{
    "componentChunkName": "component---src-templates-article-page-js",
    "path": "/journals/biology/micropub-biology-002278",
    "result": {"data":{"article":{"manuscript":{"id":"1e3fa65c-15b6-4b1c-9640-f276c7573e2f","submissionTypes":["new finding"],"citations":[],"doi":"10.17912/micropub.biology.002278","dbReferenceId":null,"pmcId":null,"pmId":null,"proteopedia":null,"reviewPanel":null,"species":["arabidopsis"],"integrations":[],"corrections":null,"history":{"received":"2026-07-09T19:39:46.111Z","revisionReceived":"2026-07-22T00:55:04.375Z","accepted":"2026-08-11T15:43:28.400Z","published":"2026-08-12T21:07:03.879Z","indexed":"2026-08-26T21:07:03.879Z"},"versions":[{"id":"750f5e8d-dc81-4d73-b859-c63840932406","decision":"edit","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, temperatures between 34<sup>o</sup>C and 37<sup>o</sup>C induce AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. To understand this, we analyzed RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C–40°C. We found that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to both decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock responses (HSR), suggests that the combinatorial effects of changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant HSR and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"<p>This manuscript contains a reference to Gillham et al. describing the construction and technical validation of the data that are analyzed here. The submitted manuscript is attached as a PDF for the reviewer but should not be included as extended data in the final publication.</p>","doi":null,"resourceType":"Text","name":"Gillham et al submission - Scientific Data.pdf","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3af29f9f288c6f2f2377019589e28ce0.pdf"}],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/329793ecea406d0f179137ad96db114a.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i>HSA32</i> and <i>HSP101</i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel.&nbsp;</p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced HSR, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM.&nbsp;</p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels.&nbsp;</p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i>ACT11</i>, <i>HSA32</i>, and <i>HSP101</i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p><br></p>","imageTitle":"<h4>Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;</h4>","methods":"<h4>RNA-seq dataset generation</h4><p><br></p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in xx et al. (2026). Briefly, five day old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted, used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate (ref Scientific Data paper). Read data are available as BioProject ID PRJNA1481274 at the NCBI SRA (<a href=\"https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1481274?reviewer=ubcsdv5dkr3ect6sumoigigtve\">reviewer link</a>).&nbsp;</p><h4>Expression analysis</h4><p><br></p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?Tdztgt\">(Love et al. 2014)</a>. The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p><br></p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p><br></p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub>&nbsp;</sub></p><h4>Splicing analysis</h4><p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?soteQP\">(Lorenzi et al. 2021)</a>. For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions. The 55 gene heat-induced HSR group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all HSR genes are heat-inducible and most sHSPs are intron-free <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?iTf8MJ\">(Scharf et al. 2001)</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced HSR genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced HSR subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it.&nbsp;</p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants’ acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (HSR) genes at acclimation temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?LDTrjT\">(Yeh et al. 2012)</a>. In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (HS). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal HS temperature, does not result in AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?7IIkql\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a>. To understand what might explain the differences in AT between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C acclimation temperatures we generated RNA-seq data from Arabidopsis seedlings incubated at 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?sghkDz\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>.</p><p><br></p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the HSR such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?aMpNeM\">(BIOL 019 2026)</a>. To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the HSR and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?8YhE9J\">(Petrillo 2023)</a> and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?QNtpGD\">(Rosenkranz et al. 2022)</a>. Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of HSR genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p><br></p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples we compared the expression of genes induced at 37oC vs 22oC (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i>HSP101</i> (At1g74310) and <i>HSA32</i> (At4g21320), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?x2jq1q\">(Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000)</a>. The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 22<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions (including <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i>) revealed that induced HSR genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated HSR functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR although they could also reflect differences in&nbsp; splicing efficiency between genes with high and low rates of transcription <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?oyogBY\">(Zhu et al. 2020)</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>In order to estimate the potential effects of IR on the HSR we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?G8OGIc\">(Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019)</a>. Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high quality IR data.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and HSR induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32 </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?ffa1N1\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a> we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the HSR (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced HSR genes as a group as well as for <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32</i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i>ACT11</i> At3g12110) and for <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> shows that while <i>ACT11 </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> result in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known HSR functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical HSR genes.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham et al. 2026. High-Resolution Transcriptomic Profiling of Arabidopsis Thaliana across a 37°C–40°C Thermal Gradient. Sumbitted to Scientific Data</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"<h2>Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response</h2>","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"1c79e2a1-085e-4481-b686-39e6666d6d0f","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, temperatures between 34<sup>o</sup>C and 37<sup>o</sup>C induce AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. To understand this, we analyzed RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C–40°C. We found that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to both decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock responses (HSR), suggests that the combinatorial effects of changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant HSR and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"<p>This manuscript contains a reference to Gillham et al. describing the construction and technical validation of the data that are analyzed here. The submitted manuscript is attached as a PDF for the reviewer but should not be included as extended data in the final publication.