over long periods of time (Wright et al. 2020, Oberbeckmann et al. 2015). The nurdles we collected showed visual evidence of diverse microbial colonization (Fig 1C). Several studies have shown that pieces of plastic debris from marine environments collect unique microbiomes (Zettler et al. 2013) and that nurdles may host human pathogens (Rodrigues et al. 2019), but there is no published data available on the full composition of the microbiome associated with Gulf Coast nurdles.</p><p>While nurdles account for an increasing percentage of primary microplastic pollution in many environments, they lack any sort of hazard classification that might aid in their mitigation or clean-up support from U.S. government sources. Studies have been conducted on their polymer composition, showing that a majority of nurdles recovered from Gulf Coast beaches are made of polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) (Jiang et al. 2022). Most of these nurdles likely originate from the Texas Gulf Coast (Cisco et al. 2025). Further studies demonstrate an association of toxic chemicals with nurdles as they weather and travel throughout the environment (Jiang et al. 2021). Understanding the microbiome composition of nurdles will provide a foundation for further research on the impact of this type of pollution. Future studies can examine potential hazards against human health, aquaculture, and agriculture, and prospect for the discovery and characterization of novel marine bacteria with an eye towards plastic degradation, spill-origin tracking, or other useful characteristics.</p><p>To gain this initial understanding of the nurdle microbiome, targeted metagenomic sequencing was conducted on microbial DNA isolated from groups of nurdles collected from the Texas Gulf Coast. Genomic DNA extracted from the groups of nurdles ranged from 32.6-133 ng. PCR amplification and purification of the full-length 16S region yielded 49-204 ng of amplicon DNA. Genomic DNA was also extracted and amplified from sand collected at the sampling location, yielding 272 ng of genomic DNA and 97.4 ng of purified 16S amplicon. This suggests a roughly equivalent microbial presence in both sand and nurdle samples. Samples were normalized such that the pooled library included 10 ng of amplicon DNA from each sample, and full-length 16S metagenomic sequencing was completed using the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The relative abundances of microbial genera identified from nurdle-associated microbial DNA were compared with sand-associated microbial DNA (Fig 1D).</p><p>Sequencing results were analyzed using the Minimap2 pipeline via EPI2ME to generate a rarefied abundance table at the genus rank. We saw a greater variety of microbial genera associated with nurdles that were notably distinct from the sand sample, suggesting that the nurdle microbiome is unique to its plastic environment. Of the top nine genera represented in nurdle samples, only one was found to be shared with the sand sample (<i>Sulfitobacter</i>), which was represented as 8-16% of reads for nurdle samples compared to 0.8% of reads from the sand sample (Fig 1D). The average effective number of species for nurdle samples was 65, compared with 33 for the sand sample. This trend in diversity was reflected in the Shannon’s diversity index as well, with the nurdle samples scoring an average of 4.17, compared to 3.5 for sand.</p><p>This data shows a great diversity of microbes associated with the surface of nurdles, some of which may also contribute to a “hazard” classification for the marine pollutant: several genera of pathogenic bacteria were found, with <i>Vibrio</i> species displayed in the highest abundance and found in all samples. Members of the genus Vibrio can be pathogens of fish and humans (Vandeputte et al. 2024). Other pathogenic genera represented in the nurdle data set are <i>Shigella</i>, <i>Escherichia, Tenacibaculum, Flavobacterium, </i>and <i>Salmonella </i>(The et al. 2016, Fernández-Álvarez and Santos 2018, Lee et al. 2023). Further investigation into the presence of these pathogenic genera on nurdles could impact guidelines for recreation or aquaculture in areas with high nurdle pollution.</p><p>Overall, we conclude that nurdles, like other marine microplastics, carry a unique microbiome that is distinct from the sand upon which they were collected. This microbiome is composed of a diverse set of both known and unknown microbes. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the full scale of the metagenome surrounding the nurdle and the roles that these bacteria play for their “host” and adjacent environments. The presence of these microbes gives rise to additional questions regarding seasonality, influence of polymer composition or weathering status, and location of nurdles.</p>","references":[{"reference":"<p>Andrady AL. 2022. Weathering and fragmentation of plastic debris in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 180: 113761.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113761"},{"reference":"<p>Cisco J, Hua J, Jiang X, Xue J, Tunnell J, Du J, Liu Z. 2025. Evaluating the weathering and transport of plastic nurdles along the north- and southwestern Gulf of Mexico coasts. Environmental Research Letters 20: 114008.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ae08cd"},{"reference":"<p>Fernández-Álvarez C, Santos Y. 2018. Identification and typing of fish pathogenic species of the genus Tenacibaculum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102: 9973-9989.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1007/s00253-018-9370-1"},{"reference":"<p>Jiang X, Lu K, Tunnell JW, Liu Z. 2021. The impacts of weathering on concentration and bioaccessibility of organic pollutants associated with plastic pellets (nurdles) in coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 170: 112592.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112592"},{"reference":"<p>Lee BH, Nicolas P, Saticioglu IB, Fradet B, Bernardet JFo, Rigaudeau D, Rochat T, Duchaud E. 2023. Investigation of the Genus\n            <i>Flavobacterium</i>\n            as a Reservoir for Fish-Pathogenic Bacterial Species: the Case of Flavobacterium collinsii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89: 10.1128/aem.02162-22.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/aem.02162-22"},{"reference":"<p>Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T. 2000. Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 35: 318-324.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es0010498"},{"reference":"<p>Oberbeckmann S, Löder MGJ, Labrenz M. 2015. Marine microplastic-associated biofilms – a review. Environmental Chemistry 12: 551-562.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1071/EN15069"},{"reference":"<p>Rodrigues A, Oliver DM, McCarron A, Quilliam RS. 2019. Colonisation of plastic pellets (nurdles) by E. coli at public bathing beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 139: 376-380.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.011"},{"reference":"<p>Sewwandi M, Keerthanan S, Perera KI, Vithanage M. 2023. Plastic Nurdles in Marine Environments Due to Accidental Spillage. Microplastics in the Ecosphere : 415-432.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/9781119879534.ch26"},{"reference":"<p>The HC, Thanh DP, Holt KE, Thomson NR, Baker S. 2016. The genomic signatures of Shigella evolution, adaptation and geographical spread. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14: 235-250.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nrmicro.2016.10"},{"reference":"<p>Tunnell JW, Dunning KH, Scheef LP, Swanson KM. 2020. Measuring plastic pellet (nurdle) abundance on shorelines throughout the Gulf of Mexico using citizen scientists: Establishing a platform for policy-relevant research. Marine Pollution Bulletin 151: 110794.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110794"},{"reference":"<p>Vandeputte M, Kashem MA, Bossier P, Vanrompay D. 2024. <i>Vibrio</i> pathogens and their toxins in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Reviews in Aquaculture 16: 1858-1878.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/raq.12926"},{"reference":"<p>Wright RJ, Erni-Cassola G, Zadjelovic V, Latva M, Christie-Oleza JA. 2020. Marine Plastic Debris: A New Surface for Microbial Colonization. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 54: 11657-11672.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.0c02305"},{"reference":"<p>Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science &amp; Technology 47: 7137-7146.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1021/es401288x"}],"title":"<p>The Microbiome of Nurdles: Life on the Primary Microplastics of the Texas Gulf Coast</p>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"3a9dec70-c901-4257-9176-adc26dc38b13","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}},
    "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}