</p>","doi":null,"resourceType":"Text","name":"Gillham et al submission - Scientific Data.pdf","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3af29f9f288c6f2f2377019589e28ce0.pdf"}],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/329793ecea406d0f179137ad96db114a.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i>HSA32</i> and <i>HSP101</i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel.&nbsp;</p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced HSR, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM.&nbsp;</p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels.&nbsp;</p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i>ACT11</i>, <i>HSA32</i>, and <i>HSP101</i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p><br></p>","imageTitle":"Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;","methods":"RNA-seq dataset generation<p><br></p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in xx et al. (2026). Briefly, five day old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted, used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate (ref Scientific Data paper). Read data are available as BioProject ID PRJNA1481274 at the NCBI SRA (reviewer link).&nbsp;</p>Expression analysis<p><br></p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 (Love et al. 2014). The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p><br></p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p><br></p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub>&nbsp;</sub></p>Splicing analysis<p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 (Lorenzi et al. 2021). For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions. The 55 gene heat-induced HSR group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all HSR genes are heat-inducible and most sHSPs are intron-free (Scharf et al. 2001).&nbsp;</p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced HSR genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced HSR subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it.&nbsp;</p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants’ acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (HSR) genes at acclimation temperatures (Yeh et al. 2012). In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (HS). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal HS temperature, does not result in AT (Silva-Correia et al. 2014). To understand what might explain the differences in AT between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C acclimation temperatures we generated RNA-seq data from Arabidopsis seedlings incubated at 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour (Gillham et al. 2026).</p><p><br></p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the HSR such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C (BIOL 019 2026). To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the HSR and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants (Petrillo 2023) and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures (Rosenkranz et al. 2022). Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of HSR genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p><br></p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples we compared the expression of genes induced at 37oC vs 22oC (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i>HSP101</i> (At1g74310) and <i>HSA32</i> (At4g21320), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively (Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000). The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 22<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions (including <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i>) revealed that induced HSR genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated HSR functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR although they could also reflect differences in&nbsp; splicing efficiency between genes with high and low rates of transcription (Zhu et al. 2020).&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>In order to estimate the potential effects of IR on the HSR we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms (Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019). Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high quality IR data.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and HSR induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32 </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT (Silva-Correia et al. 2014) we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the HSR (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced HSR genes as a group as well as for <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32</i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i>ACT11</i> At3g12110) and for <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> shows that while <i>ACT11 </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> result in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known HSR functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical HSR genes.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham et al. 2026. High-Resolution Transcriptomic Profiling of Arabidopsis Thaliana across a 37°C–40°C Thermal Gradient. Sumbitted to Scientific Data</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"69097145-99dd-455d-9d31-e3ebd23d621a","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, temperatures between 34<sup>o</sup>C and 37<sup>o</sup>C induce AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. To understand this, we analyzed RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C–40°C. We found that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to both decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock responses (HSR), suggests that the combinatorial effects of changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant HSR and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"<p>This manuscript contains a reference to Gillham et al. describing the construction and technical validation of the data that are analyzed here. The submitted manuscript is attached as a PDF for the reviewer but should not be included as extended data in the final publication.</p>","doi":null,"resourceType":"Text","name":"Gillham et al submission - Scientific Data.pdf","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3af29f9f288c6f2f2377019589e28ce0.pdf"}],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/329793ecea406d0f179137ad96db114a.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i>HSA32</i> and <i>HSP101</i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel.&nbsp;</p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced HSR, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM.&nbsp;</p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels.&nbsp;</p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i>ACT11</i>, <i>HSA32</i>, and <i>HSP101</i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p><br></p>","imageTitle":"Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;","methods":"<p>RNA-seq dataset generation</p><p><br></p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in Gillham et al. (2026). Briefly, five-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted, used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?g977pv\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. Read data are available as BioProject ID PRJNA1481274 at the NCBI SRA (<a href=\"https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1481274?reviewer=ubcsdv5dkr3ect6sumoigigtve\">reviewer link</a>).&nbsp;</p><p><br>Expression analysis</p><p><br></p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 (Love et al. 2014). The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p><br></p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p><br></p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub>&nbsp;</sub></p><p>Splicing analysis</p><p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 (Lorenzi et al. 2021). For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions. The 55 gene heat-induced HSR group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all HSR genes are heat-inducible and most sHSPs are intron-free (Scharf et al. 2001).&nbsp;</p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced HSR genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced HSR subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it.&nbsp;</p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants’ acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (HSR) genes at acclimation temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?LDTrjT\">(Yeh et al. 2012)</a>. In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (HS). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal HS temperature, does not result in AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?7IIkql\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a>. To understand the differences in AT between 37°C and 40°C acclimation, we generated RNA-seq data from <i>Arabidopsis</i> seedlings incubated at 37°C, 38°C, 39°C, and 40°C for one hour <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?sghkDz\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>.</p><p><br></p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the HSR such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?aMpNeM\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the HSR and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?8YhE9J\">(Petrillo 2023)</a> and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?QNtpGD\">(Rosenkranz et al. 2022)</a>. Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of HSR genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p><br></p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples, we compared the expression of genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C vs 22<sup>o</sup>C (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i>HSP101</i> (At1g74310) and <i>HSA32</i> (At4g21320), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?x2jq1q\">(Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000)</a>. The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 22<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated HSR functions (including <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i>) revealed that induced HSR genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated HSR functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR although they could also reflect differences in&nbsp; splicing efficiency between genes with high and low rates of transcription <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?oyogBY\">(Zhu et al. 2020)</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>To estimate the potential effects of IR on the HSR, we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?G8OGIc\">(Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019)</a>. Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high-quality IR data.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and HSR induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32 </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?ffa1N1\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a> we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the HSR (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced HSR genes as a group, as well as for <i>HSP101</i> and <i>HSA32</i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i>ACT11</i> At3g12110) and for <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> shows that, while <i>ACT11 </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i>HSP101 </i>and <i>HSA32</i> results in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known HSR functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by genetically modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical HSR genes.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham et al. 2026. High-Resolution Transcriptomic Profiling of Arabidopsis Thaliana across a 37°C–40°C Thermal Gradient. Sumbitted to Scientific Data</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Nicholas Provart"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"99474a8f-3efa-4e0e-b99b-03eb7ec8af6a","decision":"revise","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, temperatures between 34<sup>o</sup>C and 37<sup>o</sup>C induce AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. To understand this, we analyzed RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C–40°C. We found that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to both decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock responses (<a>HS</a>R), suggests that the combinatorial effects of changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant <a>HS</a>R and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/329793ecea406d0f179137ad96db114a.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"afdfb107-2d05-428e-8587-ecc05acacd45\">HSA32</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"8912e099-89b0-4fae-b2d9-0f2caa37faa0\">HSP101</a></i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel. </p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced <a>HS</a>R, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM. </p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels. </p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"2e3cfb6f-61c7-4035-bae6-3df40413f1ba\">ACT11</a></i>, <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"b450e7c2-d5bf-415d-8b94-f3bbd293be92\">HSA32</a></i>, and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"af1ab1be-41b1-4abf-87fe-bc8de6b7cbd8\">HSP101</a></i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p><br /></p>","imageTitle":"Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;","methods":"<p>RNA-seq dataset generation</p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in Gillham et al. (2026). Briefly, five-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted and used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?g977pv\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. Read data are available as BioProject ID <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1481274\" id=\"5aa39093-03ba-45ef-ac64-24021b6025d1\">PRJNA1481274</a> at the NCBI SRA. </p><p>Expression analysis</p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 (Love et al. 2014). The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance. </p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub> </sub></p><p>Splicing analysis</p><p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 (Lorenzi et al. 2021). For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated <a>HS</a>R functions. The 55 gene heat-induced <a>HS</a>R group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all <a>HS</a>R genes are heat-inducible and most s<a>HS</a>Ps are intron-free (Scharf et al. 2001). </p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced <a>HS</a>R genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced <a>HS</a>R subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it. </p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br /></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants' acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (<a>HS</a>R) genes at acclimation temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?LDTrjT\">(Yeh et al. 2012)</a>. In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (<a>HS</a>). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal <a>HS</a> temperature, does not result in AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?7IIkql\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a>. To understand the differences in AT between 37°C and 40°C acclimation, we generated RNA-seq data from <i>Arabidopsis</i> seedlings incubated at 37°C, 38°C, 39°C, and 40°C for one hour <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?sghkDz\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>.</p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the <a>HS</a>R such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?aMpNeM\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the <a>HS</a>R and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?8YhE9J\">(Petrillo 2023)</a> and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?QNtpGD\">(Rosenkranz et al. 2022)</a>. Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of <a>HS</a>R genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples, we compared the expression of genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C vs 22<sup>o</sup>C (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"5b55e139-f71a-4a98-955c-4c813347282b\">HSP101</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At1g74310\" id=\"ab8c87f0-4c85-454e-8f16-8b44a3e0fff2\">At1g74310</a>) and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"e2e09c52-ea30-4f3d-8eab-535c43ebe4c1\">HSA32</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At4g21320\" id=\"d0331a09-383f-40ff-b68b-00140b5400ab\">At4g21320</a>), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?x2jq1q\">(Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000)</a>. The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"629d59af-ba97-4c15-92fd-016d17c0fcbf\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"4f459bec-b190-476b-a724-cb09a0e7f2af\">HSA32</a></i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures. </p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 37<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated <a>HS</a>R functions (including <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"32ad9df7-8130-4610-91d9-d949fc355db7\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"cb928887-a5d4-483f-9901-04a46a45efd8\">HSA32</a></i>) revealed that induced <a>HS</a>R genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated <a>HS</a>R functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR, although they could also reflect a kinetic model where IR occurs in rapidly transcribed genes associated with accessible chromatin such as the induced <a>HS</a>R genes <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?YKQEHQ\">(Ullah et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2020; Kodama et al. 2007)</a>.</p><p>For both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"4961363e-ebdc-40e8-8a1d-7a8c45636b16\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"44df998a-9585-491f-9375-ed127523b72c\">HSA32</a></i>, IR generates transcripts containing premature termination codons that, if translated, would encode truncated and non-functional proteins. Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?G8OGIc\">(Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019)</a>. </p><p>To estimate the potential effects of IR on the <a>HS</a>R, we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high-quality IR data. IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and <a>HS</a>R induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"089e782c-1086-4769-8bef-6ab60380b2b5\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"0f0a028f-7c76-4d44-820d-59ad08fc6d1d\">HSA32</a> </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?ffa1N1\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a> we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the <a>HS</a>R (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced <a>HS</a>R genes as a group, as well as for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"fbf77c92-de42-44f0-98a5-dc35e6b403f3\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"6bdd48cc-28e3-42a6-a34e-1170250c6be6\">HSA32</a></i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"befb5d0a-5ffb-4d58-ade8-3d054d41ea82\">ACT11</a></i> <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At3g12110\" id=\"462eff55-b3e8-4e76-aa3d-91fe333e23e8\">At3g12110</a>) and for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"bb475cdb-7816-4e96-92d7-601d96c0e6d0\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a12afe30-dd15-45aa-9578-cfad810448d6\">HSA32</a></i> shows that, while <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"09289495-e22f-4bec-bfcc-8d05e085feaa\">ACT11</a> </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"8a5c4adb-99db-4975-b2ba-5b7b1c98b095\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a7de2f96-66a8-404b-8390-e7540a16b0a9\">HSA32</a></i> results in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p> It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known <a>HS</a>R functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by genetically modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical <a>HS</a>R genes.    </p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham E, Hu J, Huang Y, Kochi A, McDonald K, Scott-Joseph C, et al., Kaplinsky. 2026. High-resolution transcriptomic profiling of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> across a 37°C–40°C thermal gradient. bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.07.19.739423.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.07.19.739423"},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"<p>Kodama Y, Nagaya S, Shinmyo A, Kato K. 2007. Mapping and Characterization of DNase I Hypersensitive Sites in Arabidopsis Chromatin. Plant and Cell Physiology 48: 459-470.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcm017"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"<p>Ullah F, Hamilton M, Reddy ASN, Ben-Hur A. 2018. Exploring the relationship between intron retention and chromatin accessibility in plants. BMC Genomics 19: 10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Nicholas Provart"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"aeb90d0e-7717-4f7d-8d05-0b2674943385","decision":"accept","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, 34<sup>o</sup>C-37<sup>o</sup>C induces AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. Analyzing RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C-40°C showed that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock responses (HSR), suggests that combinatorial changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant HSR and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/96a47a7bc43117cfd8e3ea72fca416a6.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i>HSA32</i> and <i>HSP101</i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel.&nbsp;</p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced HSR, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM.&nbsp;</p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels.&nbsp;</p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i>ACT11</i>, <i>HSA32</i>, and <i>HSP101</i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p>All temperatures are reported in <sup>o</sup>C.</p><p><br></p>","imageTitle":"Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;","methods":"<p>RNA-seq dataset generation</p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in Gillham et al. (2026). Briefly, five-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted and used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?g977pv\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. Read data are available as BioProject ID <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1481274\" id=\"5aa39093-03ba-45ef-ac64-24021b6025d1\">PRJNA1481274</a> at the NCBI SRA. </p><p>Expression analysis</p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 (Love et al. 2014). The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance. </p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub> </sub></p><p>Splicing analysis</p><p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 (Lorenzi et al. 2021). For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated <a>HS</a>R functions. The 55 gene heat-induced <a>HS</a>R group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all <a>HS</a>R genes are heat-inducible and most s<a>HS</a>Ps are intron-free (Scharf et al. 2001). </p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced <a>HS</a>R genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced <a>HS</a>R subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it. </p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br /></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants' acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (<a>HS</a>R) genes at acclimation temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?LDTrjT\">(Yeh et al. 2012)</a>. In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (<a>HS</a>). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal <a>HS</a> temperature, does not result in AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?7IIkql\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a>. To understand the differences in AT between 37°C and 40°C acclimation, we generated RNA-seq data from <i>Arabidopsis</i> seedlings incubated at 37°C, 38°C, 39°C, and 40°C for one hour <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?sghkDz\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>.</p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the <a>HS</a>R such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?aMpNeM\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the <a>HS</a>R and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?8YhE9J\">(Petrillo 2023)</a> and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?QNtpGD\">(Rosenkranz et al. 2022)</a>. Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of <a>HS</a>R genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples, we compared the expression of genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C vs 22<sup>o</sup>C (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"5b55e139-f71a-4a98-955c-4c813347282b\">HSP101</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At1g74310\" id=\"ab8c87f0-4c85-454e-8f16-8b44a3e0fff2\">At1g74310</a>) and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"e2e09c52-ea30-4f3d-8eab-535c43ebe4c1\">HSA32</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At4g21320\" id=\"d0331a09-383f-40ff-b68b-00140b5400ab\">At4g21320</a>), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?x2jq1q\">(Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000)</a>. The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"629d59af-ba97-4c15-92fd-016d17c0fcbf\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"4f459bec-b190-476b-a724-cb09a0e7f2af\">HSA32</a></i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures. </p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 37<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated <a>HS</a>R functions (including <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"32ad9df7-8130-4610-91d9-d949fc355db7\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"cb928887-a5d4-483f-9901-04a46a45efd8\">HSA32</a></i>) revealed that induced <a>HS</a>R genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated <a>HS</a>R functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR, although they could also reflect a kinetic model where IR occurs in rapidly transcribed genes associated with accessible chromatin such as the induced <a>HS</a>R genes <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?YKQEHQ\">(Ullah et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2020; Kodama et al. 2007)</a>.</p><p>For both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"4961363e-ebdc-40e8-8a1d-7a8c45636b16\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"44df998a-9585-491f-9375-ed127523b72c\">HSA32</a></i>, IR generates transcripts containing premature termination codons that, if translated, would encode truncated and non-functional proteins. Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?G8OGIc\">(Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019)</a>. </p><p>To estimate the potential effects of IR on the <a>HS</a>R, we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high-quality IR data. IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and <a>HS</a>R induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"089e782c-1086-4769-8bef-6ab60380b2b5\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"0f0a028f-7c76-4d44-820d-59ad08fc6d1d\">HSA32</a> </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?ffa1N1\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a> we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the <a>HS</a>R (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced <a>HS</a>R genes as a group, as well as for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"fbf77c92-de42-44f0-98a5-dc35e6b403f3\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"6bdd48cc-28e3-42a6-a34e-1170250c6be6\">HSA32</a></i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"befb5d0a-5ffb-4d58-ade8-3d054d41ea82\">ACT11</a></i> <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At3g12110\" id=\"462eff55-b3e8-4e76-aa3d-91fe333e23e8\">At3g12110</a>) and for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"bb475cdb-7816-4e96-92d7-601d96c0e6d0\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a12afe30-dd15-45aa-9578-cfad810448d6\">HSA32</a></i> shows that, while <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"09289495-e22f-4bec-bfcc-8d05e085feaa\">ACT11</a> </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"8a5c4adb-99db-4975-b2ba-5b7b1c98b095\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a7de2f96-66a8-404b-8390-e7540a16b0a9\">HSA32</a></i> results in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p> It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known <a>HS</a>R functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by genetically modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical <a>HS</a>R genes.    </p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham E, Hu J, Huang Y, Kochi A, McDonald K, Scott-Joseph C, et al., Kaplinsky. 2026. High-resolution transcriptomic profiling of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> across a 37°C–40°C thermal gradient. bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.07.19.739423.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.07.19.739423"},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"<p>Kodama Y, Nagaya S, Shinmyo A, Kato K. 2007. Mapping and Characterization of DNase I Hypersensitive Sites in Arabidopsis Chromatin. Plant and Cell Physiology 48: 459-470.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcm017"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"<p>Ullah F, Hamilton M, Reddy ASN, Ben-Hur A. 2018. Exploring the relationship between intron retention and chromatin accessibility in plants. BMC Genomics 19: 10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"5977f155-e7b4-40b1-a870-b7a0a6106878","decision":"publish","abstract":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are critical for survival, yet acquired thermotolerance (AT) is limited to a tight temperature range. In Arabidopsis, 34<sup>o</sup>C-37<sup>o</sup>C induces AT while 40<sup>o</sup>C does not. Analyzing RNA-seq data from seedlings acclimated between 37°C-40°C showed that while heat-induced genes are robustly expressed, their functional expression is severely attenuated as temperatures rise due to decreasing expression levels and increasing intron retention. This reduction, particularly for genes with functions in the heat shock response (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"d86fbe59-f842-410b-8bf2-8fa310e96b4d\">HS</a>R), suggests that combinatorial changes in expression and splicing play a key role in tuning the plant <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"eb450662-6071-401c-a362-13539c4ad638\">HS</a>R and limiting AT at higher temperatures.</p>","acknowledgements":"<p>We would like to thank Swarthmore College for generously supporting student research and the staff of the Department of Biology for their support.</p>","authors":[{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","validation","software"],"email":"huangyifan008@Hotmail.com","firstName":"Yifan","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0008-0851-2568"},{"affiliations":["Swarthmore College"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","supervision","writing_reviewEditing","writing_originalDraft","methodology"],"email":"nkaplin1@swarthmore.edu","firstName":"Nick","lastName":"Kaplinsky","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":null,"WBId":"","orcid":"0000-0002-1759-1826"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"<p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p>","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"<p>N/A</p>","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/96a47a7bc43117cfd8e3ea72fca416a6.png"},"imageCaption":"<p>(A) Per-gene expression trajectories are shown for uninduced genes (left) and genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C (right) using log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001 as criteria for induction. For each gene, expression was normalized to its 37<sup>o</sup>C value. Individual genes are shown in blue-grey, <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"0256b6a8-4a36-4131-9eed-123cee210fa7\">HSA32</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"84107337-71dc-4ff7-b88f-d6b81c957204\">HSP101</a></i> are shown in yellow and orange, and red circles indicate the mean normalized expression of all genes. For clarity, 4000 randomly selected genes (out of 26,009) are shown in the uninduced panel. </p><p>(B) Mean intron retention in heat-induced, induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"1e9bd1d6-fac7-4253-8037-81e5e6bb1013\">HS</a>R, and uninduced genes at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Error bars are ± SEM. </p><p>(C) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 22<sup>o</sup>C levels. Error bars are ± SEM. </p><p>(D) Unadjusted and IR-adjusted mean expression normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C levels. For panels C and D, IR transcripts are assumed to be non-functional and thus do not contribute to gene expression.</p><p>(E) Genome-browser views of RNA-seq coverage for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"2134c22c-ea5a-4702-8cc9-7eba3b93dc38\">ACT11</a></i>, <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"86c89784-a000-4cd0-81cd-43f83cb17905\">HSA32</a></i>, and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"42275bf9-e686-4576-a7bf-607b99a40f4c\">HSP101</a></i> at 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. Colored tracks indicate coverage at each temperature; blue gene models indicate exon–intron structure.</p><p>All temperatures are reported in <sup>o</sup>C.</p><p><br /></p>","imageTitle":"Lower mRNA levels and increased intron retention result in decreased expression of heat-induced genes as temperatures increase from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C&nbsp;&nbsp;","methods":"<p>RNA-seq dataset generation</p><p>A detailed description of plant growth and treatment conditions, RNA extraction, RNA-seq library construction and sequencing, and the processing and technical validation of the RNA-seq data can be found in Gillham et al. (2026). Briefly, five-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 22<sup>o</sup>C, 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C for one hour before total RNA was extracted and used to prepare Illumina RNA-seq libraries. RNA-seq reads were trimmed, quality filtered, and mapped to the Arabidopsis genome. Each temperature treatment was replicated in triplicate <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?g977pv\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. Read data are available as BioProject ID <a href=\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1481274\" id=\"5aa39093-03ba-45ef-ac64-24021b6025d1\">PRJNA1481274</a> at the NCBI SRA. </p><p>Expression analysis</p><p>Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq2 v1.40.2 (Love et al. 2014). The heat-induced gene set consisted of 1,806 nuclear genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C relative to 22<sup>o</sup>C (log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001). The comparison set contained 26,009 uninduced genes that had usable DESeq2 data for all 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C pairwise comparisons to 22<sup>o</sup>C.</p><p>Gene-set temperature trends were evaluated using two complementary tests. First, for each gene we calculated the slope of log<sub>2</sub>-normalized expression across 37<sup>o</sup>C, 38<sup>o</sup>C, 39<sup>o</sup>C, and 40<sup>o</sup>C. We then tested whether the mean slope for each gene set was more negative or more positive than expected by chance using 20,000 within-gene permutations of the temperature labels. When no permutation was as extreme as the observed value, the result is reported as p &lt; 0.00005, the resolution limit of the permutation test.</p><p>As a second, order-based test, we counted the number of genes whose expression followed a strictly monotonic decrease across the temperature series: 37<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 38<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 39<sup>o</sup>C &gt; 40<sup>o</sup>C. The probability of this exact ordering is 1/24 if the values are equally likely to occur in any order. We used an exact upper-tail binomial calculation to test whether the observed number of monotonically decreasing genes was greater than expected by chance. </p><p>To estimate the abundance of potentially functional transcripts, we assumed that all intron retention events produce non-functional transcripts. We analyzed genes for which we had expression data at all temperatures and IRFinder warning-free data across all samples (see splicing analysis). IR-adjusted expression was calculated as:</p><p>(expression<sub>temp</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>temp</sub>)) / (expression<sub>22</sub> x (1 - max_IR<sub>22</sub>)). A small number of genes with max_IR<sub>22</sub>=1 resulted in undefined IR-adjusted expression values and were excluded from the analysis.<sub> </sub></p><p>Splicing analysis</p><p>Gene-level intron retention was generated using IRFinder v2.0.1 (Lorenzi et al. 2021). For each gene in each sample, the maximum IR ratio (max_IR) observed across all annotated introns was determined. Genes were retained for this analysis only if they had warning-free IR values for all three biological replicates at all temperatures. Three groups of retained genes were used for our IR analysis: 778 heat-induced genes and 9553 uninduced genes (as defined above), and 55 heat-induced genes with annotated <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"b3fb8a27-e68f-483d-b30a-c2ec6a608b91\">HS</a>R functions. The 55 gene heat-induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"bd9c699c-f9fa-433c-9da5-afe40b62c0b6\">HS</a>R group was generated by overlapping heat-induced genes, genes with warning-free IR values, and the 263 Arabidopsis genes annotated with cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) or response to heat (GO:0009408) terms. Not all <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"c8a56c66-33f0-44c9-9559-8ce13283fcaa\">HS</a>R genes are heat-inducible and most s<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"d5232c86-a23d-40a8-a426-ca04492a86b8\">HS</a>Ps are intron-free (Scharf et al. 2001). </p><p>For each retained gene, max_IR values from each replicate were averaged and used to calculate group-level max_IR means.</p><p>For comparisons involving induced heat-induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"9b9d82a1-980e-44fd-8f99-eb0e12ad5532\">HS</a>R genes and heat-induced genes, the heat-induced group was defined as heat-induced genes excluding the induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"e6972b91-67be-4dcf-ac71-e157fdc17476\">HS</a>R subset to avoid non-independence caused by comparing a subset of genes directly with the full parent set that contains it. </p><p>Statistical comparisons between temperatures within the same gene set used paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between groups used two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected across all comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg correction.</p><p><br /></p>","reagents":"<p></p>","patternDescription":"<p>Plant responses to high temperatures are finely tuned to maximize plant growth and survival. Plants' acquisition of thermotolerance at moderately hot temperatures allows them to survive high temperatures that would otherwise be lethal. Acquired thermotolerance (AT) is mediated by the induction of heat shock response (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"aa650b86-3198-4a35-af88-bbb32bf17e21\">HS</a>R) genes at acclimation temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?LDTrjT\">(Yeh et al. 2012)</a>. In Arabidopsis, acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C confers AT and protects seedlings from what would otherwise be a lethal 45<sup>o</sup>C heat shock (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"0f00cb02-6b5c-44fa-8fe9-f1fbefa917ad\">HS</a>). Acclimation at 40<sup>o</sup>C, a non-lethal <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"55ce1a81-b8bc-4b63-ab6d-3c7e4e8c98df\">HS</a> temperature, does not result in AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?7IIkql\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a>. To understand the differences in AT between 37°C and 40°C acclimation, we generated RNA-seq data from <i>Arabidopsis</i> seedlings incubated at 37°C, 38°C, 39°C, and 40°C for one hour <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?sghkDz\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>.</p><p>Compared to plants grown at 22<sup>o</sup>C, plants grown at 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C expressed heat-induced genes enriched for GO terms associated with the <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"d81a05cd-c955-4e7b-8c85-42be0ef7c82e\">HS</a>R such as response to heat and protein folding chaperone. Although GO enrichment did not distinguish between these temperatures, PCA and global sample distance analyses clearly showed degree by degree transcriptional differences. Surprisingly, global patterns of gene expression were more similar at 40<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C than at 37<sup>o</sup>C and 22<sup>o</sup>C <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?aMpNeM\">(Gillham et al. 2026)</a>. To investigate the transcriptomic differences that fine-tune the <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"cc3c9380-39bf-47a7-adbe-c233ae117b5d\">HS</a>R and control whether or not AT occurs, we analyzed gene expression considering intron retention (IR). IR is the most common form of alternative splicing in plants <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?8YhE9J\">(Petrillo 2023)</a> and occurs at high levels at elevated temperatures <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?QNtpGD\">(Rosenkranz et al. 2022)</a>. Our results suggest that although all temperatures between 37<sup>o</sup>C and 40<sup>o</sup>C result in a robust induction of <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"9906c5ff-b8fa-479b-a1b8-a033c04a86f0\">HS</a>R genes, differences in absolute expression levels coupled with alternative splicing may explain the observed differences in AT at these temperatures.</p><p>In order to determine if levels of heat-induced genes differ between 37<sup>o</sup>C-40<sup>o</sup>C samples, we compared the expression of genes induced at 37<sup>o</sup>C vs 22<sup>o</sup>C (heat-induced, log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt;= 1 and p<sub>adj</sub> &lt; 0.0001) to uninduced genes. The induced set includes <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"5b55e139-f71a-4a98-955c-4c813347282b\">HSP101</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At1g74310\" id=\"ab8c87f0-4c85-454e-8f16-8b44a3e0fff2\">At1g74310</a>) and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"e2e09c52-ea30-4f3d-8eab-535c43ebe4c1\">HSA32</a></i> (<a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At4g21320\" id=\"d0331a09-383f-40ff-b68b-00140b5400ab\">At4g21320</a>), genes required for the acquisition and maintenance of AT, respectively <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?x2jq1q\">(Charng et al. 2006; Hong and Vierling 2000)</a>. The induced genes showed a strong negative temperature trend, with expression decreasing from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. Both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"629d59af-ba97-4c15-92fd-016d17c0fcbf\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"4f459bec-b190-476b-a724-cb09a0e7f2af\">HSA32</a></i> exhibit attenuated expression as temperatures rise from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C. In contrast, uninduced genes showed a small but statistically supported increase in expression across the same temperature range (Fig. 1A). These trends are statistically supported by both permutation testing and probability analyses (p &lt; 0.00005). Thus, the attenuation of gene expression as temperatures increase is a feature of heat-induced genes rather than a general property of gene expression at high temperatures. </p><p>Rates of IR are low at 22<sup>o</sup>C and increase with elevated temperature. IR increased from 37<sup>o</sup>C through 39<sup>o</sup>C, with the highest IR levels observed at 39<sup>o</sup>C for heat-induced genes and a continued modest increase through 40<sup>o</sup>C for uninduced genes. Heat-induced genes showed a much stronger increase in intron retention than uninduced genes, with significantly higher IR at all temperatures from 37<sup>o</sup>C to 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>&lt;1.46x10<sup>-21</sup>). In contrast, basal intron retention at 22<sup>o</sup>C was not significantly different between these two groups (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.13). Analysis of IR in heat-induced genes with annotated <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"59373232-58ce-4c11-9788-8bf44e6a6fe2\">HS</a>R functions (including <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"32ad9df7-8130-4610-91d9-d949fc355db7\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"cb928887-a5d4-483f-9901-04a46a45efd8\">HSA32</a></i>) revealed that induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"d379ab51-3e69-4aca-8626-89aa4a1d334b\">HS</a>R genes exhibit significantly higher IR at 39<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.02) and 40<sup>o</sup>C (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.0018) than heat-induced genes without annotated <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"30e99e5f-31bb-47e9-9ed1-2c1271a4dc9e\">HS</a>R functions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that there may be specificity in heat-induced IR, although they could also reflect a kinetic model where IR occurs in rapidly transcribed genes associated with accessible chromatin such as the induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"9893f2f6-3959-4ae0-bd64-fdcfd9ad96cd\">HS</a>R genes <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?YKQEHQ\">(Ullah et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2020; Kodama et al. 2007)</a>.</p><p>For both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"4961363e-ebdc-40e8-8a1d-7a8c45636b16\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"44df998a-9585-491f-9375-ed127523b72c\">HSA32</a></i>, IR generates transcripts containing premature termination codons that, if translated, would encode truncated and non-functional proteins. Although there are examples of functional IR in Arabidopsis, these appear to be the exception and not the rule and, to the extent they have been characterized, functional IR variants appear to encode dominant negative isoforms <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?G8OGIc\">(Kim et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2019)</a>. </p><p>To estimate the potential effects of IR on the <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"c59cb965-eb19-47f1-99a7-4e10227ed7a8\">HS</a>R, we made the simplifying assumption that IR transcripts are non-functional and calculated IR-adjusted expression values for each gene as expression x (1 - max_IR). Unadjusted expression patterns of genes for which we have IR data (Fig. 1C) are similar to those observed for all genes (Fig. 1A). This demonstrates that the subset of genes with complete IR data behaves similarly to larger gene sets that include genes without high-quality IR data. IR increases significantly with temperature for induced and <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"ea96fd4c-641b-4924-b406-b240374129fd\">HS</a>R induced genes (Fig. 1B), resulting in lower IR-adjusted expression levels compared to unadjusted expression levels for these groups of genes as well as for both <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"089e782c-1086-4769-8bef-6ab60380b2b5\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"0f0a028f-7c76-4d44-820d-59ad08fc6d1d\">HSA32</a> </i>(Fig. 1C). Because acclimation at 37<sup>o</sup>C results in strong AT <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?ffa1N1\">(Silva-Correia et al. 2014)</a> we calculated IR-adjusted expression (functional expression) at higher temperatures normalized to 37<sup>o</sup>C to estimate how the combination of decreased expression and IR might attenuate the <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"5fd7c026-003a-4590-9d5f-5d773f77dad8\">HS</a>R (Fig. 1D). While the small increase in IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C among uninduced genes results in a ~9% decrease in functional expression, the larger increase in IR combined with significantly decreased expression levels results in a ~91% decrease in functional expression for induced genes. That estimate increases to ~95% for induced <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"d7f6d394-77e9-495c-a3b8-066b3eec07aa\">HS</a>R genes as a group, as well as for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"fbf77c92-de42-44f0-98a5-dc35e6b403f3\">HSP101</a></i> and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"6bdd48cc-28e3-42a6-a34e-1170250c6be6\">HSA32</a></i>. Inspection of RNA-seq coverage for an uninduced gene (<i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"befb5d0a-5ffb-4d58-ade8-3d054d41ea82\">ACT11</a></i> <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=At3g12110\" id=\"462eff55-b3e8-4e76-aa3d-91fe333e23e8\">At3g12110</a>) and for <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"bb475cdb-7816-4e96-92d7-601d96c0e6d0\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a12afe30-dd15-45aa-9578-cfad810448d6\">HSA32</a></i> shows that, while <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G12110\" id=\"09289495-e22f-4bec-bfcc-8d05e085feaa\">ACT11</a> </i>levels and splicing are substantially temperature independent, the combination of reduced expression levels and high levels of IR at 40<sup>o</sup>C observed in <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT1G74310\" id=\"8a5c4adb-99db-4975-b2ba-5b7b1c98b095\">HSP101</a> </i>and <i><a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT4G21320\" id=\"a7de2f96-66a8-404b-8390-e7540a16b0a9\">HSA32</a></i> results in few spliced transcripts (Fig. 1E).</p><p> It seems plausible that the dramatic reduction in the number of functional heat-induced transcripts, especially those with known <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"ba7b571d-ac11-46b1-99ff-c96a5a38f0d3\">HS</a>R functions, may explain the lack of AT observed when acclimation is hotter than 37<sup>o</sup>C. This hypothesis could be tested by genetically modulating thermally induced IR or by engineering plants to express intron-free alleles of critical <a href=\"https://www.arabidopsis.org/locus?name=AT3G61590\" id=\"511cc535-2ff7-47af-8285-c9e00edaf4b2\">HS</a>R genes.    </p>","references":[{"reference":"Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Hsu F, Ko S. 2006. Arabidopsis Hsa32, a Novel Heat Shock Protein, Is Essential for Acquired Thermotolerance during Long Recovery after Acclimation. Plant Physiology. 140: 1297.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.105.074898"},{"reference":"<p>Gillham E, Hu J, Huang Y, Kochi A, McDonald K, Scott-Joseph C, et al., Kaplinsky. 2026. High-resolution transcriptomic profiling of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> across a 37°C–40°C thermal gradient. bioRxiv 10.64898/2026.07.19.739423.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.64898/2026.07.19.739423"},{"reference":"Hong SW, Vierling E. 2000. Mutants of Arabidopsis Thaliana Defective in the Acquisition of Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97: 4392.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.97.8.4392"},{"reference":"Kim JY, Ryu JY, Baek K, Park CM. 2016. High Temperature Attenuates the Gravitropism of Inflorescence Stems by Inducing SHOOT GRAVITROPISM 5 Alternative Splicing in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209: 265.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/nph.13602"},{"reference":"<p>Kodama Y, Nagaya S, Shinmyo A, Kato K. 2007. Mapping and Characterization of DNase I Hypersensitive Sites in Arabidopsis Chromatin. Plant and Cell Physiology 48: 459-470.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcm017"},{"reference":"Liu J, Sun N, Liu M, Et Al. 2013. An Autoregulatory Loop Controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 Expression: Role of Heat Shock-Induced Alternative Splicing. Plant Physiol. 162: 512.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.112.205864"},{"reference":"Lorenzi C, Barriere S, Arnold K, Luco RF, Oldfield AJ, Ritchie W. 2021. IRFinder-S: A Comprehensive Suite to Discover and Explore Intron Retention. Genome Biology. 22: 307.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02515-8"},{"reference":"Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15: 550.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8"},{"reference":"Petrillo E. 2023. Do Not Panic: An Intron-Centric Guide to Alternative Splicing. The Plant Cell. 35: 1752.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/plcell/koad009"},{"reference":"Rosenkranz RRE, Ullrich S, Lochli K, Simm S, Fragkostefanakis S. 2022. Relevance and Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Heat Stress Response: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2022.911277"},{"reference":"Scharf KD, Siddique M, Vierling E. 2001. The Expanding Family of Arabidopsis Thaliana Small Heat Stress Proteins and a New Family of Proteins Containing α-Crystallin Domains (Acd Proteins). Cell Stress & Chaperones. 6: 225.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2"},{"reference":"Silva Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, Lino Neto T, Azevedo H. 2014. Phenotypic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Heat Stress Response during Germination and Early Seedling Development. Plant Methods. 10: 7.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1746-4811-10-7"},{"reference":"<p>Ullah F, Hamilton M, Reddy ASN, Ben-Hur A. 2018. Exploring the relationship between intron retention and chromatin accessibility in plants. BMC Genomics 19: 10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z.</p>","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12864-017-4393-z"},{"reference":"Wu Z, Liang J, Wang C, Et Al. 2019. Alternative Splicing Provides a Mechanism to Regulate LlHSFA3 Function in Response to Heat Stress in Lily1. Plant Physiology. 181: 1651.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1104/pp.19.00839"},{"reference":"Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY. 2012. Some like It Hot, Some like It Warm: Phenotyping to Explore Thermotolerance Diversity. Plant Sci. 195: 10.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.004"},{"reference":"Zhu D, Mao F, Tian Y, Et Al. 2020. The Features and Regulation of Co-Transcriptional Splicing in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 13: 278.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.004"}],"title":"Changes in both gene expression and intron retention tune the <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> heat shock response","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","label":"Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lontra longicaudis","label":"Lontra longicaudis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stewartia floidana","label":"Stewartia floridana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"1e3fa65c-15b6-4b1c-9640-f276c7573e2f","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}},
    "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}